| 
	
	
		
	
	
	
		|  11-17-2011, 11:11 PM | #861 |  
	| First Line Centre | 
				  
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Ozy_Flame  I really wish they'd keep the 301 where it is, it would be a faster alternative than the LRT and those who don't want to cram into the trains when they hit Westbrook and Shaganappi. I don't want to be one of those people who stand  around 26th waiting for a bus and have to miss every third one because they're full! |  
What?  The 301 BRT was specifically designed and implemented to be a precursor to LRT in the west, and also to be fully replaced by the higher-capacity, faster and more reliable LRT service.  It has limited stops at approximately where the LRT was planned to stop to develop and grow the travel patterns for when LRT could be built and operational.
 
Also, there's no need for redundant and supplemental bus service along the corridor (unless it is an infrequent community shuttle service like the route 81 in the south to provide some people with local service).  The West LRT will not systematically fill to crush loads (as seen on other lines) or even uncomfortably crowded loads in the foreseeable future.  Capacity will be such that it will outstrip demand due to the line being operationally linked to a line with higher ridership.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  11-17-2011, 11:28 PM | #862 |  
	|  Posted the 6 millionth post ! | 
				  
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by frinkprof  What?  The 301 BRT was specifically designed and implemented to be a precursor to LRT in the west, and also to be fully replaced by the higher-capacity, faster and more reliable LRT service.  It has limited stops at approximately where the LRT was planned to stop to develop and grow the travel patterns for when LRT could be built and operational.
 Also, there's no need for redundant and supplemental bus service along the corridor (unless it is an infrequent community shuttle service like the route 81 in the south to provide some people with local service).  The West LRT will not systematically fill to crush loads (as seen on other lines) or even uncomfortably crowded loads in the foreseeable future.  Capacity will be such that it will outstrip demand due to the line being operationally linked to a line with higher ridership.
 |  
Fair enough. But I just fear that their capacity forecasts are going to be off, considering they are taking away, for example, the 101, 104 and 301 going down Bow Trail into downtown. That may not seem like much, but that is a lot of people filling these routes every 5-10 minutes. And After taking these routes day in and day out for the last four (almost five) years, I just see a huge bottleneck forming at Westbrook station, unless they are really confident that a fourth car on a train is going to handle capacity. And fill loads are not going to get better as the city grows; they're likely to get worse.
 
Is there any public information on load forecasts that can be accessed? I'd be curious to know.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  11-17-2011, 11:54 PM | #864 |  
	| tromboner 
				 
				Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: where the lattes are      | 
 
			
			^ Ridership has more than doubled from 2000 to 2010 for the AM trips on the South line. The only way to keep up with that kind of growth is the 8th Ave subway.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  11-18-2011, 09:08 PM | #865 |  
	| Franchise Player | 
 
			
			Why does outbound ridership increase in the afternoon, to the point that the NW line increases in ridership over the NE line. It looks like nearly a 30% increase from morning to evening rush, which doesn't seem intuitive to me. Any ideas?
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  11-24-2011, 09:09 PM | #866 |  
	| Lifetime Suspension | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| @markusoff seniors: your annual transit passes are going up to $55 from $35 in January. 12-3 council vote.
 |  
From Jason Markusoff via twitter
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
			| The Following User Says Thank You to MrMastodonFarm For This Useful Post: |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  11-24-2011, 09:57 PM | #867 |  
	| Lifetime Suspension | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by bizaro86  Why does outbound ridership increase in the afternoon, to the point that the NW line increases in ridership over the NE line. It looks like nearly a 30% increase from morning to evening rush, which doesn't seem intuitive to me. Any ideas? |  
Car poolers who get downtown without transit but take it home due to different hours?
 
Not impressed with the reserved parking at Crowfoot. Looking for a parking spot at about 9:15 AM, all 4 hour parking is gone. Reserved parking doesn't open until 10 AM. And non-reserved parking had one free spot. Good thing the paid parking pays for improved maintenance and snow removal at the lots, otherwise I would have had to risk my life navigating the icy stairs of doom to make the 1 km walk to the train platform. Oh wait, they weren't cleared at all. Not at 9:15 AM, not by 12:15 PM.
 
smh
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
			| The Following User Says Thank You to TurnedTheCorner For This Useful Post: |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  11-24-2011, 11:04 PM | #868 |  
	| wins 10 internets 
				 
				Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: slightly to the left      | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by MrMastodonFarm  From Jason Markusoff via twitter |  
wait, annual passes? if they can make those for old folks why can't they make them for everyone else?
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  11-24-2011, 11:14 PM | #869 |  
	| First Line Centre | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by bizaro86  Why does outbound ridership increase in the afternoon, to the point that the NW line increases in ridership over the NE line. It looks like nearly a 30% increase from morning to evening rush, which doesn't seem intuitive to me. Any ideas? |  
Yeah that one's odd.  My best guess is some peculiarity with classes at SAIT and/or U of C - like people taking evening classes or something.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  11-25-2011, 02:35 AM | #870 |  
	| First Line Centre 
				 
				Join Date: Jul 2011 Location: Oshawa      | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by MrMastodonFarm  From Jason Markusoff via twitter |  
Seriously? $35 bucks for an ANNUAL pass? That is stupidly cheap and even for seniors it ought to be more expensive than that for a yearly transit pass. Especially since as far as I know it is free to travel by train downtown.
		 
				__________________ 
	Quote: 
	
		| Somewhere Leon Trotsky is an Oilers fan, because who better demonstrates his philosophy of the permanent revolution? |  |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  11-25-2011, 07:20 AM | #871 |  
	| Playboy Mansion Poolboy 
				 
				Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Close enough to make a beer run during a TV timeout      | 
 
			
			The one thing with the cheap annual pass; I know of many senior who got it because the price was spo cheap.  Those seniors started taking the train or bus to doctor's appointments instead of driving.  After seeing my uncle's driving I was quite happy to pay my regular fare knowing I was subsidizing him driving less.  (He no longer has his license.)
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
			| The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to ken0042 For This Useful Post: |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  11-25-2011, 08:29 AM | #872 |  
	| Franchise Player | 
				  
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by TurnedTheCorner  Car poolers who get downtown without transit but take it home due to different hours?
 Not impressed with the reserved parking at Crowfoot. Looking for a parking spot at about 9:15 AM, all 4 hour parking is gone. Reserved parking doesn't open until 10 AM. And non-reserved parking had one free spot. Good thing the paid parking pays for improved maintenance and snow removal at the lots, otherwise I would have had to risk my life navigating the icy stairs of doom to make the 1 km walk to the train platform. Oh wait, they weren't cleared at all. Not at 9:15 AM, not by 12:15 PM.
 
 smh
 |  
Don't worry, they've increased the number of reserved spots at Crowfoot/Dalhousie, even though not all of the previously set aside spots (at Dalhousie anyway) were getting used. 
  
To me the current system is much worse than either of the preceding choices (all free, or all $3/day). When it was free I had to get there early on the very infrequent days I needed to drive to the station. When it was $3 I could come any time and pay my $3. 
  
Now that it's monthly reserved/free my choices are get there even earlier for free parking, or buy a monthly pass for 1-2 days that I drive (might as well just drive downtown)
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
			| The Following User Says Thank You to bizaro86 For This Useful Post: |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  11-27-2011, 09:24 AM | #873 |  
	| First Line Centre | 
 
			
			Some photos of the northeast extension stations at Saddletown and Martindale taken by "AB Born" on SSP. 
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by AB Born on SSP
					
				 |  |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  11-27-2011, 09:51 AM | #874 |  
	| First Line Centre 
				 
				Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: Calgary      | 
 
			
			The two people that live almost on the tracks....I feel sorry for them. If that wasn't bad enough, they have a station at arms length from their window.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  11-27-2011, 10:09 AM | #875 |  
	| Franchise Player 
				 
				Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Calgary, Alberta      | 
 
			
			Ya that's pretty a bad spot for a house to be. Was the ROW established before the community was built? If so developers didn't really give a damn about personal space here.
 As for the Saddleridge station, I dig the lanterns concept.
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  11-27-2011, 10:13 AM | #876 |  
	| Franchise Player 
				 
				Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: Calgary, AB      | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by stampsx2  The two people that live almost on the tracks....I feel sorry for them. If that wasn't bad enough, they have a station at arms length from their window. |  
Hard to feel sorry for them when the area has been pegged for LRT and plans made available for more than a decade.
 
Those homes are probably dirt cheap.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  11-27-2011, 08:29 PM | #877 |  
	| First Line Centre | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Joborule  Ya that's pretty a bad spot for a house to be. Was the ROW established before the community was built? If so developers didn't really give a damn about personal space here.
 As for the Saddleridge station, I dig the lanterns concept.
 |  
The LRT Right of Way was secured and designated as part of the 1984 Saddleridge Area Structure Plan, which is a statutory plan that will proceeds any development work on the land, so yeah the land use (for single family housing, not necessarily the exact layout of the lots) would have been part of the same process, and the configuration of the lots would have followed that.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  11-27-2011, 11:59 PM | #878 |  
	| Draft Pick | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by stampsx2  The two people that live almost on the tracks....I feel sorry for them. If that wasn't bad enough, they have a station at arms length from their window. |  
At least they wouldn't have to walk too far to catch public transit!
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  11-28-2011, 12:42 PM | #879 |  
	| First Line Centre | 
				  
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| Wind storm fallout: City predicts full LRT service restored by afternoon rush hour 
 
 
 Every bus in fleet put into action
 
 
 
 By Jason Markusoff and Sherri Zickefoose, Calgary Herald November 28, 2011 12:09 PM
 
 UPDATE 12:02 [P.M.]
 City of Calgary Fire Chief Bruce Burrell said full LRT service will be restored well in advance of the afternoon rush hour.
 
 
 Areas of the downtown still closed off Monday, after Sunday's high windstorm, will also reopen soon, Burrell added.
 
 [..................]
 
 City crews were still trying to reopen the 7th Avenue LRT corridor  mid-morning Monday after a rush-hour mess left hundreds of commuters  waiting in frustration for shuttle buses into downtown.
 
 Mayor  Naheed Nenshi said every bus in the city fleet was put in action trying  to clear the backlog. But buses were no replacement for three-car  trains.
 
 
 Downtown-bound trains dropped off passengers at Erlton  (south line), Lions Park (NW) and Bridgeland (NE) stations, and hundreds  waited in queues at each for shuttles.
 
 
 Many people decided to walk instead. And the glut of buses added further to morning road congestion.
 
 [...]
 
 "Every single bus we had was on the ground, so you can’t create buses  out of thin air overnight, unfortunately,” the mayor told reporters.
 
 “I  understand that there were some problems with information to passengers  on the trains and at the stations, and given that we’ve got those fancy  new signs, we’ll learn about how to do that better in the future.”
 |  |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
			| The Following User Says Thank You to frinkprof For This Useful Post: |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  11-28-2011, 01:19 PM | #880 |  
	| Franchise Player 
				 
				Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Supporting Urban Sprawl      | 
 
			
			That explained why they sardined us into an old style bus on the 302 this morning.
		 
				__________________"Wake up, Luigi! The only time plumbers sleep on the job is when we're working by the hour."
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		
	
	
	
	
	| 
	|  Posting Rules |  
	| 
		
		You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts 
 HTML code is Off 
 |  |  |  All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:56 AM. | 
 
 
 |