Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-10-2025, 04:03 PM   #61
Wolven
First Line Centre
 
Wolven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperMatt18 View Post
Andersson (50%) retention for 2027 1st + Bichsel feels like it would have been great..but my guess is Dallas might feel like that's too much.
Uhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh. I don't think it is Dallas saying 'no' to that deal.

Pretty much every other team that has expressed interest in Andersson would be able to beat a "late 1st in 2027 + Bichsel" offer and I would argue that payment is not enough to justify adding the retention slot.

Also, I still think the Andersson trade return needs to bring back a great C prospect.
__________________
Wolven is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2025, 04:17 PM   #62
Kipper_3434
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wolven View Post
Uhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh. I don't think it is Dallas saying 'no' to that deal.

Pretty much every other team that has expressed interest in Andersson would be able to beat a "late 1st in 2027 + Bichsel" offer and I would argue that payment is not enough to justify adding the retention slot.

Also, I still think the Andersson trade return needs to bring back a great C prospect.
Depends on your definition of great and you're entitled to your opinion. Why does it have to bring back a great C prospect? When's the last time an expiring UFA was moved for a top center prospect? What exactly is wrong with a high end LD or W prospect. Any prospect with elite potential coming back would be a win. Much more likely to get draft picks and a b level prospect.

Flames have very little leverage here.
Kipper_3434 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2025, 06:00 PM   #63
Wolven
First Line Centre
 
Wolven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kipper_3434 View Post
Depends on your definition of great and you're entitled to your opinion. Why does it have to bring back a great C prospect? When's the last time an expiring UFA was moved for a top center prospect? What exactly is wrong with a high end LD or W prospect. Any prospect with elite potential coming back would be a win. Much more likely to get draft picks and a b level prospect.

Flames have very little leverage here.
The Flames have most of the leverage here. The Stars have almost zero leverage.
- Andersson is not an expiring UFA, he has a full year left on his contract for a very reasonable cost
- Andersson is the top RD available on the market right now
- Andersson is the best D available as a UFA next summer
- The Flames can decide where Andersson goes, including keeping him in Calgary if the offers are garbage right now and trading him in March to whichever contender is willing to meet Conroy's price.

The Flames could use LD depth, we have no need for wingers, and we are desparate for C. Andersson may be the biggest trade chip the Flames have for the next few years, so I would hope that the priority is C.

A lot of people are thinking that the Stars or Golden Knights are the only options here, but there are easily 5 other teams that could use a RD upgrade.

It all comes down to who is going to meet Conroy's price.
__________________
Wolven is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Wolven For This Useful Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:55 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy