Obama's addition of troops to Afghan...

[moncton golden flames]

Originally Posted by valo403

Oh I get it now, forgive me for thinking that you might actually attempt to support your opinions.

money, banking and the federal reserve

[peter12]

Here we go again, this stuff is like a disease.

[VladtheImpaler]

Originally Posted by moncton golden flames

money, banking and the federal reserve

Yeah, I read Kiyasaki's books, etc. and understand the theory that the Fed Reserve system has rendered the US dollar Monopoly money, but what does that have to do with control of US foreign policy? Why is it in the Fed's interest that Obama send another 30K troops to the Hindu Kush?

[valo403]

Originally Posted by VladtheImpaler

Yeah, I read Kiyasaki's books, etc. and understand the theory that the Fed Reserve system has rendered the US dollar Monopoly money, but what does that have to do with control of US foreign policy? Why is it in the Fed's interest that Obama send another 30K troops to the Hindu Kush?

I don't think he wrote that book yet, and a personal argument appears to be out of the question.

[VladtheImpaler]

Originally Posted by valo403

I don't think he wrote that book yet, and a personal argument appears to be out of the question.

I thought Kiyasaki wrote or published a book on every topic.

[moncton golden flames]

Originally Posted by VladtheImpaler

Yeah, I read Kiyasaki's books, etc. and understand the theory that the Fed Reserve system has rendered the US dollar Monopoly money, but what does that have to do with control of US foreign policy? Why is it in the Fed's interest that Obama send another 30K troops to the Hindu Kush?

the rothschilds are one of the predominant people behind the fed. Here. if you question the source, research who the author is.

going to war, sending more troops, building more tanks, planes etc...all costs money. the money to fund such things does not appear out of thin air. it comes from the banks and banks get their money from the federal reserve.

i'm digressing. i don't have to convince anybody of my opinion. it came up in a round about way and i don't want to further hijack this thread.

[mikey_the_redneck]

Originally Posted by VladtheImpaler

Yeah, I read Kiyasaki's books, etc. and understand the theory that the Fed Reserve system has rendered the US dollar Monopoly money, but what does that have to do with control of US foreign policy? Why is it in the Fed's interest that Obama send another 30K troops to the Hindu Kush?

Well, in order to pay for the war effort, the U.S. must borrow massive amounts of money from..............the Federal Reserve, which they then make massive amounts of interest on. So while it may be politically incorrect for the bankers to say that business is booming because of the war, it is sadly true for them. The longer the war continues the more money they make. Big business is behind EVERYTHING, not always with Average Joes' best interests at heart.

[peter12]

Originally Posted by moncton golden flames

the rothschilds are one of the predominant people behind the fed. Here. if you question the source, research who the author is.

going to war, sending more troops, building more tanks, planes etc...all costs money. the money to fund such things does not appear out of thin air. it comes from the banks and banks get their money from the federal reserve.

i'm digressing. i don't have to convince anybody of my opinion. it came up in a round about way and i don't want to further hijack this thread.

I knewwww the Jews were behind it.

[moncton golden flames]

Originally Posted by peter12

I knewwww the Jews were behind it.

i guess you were right. sorry peter12! i never looked at the rothschilds like that, so i was ignorant.

[VladtheImpaler]

Originally Posted by peter12

I knewwww the Jews were behind it.

Well, anyone who's read the Protocols knows this...