10-08-2012, 03:25 PM
|
#81
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vulcan
I think we live in different worlds. I try to follow the golden rule because I feel it is right. You can have a philosophical discussion with someone else, I don't believe in philosophy.
|
|
|
|
10-08-2012, 03:36 PM
|
#82
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lethbridge
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Iginla
Lol I hope you realize that death row inmates cost us a whole lot more than a regular inmate would.
Putting them to death costs the system a whole lot more with the multiple appeals they use.
|
Time to get rid of the appeals and reduce those costs.
|
|
|
10-08-2012, 03:38 PM
|
#83
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by moon
Time to get rid of the appeals and reduce those costs.
|
You can't be serious. We're talking about state sanctioned murder, and you want to open the door to even more innocent people being killed?
|
|
|
10-08-2012, 03:43 PM
|
#84
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Sunshine Coast
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mean Mr. Mustard
|
and what does that mean?
|
|
|
10-08-2012, 03:47 PM
|
#85
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lethbridge
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by valo403
You can't be serious. We're talking about state sanctioned murder, and you want to open the door to even more innocent people being killed?
|
That was said tongue in cheek but criminals do seem to get way too many appeals/drawn out appeal process in my opinion.
State sanctioned murder is also a ridiculous term.
|
|
|
10-08-2012, 03:55 PM
|
#86
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lethbridge
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thor
yet the only nations that still do are a very nationalistic USA and theocracies.
|
Unless sclitheroe and wikipedia are wrong this is not true at all.
|
|
|
10-08-2012, 03:55 PM
|
#87
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by moon
That was said tongue in cheek but criminals do seem to get way too many appeals/drawn out appeal process in my opinion.
State sanctioned murder is also a ridiculous term.
|
You can't "get away with" an appeal. If you have legal grounds upon which to appeal you have a right to do so, you don't get to just stomp your feet and get a new trial because you didn't like the result. The grounds for an appeal are extremely limited.
|
|
|
10-08-2012, 03:58 PM
|
#88
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lethbridge
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by valo403
You can't "get away with" an appeal. If you have legal grounds upon which to appeal you have a right to do so, you don't get to just stomp your feet and get a new trial because you didn't like the result. The grounds for an appeal are extremely limited.
|
I don't think I said get away. I said they get way too many as in the grounds are not limited enough based on what I have read in regards to the grounds of some appeals.
|
|
|
10-08-2012, 04:03 PM
|
#89
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by moon
I don't think I said get away. I said they get way too many as in the grounds are not limited enough based on what I have read in regards to the grounds of some appeals.
|
My mistake there, I misread. Regardless, I'm not sure what you have read, but the grounds for an appeal are incredibly limited. Appeals can only be brought for errors in the application of the law, you can't argue facts.
|
|
|
10-08-2012, 04:06 PM
|
#90
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lethbridge
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by valo403
My mistake there, I misread. Regardless, I'm not sure what you have read, but the grounds for an appeal are incredibly limited. Appeals can only be brought for errors in the application of the law, you can't argue facts.
|
It seems like what they find to be errors in the law are very broad for many of the death penalty (and other cases).
I have read about cases where the error certainly wasn't agreed on by all parties involved or observers so not sure that they can be labeled as fact.
|
|
|
10-08-2012, 04:13 PM
|
#91
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by moon
It seems like what they find to be errors in the law are very broad for many of the death penalty (and other cases).
I have read about cases where the error certainly wasn't agreed on by all parties involved or observers so not sure that they can be labeled as fact.
|
Well if the error could be agreed on by all parties it would a relatively obvious appeal, which pretty much never happens. I'm not sure how the prosecution disagreeing that there was an error makes something less worthy of appellate review, it's exactly what you'd expect to see.
|
|
|
10-08-2012, 05:29 PM
|
#92
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SW Ontario
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by T@T
Troy Davis executed just last year was quite likely innocent.
|
No he actually quite likely wasn't. The guy admitted to being the triggerman to others and then cried innocence once he was sentenced to die. The guy killed a police officer, good riddance!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Troy_Davis
|
|
|
10-08-2012, 05:33 PM
|
#93
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dissentowner
No he actually quite likely wasn't. The guy admitted to being the triggerman to others and then cried innocence once he was sentenced to die. The guy killed a police officer, good riddance!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Troy_Davis
|
False confession never crossed your mind? I'm not saying it was the case here, but do you think they never happen?
|
|
|
10-11-2012, 11:06 PM
|
#94
|
Franchise Player
|
I am definitely too morbid for my own good.
I was reading the offender information of the 2nd one down and saw that the woman he sexually assaulted and murdered were found by guys "laying pipe" and I found it hilarious.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:08 AM.
|
|