Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-04-2026, 01:11 PM   #61
dino7c
Franchise Player
 
dino7c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM View Post
Some post-trade interview. Go look it up.
So its a quote from years later? at the time he would have done 8 IMO, especially if Brad paid up. Like brad would hold players feet to the fire for 100k or an extra year but wouldn't lock this down?

Also, Tkachuk said he wanted to re-sign during his exit interveiw after the Dallas series if we are going by his "word"
__________________
GFG
dino7c is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2026, 01:11 PM   #62
Burning Beard
Franchise Player
 
Burning Beard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2020
Exp:
Default

Treliving needs to pursue a career at Sportsnet. His "in on everything" schtick would fit in wonderfully there.
Burning Beard is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2026, 01:16 PM   #63
Flamesfan05
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: Dallas
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Erick Estrada View Post
He actually started out his tenure very well but as the years passed his affinity for depth forwards and defensemen became costly as he started using draft picks as currency to attain them. It was also strange how he had no problems overpaying UFA's, yet squeezed his own players when it came to contract negotiations. Worst of all, it seems he doesn't learn from his mistakes as he's basically repeated all the same mistakes with the Leafs blowing picks and prospects on depth players while letting Marner (I realize he inherited that issue but he had two years to be proactive) walk for nothing. He's going to leave the Leafs in a situation somewhat similar to the Flames. In shambles.
The wizard was always a piece or two short, bad goalie then bad coaches, the extra pieces he brought in to fill the team were always terrible or useless, Hamonic, Brouwer, Neal, endless number of useless spared dmen and 4th liners. Then he ran out of time when the core left he cause he ####ed them so bad on contract when he had a chance.
Flamesfan05 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2026, 01:22 PM   #64
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dino7c View Post
So its a quote from years later? at the time he would have done 8 IMO, especially if Brad paid up. Like brad would hold players feet to the fire for 100k or an extra year but wouldn't lock this down?

Also, Tkachuk said he wanted to re-sign during his exit interveiw after the Dallas series if we are going by his "word"
It's a quote from right after he was traded, repeating supposedly the discussion he had at the time. If anything, he was exaggerating his willingness to extend long term IMO, to make himself look good.
GioforPM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2026, 01:26 PM   #65
Torture
Loves Teh Chat!
 
Torture's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Exp:
Default

wrong thread..
Torture is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2026, 01:31 PM   #66
Macindoc
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Exp:
Default

The good: initial RFA signings

The bad: trades (especially picks for depth D)

The ugly: UFA signings, cap management, coaching hires
Macindoc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2026, 03:36 PM   #67
calumniate
Franchise Player
 
calumniate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: A small painted room
Exp:
Default

Laughton being sat tonight along with McMann and Ekman-Larsson.

Laughton has 12 points in 42 games, averaging 13 mins of icetime
calumniate is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2026, 03:40 PM   #68
googol
Backup Goalie
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM View Post
It's a quote from right after he was traded, repeating supposedly the discussion he had at the time. If anything, he was exaggerating his willingness to extend long term IMO, to make himself look good.

Which team has offered their RFAs a bridge contract if they are not in cap trouble? Generally, all great RFAs are signed for the full term. You can pin this one on the GM and not the player.
googol is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2026, 03:45 PM   #69
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by googol View Post
Which team has offered their RFAs a bridge contract if they are not in cap trouble? Generally, all great RFAs are signed for the full term. You can pin this one on the GM and not the player.
I'm not saying Treliving shouldn't have offered a longer term. I think it would have been rejected in favour of a shorter term and higher money. Treliving overestimated Tkachuk's desire to stay and thought he'd still be around after the shorter contract (which everyone here thought was perfectly OK at the time).

And frankly, I don't believe anything out of Tkachuk about his intentions back then anyway. He loved the talks with Fla in his RFA neg period.
GioforPM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2026, 03:48 PM   #70
Jason14h
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM View Post
Some post-trade interview. Go look it up.
Gotcha so you're making stuff up again! Facts!
Jason14h is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2026, 03:49 PM   #71
Jason14h
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM View Post
It's a quote from right after he was traded, repeating supposedly the discussion he had at the time. If anything, he was exaggerating his willingness to extend long term IMO, to make himself look good.
A quote you can't provide ! Couldn't possibly be you are misremembering?

Facts!
Jason14h is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2026, 03:52 PM   #72
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason14h View Post
Gotcha so you're making stuff up again! Facts!
A. I never make stuff up and say it's a fact. Tell even one time I did. Show your work.

B. I just looked it up and I was a little wrong - he didn't say 5-6-7, he said 6-7-8. Which I take with a huge grain of salt. It'd be the lowest number, if that, when he's spinning post trade. And he claimed he was told a shorter deal was to "keep the team together" which he "wasn't too happy with".

Then he plays hero and talks about how he did the best for Calgary (except extending of course).

https://dailyhive.com/calgary/matthe...ar-deal-flames
GioforPM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2026, 03:58 PM   #73
Jason14h
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM View Post
A. I never make stuff up and say it's a fact. Tell even one time I did. Show your work.

B. I just looked it up and I was a little wrong - he didn't say 5-6-7, he said 6-7-8. Which I take with a huge grain of salt. It'd be the lowest number, if that, when he's spinning post trade. And he claimed he was told a shorter deal was to "keep the team together" which he "wasn't too happy with".

Then he plays hero and talks about how he did the best for Calgary (except extending of course).

https://dailyhive.com/calgary/matthe...ar-deal-flames
You just state things as fact - As you did here that:

Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM View Post
Tkachuk wasn't signing an 8 year deal. His idea of long term was 5 years - he said so.
But its more that you rag on others for "making stuff up"

I'm glad we could get the correct Fact out - That MT would have signed a 6-8 year deal vs the 5 you claimed.

See how easy it is for someone to misremember. They aren't always making something up.

Maybe this will help you to not be so sure of yourself all the time!
Jason14h is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Jason14h For This Useful Post:
Old 03-04-2026, 04:09 PM   #74
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason14h View Post
You just state things as fact - As you did here that:



But its more that you rag on others for "making stuff up"

I'm glad we could get the correct Fact out - That MT would have signed a 6-8 year deal vs the 5 you claimed.

See how easy it is for someone to misremember. They aren't always making something up.

Maybe this will help you to not be so sure of yourself all the time!
I don't call out people for making mistakes - I might point them out. But many are clearly making things up. You can't seem to discern the difference.
GioforPM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2026, 05:59 PM   #75
PuckSlap
Powerplay Quarterback
 
PuckSlap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2021
Exp:
Default

PuckSlap is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:10 PM.

Calgary Flames
2025-26






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy