Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-15-2017, 03:25 PM   #781
JerryUnderscore
Scoring Winger
 
JerryUnderscore's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Halifax, NS
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM View Post
Back OT, Treliving has been as solid a GM as any out there right now.
There's a very short list of people I'd rather have in charge of this team.

David Poile, Ken Holland, Stan Bowman or Steve Yzerman are the only ones I could think of and they're all maybes at best.

Treliving has been very solid overall.
__________________
"I’m on a mission to civilize." - Will McAvoy
JerryUnderscore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2017, 04:05 PM   #782
Enoch Root
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2012
Exp:
Default

When the Flames were looking at hiring a new GM, there were two primary candidates on almost everyone's list:

Jim Nill
Jim Benning

Burke hired a guy few of us had heard of instead, by the name of Brad Treliving.

After hearing about Treliving, and hearing him speak, I was happy with the decision, but still would have preferred Nill.

Looking back now, all I can say is thank fricking God! Way to go Burky!
Enoch Root is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Enoch Root For This Useful Post:
Old 03-15-2017, 04:26 PM   #783
Vinny01
Franchise Player
 
Vinny01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root View Post
When the Flames were looking at hiring a new GM, there were two primary candidates on almost everyone's list:

Jim Nill
Jim Benning

Burke hired a guy few of us had heard of instead, by the name of Brad Treliving.

After hearing about Treliving, and hearing him speak, I was happy with the decision, but still would have preferred Nill.

Looking back now, all I can say is thank fricking God! Way to go Burky!

Pretty sure Nill was in Dallas when Burke was searching for his guy. I remember
Nieuwndyk was heavily rumored as a candidate
Vinny01 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2017, 07:10 PM   #784
Enoch Root
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vinny01 View Post
Pretty sure Nill was in Dallas when Burke was searching for his guy. I remember
Nieuwndyk was heavily rumored as a candidate
Yes, by the time they were in the full hiring process, Nill was already in Dallas.

But leading up to that, until Dallas hired him, he was the top candidate out there, and just about everybody's first choice. That is what I meant.
Enoch Root is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Enoch Root For This Useful Post:
Old 03-16-2017, 07:22 PM   #785
bigrangy
Franchise Player
 
bigrangy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Exp:
Default

The issue with the Granlund trade isn't the trade itself. The Flames traded a guy that wasn't in the future plans for a guy who had top-6 upside. You make that trade every day of the week.

Unfortunately, I don't think the Flames expected Granlund to become a full time NHLer, nevermind being a near 20 goal scorer (even if it is a lucky season). I don't think that Brad makes that trade if he thinks Granlund had this sort of play in him.

Also, Shinkaruk looks like a flop at this point. I don't know whether that's on him or on the joke of a development system that the Flames have or even a bit of both. Brad must have thought that Shinkaruk would have an NHL future, otherwise why trade for him? So in this trade, the Flames organization has (at least so far) got their scouting reports wrong on two players. Obviously, there's still a lot of time left in both guys' careers but this trade seem to have missed its mark.

Regardless, Treliving still needs to be re-signed. He learns from his mistakes and isn't too stubborn to fix them when he's given the opportunity. Hopefully he can move out Brouwer this summer, replace him with a legitimate top 6 option, and have the team much better prepared for the 1st game of next year.
__________________
Oliver Kylington is the greatest and best player in the world
bigrangy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2017, 08:39 PM   #786
Erick Estrada
Franchise Player
 
Erick Estrada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bigrangy View Post
The issue with the Granlund trade isn't the trade itself. The Flames traded a guy that wasn't in the future plans for a guy who had top-6 upside. You make that trade every day of the week.

Unfortunately, I don't think the Flames expected Granlund to become a full time NHLer, nevermind being a near 20 goal scorer (even if it is a lucky season). I don't think that Brad makes that trade if he thinks Granlund had this sort of play in him.

Also, Shinkaruk looks like a flop at this point. I don't know whether that's on him or on the joke of a development system that the Flames have or even a bit of both. Brad must have thought that Shinkaruk would have an NHL future, otherwise why trade for him? So in this trade, the Flames organization has (at least so far) got their scouting reports wrong on two players. Obviously, there's still a lot of time left in both guys' careers but this trade seem to have missed its mark.

Regardless, Treliving still needs to be re-signed. He learns from his mistakes and isn't too stubborn to fix them when he's given the opportunity. Hopefully he can move out Brouwer this summer, replace him with a legitimate top 6 option, and have the team much better prepared for the 1st game of next year.
Granlund is a full time NHLer on arguably the worst roster in the NHL.
Erick Estrada is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Erick Estrada For This Useful Post:
Old 03-16-2017, 09:12 PM   #787
David Struch
First Line Centre
 
David Struch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bigrangy View Post
Hopefully he can move out Brouwer this summer, replace him with a legitimate top 6 option, and have the team much better prepared for the 1st game of next year.
I would think that's the furthest thing from Treliving's mind. It's only the first year of Brouwer's four year deal. Hopefully he'll activate warrior mode during this years playoffs. Gulutzan must like him too, Troy is an alternate Captain and also plays on the 1st power play unit.
David Struch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2017, 11:34 PM   #788
Hackey
#1 Goaltender
 
Hackey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bigrangy View Post
The issue with the Granlund trade isn't the trade itself. The Flames traded a guy that wasn't in the future plans for a guy who had top-6 upside. You make that trade every day of the week.

Unfortunately, I don't think the Flames expected Granlund to become a full time NHLer, nevermind being a near 20 goal scorer (even if it is a lucky season). I don't think that Brad makes that trade if he thinks Granlund had this sort of play in him.

Also, Shinkaruk looks like a flop at this point. I don't know whether that's on him or on the joke of a development system that the Flames have or even a bit of both. Brad must have thought that Shinkaruk would have an NHL future, otherwise why trade for him? So in this trade, the Flames organization has (at least so far) got their scouting reports wrong on two players. Obviously, there's still a lot of time left in both guys' careers but this trade seem to have missed its mark.

Regardless, Treliving still needs to be re-signed. He learns from his mistakes and isn't too stubborn to fix them when he's given the opportunity. Hopefully he can move out Brouwer this summer, replace him with a legitimate top 6 option, and have the team much better prepared for the 1st game of next year.
Granlund didn't have a place on the team. He wouldn't have been a top 6 player here and I think you can find more effective players for the bottom 6. 32 points on a weak Vancouver team where he is getting top 6 ice time and PP time doesn't make me lose any sleep.
Hackey is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Hackey For This Useful Post:
Old 03-17-2017, 01:24 AM   #789
FlameZilla
First Line Centre
 
FlameZilla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hackey View Post
Granlund didn't have a place on the team. He wouldn't have been a top 6 player here and I think you can find more effective players for the bottom 6. 32 points on a weak Vancouver team where he is getting top 6 ice time and PP time doesn't make me lose any sleep.
Even Rico Fata managed to get 16 goals & 32 points one season when he played top 6 on a Pittsburgh team which was tanking to get Crosby (the 'Skid for Syd'). Did that make him a top 6 NHL forward? Hell no, he was in Europe 2 seasons later.

With Backlund, Monahan, Bennett and Stajan here last season there was no way Granlund would ever play C in the top 9 for the Flames. Flipping him for a winger with similar value was a good deal. If the Flames depth was as bad as Vancouver's then I bet a Hunter Shinkaruk playing top 6 minutes would pop 20 goals or so too. If we hadn't drafted Tkachuk (thanks again Vancouver) there's a chance Shinkaruk would have made the team and done exactly that.
FlameZilla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2017, 10:05 PM   #790
smiggy77
Powerplay Quarterback
 
smiggy77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Bump just cuz I wanna be a jerk


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
smiggy77 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to smiggy77 For This Useful Post:
Old 03-31-2017, 10:13 PM   #791
Boreal
First Line Centre
 
Boreal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FlameZilla View Post
Even Rico Fata managed to get 16 goals & 32 points one season when he played top 6 on a Pittsburgh team which was tanking to get Crosby (the 'Skid for Syd'). Did that make him a top 6 NHL forward? Hell no, he was in Europe 2 seasons later.

With Backlund, Monahan, Bennett and Stajan here last season there was no way Granlund would ever play C in the top 9 for the Flames. Flipping him for a winger with similar value was a good deal. If the Flames depth was as bad as Vancouver's then I bet a Hunter Shinkaruk playing top 6 minutes would pop 20 goals or so too. If we hadn't drafted Tkachuk (thanks again Vancouver) there's a chance Shinkaruk would have made the team and done exactly that.
What are you talking about. They won a lottery. Skid for Syd? Use your brain & check facts. If they were trying to lose it was to get Ovechkin & they ended up with Malkin.

The modern version of the Penguins are not the Oilers.
Boreal is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:27 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy