06-21-2013, 11:08 PM
|
#781
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by gottabekd
I guess the thing is, a couple days before reversing the DRM they were saying "We absolutely won't change anything", so it's hard to know what to believe.
|
Yeah, hard to believe anything Microsoft says these days. Hell, even their "family-sharing" program is looking more like a half baked last minute token promise more than anything real.
I really hope people stop crying about this "lost" feature that never really was and more just a half assed promise trying to placate people so offended by the DRM restrictions in the first place.
http://www.theverge.com/2013/6/21/44...mored-features
The feature would have allowed Xbox One owners to share their game libraries with other family members, regardless of their location. However, the engineer reveals that Family Sharing would only let family members access a "demo mode" of the game for between 15 mins and 45 mins, and in some cases an hour.
EDIT: All of this and the obvious fact that developers would never allow 1 game to be freely shared to 9 nine other people. That is just idiotic for somebody to believe or claim as realistic in the first place.
Last edited by chemgear; 06-21-2013 at 11:30 PM.
|
|
|
06-21-2013, 11:36 PM
|
#782
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Calgary - Centre West
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by chemgear
I really hope people stop crying about this "lost" feature that never really was and more just a half assed promise trying to placate people so offended by the DRM restrictions in the first place.
http://www.theverge.com/2013/6/21/44...mored-features
The feature would have allowed Xbox One owners to share their game libraries with other family members, regardless of their location. However, the engineer reveals that Family Sharing would only let family members access a "demo mode" of the game for between 15 mins and 45 mins, and in some cases an hour.
EDIT: All of this and the obvious fact that developers would never allow 1 game to be freely shared to 9 nine other people. That is just idiotic for somebody to believe or claim as realistic in the first place.
|
It's unconfirmed, officially denied, and as such can be considered speculation, so no, no one has to stop complaining about the loss of the feature. What would be the point of giving people the ability to play basically a time-limited demo? They already offer those today.
__________________
-James
GO FLAMES GO.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Azure
Typical dumb take.
|
|
|
|
06-21-2013, 11:54 PM
|
#783
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by TorqueDog
It's unconfirmed, officially denied, and as such can be considered speculation, so no, no one has to stop complaining about the loss of the feature. What would be the point of giving people the ability to play basically a time-limited demo? They already offer those today.
|
Sure you can complain about it - Microsoft can still put it in for people that make online purchases. What is stopping them? It is fully their choice.
But if you, or I, or anybody else is looking for solid facts and plans about the Xbone 180 - we should all avoid official Microsoft representatives. They have both confirmed and denied the same things this whole way though. Including changing anything about their officially announced policies about DRM and such.
Seriously though, I found this one hour timed demo "speculation" from multiple Verge sources interesting though. Remember at the console launch, they mentioned how you had to call in every 24 hours for permission? But at a "friend's" house the time changed to 1 hour? That was the family share program - it was in front of us this whole time!
^ just my speculation and thinking out loud. I doubt the Verge would accept me as a source!
Last edited by chemgear; 06-21-2013 at 11:56 PM.
|
|
|
06-22-2013, 09:31 AM
|
#784
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Elbows Up!!
|
another post from a "heartbroken" m$ employee.
http://pastebin.com/TE1MWES2
__________________
Franchise > Team > Player
Future historians will celebrate June 24, 2024 as the date when the timeline corrected itself.
|
|
|
06-22-2013, 10:35 AM
|
#785
|
On Hiatus
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Calgary Alberta Canada
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by McG
|
Quote:
So when you buy a game used you're hurting developers much more than say a movie studio. Many gamers fail to realize this when they purchase these preowned games.
|
My god what have we done how will we sleep at night
|
|
|
06-22-2013, 11:25 AM
|
#786
|
CP Gamemaster
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: The Gary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by McG
|
Wow, how did the industry survive until now if used games are so evil!?!?!?!
|
|
|
06-22-2013, 12:32 PM
|
#787
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Calgary, AB
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mazrim
Wow, how did the industry survive until now if used games are so evil!?!?!?! 
|
By providing a huge amount of overpriced DLC that could have been part of the original game!
|
|
|
06-22-2013, 04:30 PM
|
#788
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Why can't they just allow offline gaming and make kinect optional. If a customer wants to play online they can check in to insure it's a legitimate game.
|
|
|
06-22-2013, 07:07 PM
|
#789
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Victoria
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by drPepper1
Why can't they just allow offline gaming and make kinect optional. If a customer wants to play online they can check in to insure it's a legitimate game.
|
well they have now...
but trying to make sure players are using valid copies of games isn't limited to just playing multiplayer online.... they want to ensure that offline play is using legal games too
|
|
|
06-22-2013, 10:46 PM
|
#790
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: On my metal monster.
|
I have to seriously laugh out loud when I see a Microsoft employee say "So when you buy a game used you're hurting developers much more than say a movie studio. Many gamers fail to realize this when they purchase these preowned games."
It would be nice for them to stop lying to consumers. Used sales hurt the publishers, not game developers. Game developers (the studio itself) make s*** money even if the game is a relative success.
Also, that entire rant from a "heartbroken employee" is complete bollocks. A) You didn't do a good enough job with your vision because you never explained it because you guys are all tech geeks who have no understanding of PR, business, the consumer desires and B) it was never a good idea in the first place as evident by the pre-order sales and the massive outcry from the community.
If it were a good idea, they would still implement it, but alas they have no clue what to do other than to follow their competition.
|
|
|
06-23-2013, 01:12 AM
|
#791
|
Backup Goalie
Join Date: Aug 2005
Exp:  
|
Glad they changed some of the policies but still hoping they address the Kinect scenario.
First with the stuff they changed I didn't have a problem with it because I couldn't trade my games and stuff. My problem was I am a big gamer so I buy a lot of games and I like to know that if I get the urge to pull out an old system and games I can do that as long as the system is still operational. Much like how I still pull out my SNES. The last SNES game was released in 1998 so it has been 15 years since you could say the system ended. The last Xbox game was released in in 2008 and they shutdown XBL for it in 2010. Only two years and they shut it down. If they were to do that with Xbox One that would have meant it was a paperweight with coasters only two years after the final game for it. So I am glad I will be able to play the single player portion of games whenever I should so desire after the Xbox One's run comes to an end. It is why I won't buy any new full price games on Steam ever and only use it when there are really, really good deals.
With the online check in thing I didn't have a huge issue with that but there have been a few times where XBL has seen outages of more than 24 hours as well as ISP's. So that could have created some problems. I was also part of a handful of gamers who couldn't use our accounts for more than a month. We were a group that reached a certain number of games played first (Can't remember what the exact number of games was when it happened) that the profiles were not ready to handle so it corrupted our profiles preventing us from getting online, recovering our profiles etc. Basically first world problems to the extreme. In that case we were able to use another account in the meantime but if that were the Xbox One with these two policies we wouldn't have been able to play our games. Obviously I don't expect something like that to happen again though.
And even though that was one of the things that pushed me over to the PS3 as my primary console and it was frustrating at the time I do have to give Microsoft some credit. I mean normally when you get only a handful of people calling you about a problem I am sure it just gets pushed aside as a non-issue. Which the first few calls did result it since obviously the basic customer service would be totally oblivious to it. But after a few days we did get contacted by somebody that actually worked on the Xbox and not just a customer support agent. So between the group of us and him in constant contact we were eventually able to work it out. In the end they had to send us fixed accounts on memory cards and it was the year the big fall update got slightly delayed since they added a fix for that problem to ensure it didn't happen to anybody else. Plus gave us a free year of XBL which isn't bad for only a month lost  Oh and they installed a free game on the memory card with the fixed profile but I don't think they thought that one through considering the problem was we had played too many games and of course all of us had the game
When it comes to the Kinect I am not one of those people wearing a tin foil hat worried they will be spying on me. I just don't want an ugly camera sitting above my nice big screen TV all the time. I enjoy the Kinect as a fun way to mix my love for gaming and exercise together but I only pull it out for that. And even then if a game supports the controller for menus like Dance Central I will navigate with it. That is what I want my Kinect use to remain as. You just can't help but notice which company works with televisions and which company is primarily involved in the PC market when you look at the systems. Sony make a small (Although ugly) system to go nicely in the home theater with a thin TV. Microsoft design a giant box of a console and then want you to always have an ugly camera hooked up above your TV. Honestly I don't even know what I am going to do with the Kinect. When I use it with the 360 I put it on a ledge that is much higher than the TV so the cords dangle down. Obviously I don't want that when it is also hooked up though. And I am sure they will have some kind of mount for the TV but like the Kinect and PS Eye mounts available now those don't work out with a lot of newer sets either since so many companies are going for bezeless designs that you would have to clasp those to the screen itself.
All that being said I pre-ordered both systems the second they went up for pre-order despite the policies Microsoft had so them changing policies doesn't change that I was getting it anyway. I can't resist Forza 5 over some policies I may or may not like. Especially with all three Top Gear hosts involved this time around
Quote:
Originally Posted by 3 Justin 3
I have to seriously laugh out loud when I see a Microsoft employee say "So when you buy a game used you're hurting developers much more than say a movie studio. Many gamers fail to realize this when they purchase these preowned games."
It would be nice for them to stop lying to consumers. Used sales hurt the publishers, not game developers. Game developers (the studio itself) make s*** money even if the game is a relative success.
|
To be fair you are forgetting a key part of that. The game developers get paid by the publishers no matter what yes. But a game doesn't make the publisher enough money and what happens? The developer gets shutdown while the big publishers keep going on with business as usual. So in the end it does hurt the developers more even if they are not getting the money from the sales.
Used sales need regulated in some form is what needs to happen. Companies always try to take actions that impact the consumers negatively with DRM and stuff when the real issue comes from places like Gamestop that have turned used game sales into a billion dollar industry and a far cry from the days of two kids trading a NES cartridge on a playground. What they need to do is fight for some kind of regulations that would see stores like Gamestop have to share 10% or something from every used sale with the publisher. 10% of the billions Gamestop make from used sales is still billions so hardly going to put them out of business while that money could help the publishers get the money they want to keep the developers in business.
__________________
Last edited by Spinoff90; 06-23-2013 at 01:26 AM.
|
|
|
06-24-2013, 08:58 AM
|
#792
|
Dances with Wolves
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Section 304
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 3 Justin 3
I have to seriously laugh out loud when I see a Microsoft employee say "So when you buy a game used you're hurting developers much more than say a movie studio. Many gamers fail to realize this when they purchase these preowned games."
It would be nice for them to stop lying to consumers. Used sales hurt the publishers, not game developers. Game developers (the studio itself) make s*** money even if the game is a relative success.
Also, that entire rant from a "heartbroken employee" is complete bollocks. A) You didn't do a good enough job with your vision because you never explained it because you guys are all tech geeks who have no understanding of PR, business, the consumer desires and B) it was never a good idea in the first place as evident by the pre-order sales and the massive outcry from the community.
If it were a good idea, they would still implement it, but alas they have no clue what to do other than to follow their competition.
|
Except that the publisher is the one who funds the game in the first place, so it's up to them whether the studio gets funding for more. Awesome games like Heavy Rain end up in the hands of tons of gamers (as seen by their data), but sales don't reflect it. Had the raw sales been higher, perhaps we could have seen a sequel.
|
|
|
06-24-2013, 12:35 PM
|
#793
|
Atomic Nerd
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Calgary
|
|
|
|
06-24-2013, 12:38 PM
|
#794
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Calgary, AB
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hack&Lube
|
At first I was surprised that a guy who is such a ###### was Canadian....then I read his bio and saw he was from Vancouver.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to SuperMatt18 For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-28-2013, 08:49 AM
|
#795
|
The new goggles also do nothing.
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Calgary
|
__________________
Uncertainty is an uncomfortable position.
But certainty is an absurd one.
|
|
|
06-28-2013, 05:44 PM
|
#796
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by photon
|
So huge! And it still has a separate power brick. Lots of room for future iteration (smaller) sales though.
|
|
|
06-28-2013, 05:53 PM
|
#797
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Calgary - Centre West
|
Internal power supply = more heat, also means if the PSU dies, it isn't user-replacable.
Also, looks like non-proprietary connectors for the HD, so I'm sure the mod community will have a way to swap the HD to a larger size.
__________________
-James
GO FLAMES GO.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Azure
Typical dumb take.
|
Last edited by TorqueDog; 06-28-2013 at 05:55 PM.
|
|
|
06-28-2013, 06:04 PM
|
#798
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by TorqueDog
Internal power supply = more heat, also means if the PSU dies, it isn't user-replacable.
Also, looks like non-proprietary connectors for the HD, so I'm sure the mod community will have a way to swap the HD to a larger size.
|
Hell, Microsoft should make it even bigger then.
Good catch on the HD. Sounds like they'll do their super expensive hard drive upgrade option again. Glad the PS4 is easily upgradable without this nonsense like the PS3.
Last edited by chemgear; 06-28-2013 at 06:07 PM.
|
|
|
06-28-2013, 07:33 PM
|
#799
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Calgary - Centre West
|
I don't think they will offer a hard drive upgrade that isn't a different hardware SKU entirely (Pro, Elite), to be honest, unless the final hardware has an access panel to accommodate easily swapping the drive. :-/
Cracking open the case like that is enough to get your warranty voided with nearly any hardware manufacturer.
__________________
-James
GO FLAMES GO.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Azure
Typical dumb take.
|
|
|
|
06-28-2013, 08:00 PM
|
#800
|
Franchise Player
|
It took me a while to upgrade the PS3 hard drive but with PS+ you kinda have to with all the free games. I'm pretty impressed with how slick/smooth the upgrade is. And the warranty isn't voided either.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:11 AM.
|
|