View Poll Results: The myth is that a plane on a conveyor belt will be able to take off
|
Plausible
|
  
|
31 |
18.79% |
Confirmed
|
  
|
30 |
18.18% |
Busted
|
  
|
104 |
63.03% |
01-28-2008, 04:20 PM
|
#61
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: not lurking
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by burn_baby_burn
How big of treadmill are we talking about?
|
If you look at the photo in the link at the beginning of the article, it looks like it's a few hundred feet long. This isn't a treadmill that the plane is intended to stay stationary on.
|
|
|
01-28-2008, 04:20 PM
|
#62
|
Playboy Mansion Poolboy
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Close enough to make a beer run during a TV timeout
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ducay
Guys, the plane takes off.
|
I guess my thinking is that if the plane needs to hit 100 knots to take off, and the treadmill is going at 100 knots, the plane will now require a ground speed of 200 knots to take off.
And looking at the plane in the picture, I'm not sure it is capable of reaching a speed of double its takeoff velocity; be it ground speed or air speed.
|
|
|
01-28-2008, 04:21 PM
|
#63
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: in your blind spot.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by burn_baby_burn
I was assuming that the plane would be stationary on the treadmill similar to a person running on a treadmill. How would air move over the wings?
|
Why would it stay stationary? The prop or jet engine isn't pushing against the treadmill, it is pushing against the air.
__________________
"The problem with any ideology is that it gives the answer before you look at the evidence."
—Bill Clinton
"The greatest obstacle to discovery is not ignorance--it is the illusion of knowledge."
—Daniel J. Boorstin, historian, former Librarian of Congress
"But the Senator, while insisting he was not intoxicated, could not explain his nudity"
—WKRP in Cincinatti
|
|
|
01-28-2008, 04:22 PM
|
#64
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Calgary, Alberta
|
I don't think it will fly, I think the forward thrust is meant to counter act gravity until the plane achieves liftoff. Now with the treadmill counter acting the effects of gravity in relation to the wheels and the runway, I don't think there will be enough forward motion to create lift. I am still trying to wrap my head around the whole idea.
|
|
|
01-28-2008, 04:39 PM
|
#65
|
The new goggles also do nothing.
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by burn_baby_burn
I was assuming that the plane would be stationary on the treadmill similar to a person running on a treadmill. How would air move over the wings?
|
Why would you assume that? What would cause the airplane to remain stationary? Like Bobblehead says, the engine causes the plane to move by throwing air backwards, not by acting on the treadmill somehow.
__________________
Uncertainty is an uncomfortable position.
But certainty is an absurd one.
|
|
|
01-28-2008, 04:44 PM
|
#66
|
The new goggles also do nothing.
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ken0042
I guess my thinking is that if the plane needs to hit 100 knots to take off, and the treadmill is going at 100 knots, the plane will now require a ground speed of 200 knots to take off.
And looking at the plane in the picture, I'm not sure it is capable of reaching a speed of double its takeoff velocity; be it ground speed or air speed.
|
Ground speed means nothing to an airplane, airplanes can fly with zero ground speed. The only thing that matters with respect to being able to fly is airspeed.
In a way you are right, if the plane needs 100 knots airspeed to take off, and the treadmill is going 100 knots, the plane WILL require a "treadmill speed" of 200 knots to take off, but it will still only need 100 knots of air speed.
And the amount of energy required to reach 100 knots won't change by much, it isn't going twice as fast relative to what matters; the surrounding air. It will take a little more energy to overcome the friction of the wheels spinning twice as fast though.
__________________
Uncertainty is an uncomfortable position.
But certainty is an absurd one.
|
|
|
01-28-2008, 04:45 PM
|
#67
|
The new goggles also do nothing.
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GreatWhiteEbola
I don't think it will fly, I think the forward thrust is meant to counter act gravity until the plane achieves liftoff.
|
Forward thrust goes forward, gravity goes down, the two act at right angles to each other, one can't counteract the other.
Forward thrust moves the plane forward, as air moves over the wings lift is generated which counteracts gravity.
__________________
Uncertainty is an uncomfortable position.
But certainty is an absurd one.
|
|
|
01-28-2008, 04:49 PM
|
#68
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Calgary, Alberta
|
The thrust doesn't create lift until it counteracts gravity, the relationship between the runway and wheels is key. Gravity will prevent liftoff as there will not be adequate high/ low pressure differentiation on the airfoil.
|
|
|
01-28-2008, 04:52 PM
|
#69
|
The new goggles also do nothing.
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GreatWhiteEbola
The thrust doesn't create lift until it counteracts gravity
|
Thrust doesn't create lift, it moves the plane forward. Lift is created by the wings, with more lift being generated the faster the plane goes forward (well that and wing geometry and angle of attack and stuff, but keeping it simple for argument's sake).
Quote:
the relationship between the runway and wheels is key. Gravity will prevent liftoff as there will not be adequate high/ low pressure differentiation on the airfoil.
|
The only relationship between the treadmill surface and the wheels is that one will cause the other to turn.
Yes gravity will prevent liftoff if there is not enough lift, but what would cause there to not be enough lift? Once the airplane reaches the appropriate airspeed it will take off, so for the plane to not be able to take off, something has to stop it from moving forward. What's stopping it from moving forward?
__________________
Uncertainty is an uncomfortable position.
But certainty is an absurd one.
|
|
|
01-28-2008, 04:57 PM
|
#71
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Chiefs Kingdom, Yankees Universe, C of Red.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by photon
Why would you assume that? What would cause the airplane to remain stationary? Like Bobblehead says, the engine causes the plane to move by throwing air backwards, not by acting on the treadmill somehow.
|
I didn't see the picture. How would it remain stationary? The same way a person running on a treadmill stays stationary. Allthough your feet are moving. Your body stays in one place.
__________________
|
|
|
01-28-2008, 05:08 PM
|
#72
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Calgary, Alberta
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by photon
Thrust doesn't create lift, it moves the plane forward. Lift is created by the wings, with more lift being generated the faster the plane goes forward (well that and wing geometry and angle of attack and stuff, but keeping it simple for argument's sake).
The only relationship between the treadmill surface and the wheels is that one will cause the other to turn.
Yes gravity will prevent liftoff if there is not enough lift, but what would cause there to not be enough lift? Once the airplane reaches the appropriate airspeed it will take off, so for the plane to not be able to take off, something has to stop it from moving forward. What's stopping it from moving forward?
|
The runway/ treadmill. Gravity is sticking the plane to the runway. If there is no thrust the plane will move in the same direction as the treadmill. Opposite of what is required for an adequate airspeed for lift off. Now, I'm assuming that the treadmill with be matching the forward thrust of the plane or the experiment is debating a moot point as we all know how a plane works.
|
|
|
01-28-2008, 05:10 PM
|
#73
|
The new goggles also do nothing.
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by burn_baby_burn
I didn't see the picture. How would it remain stationary? The same way a person running on a treadmill stays stationary. Allthough your feet are moving. Your body stays in one place.
|
Your body doesn't remain stationary though, your body is moving constantly with relation to what you are pushing against; your feet push against the treadmill to move you forward. The treadmill surface itself is moving backwards though so you remain stationary, but only in relation to the walls and floor of your house.
In this case the plane is moving air to generate thrust, so the plane will move in relation to the surrounding air; the treadmill doesn't have anything to do with that, there's no energy being directed into the treadmill from the airplane.
__________________
Uncertainty is an uncomfortable position.
But certainty is an absurd one.
|
|
|
01-28-2008, 05:15 PM
|
#74
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Calgary, Alberta
|
The interaction between the runway and the wheels is what provides forward motivation to get the appropriate airspeed for liftoff.
|
|
|
01-28-2008, 05:15 PM
|
#75
|
The new goggles also do nothing.
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GreatWhiteEbola
The runway/ treadmill. Gravity is sticking the plane to the runway. If there is no thrust the plane will move in the same direction as the treadmill. Opposite of what is required for an adequate airspeed for lift off.
|
Right, but the force of that drag is no where close to the force of the thrust. The plane is on wheels which are designed to roll with minimal friction.
Quote:
Now, I'm assuming that the treadmill with be matching the forward thrust of the plane or the experiment is debating a moot point as we all know how a plane works.
|
That's the assumption of the scenario.. now if you could spin the treadmill fast enough that the friction of the wheels generated enough drag to counteract the thrust perfectly, then yes the plane would stand still and nothing would happen. Though more likely the plane would flip over if that much drag was generated at the landing gear.
__________________
Uncertainty is an uncomfortable position.
But certainty is an absurd one.
|
|
|
01-28-2008, 05:16 PM
|
#76
|
The new goggles also do nothing.
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GreatWhiteEbola
The interaction between the runway and the wheels is what provides forward motivation to get the appropriate airspeed for liftoff.
|
Not in any airplane I've seen, the wheels on an airplane aren't driven, they just spin free (and have brakes).
__________________
Uncertainty is an uncomfortable position.
But certainty is an absurd one.
|
|
|
01-28-2008, 05:23 PM
|
#77
|
Such a pretty girl!
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GreatWhiteEbola
The interaction between the runway and the wheels is what provides forward motivation to get the appropriate airspeed for liftoff.
|
You are really looking at this the wrong way. Like Photon said, this isn't true for any existing aircraft. Planes are driven/propelled through the wheels like a car.
I should just do a free body diagram right now and just put this thing to rest.
__________________
|
|
|
01-28-2008, 05:38 PM
|
#78
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Calgary, Alberta
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by photon
Not in any airplane I've seen, the wheels on an airplane aren't driven, they just spin free (and have brakes).
|
We have to get to the same page here. Would you agree that there is a relationship between the runway and the wheels where gravity is concerned? Nothing to do with drag coefficients or friction.
Now the reason an airplane can break free from gravity is because it has a stable base <the runway> of which it can propagate itself forward. Now introducing a moving counteracting surface will cause the free wheeling land gear of the plane to no longer allow forward movement.
All forces being equal
|
|
|
01-28-2008, 06:53 PM
|
#79
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
What makes airfoils function? Airflow over the wing. The plane will not generate enough airflow over the wing to generate the lift required to achieve flight. If the plane remains stationary on the conveyor belt, there is no airflow over the wing. Even if the engine is at max power, of the plane does not move forward to generate any airflow the plane stands no chance of getting off the ground.
Does anyone know how planes take off on aircraft carriers? They use a steam powered catapult system that accelerates the plane to a speed where enough air flows over the foil to lift the plane. To make this function better, the ship turns into the wind to maximize the lift the plane gets from the slingshot. The plane is airbourne before the engines have a chance to pull/push the plane forward through the air. This is busted before it begins.
|
|
|
01-28-2008, 07:01 PM
|
#80
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Calgary, Alberta
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackArcher101
I should just do a free body diagram right now and just put this thing to rest.
|
Waiting...
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:25 PM.
|
|