04-15-2025, 10:30 AM
|
#9401
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GirlySports
You're probably right. It's America. However, a full primary would have brought more ideas, more talking points and more people running. Maybe people not even considered. Did we ever consider Mark Carney until he actually ran?
|
Yes. Carney has been rumoured to be a potential successor to Trudeau for years now. If it was Karina Gould kicking PP's ass up and down Wellington St. right now, you'd have a point, but Carney was either the front runner or a close second as the heir apparent to the LPC for a long time. There was actually an argument that he should hold off for next time because it looked like it would be a waste of a viable PM candidate to run this time given the polling situation, until Trump started Trumping.
__________________
"The great promise of the Internet was that more information would automatically yield better decisions. The great disappointment is that more information actually yields more possibilities to confirm what you already believed anyway." - Brian Eno
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to CorsiHockeyLeague For This Useful Post:
|
|
04-15-2025, 10:37 AM
|
#9402
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Senator Clay Davis
We need to stop trying to give Americans the "if only" out. Tired of excusing their extreme stupidity and ignorance. Trump was winning against virtually anyone, cause Americans are indeed as stupid and ignorant as they appear. No other country would let a felon run, let alone win a major party nomination, never mind winning the actual election.
|
Indeed. Large swaths of important people in that country are looking at ways to get him elected for a third term. They believe he is the savior god-king.
|
|
|
04-15-2025, 10:57 AM
|
#9403
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CorsiHockeyLeague
Yes. Carney has been rumoured to be a potential successor to Trudeau for years now. If it was Karina Gould kicking PP's ass up and down Wellington St. right now, you'd have a point, but Carney was either the front runner or a close second as the heir apparent to the LPC for a long time. There was actually an argument that he should hold off for next time because it looked like it would be a waste of a viable PM candidate to run this time given the polling situation, until Trump started Trumping.
|
Yeah, Carney has been the Liberal heir apparent for a long time.
I do think Kamala was a bad choice and they should have gone elsewhere for the candidate, even if the primary needed to be very short.
|
|
|
04-15-2025, 11:51 AM
|
#9404
|
Crash and Bang Winger
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Western Canada
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Senator Clay Davis
We need to stop trying to give Americans the "if only" out. Tired of excusing their extreme stupidity and ignorance. Trump was winning against virtually anyone, cause Americans are indeed as stupid and ignorant as they appear. No other country would let a felon run, let alone win a major party nomination, never mind winning the actual election.
|
Trump is representative of USA, and is the dominant point of view of the populations of many states.
We need to stop saying he doesn't represent America, because he does. Even after the sh##show since he's elected, 41% of Americans view him favourably according to Quinnipac poll today. 48% favourable based on Rasmussen!
Think about it where we are.
- Trump has alienated almost all the US's allies
- He's taking actions that are crashing the future economic potential of hte US.
- He's openly talking of defying the constitution for a third term
- He is sending people to foreign prisons (essentially concentration camps) without due process
- He is now defying the supreme court rulings.
This is wild. But what is clear is that the USA is done as a global power. I don't think there is anyway the country can come back from this, even with new leadership. There will always be 48% of the country that want this.
Never mind another 3.5 years of this.
We are in the midst of a transition to a new world order where the US is not not in charge, and may not even have a voice at the table with other liberal democracies.
|
|
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to marsplasticeraser For This Useful Post:
|
|
04-15-2025, 11:56 AM
|
#9405
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Victoria, BC
|
The entire machine down there is pushing fascist disinformation. Therefore, I don’t trust or believe the polls. Especially Rasmussen.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Drak For This Useful Post:
|
|
04-15-2025, 12:20 PM
|
#9406
|
The new goggles also do nothing.
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Calgary
|
Where do I put money down on a 3rd Trump term?
From a recent Morning Consult poll
__________________
Uncertainty is an uncomfortable position.
But certainty is an absurd one.
|
|
|
04-15-2025, 12:25 PM
|
#9407
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Virginia
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by photon
Where do I put money down on a 3rd Trump term?
From a recent Morning Consult poll

|
Those polls are pretty meaningless at this point. I'm sure Hillary was leading similar polls in 2027. The incumbent just gets a plurality due to name recognition.
I like Pete for 2028. It's time for someone smart and eloquent to take a shot at straightening things out.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to nfotiu For This Useful Post:
|
|
04-15-2025, 12:25 PM
|
#9408
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Victoria, BC
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bizaro86
I do think Kamala was a bad choice and they should have gone elsewhere for the candidate, even if the primary needed to be very short.
|
I’m not sure the candidate matters, being up against a massive disinformation machine and a totally complicit MSM.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Drak For This Useful Post:
|
|
04-15-2025, 12:40 PM
|
#9409
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Pickle Jar Lake
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by marsplasticeraser
Trump is representative of USA, and is the dominant point of view of the populations of many states.
We need to stop saying he doesn't represent America, because he does. Even after the sh##show since he's elected, 41% of Americans view him favourably according to Quinnipac poll today. 48% favourable based on Rasmussen!
Think about it where we are.
- Trump has alienated almost all the US's allies
- He's taking actions that are crashing the future economic potential of hte US.
- He's openly talking of defying the constitution for a third term
- He is sending people to foreign prisons (essentially concentration camps) without due process
- He is now defying the supreme court rulings.
This is wild. But what is clear is that the USA is done as a global power. I don't think there is anyway the country can come back from this, even with new leadership. There will always be 48% of the country that want this.
Never mind another 3.5 years of this.
We are in the midst of a transition to a new world order where the US is not not in charge, and may not even have a voice at the table with other liberal democracies.
|
Yup, they democratically did this:
Be better, America. I am disappoint.
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Fuzz For This Useful Post:
|
|
04-15-2025, 01:22 PM
|
#9410
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by nfotiu
Those polls are pretty meaningless at this point. I'm sure Hillary was leading similar polls in 2027. The incumbent just gets a plurality due to name recognition.
I like Pete for 2028. It's time for someone smart and eloquent to take a shot at straightening things out.
|
Or back before running in 2016, Trump would never have polled that high for the Republicans this early. His candidacy was largely seen as a gimmick at the beginning and was brushed off by many in the same party.
I could see them latching on to a red state Democrat like Andy Beshear. He could help bridge the culture divide.
__________________
"A pessimist thinks things can't get any worse. An optimist knows they can."
Last edited by FlamesAddiction; 04-15-2025 at 01:28 PM.
|
|
|
04-15-2025, 01:27 PM
|
#9411
|
NOT breaking news
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Calgary
|
Run Obama if Trump runs again.
__________________
Watching the Oilers defend is like watching fire engines frantically rushing to the wrong fire
|
|
|
04-15-2025, 01:31 PM
|
#9412
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Virginia
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GirlySports
Run Obama if Trump runs again.
|
They have some twisted logic that Trump is eligible because he had a gap between two terms, but Obama isn't.
|
|
|
04-15-2025, 01:39 PM
|
#9413
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Victoria
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by nfotiu
I like Pete for 2028. It's time for someone smart and eloquent to take a shot at straightening things out.
|
If Pete is the nominee, the Republicans are getting a third term.
|
|
|
04-15-2025, 01:41 PM
|
#9414
|
Franchise Player
|
America won't vote in a gay man for at least another 25 years.
|
|
|
04-15-2025, 01:43 PM
|
#9415
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Victoria
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CroFlames
America won't vote in a gay man for at least another 25 years.
|
Not only that, but the only voters he appeals to are middle-aged, centrist, decorum perverts.
Last edited by rubecube; 04-15-2025 at 01:53 PM.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to rubecube For This Useful Post:
|
|
04-15-2025, 01:44 PM
|
#9416
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Pickle Jar Lake
|
Quote:
Eggs are so expensive that some Americans are decorating potatoes this Easter
|
Colbert's "is potato" mocking the Russians a few years ago may be hitting a liiiitle close to home now.
|
|
|
04-15-2025, 02:13 PM
|
#9417
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Maryland State House, Annapolis
|
I think mulling over possible 2028 Dem candidates should probably wait until we get through 2026 and can confirm there will actually be fair elections. Now if there are fair elections in 2026 then not having AOC as the candidate in 2028 would be malpractice, which means that's what the Dems will do.
__________________
"Think I'm gonna be the scapegoat for the whole damn machine? Sheeee......."
|
|
|
04-15-2025, 02:18 PM
|
#9418
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Senator Clay Davis
I think mulling over possible 2028 Dem candidates should probably wait until we get through 2026 and can confirm there will actually be fair elections. Now if there are fair elections in 2026 then not having AOC as the candidate in 2028 would be malpractice, which means that's what the Dems will do.
|
Um...you're looking to appeal to mainstream/middle America and you think AOC is the choice? That's how you end up with Trump Jr getting elected.
|
|
|
04-15-2025, 02:24 PM
|
#9419
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GirlySports
As you suggest, Carney galvanized the Liberals. Do we not think in a full primary someone couldn't have galvanized the Democrats.... against Trump! Could use the same arguments, THIS IS WHAT TRUMP IS GOING TO DO!
It's ironic that since Obama, an Obama-like figure can't make any headway in the Democratic party.
|
Harris predicted pretty much everything that Trump is doing. And there really was no better candidate. She was youthful appearing (but not young), experienced, articulate, had good policy messages and she creamed Trump in the debate. What could she do differently? Endorse Palestine more (and alienate Jews)? Reject Liz Cheney (and alienate centrists)?
Let's face it. Americans voted for Trump because he is racist, sexist and brash. In numbers big enough to make him president. And because the media down there just won't do their jobs.
|
|
|
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to GioforPM For This Useful Post:
|
|
04-15-2025, 02:26 PM
|
#9420
|
#1 Goaltender
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Senator Clay Davis
I think mulling over possible 2028 Dem candidates should probably wait until we get through 2026 and can confirm there will actually be fair elections. Now if there are fair elections in 2026 then not having AOC as the candidate in 2028 would be malpractice, which means that's what the Dems will do.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bizaro86
Um...you're looking to appeal to mainstream/middle America and you think AOC is the choice? That's how you end up with Trump Jr getting elected.
|
Just pick the one people are getting excited about, don't worry about crafting the perfect plutonic ideal of a candidate to appeal to everyone, that's how they get into these messes.
AOC was overly aggressive in her rhetoric early on which offended some (I personally think she has toned it down without moderating, which i think is very politically savvy, and it was also probably politically savvy to be controversial early while brand building, so she might be the person).
Buttigieg might be the guy, but even if it looks like it will be him there will be worried about going to another white man (and not "representing" everyone), or going to a gay man and offending "middle" America
Newsom will create concern that they are just drifting back to another 60+ white man, and doubling down on a safe state. (57 now, he will be turning 61 shortly before the next election)
There is no right answer, but they just have to go with whoever is generating political buzz at the time and not worry about demographic so much.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:54 PM.
|
|