Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-26-2024, 01:07 PM   #8821
Roof-Daddy
Franchise Player
 
Roof-Daddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Exp:
Default

Hopefully a contender with limited cap space wants Laine and the Flames can eat some of the contract for a price
Roof-Daddy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2024, 01:08 PM   #8822
Macho0978
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kipper_3434 View Post
Don't need Laine after signing Mantha. Would hurt our development of prospects to add another scoring winger.
Laine hurts Kuzmenko's value as both are goal scoring righties that excel on the PP. We already have Kuzmenko and if he plays well, we can flip him for the assets people are suggesting we flip Laine for. Kuzmenko is already here so it does not cost us anything to pick him up and his cap hit is easier to trade. We need to leave Kuzmenko where he is and maximize his trade value.
Macho0978 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Macho0978 For This Useful Post:
Old 07-26-2024, 02:38 PM   #8823
Redrum
First Line Centre
 
Redrum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paulie Walnuts View Post
I think Conroy has made it clear, we are rebuilding but he still wants them to compete.
In other words he wants to rebuild but doesn't want to go full Oiler.

But yeah we need something to build around before we start building.
Redrum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2024, 02:52 PM   #8824
CFO
Scoring Winger
 
Join Date: Feb 2021
Exp:
Default

I don't understand why Columbus needs to package assets? Don't they have cap room?

Why wouldn't they just retain significant salary on Laine for 2 years and then give him away for that?

At a cap hit 3/4 million a year there must be takers
CFO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2024, 02:55 PM   #8825
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CFO View Post
I don't understand why Columbus needs to package assets? Don't they have cap room?

Why wouldn't they just retain significant salary on Laine for 2 years and then give him away for that?

At a cap hit 3/4 million a year there must be takers
It might be great for Calgary if they take him for a year or to the TDL and flip him at a second retention.
GioforPM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2024, 05:07 PM   #8826
The Cobra
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Macho0978 View Post
Laine hurts Kuzmenko's value as both are goal scoring righties that excel on the PP. We already have Kuzmenko and if he plays well, we can flip him for the assets people are suggesting we flip Laine for. Kuzmenko is already here so it does not cost us anything to pick him up and his cap hit is easier to trade. We need to leave Kuzmenko where he is and maximize his trade value.
Laine’s contract makes him zero competition for Kuzmenko..
The Cobra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2024, 05:11 PM   #8827
Classic_Sniper
#1 Goaltender
 
Classic_Sniper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Redrum View Post
In other words he wants to rebuild but doesn't want to go full Oiler.

But yeah we need something to build around before we start building.
That's too bad. He's making the same mistakes some of the other former GMs have made in the past. They know they're gonna be bad, but don't be too bad, wow yeah, that's worked out so well for this organization over the last several decades. Maybe in 10 years we can try to win 1 round and be swept in the 2nd. Mediocrity forever.
Classic_Sniper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2024, 05:40 PM   #8828
flamesgod
Powerplay Quarterback
 
flamesgod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Saskatoon
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Classic_Sniper View Post
That's too bad. He's making the same mistakes some of the other former GMs have made in the past. They know they're gonna be bad, but don't be too bad, wow yeah, that's worked out so well for this organization over the last several decades. Maybe in 10 years we can try to win 1 round and be swept in the 2nd. Mediocrity forever.
He’s making the mistake or that’s the mandate from above?
flamesgod is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2024, 05:49 PM   #8829
Kipper_3434
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Classic_Sniper View Post
That's too bad. He's making the same mistakes some of the other former GMs have made in the past. They know they're gonna be bad, but don't be too bad, wow yeah, that's worked out so well for this organization over the last several decades. Maybe in 10 years we can try to win 1 round and be swept in the 2nd. Mediocrity forever.
You want a tank. A rebuild is not a tank. A tank is something you put oil in. Oilers tank.


In all seriousness, Conroy has been incomprehensibly better at asset management than Treliving was for us. Treliving rarely traded expiring UFA's for example.
Kipper_3434 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2024, 06:07 PM   #8830
monkeyman
First Line Centre
 
monkeyman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kipper_3434 View Post
You want a tank. A rebuild is not a tank. A tank is something you put oil in. Oilers tank.


In all seriousness, Conroy has been incomprehensibly better at asset management than Treliving was for us. Treliving rarely traded expiring UFA's for example.
LOL. I didn't see the end coming.
__________________
The Delhi police have announced the formation of a crack team dedicated to nabbing the elusive 'Monkey Man' and offered a reward for his -- or its -- capture.
monkeyman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2024, 06:48 PM   #8831
Jay Random
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Classic_Sniper View Post
That's too bad. He's making the same mistakes some of the other former GMs have made in the past. They know they're gonna be bad, but don't be too bad, wow yeah, that's worked out so well for this organization over the last several decades. Maybe in 10 years we can try to win 1 round and be swept in the 2nd. Mediocrity forever.
Yeah, it's just not going to be good enough to finish dead last with 60 points and draft in the top 3 (position dependent on lottery results).

We need to finish dead last with 30 points and draft super-double-secret-probation top 3! Because the NHL has a secret stash of generational players that are only available to teams that try really really hard to suck.
__________________
WARNING: The preceding message may not have been processed in a sarcasm-free facility.
Jay Random is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Jay Random For This Useful Post:
Old 07-26-2024, 07:35 PM   #8832
Samonadreau
Franchise Player
 
Samonadreau's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Paradise
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roof-Daddy View Post
Hopefully a contender with limited cap space wants Laine and the Flames can eat some of the contract for a price
We only have one retention spot left. Gotta make it count. maybe that's it but I'm hoping there's a bigger bread winner.

edit: nm 2 left

Last edited by Samonadreau; 07-26-2024 at 08:11 PM.
Samonadreau is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2024, 07:56 PM   #8833
memphusk
Franchise Player
 
memphusk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

Who is being retained on? Just Markstrom isn't it?
__________________
I hate just about everyone and just about everything.
memphusk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2024, 07:59 PM   #8834
transplant99
Fearmongerer
 
transplant99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Wondering when # became hashtag and not a number sign.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by memphusk View Post
Who is being retained on? Just Markstrom isn't it?
Correct.

Flames have 2 retention spots if they so choose to use them.
transplant99 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to transplant99 For This Useful Post:
Old 07-26-2024, 08:03 PM   #8835
Redrum
First Line Centre
 
Redrum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Classic_Sniper View Post
That's too bad. He's making the same mistakes some of the other former GMs have made in the past. They know they're gonna be bad, but don't be too bad, wow yeah, that's worked out so well for this organization over the last several decades. Maybe in 10 years we can try to win 1 round and be swept in the 2nd. Mediocrity forever.
Well there's a big difference between a rebuild and full Oiler. If not for the rule designed specifically to keep the Oilers(not bad teams in general) from getting the 1st overall(which got them McDiver), they'd be working on 20 years with no playoffs. Instead, Buffalo is suffering the consequences of Edmonton's extreme no goodness.

You're not wrong though, they've botched it badly in the past and they have a long way to go. But hopefully the prospects they've gathered in the last few months will encourage them to stick with it rather than trying to go for it with a half-assed attempt like 10 years ago.
Redrum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2024, 08:11 PM   #8836
Samonadreau
Franchise Player
 
Samonadreau's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Paradise
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by memphusk View Post
Who is being retained on? Just Markstrom isn't it?
Quote:
Originally Posted by transplant99 View Post
Correct.

Flames have 2 retention spots if they so choose to use them.
You are correct, I was thinking of before July 1.
Samonadreau is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2024, 08:25 PM   #8837
Jay Random
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Samonadreau View Post
You are correct, I was thinking of before July 1.
July 1 wasn't even particularly relevant. The language in the CBA is quite clear: a team can only have retained salary from three player contracts during any given league year. ‘Retention slots’ are a lazy shorthand used by sports reporters, most of whom can't understand legal documents or accounting procedures, but can at least count to three.

If, for instance, a team made a trade with retention at the 2024 draft, the amount retained would count against the '24-25 cap, not '23-24, because none of the retained salary was actually due to be paid before the end of the '23-24 league year. It doesn't matter that the actual trade occurred in June, as long as no cheques were payable before July 1.
__________________
WARNING: The preceding message may not have been processed in a sarcasm-free facility.
Jay Random is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2024, 08:46 PM   #8838
Samonadreau
Franchise Player
 
Samonadreau's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Paradise
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jay Random View Post
July 1 wasn't even particularly relevant. The language in the CBA is quite clear: a team can only have retained salary from three player contracts during any given league year. ‘Retention slots’ are a lazy shorthand used by sports reporters, most of whom can't understand legal documents or accounting procedures, but can at least count to three.

If, for instance, a team made a trade with retention at the 2024 draft, the amount retained would count against the '24-25 cap, not '23-24, because none of the retained salary was actually due to be paid before the end of the '23-24 league year. It doesn't matter that the actual trade occurred in June, as long as no cheques were payable before July 1.
Before July 1 we had 2 retention slots used. That's all I meant.
Samonadreau is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2024, 08:58 PM   #8839
Royle9
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Exp:
Default

With Laine coming out of the NHLPA player assistance program trade talks have definitely picked up and with teams free to speak to him, it sounds like there's a number of teams looking to potentially pick him up if he's comfortable joining them.

Cant forget his shoulder injury however, though rumour is he's healing well and training is going quite well.
Jackets are willing to eat salary to sweeten the deal, but what version of Laine are you getting? He hasn't performed up to his ability the last few seasons and teams know this.

MTL is pretty high on Laine, seems to be substantial smoke around a deal with CBJ looking for futures now more so than roster players. B prospect + 2nd round pick is what teams seem to be comfortable giving up, but CBJ continue to want as much as possible. Some teams still think a deal around what Kuznetsov got is more realistic (3rd + retention by the team) so we'll see.

I've been told Calgary has no interest so some of you can breathe a sigh of relief
Royle9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2024, 09:20 PM   #8840
Sandman
Franchise Player
 
Sandman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

I like the "idea" of Laine more than the real thing. I think his GAF meter is diminishing rapidly with each passing year.
Sandman is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
e=ng , edmonton is no good


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:55 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy