Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-02-2012, 08:20 PM   #61
4X4
One of the Nine
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Exp:
Default

^ A bit drastic, but I like it.
4X4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2012, 08:44 PM   #62
BlackArcher101
Such a pretty girl!
 
BlackArcher101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Slava View Post
The problem with the lights is that (a) the ratio of users in the morning is roughly 5:10,000 (by my purely anecdotal and irritated calculation) and (b) they hold up those thousands of vehicles from getting North to the first legitimate E-W thoroughfare in the south. In other words, those lights at Southcentre are far enough north that a lot of volume has either headed east or west by that point, so its a greatly reduced issue.
I guess that's where I'm confused. I live on Lake Fraser and travel through these lights. Turn left to head south (the only reason you'd be at the light), you wait forever to turn as the light going north stays green for a long time. Sure the ratio of N-S and E-W cars is low, but the light pattern makes up for it. Returning home, it's the same situation with the N-S direction staying green for a long time. The cars waiting to get into Lake Fraser sit there a lot longer than the N-S cars do at a red. I do admit though that it causes considerable backup on the Anderson ramp to south Macleod which never recovers.

I just can't think of a better way to have traffic leave Lake Fraser other than having elevated ramps. If the belief that the intersection should have never been built, then development on lake fraser shouldn't have been allowed.
__________________
BlackArcher101 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2012, 08:52 PM   #63
Senator Clay Davis
Franchise Player
 
Senator Clay Davis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Maryland State House, Annapolis
Exp:
Default

Close the light at Lake Fraser and turn it into exit at Lake Fraser going northbound/an entrance to Macleod north, and force everyone going south to go to Canyon Meadows. If they're going south they need to go there anyways, might take a bit longer but so be it. You can also go northbound Macleod at the entrance near the Tim Hortons on Lake Fraser. But yeah come winter it becomes a disaster because of that light.
__________________
"Think I'm gonna be the scapegoat for the whole damn machine? Sheeee......."
Senator Clay Davis is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Senator Clay Davis For This Useful Post:
Old 10-02-2012, 09:01 PM   #64
Slava
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Senator Clay Davis View Post
Close the light at Lake Fraser and turn it into exit at Lake Fraser going northbound/an entrance to Macleod north, and force everyone going south to go to Canyon Meadows. If they're going south they need to go there anyways, might take a bit longer but so be it. You can also go northbound Macleod at the entrance near the Tim Hortons on Lake Fraser. But yeah come winter it becomes a disaster because of that light.
That's exactly what should be done. I've approached DCU about that, or at the very least close the intersection to LH turns during rush hour. In case there is a remaining person who lives in the ward that I haven't told though, she didn't have time to meet with me....on more than one request.
Slava is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2012, 05:34 AM   #65
Kavvy
Self Imposed Exile
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Well there is an update

http://www.calgaryherald.com/news/Co...523/story.html


Quote:
the community association will get three months to finally sit down with the developer and city planners in hopes of crafting a more tolerable project.

Council delayed final approval of the 1,400-home plan, ordering city officials to bring together the two sides whose encounters have mostly resulted in bitterness and acrimony.

The goal is to reach a compromise.

“I’m not convinced that will be the case, that much more can be gained,” said Geo-Energy Enterprises spokesman Ray Clark after council’s decision late Tuesday night.

The Shawnee-Evergreen Community Association president, whose group pressed for discussion about recreation space, traffic and groundwater concerns after long bouts of distrusting the developer, was more upbeat.

“The outcome is very good, now that we’ve gotten certain things we’ve asked for,” she said.
Kavvy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2012, 11:57 AM   #66
Mazrim
CP Gamemaster
 
Mazrim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: The Gary
Exp:
Default

All they've gotten is more time...unless the community association thinks this means there is guaranteed changes to be made?
Mazrim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2012, 02:51 PM   #67
Bigtime
Franchise Player
 
Bigtime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

DCU is getting nasty on twitter, calling out one of the developer reps (former Alderman Ray Clark):

Quote:
Originally Posted by Big Red YYC
Ray Clark should be fired by Geo Energy for his caustic insensitive shots at the Shawnee community. No way he can be at the table to partner
I was getting the cole's notes on twitter during the hearing the last couple of days, from tweets at the time it sounded like he gave a pretty frank account of how the community association was to deal with from the start.

Stuff like this probably won't help when the two sides sit down and meet again.
Bigtime is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2012, 03:28 PM   #68
bizaro86
Franchise Player
 
bizaro86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fotze View Post
Just poking through the website of the developer of this project. Looks like former Alderman Ray Clark is a principle with the company.
Their website: http://www.shawneepark.ca/developer says Ray Clark is a principal of Ray Clark Consulting, not Geo-Energy, which is the developer.
bizaro86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2012, 03:29 PM   #69
Regulator75
Franchise Player
 
Regulator75's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Behind Nikkor Glass
Exp:
Default

How can DCU keep getting re-elected? Do we need to wait until all the old people die in her district?
__________________

More photos on Flickr
Regulator75 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Regulator75 For This Useful Post:
Old 10-03-2012, 04:52 PM   #70
Rudee
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Exp:
Default

I live a few blocks away from this area, and I'm certainly not looking forward to having an additional 1400 homes in the area. The area is already congested as it is. 1400 new homes in this area is 1400 too many. It will affect everybody in the general area. (Milrise, Shawnessy, Somerset, Evergreen, Bridlewood)
Rudee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2012, 05:05 PM   #71
You Need a Thneed
Voted for Kodos
 
You Need a Thneed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kavy View Post
It should be clarified that Council approved the proposal, but only gave the bylaw a first reading. They didn't refer the proposal back to administration, or anything else.

Mostly, 3 more months for the community to come to terms that development is going to happen, and try and get a few more slight tweaks done if they want. The developer probably has to show council that they have taken the concerns of the community seriously, and talked to them in good faith, and they will get the second and third readings required to approve the proposal.
You Need a Thneed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2012, 01:02 AM   #72
1stLand
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rudee View Post
I live a few blocks away from this area, and I'm certainly not looking forward to having an additional 1400 homes in the area. The area is already congested as it is. 1400 new homes in this area is 1400 too many. It will affect everybody in the general area. (Milrise, Shawnessy, Somerset, Evergreen, Bridlewood)
The intersection of Fish Creek BLVD & James McKevitt is accident central. James McKevitt is busy as it is. This road will only get busier
1stLand is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2012, 01:12 AM   #73
jayswin
Celebrated Square Root Day
 
jayswin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bigtime View Post
Well aren't all those things that YNAT said what most people trot out as some of the advantages to living and raising a family in the burbs?

I can't let the kids play in the sand trap (although that would be awesome). However if instead of the course there was some green space and pathways I can definitely see how it would be a plus versus a golf course.
Sure, you can have an extra greenspace and park, with the added bonus of literally thousands of people being added to your neibourhood.
jayswin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2012, 08:05 AM   #74
bizaro86
Franchise Player
 
bizaro86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Regulator75 View Post
How can DCU keep getting re-elected? Do we need to wait until all the old people die in her district?
I think you probably need to wait until DCU dies. Although she could possibly be a vampire...
bizaro86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2012, 09:23 AM   #75
REDVAN
Franchise Player
 
REDVAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bizaro86 View Post
I think you probably need to wait until DCU dies. Although she could possibly be a vampire...
I've disliked her ever since she was elected. Too bad she didn't go provincial lol
__________________
REDVAN!
REDVAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2012, 10:08 AM   #76
Rerun
Often Thinks About Pickles
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Okotoks
Exp:
Default

Ok.. since I don't live in Calgary I don't have a clue who DCU is ?
Actually I don't have a clue who my Okotoks alderman is... (not even if they are called that in Okotoks)... or even if I have one..

Edit: Forget it.. I read the above link and found out who DCU is.
Rerun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2012, 10:12 AM   #77
polak
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Exp:
Default

The more I think about this, the more I believe the only way this works traffic-wise is if you cross 14th over Fish Creek.
polak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2012, 10:32 AM   #78
Ducay
Franchise Player
 
Ducay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by polak View Post
The more I think about this, the more I believe the only way this works traffic-wise is if you cross 14th over Fish Creek.
Or perhaps a road that rings around the city, and happens to run right beside Evergreen?


Problem is by the time that leg gets built, they'll have hover cars and all these points will be moot.
Ducay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2012, 05:32 PM   #79
mrkajz44
First Line Centre
 
mrkajz44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Deep South
Exp:
Default

Realistically, the only issue with this project is the potential traffic issues. However, for me it's more of a drop in the bucket kind of feeling considering how bad traffic already is on McLeod trail to get over Fish Creek Park.

Quite honestly, what is the difference between 1,400 homes in Shawnee versus 1,400 in Chaparral or Silverado? It's still the same amount of cars trying to get over Fish Creek park in the only way possible, McLeod Trail. Actually, there are likely more cars if the homes were built in Chaparral or Silverado as they are all single family homes; at least the Shawnee development will have townhomes and condos which many people will buy to use the train exclusively.
__________________
Much like a sports ticker, you may feel obligated to read this
mrkajz44 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2012, 05:41 PM   #80
Slava
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by polak View Post
The more I think about this, the more I believe the only way this works traffic-wise is if you cross 14th over Fish Creek.
Its almost like I've read that somewhere before!
Slava is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:58 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy