07-29-2024, 12:48 PM
|
#781
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
|
Because everyone is a hypocrite, remember it wasn't that long ago when it was the Republicans (and Trump as one of the loudest voices) complaining about the EC when it looked like Obama could lose the popular vote while easily winning the EC.
- In 2008, Obama won the popular vote 52.9% - 45.7%, but won the EC 365 - 173.
- In 2012, Obama won the popular vote 51.1% - 47.2%, but won the EC 332 - 206.
__________________
Turn up the good, turn down the suck!
|
|
|
07-29-2024, 12:50 PM
|
#782
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Helsinki, Finland
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CliffFletcher
Or the UK, where Labour just won 63 per cent of the seats in parliament with only a third of the popular vote.
Of course, proportional representation has its own problems. It gives more power to fringe parties, makes coalition governments the norm, and those coalitions reliant on back-room wheeling and dealing that can drag on for months and months.
|
The idea that coalition governments lead to more back-room wheeling and dealing is pretty ridiculous. Coalitions tend to lead to very public and widely covered wheeling and dealing, because it's much harder to hide that you're wheeling and dealing when you have multiple parties involved.
Also, "drag on for months and months..." The US senate has been going between barely functional and completely paralyzed as a decision making branch for two decades now.
It's honestly so bizarre that anyone would defend the US system of governance, it's just so obviously incredibly antiquated and disfunctional.
|
|
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Itse For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-29-2024, 01:11 PM
|
#783
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Itse
The idea that coalition governments lead to more back-room wheeling and dealing is pretty ridiculous. Coalitions tend to lead to very public and widely covered wheeling and dealing, because it's much harder to hide that you're wheeling and dealing when you have multiple parties involved.
Also, "drag on for months and months..." The US senate has been going between barely functional and completely paralyzed as a decision making branch for two decades now.
It's honestly so bizarre that anyone would defend the US system of governance, it's just so obviously incredibly antiquated and disfunctional.
|
We were discussing FPTP vs PR in general. Going back to the example of the UK, if the latest election used the Scottish system of PR, labour would have won 236 seats instead of 411, taking them well out of majority territory, the populist right-wing Reform UK would have 94 MPs instead of five, and the Green Party 42 seats instead of 4.
Whether you think that would be a better result or not, it would clearly benefit the parties on the extremes. And Labour would have had to enter into three-way negotiations with the Liberal Democrats and Greens to form a government. Those negotiations would likely involve Labour making concessions that Labour voters might not have had in mind and that they had no say over.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by fotze
If this day gets you riled up, you obviously aren't numb to the disappointment yet to be a real fan.
|
|
|
|
07-29-2024, 01:13 PM
|
#784
|
The new goggles also do nothing.
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GGG
If you look at the interstate electoral compact it’s up to 209 electors approved and 50 pending.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nati...rstate_Compact
So this means that just 11 ECs need to pass the legislation before direct voting of the president will be law. Some republicans have vowed to challange the constitutionality of these bills so that is still potentially an obstacle.
But if you look at potential states that could ratify this. Places like Pennsylvania and Arizona which are fairly purple would be sufficient Wisconsin would put it one seat shy.
Will these current swing states in presidential elections vote to diminish their power? Possibly, it may be valuable for the representatives of these states not to be has heavily correlated with presidential outcomes.
|
This has always been something I found interesting, would be nice for it to one day just kick in.
__________________
Uncertainty is an uncomfortable position.
But certainty is an absurd one.
|
|
|
07-29-2024, 02:07 PM
|
#785
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Chicago
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by getbak
Because everyone is a hypocrite, remember it wasn't that long ago when it was the Republicans (and Trump as one of the loudest voices) complaining about the EC when it looked like Obama could lose the popular vote while easily winning the EC.
- In 2008, Obama won the popular vote 52.9% - 45.7%, but won the EC 365 - 173.
- In 2012, Obama won the popular vote 51.1% - 47.2%, but won the EC 332 - 206.
|
Those things are always self serving and partisan. Remember when Trudeau promised that 2015 would be the last FPP election in Canada? Maybe they never intended to, or maybe they realized this is at least somewhat typical
https://www.electoral-reform.org.uk/...he-most-seats/
|
|
|
07-29-2024, 05:24 PM
|
#786
|
Franchise Player
|
Roy Cooper is out of the VP race. He is dropping out.
|
|
|
07-29-2024, 05:44 PM
|
#787
|
tromboner
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: where the lattes are
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Itse
It's honestly so bizarre that anyone would defend the US system of governance, it's just so obviously incredibly antiquated and disfunctional.
|
They have the oldest/second oldest constitution for a democracy (depending on how you view San Marino) and it shows.
Other countries that did theirs more recently have learned from others' mistakes, but the US still treat theirs as if it's infallible, like their founding fathers were prophets.
|
|
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to SebC For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-29-2024, 06:34 PM
|
#788
|
Franchise Player
|
This weird bit is catching on and I like it. Now apparently JP Mandell was on gay apps and sleeping with men and has a sock fetish.
From banging couches to socks what a weird group.
|
|
|
07-29-2024, 08:58 PM
|
#789
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: east van
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paulie Walnuts
This weird bit is catching on and I like it. Now apparently JP Mandell was on gay apps and sleeping with men and has a sock fetish.
From banging couches to socks what a weird group.
|
The odd thing about the couch stories is it's what the kids in the juvi used to do, boost a box of latex gloves from the nursing station and fill them with lotion or alternatively put two mattress side by side and 'know them biblically', they even had names for the acts, one was called a 'FiFi' and the other a FoFo
|
|
|
07-29-2024, 09:16 PM
|
#791
|
Commie Referee
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Small town, B.C.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by calgarygeologist
Roy Cooper is out of the VP race. He is dropping out.
|
The more I hear Walz speak the more I like him.
https://twitter.com/user/status/1818097206177550581
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to KootenayFlamesFan For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-29-2024, 09:31 PM
|
#792
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SebC
They have the oldest/second oldest constitution for a democracy (depending on how you view San Marino) and it shows.
Other countries that did theirs more recently have learned from others' mistakes, but the US still treat theirs as if it's infallible, like their founding fathers were prophets.
|
And they still mythologize the 'great American experiment' as if they're on the bleeding edge of democracy. Actually they may be, but not leading edge.
|
|
|
07-29-2024, 09:32 PM
|
#793
|
Franchise Player
|
Walz and Shapiro both look like strong candidates for VP.
JP is going to get his ass kicked in a debate. Hopefully he has a couch to go home to.
|
|
|
07-29-2024, 11:43 PM
|
#794
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Helsinki, Finland
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CliffFletcher
We were discussing FPTP vs PR in general. Going back to the example of the UK, if the latest election used the Scottish system of PR, labour would have won 236 seats instead of 411, taking them well out of majority territory, the populist right-wing Reform UK would have 94 MPs instead of five, and the Green Party 42 seats instead of 4.
Whether you think that would be a better result or not, it would clearly benefit the parties on the extremes. And Labour would have had to enter into three-way negotiations with the Liberal Democrats and Greens to form a government. Those negotiations would likely involve Labour making concessions that Labour voters might not have had in mind and that they had no say over.
|
It's so weird that you consider the idea that "the results would reflect the voters better" as a bad thing.
Yeah, the government would have to consider the views of more voters, not just the voters of the biggest party. Oh the shock and horror.
The UK is also a s***show with an extremely antiquated political system.
As for "helping the extremes..." Have you seen the Tories and the GOP? The idea that smaller parties are somehow by default more extreme than larger ones is just not true.
Last edited by Itse; 07-29-2024 at 11:49 PM.
|
|
|
07-30-2024, 05:35 AM
|
#795
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Austria, NOT Australia
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by KootenayFlamesFan
|
same. I think you really can't go wrong between Shapiro, Kelly and Walz, but I'm starting to believe Walz might be the guy.
And while he's apparently not in the race anymore, another shoutout to Pete Buttigieg. Absolute masterclass on Fox News the other day ... he's just incredibly good at this stuff. He'll make a fine president one day.
https://twitter.com/user/status/1817552850995871795
|
|
|
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to devo22 For This Useful Post:
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:43 AM.
|
|