02-24-2025, 08:01 AM
|
#61
|
Powerplay Quarterback
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: MTL
|
Based on the comments here:
In: Celebrini, W.Johnston, Harley
Out: Stone, Doughty, Marchand
Bubble: Bedard, Pietrangelo, Weegar, Sanheim, Reinhart, Suzuki
|
|
|
02-24-2025, 08:08 AM
|
#62
|
Powerplay Quarterback
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: MTL
|
My updated 2026 roster:
Crosby - McKinnon - Reinhart
Marner - McDavid - Point
Celebrini - Bennett - W.Johnston
Hagel - Suzuki - Jarvis
Bedard
Toews - Makar
Morrissey - Theodore
Harley - Parayko
Weegar
Binnington
Thompson
Hill
Bubble: Bedard, Jarvis, Reinhart, Pietrangelo, Harley, Sanheim, Weegar, Blackwood, Thompson, Hill
|
|
|
02-24-2025, 08:17 AM
|
#63
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Flames Town
|
If Weegar couldn't make the team for this past tournament and got passed over a few times even with injuries, I don't think he is even on the bubble for 2026.
|
|
|
02-24-2025, 09:09 AM
|
#64
|
Powerplay Quarterback
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: MTL
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by keenan87
If Weegar couldn't make the team for this past tournament and got passed over a few times even with injuries, I don't think he is even on the bubble for 2026.
|
Agreed. I am hopeful since he can effectively play both R & L sides which makes him an ideal placeholder. But you are likely right.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to PepsiFree For This Useful Post:
|
|
02-24-2025, 10:15 AM
|
#66
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by keenan87
If Weegar couldn't make the team for this past tournament and got passed over a few times even with injuries, I don't think he is even on the bubble for 2026.
|
It might depend on how he starts next year. He didn't have a great start this year, overshadowed by Andersson's great start.
|
|
|
02-24-2025, 10:48 AM
|
#67
|
Crash and Bang Winger
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Calgary
|
I just realized this is the winter olympics we all voted "yes or no" on a bidding package years ago. Imagine we actually put in a bid and won it. Gold medal game USA v Canada in our new arena..
I know the Calgary olympic committee is probably shaking their head.
I know it was expensive.... but damn...
|
|
|
02-24-2025, 10:53 AM
|
#68
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Alberta
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlameyMcFlameFace
I just realized this is the winter olympics we all voted "yes or no" on a bidding package years ago. Imagine we actually put in a bid and won it. Gold medal game USA v Canada in our new arena..
I know the Calgary olympic committee is probably shaking their head.
I know it was expensive.... but damn...
|
Would probably have a train from airport to banff to go with the new arena too.
Should have done it for sure.
|
|
|
02-24-2025, 12:00 PM
|
#69
|
Powerplay Quarterback
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: MTL
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlameyMcFlameFace
I just realized this is the winter olympics we all voted "yes or no" on a bidding package years ago. Imagine we actually put in a bid and won it. Gold medal game USA v Canada in our new arena..
I know the Calgary olympic committee is probably shaking their head.
I know it was expensive.... but damn...
|
I don't have a dog in the fight, but the vote for no was so short-sighted and based on typical populist dog whistles.
The City was to pay $550M out of the estimated $5.1B price tag and get:
-a new events centre/arena
-renovated McMahon stadium
-renovated Olympic Oval
-a new fieldhouse
-2600 affordable housing units
Instead, Calgary is paying $520 and getting one of those things.
The renovated McMahon stadium, -renovated Olympic Oval, and the housing units will need to paid directly by Calgary tax payers instead.
|
|
|
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Funkhouser For This Useful Post:
|
|
02-24-2025, 01:33 PM
|
#70
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Funkhouser
I don't have a dog in the fight, but the vote for no was so short-sighted and based on typical populist dog whistles.
The City was to pay $550M out of the estimated $5.1B price tag and get:
-a new events centre/arena
-renovated McMahon stadium
-renovated Olympic Oval
-a new fieldhouse
-2600 affordable housing units
Instead, Calgary is paying $520 and getting one of those things.
The renovated McMahon stadium, -renovated Olympic Oval, and the housing units will need to paid directly by Calgary tax payers instead.
|
If it makes you feel better, you can pretend that the governments spent $30 million on the bid and didn't win, and after wasting the money they didn't have an appetite to support an arena and events center on it's own.
Honestly, it was a pretty shaky bid plan to begin with. They wanted to host some events in Edmonton and Whistler, aside from just in and around Calgary. I doubt the Olympic committee would have approved that.
__________________
"A pessimist thinks things can't get any worse. An optimist knows they can."
|
|
|
02-24-2025, 06:07 PM
|
#71
|
Crash and Bang Winger
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlamesAddiction
If it makes you feel better, you can pretend that the governments spent $30 million on the bid and didn't win, and after wasting the money they didn't have an appetite to support an arena and events center on it's own.
Honestly, it was a pretty shaky bid plan to begin with. They wanted to host some events in Edmonton and Whistler, aside from just in and around Calgary. I doubt the Olympic committee would have approved that.
|
Wow, I had no idea Edmonton and Whistler were also part of the plans.
|
|
|
02-24-2025, 06:25 PM
|
#72
|
Powerplay Quarterback
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: MTL
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlamesAddiction
If it makes you feel better, you can pretend that the governments spent $30 million on the bid and didn't win, and after wasting the money they didn't have an appetite to support an arena and events center on it's own.
Honestly, it was a pretty shaky bid plan to begin with. They wanted to host some events in Edmonton and Whistler, aside from just in and around Calgary. I doubt the Olympic committee would have approved that.
|
The summer olympics in Paris just had events in Polynesia…I don’t think it would be an issue to have a couple events in Whistler or Edmonton.
|
|
|
02-24-2025, 06:41 PM
|
#73
|
That Crazy Guy at the Bus Stop
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Springfield Penitentiary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Funkhouser
I don't have a dog in the fight, but the vote for no was so short-sighted and based on typical populist dog whistles.
The City was to pay $550M out of the estimated $5.1B price tag and get:
-a new events centre/arena
-renovated McMahon stadium
-renovated Olympic Oval
-a new fieldhouse
-2600 affordable housing units
Instead, Calgary is paying $520 and getting one of those things.
The renovated McMahon stadium, -renovated Olympic Oval, and the housing units will need to paid directly by Calgary tax payers instead.
|
Two wrongs don’t make a right. Just because Gondek and council screwed us on the current arena deal doesn’t mean the Olympic deal with any good either.
Would have cost us a hell of a lot more than 550 million once all was said and done.
The Olympics only serve to enrich the IOC and its partners. Host cities and countries never come out ahead.
|
|
|
02-24-2025, 07:38 PM
|
#74
|
Powerplay Quarterback
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: MTL
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cecil Terwilliger
Two wrongs don’t make a right. Just because Gondek and council screwed us on the current arena deal doesn’t mean the Olympic deal with any good either.
Would have cost us a hell of a lot more than 550 million once all was said and done.
The Olympics only serve to enrich the IOC and its partners. Host cities and countries never come out ahead.
|
Even if the cost to the City doubled (it wouldn't have), it would still have been a great deal. Not to mention the economic benefits associated with the Olympics beyond just infrastructure.
Yes the IOC is corrupt. Yes Calgary would have had a net gain on their investment. Both statements can be true.
|
|
|
02-24-2025, 07:39 PM
|
#75
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cecil Terwilliger
Two wrongs don’t make a right. Just because Gondek and council screwed us on the current arena deal doesn’t mean the Olympic deal with any good either.
Would have cost us a hell of a lot more than 550 million once all was said and done.
The Olympics only serve to enrich the IOC and its partners. Host cities and countries never come out ahead.
|
That and Calgary taxpayers also pay provincial and federal taxes. So saying that it would only cost Calgary $550M is disingenuous.
And the lack of affordable housing units is a chronic issue, spanning across many decades and many countries. It's not the kind of problem that one Olympics would magically fix.
|
|
|
02-24-2025, 07:54 PM
|
#76
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Auckland, NZ
|
My firm worked on a part of the Olympic bid, and it's really too bad the actual costs / benefits weren't communicated properly to the public at the time.
Hosting the Olympics would have uniquely provided external funding (provincial, federal, IOC, private) for the badly-needed renovations and rehabilitations of many of our legacy facilities in Calgary, including the Oval. For every $1 of municipal investment, we would have seen $5 returned from other sources - $1B from the province, $2B from the feds, $1B from the IOC (which was a very rare and unique offer), and $1B from private investment. This would have been the only chance to have Ontario, Quebec and other provinces help pay our infrastructure. Now we get to find ways to pay for all those renovations and rehabilitations on our own, from square one again. The IOC was all in on those games being in Calgary, for what it's worth.
I've said it before on here, but the Olympics would have been great to have, and at a pretty damn good value; the costs and ROI were just very poorly communicated to the public.
|
|
|
02-24-2025, 08:16 PM
|
#77
|
Powerplay Quarterback
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: MTL
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mathgod
That and Calgary taxpayers also pay provincial and federal taxes. So saying that it would only cost Calgary $550M is disingenuous.
And the lack of affordable housing units is a chronic issue, spanning across many decades and many countries. It's not the kind of problem that one Olympics would magically fix.
|
Who claimed it would?
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:41 PM.
|
|