Quote:
Originally Posted by Draug
Why should I choose Nokians over the Blizzaks?
|
Blizzaks perform great on ice. That said, the super-soft compound that gives them good performance on the ice is said to only exist in the top third of the tread (though I don't have an official source on this, just hearsay from dozens and dozens of messageboards and blog reviews). They are known for having short lifespans... dry roads in particular will eat away at them like nothing. After that compound is gone you're left with an average snow tire. They'll last 2-3 seasons, typically.
Hakkas by themselves are one of the top snow tires, with average performance on ice. There's also the option to have them studded, which gives them better performance on the ice than the Blizzaks (duh). Studded Hakkas are practically invincible. They also last much longer, 4 - 5 seasons. Just make sure that if you do get studs, that wherever you go studs are legal. Ontario bans them, other provinces have restrictions. They're OK in Alberta.
I live in Edmonton, a city that waits weeks and weeks to plow side streets. I also drive around in rural Alberta every weekend. All that equals soft or packed snow, in which case neither ice tires nor studs will help me that much. So I'm riding on un-studded Hakkas.
If you do a lot of driving where there's glare ice, go for the Blizzaks or another ice tire. Otherwise I'd suggest the Hakkas.