Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-15-2013, 08:39 PM   #81
jar_e
Franchise Player
 
jar_e's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashasx View Post
I'd be willing to make the same offer to Florida.
I can only believe the same offer has been made to Florida. You have a 99.999999% chance getting Mackinnon at 1 or 2 so I don't see why Feaster wouldn't. Probably same reply from the panthers though.
jar_e is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to jar_e For This Useful Post:
Old 06-15-2013, 08:39 PM   #82
moon
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lethbridge
Exp:
Default

Like the trade but fully understand why the Avs turned it down. They have plenty if quantity they need a stud more than a good prospect and maybes.

Would gladly add a Backlund or Baertschi but no way do you add next years first.
moon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2013, 08:39 PM   #83
DazzlinDino
Franchise Player
 
DazzlinDino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Grew up in Calgary now living in USA
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by StrykerSteve View Post
Love that Calgary made the offer. Doesn't surprise me that the Avs turned it down though.

I'd make all sorts of offers and see what it takes. But, they probably have a better chance of doing the deal with the Panthers.

Roster players, prospects, picks, any combination should be up for grabs for MacKinnon.
I think that's exactly what Feaster said he was doing.. might as well find out which teams are willing to bend and what would be our best deal.
DazzlinDino is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2013, 08:39 PM   #84
The Original FFIV
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashasx View Post
I'd be willing to make the same offer to Florida.
But then you'd have to change your sig
The Original FFIV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2013, 08:39 PM   #85
HighLifeMan
First Line Centre
 
HighLifeMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashasx View Post
I'd be willing to make the same offer to Florida.
Only if Mackinnon is still on the board.
HighLifeMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2013, 08:39 PM   #86
nik-
Franchise Player
 
nik-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashasx View Post
I'd be willing to make the same offer to Florida.
And then who do you take if Colorado takes MacKinnon? Barkov?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterJoji View Post
Johnny eats garbage and isn’t 100% committed.
nik- is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2013, 08:39 PM   #87
Lanny_McDonald
Franchise Player
 
Lanny_McDonald's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Exp:
Default

Thank god the Avs turned that down. The Flames need depth. Did fans learn nothing from the Iginla years? I want to see the Flames become the Bruins, not the Penguins or, god forbid, the Oilers. Keep the three picks and exploit this supposedly deep draft.
Lanny_McDonald is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Lanny_McDonald For This Useful Post:
Old 06-15-2013, 08:39 PM   #88
Southside
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Deep South
Exp:
Default

Feaster 'Ken I offered our three first round selections to Colorado for first overall.'
King 'And?'
Feaster 'They turned it down, but offered O' Reilly instead. '
King 'And? '
Feaster' That's why I'm here. '
King ' Jay, don't make any calls, I have a dinner meeting downtown with...< inaudible>see you later. '
Southside is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Southside For This Useful Post:
Old 06-15-2013, 08:40 PM   #89
mrdonkey
Franchise Player
 
mrdonkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GirlySports View Post
The Flames will never finish in the bottom 5. They just don't know how to do it.
Rome wasn't built in a day. Feaster and co. will do their best to ensure this team is a steaming pile of wreckage for years to come!
mrdonkey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2013, 08:40 PM   #90
kyuss275
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Exp:
Default

[QUOTE=The Original FFIV;4284749]Daigle was once viewed as a franchise player once too.

In a sense I'm glad to hear what we heard tonight and the 3 firsts (or 1st and 4 2nds) will jump start this rebuild faster than pinning everything on a great young player.

Look at TB with Stamkos and Car with E Staal. Fantastic players but without a supporting cast they both finished in bottom 5.

Stock the cupboards and suck up the next 2-3 years. Do it the right way and don't take shortcuts.[/QUOTE]


I don't really see it as a short cut. Even with McKinnon on the flames next year they would have been a bottom 5 team.
kyuss275 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2013, 08:40 PM   #91
Hockey
Franchise Player
 
Hockey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Pitt Meadows
Exp:
Default

I'm assuming the Flames would have drafted MacKinnon if they got 1st overall, right? If Jones does go to Colorado why not offer it up to Florida?
Hockey is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2013, 08:41 PM   #92
$ven27
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Halifax
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nik- View Post
And then who do you take if Colorado takes MacKinnon? Barkov?
Jones.
$ven27 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2013, 08:41 PM   #93
DazzlinDino
Franchise Player
 
DazzlinDino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Grew up in Calgary now living in USA
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GirlySports View Post
The Flames will never finish in the bottom 5. They just don't know how to do it.

especially next year they dont have those bums iginla and bouw around.
Yeah a few teams had some nice free-falls going at the end of the season.
DazzlinDino is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2013, 08:42 PM   #94
nik-
Franchise Player
 
nik-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by $ven27 View Post
Jones.
Meh, I have a sinking suspicion that Jones is going to be a relative disappointment.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterJoji View Post
Johnny eats garbage and isn’t 100% committed.
nik- is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to nik- For This Useful Post:
Old 06-15-2013, 08:42 PM   #95
moon
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lethbridge
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jar_e View Post
I can only believe the same offer has been made to Florida. You have a 99.999999% chance getting Mackinnon at 1 or 2 so I don't see why Feaster wouldn't. Probably same reply from the panthers though.
If I am Florida I take that.

But Calgary better make sure MacKinnon is there no interest in that deal if Jones is the guy they are taking.
moon is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to moon For This Useful Post:
Old 06-15-2013, 08:42 PM   #96
kyuss275
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jar_e View Post
I can only believe the same offer has been made to Florida. You have a 99.999999% chance getting Mackinnon at 1 or 2 so I don't see why Feaster wouldn't. Probably same reply from the panthers though.
Friedman said that the first 4 teams in the draft are not looking to trade down and like what they are about to get.
kyuss275 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2013, 08:43 PM   #97
Ashasx
Franchise Player
 
Ashasx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by moon View Post
Like the trade but fully understand why the Avs turned it down. They have plenty if quantity they need a stud more than a good prospect and maybes.

Would gladly add a Backlund or Baertschi but no way do you add next years first.
This thread has been moon'd.
Ashasx is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Ashasx For This Useful Post:
Old 06-15-2013, 08:43 PM   #98
jar_e
Franchise Player
 
jar_e's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kyuss275 View Post
Friedman said that the first 4 teams in the draft are not looking to trade down and like what they are about to get.
Everybody has a price....but I don't disagree with you. I 'm just saying I'm confident Feaster offered the same to Florida and got the same response.
jar_e is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to jar_e For This Useful Post:
Old 06-15-2013, 08:43 PM   #99
Ashasx
Franchise Player
 
Ashasx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nik- View Post
And then who do you take if Colorado takes MacKinnon? Barkov?
Jones.
Ashasx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2013, 08:44 PM   #100
greentree
First Line Centre
 
greentree's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Stampede Corral
Exp:
Default

If Flames can't make a reasonable deal for #1 then I think their best Plan B is to get Nichushkin at #6. He will be in the NHL next year and he's just a huge talent with size. Best Plan C is Monahan imo.
greentree is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:03 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy