Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-30-2023, 04:57 PM   #8021
Fuzz
Franchise Player
 
Fuzz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Exp:
Default

I need to wait for some snow mounds to melt before I order a sign or 15.
Fuzz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2023, 05:00 PM   #8022
Fuzz
Franchise Player
 
Fuzz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Exp:
Default

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/edmon...796780?cmp=rss

UCP announces they are spending a bunch on parks, to re-open the campgrounds they themselves closed.
Fuzz is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Fuzz For This Useful Post:
Old 03-30-2023, 05:32 PM   #8023
D as in David
#1 Goaltender
 
D as in David's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TorqueDog View Post
No, and even if there was, you're not allowed to ask for it. Don't you remember the last time someone asked for actual evidence to back up such a claim?
I legit lol'd on this. Thanks for that!
D as in David is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2023, 07:09 PM   #8024
Slava
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TorqueDog View Post
No, and even if there was, you're not allowed to ask for it. Don't you remember the last time someone asked for actual evidence to back up such a claim?
Well we have had this discussion a million times and there’s no resolution. It’s pointless, because I say “look here’s this brutal track record” and then NDP apologists say “yeah, but the UCP!”

So, while my point is that there’s no good choice for a lot of voters, it’s a pointless “whataboutism” discussion. You’ll have to forgive me if I’m not super interested in that.
Slava is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2023, 07:17 PM   #8025
Alpha_Q
Scoring Winger
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Slava View Post
Well we have had this discussion a million times and there’s no resolution. It’s pointless, because I say “look here’s this brutal track record” and then NDP apologists say “yeah, but the UCP!”

So, while my point is that there’s no good choice for a lot of voters, it’s a pointless “whataboutism” discussion. You’ll have to forgive me if I’m not super interested in that.
I think people would like to see the "brutal track record." I'm sorry, but when you folllow an invitation to back up your assertions with "I'm leaving" it's simply not going to get much support let alone respect.
Alpha_Q is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Alpha_Q For This Useful Post:
Old 03-30-2023, 07:19 PM   #8026
PepsiFree
Participant
Participant
 
PepsiFree's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Slava View Post
Well we have had this discussion a million times and there’s no resolution. It’s pointless, because I say “look here’s this brutal track record” and then NDP apologists say “yeah, but the UCP!”

So, while my point is that there’s no good choice for a lot of voters, it’s a pointless “whataboutism” discussion. You’ll have to forgive me if I’m not super interested in that.
In fairness, it hasn’t just been “yeah, but the UCP!” it’s also been accurately pointing out that your definition of “brutal” is so all-encompassing that you’d actually have a difficult time finding a provincial government across the country in the last 20 years that didn’t also qualify as “brutal.”

The ANDP is a pretty good centrist/left of centre option, all things considered, and most if not all of their main issues could be chalked up to a fairly “green” party taking over from a conservative dynasty.

I think you’ve been given some pretty convincing arguments over the last few years as to why your opinion doesn’t reflect reality, but you keep sharing the same opinion as you’ve obviously found none of the facts people have offered you interesting or worth considering.

Boiling it down to a pointless case of whataboutism not only isn’t fair, it isn’t even true. Just because you haven’t ever taken interest in the point doesn’t mean it’s pointless.
PepsiFree is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to PepsiFree For This Useful Post:
Old 03-30-2023, 07:40 PM   #8027
timun
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: May 2012
Exp:
Default

Yeah but the NDP BoRrOweD FoR OPerATioNs, WHIch jUst tO rEItErAtE Is baSIcaLlY A CarDINaL SiN IN fINanCe!
timun is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to timun For This Useful Post:
Old 03-30-2023, 07:43 PM   #8028
Slava
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Exp:
Default

Well I suppose it comes down to what you consider as being fiscally competent. The NDP oversaw a debt that went from ~10-11bn to ~$71bn. They had no possible way to pay that back, and in the face of credit downgrades they were unflinching in their spending. They didn’t cut public service at all, but continued to expand it. And, lest we want to forget and think they had no option, they did in fact have rising energy prices through the past two years of their term. The could’ve taken actions to reduce this deficit and S&P told them they should either cut spending and/or raise taxes.

And it’s kind of sadly amusing to remember Joe Ceci being warned a month ahead that the rating agencies were going to cut the credit rating and him denying it. Then, lo and behold the credit rating was knocked down two notches. That’s not political, it’s independent rating agencies with concrete actions. And just to reiterate, this is well after the oil price bottom in 2015…this is 2017 when the province was growing and leading growth in the country.
Slava is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Slava For This Useful Post:
Old 03-30-2023, 07:43 PM   #8029
Slava
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by timun View Post
Yeah but the NDP BoRrOweD FoR OPerATioNs, WHIch jUst tO rEItErAtE Is baSIcaLlY A CarDINaL SiN IN fINanCe!
Yeah, we’ve been over that. I know you’re being facetious, but it’s a fact.
Slava is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2023, 07:46 PM   #8030
Vedder
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by timun View Post
Yeah but the NDP BoRrOweD FoR OPerATioNs, WHIch jUst tO rEItErAtE Is baSIcaLlY A CarDINaL SiN IN fINanCe!
I mean, borrowing to fund your operating budget is stupid. Not sure why you’re mocking those who criticize it.
Vedder is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Vedder For This Useful Post:
Old 03-30-2023, 08:00 PM   #8031
opendoor
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

What was the alternative? Unilaterally slash government expenditures by 20% overnight to match the drop in revenue from 2014?

The real problem is the province setting itself up so it's constantly using oil royalties to subsidize everything so a drop in commodity prices pushes it into a deficit.
opendoor is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to opendoor For This Useful Post:
Old 03-30-2023, 08:17 PM   #8032
Slava
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by opendoor View Post
What was the alternative? Unilaterally slash government expenditures by 20% overnight to match the drop in revenue from 2014?

The real problem is the province setting itself up so it's constantly using oil royalties to subsidize everything so a drop in commodity prices pushes it into a deficit.
Yeah and I see that argument. But my issue is, they made it their policy to not even try. Ceci was told by ratings agencies that to maintain the credit rating they should close the gap and they elected not to.
Slava is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2023, 08:29 PM   #8033
PepsiFree
Participant
Participant
 
PepsiFree's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vedder View Post
I mean, borrowing to fund your operating budget is stupid. Not sure why you’re mocking those who criticize it.
Out of curiosity, can you provide a list of the provinces that haven’t borrowed to fund operations in the last 10-15 years?
PepsiFree is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2023, 08:36 PM   #8034
GGG
Franchise Player
 
GGG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Slava View Post
Yeah and I see that argument. But my issue is, they made it their policy to not even try. Ceci was told by ratings agencies that to maintain the credit rating they should close the gap and they elected not to.
Your aware that the current UCP budget spends 3% less than the NDP budget plus inflation plus pop growth right? Is that difference meaningful to you?
GGG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2023, 08:41 PM   #8035
Minnie
Franchise Player
 
Minnie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: On your last nerve...:D
Exp:
Default

Out of curiosity, in addition to the $80M the UCP dropped on useless weak ass pretend Tylenol, can someone add up where we're sitting at in terms of the money boondoggles from the UCP between Kenney & Smith? It has to be in the multi-billions by now. Been thinking about what that figure is sitting at but have been too ridiculous busy to sit at the computer long enough to research.

Off the top of my head, $4.3B to O&G companies that pocketed it & scarpered, $7B plus investment in the pipeline that will never be - that's just what I recall from Kenney right now, but I'm pretty sure there was more. Oh, then there's the lawsuit against the US govt which will cost the province how much?
Minnie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2023, 08:45 PM   #8036
FlameOn
Franchise Player
 
FlameOn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Minnie View Post
Out of curiosity, in addition to the $80M the UCP dropped on useless weak ass pretend Tylenol, can someone add up where we're sitting at in terms of the money boondoggles from the UCP between Kenney & Smith? It has to be in the multi-billions by now. Been thinking about what that figure is sitting at but have been too ridiculous busy to sit at the computer long enough to research.

Off the top of my head, $4.3B to O&G companies that pocketed it & scarpered, $7B plus investment in the pipeline that will never be - that's just what I recall from Kenney right now, but I'm pretty sure there was more. Oh, then there's the lawsuit against the US govt which will cost the province how much?
Giving oil companies a $20B tax credit to clean up wells when they are making bank and a ton of them are not paying their taxes.
FlameOn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2023, 08:47 PM   #8037
Slava
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GGG View Post
Your aware that the current UCP budget spends 3% less than the NDP budget plus inflation plus pop growth right? Is that difference meaningful to you?
Well again, I’m not voting for these clowns, and not planning on defending this regime. But, if you’re convinced the NDP nailed the fiscal part of their term it’s great news! They have a good shot to get back in! Honestly, all they need to do is buy some ad time and run clips from the phone call, clips from the now resigned Lethbridge West candidate and they should be off to the races.
Slava is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2023, 08:47 PM   #8038
Izzle
First Line Centre
 
Izzle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Exp:
Default

YeS, BuT tHeY wErE CaPiTuL sPeNDzzzzz
Izzle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2023, 09:04 PM   #8039
belsarius
First Line Centre
 
belsarius's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Edmonton
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vedder View Post
I mean, borrowing to fund your operating budget is stupid. Not sure why you’re mocking those who criticize it.
I mostly mock it because Keynesian economics have proven to work and that includes borrowing for your operating budget. Deficit spending during a downturn isn't stupid, it is sound economic policy that was the way of the world before Neoliberalism took hold and everyone thought we could trickle-down to prosperity.. and look where that has gotten us.
__________________
@PR_NHL
The @NHLFlames are the first team to feature four players each with 50+ points within their first 45 games of a season since the Penguins in 1995-96 (Ron Francis, Mario Lemieux, Jaromir Jagr, Tomas Sandstrom).
belsarius is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to belsarius For This Useful Post:
Old 03-30-2023, 09:04 PM   #8040
timun
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: May 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vedder View Post
I mean, borrowing to fund your operating budget is stupid. Not sure why you’re mocking those who criticize it.
The sheer ####ing hypocrisy is why I'm mocking it. Slava simultaneous absolutely cannot forgive the NDP for their "cardinal sin", yet nary a peep about the financial mismanagement of the UCP government other than a sheepish "well, I'm not planning to vote for them either...".

Yes, the provincial debt did go up a lot under the NDP. They racked up $32B in budget deficits over four years.

The UCP racked up another $29.1B in their first two years. And they were forecasting another $18.2B deficit in fiscal year 2021-22, which they only managed to avoid because revenues ended up being $25B more than forecast through essentially no creditable action on their part whatsoever! And now this year they're forecasting an almost $12.3B surplus because—surprise!—resource revenue is forecast $22.7B higher than it ever was in any given year 2015-2019.

Just so we're all clear on what actually happened (all figures in millions of $):




Can we finally put this bull####-####ing-narrative that "the NDP are fiscally incompetent" to rest? 2019-2020 was self-inflicted stupidity on a scale far worse than the NDP EVER did.

Last edited by timun; 03-30-2023 at 09:06 PM.
timun is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:50 PM.

Calgary Flames
2023-24




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021