Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-10-2026, 10:48 AM   #61
Bingo
Owner
 
Bingo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM View Post
I'd expect any top 10 pick to be at the top of the Flames prospect listing, now that Parekh has graduated.
That's going to be a big argument.

Games played ... likely graduated.
Position and age and how he got there ... still a prospect.
Bingo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2026, 12:15 PM   #62
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bingo View Post
That's going to be a big argument.

Games played ... likely graduated.
Position and age and how he got there ... still a prospect.
I'm reliably told I will agree with whatever you say.
GioforPM is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to GioforPM For This Useful Post:
Old 02-10-2026, 12:20 PM   #63
ForeverFlameFan
Franchise Player
 
ForeverFlameFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: NC
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM View Post
I'd expect any top 10 pick to be at the top of the Flames prospect listing, now that Parekh has graduated.
I still consider Parekh a prospect. He only has 14 GP.
ForeverFlameFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2026, 12:24 PM   #64
Flamefan1
Backup Goalie
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

Poop
Flamefan1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2026, 12:25 PM   #65
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ForeverFlameFan View Post
I still consider Parekh a prospect. He only has 14 GP.
This was about next year's list. He will have quite a few more by then, though maybe not enough so he would be out of Calder contention next year.
GioforPM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2026, 12:28 PM   #66
Caged Great
Franchise Player
 
Caged Great's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

I'd personally prefer one of the D-men first then the centers the Flames are picking outside the top 2. Actually I'd prefer Verhoff to everyone including McKenna and Stenberg.
__________________
Fireside Chat - The #1 Flames Fan Podcast - FiresideChat.ca
Caged Great is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Caged Great For This Useful Post:
Old 02-10-2026, 12:30 PM   #67
dissentowner
Franchise Player
 
dissentowner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SW Ontario
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM View Post
I'm reliably told I will agree with whatever you say.
Fact.
dissentowner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2026, 12:39 PM   #68
TrentCrimmIndependent
Franchise Player
 
TrentCrimmIndependent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2021
Location: Richmond upon Thames, London
Exp:
Default

Six or seven?

(~  ̄• ̄)~
TrentCrimmIndependent is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2026, 01:07 PM   #69
dino7c
Franchise Player
 
dino7c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Caged Great View Post
I'd personally prefer one of the D-men first then the centers the Flames are picking outside the top 2. Actually I'd prefer Verhoff to everyone including McKenna and Stenberg.
don't know about that, I would probably take him 3rd though
__________________
GFG

Last edited by dino7c; 02-10-2026 at 01:12 PM.
dino7c is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2026, 01:32 PM   #70
Monahammer
Franchise Player
 
Monahammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Alberta
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Caged Great View Post
I'd personally prefer one of the D-men first then the centers the Flames are picking outside the top 2. Actually I'd prefer Verhoff to everyone including McKenna and Stenberg.
Verhoeff isn't very good at defense and his offense isn't enough to balance that. IMO he will need to change the way he plays to find success at the next level.

I will be very disappointed if we end up with Verhoeff. I think at best he turns out to be Ekblad.
Monahammer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2026, 01:41 PM   #71
Bingo
Owner
 
Bingo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Monahammer View Post
Verhoeff isn't very good at defense and his offense isn't enough to balance that. IMO he will need to change the way he plays to find success at the next level.

I will be very disappointed if we end up with Verhoeff. I think at best he turns out to be Ekblad.
I liked him at his age in the WJC.

Seemed to get better and better and had a very long fuse.

Would be a great addition.
Bingo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2026, 01:51 PM   #72
traptor
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Sep 2021
Exp:
Default

Assuming we pick 5 or 6 and we end up with Bjork, Malhotra, Lawrence or Smits, I would be a little disappointed.


These don't project as franchise altering players to me.
I view them as more of the "Monahan" tier. A great player no doubt. A bonafide top of the roster player. But not someone you build a team around.

I would say Parekh is a better prospect then that group as his ceiling is higher.
traptor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2026, 02:11 PM   #73
Matty81
Franchise Player
 
Matty81's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Exp:
Default

I'm a big proponent for the flames acquiring a dynamic offensive forward and that's my hope, but if that can't happen and the best are gone at 6, Carels is an absolute beast when I've watched him. It would be really hard to be disappointed with him, I feel like he'll be a top pairing dman for 15 years in the league and he is a left shot which the flames are light on. I would rather him over Reid or Smits, he's a dynamic player offensively for a blueliner and has an edge to his game neither of those guys do.
Matty81 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Matty81 For This Useful Post:
Old 02-10-2026, 03:11 PM   #74
Robbob
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bingo View Post
That's going to be a big argument.

Games played ... likely graduated.
Position and age and how he got there ... still a prospect.
You are right, it is going to be a bit of an argument. I am not ready to graduate him...the only reason he will hit the games played mark is because he was unable to be sent down. It was a difficult developmental year because he wasn't able to go down.
Robbob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2026, 03:19 PM   #75
The EBUG's EBUG
Backup Goalie
 
Join Date: Oct 2025
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Monahammer View Post
Verhoeff isn't very good at defense and his offense isn't enough to balance that. IMO he will need to change the way he plays to find success at the next level.

I will be very disappointed if we end up with Verhoeff. I think at best he turns out to be Ekblad.
Granted he hasn't been a transcendent 1st overall pick, but if the Flames pick turns into an Aaron Ekblad type player then sign me up.
The EBUG's EBUG is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to The EBUG's EBUG For This Useful Post:
Old 02-10-2026, 03:45 PM   #76
blankall
Ate 100 Treadmills
 
blankall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The EBUG's EBUG View Post
Granted he hasn't been a transcendent 1st overall pick, but if the Flames pick turns into an Aaron Ekblad type player then sign me up.
Ekblad plays top pair on a Stanley Cup winning team, the Flames could do a lot worse.
blankall is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to blankall For This Useful Post:
Old 02-10-2026, 07:17 PM   #77
Fan69
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Monahammer View Post
Verhoeff isn't very good at defense and his offense isn't enough to balance that. IMO he will need to change the way he plays to find success at the next level.

I will be very disappointed if we end up with Verhoeff. I think at best he turns out to be Ekblad.
Ekblad is a very solid top pair guy. Only guy that is more important is a top line center. Dont agree with this assessment minute munching top pair guys are gold.
Fan69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:03 PM.

Calgary Flames
2025-26






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy