Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-18-2024, 09:14 AM   #61
Bonded
Franchise Player
 
Bonded's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kyuss275 View Post
I don’t think it’s blown off. It might not have been as close as we were hoping, but I’m pretty sure that devils and flames are still talking
Oh I don’t think it’s necessarily dead but once Markstrom started I think whatever was out there that it was happening soon faded or broke down a little.
Bonded is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2024, 09:33 AM   #62
flambers
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Badgers Nose View Post
Dude, the smoke was ‘something is happening NOW!!!’ when it should have been ‘something interesting is happening and maybe there will be a trade.’

I don’t blame the insiders or their sources. I think fans jump to conclusions.

The offer was not good enough to take to Marky. NJD tried to force the issue through media whores ‘leaking’ stuff.

It’s very unlikely the offer was as crazy good as we all hoped it would be.

The focus should be on UFAs and that’s it. If we could rewind I would have liked Conroy to shoot down the rumours and say, ‘right now my priority is sorting out the UFA situation.’
Yet, neither side has made any comment what so ever

That alone should be a clue

Read the quotes from Pat Steinberg etc
flambers is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to flambers For This Useful Post:
Old 02-18-2024, 11:07 AM   #63
CliffFletcher
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2006
Exp:
Default

From the sounds of it, the Flames and Devils were working out the basis of a deal that was acceptable to both. But when it came time to talk retention, they couldn’t agree on what the Devils would have to add to the package. Then talks broke off. Markstrom was not asked to waive his NTC, because the deal wasn’t firmed up enough.

The rest was all fans working themselves into a lather over the speculated return, even though nobody credible has offered details about the pieces in the deal.

The deal might still get revived. But it’s hard to say who’s the more motivated party in the negotiations. Markstrom is worth more to the Devils if he’s in net for a playoff push and they make it to the post-season this year. He may be worth less to them in two weeks, he may be worth more.

The best thing about the Devils’ pitch might be that it prompted other teams to inquire about Markstrom.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by fotze View Post
If this day gets you riled up, you obviously aren't numb to the disappointment yet to be a real fan.

Last edited by CliffFletcher; 02-18-2024 at 11:19 AM.
CliffFletcher is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to CliffFletcher For This Useful Post:
Old 02-18-2024, 11:10 AM   #64
FanIn80
GOAT!
 
FanIn80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scroopy Noopers View Post
You’re right, we should hand out some extensions to this group and bring in some aging vets to push us over the top…
I'm not saying that. I'm just irked a bit that it seems our only trading options are in the top third of the standings.

CBJ got the 6th overall and 12th overall in back to back drafts from CHI (who were not a playoff team) for Seth Jones. The only thing is I'm not sure if his MNTC kicked in before the trade or not. If it did, then maybe he didn't care about going to a non-playoff team or something (which Hanifin very much will care about).

VAN's pick is going to be mid-to-high 20's. If we send Marky to NJD, then they're going to move up the standings and maybe even win a round or two, which will be low-20s.

I don't even know what we're doing with Hanifin, but I doubt he's gonna waive to go to ANA or OTT or... actually isn't he from BUF? (nope he's from BOS lol).

Tanev, I'm not certain we'd get a 1st for him unless it was to another top team who's desparate for a defensive, shot-blocking D to help them go deep in the playoffs (so another pick in the 20s at best).


Like, I get it... I'm just bitching about "cleaning house, but still not picking even once in the top 10."

I was under the impression that this draft sucked outside the top 13ish, but Sandman says the whole first round is good, and he knows his stuff, so I feel a bitt better.

(I still can't help but imagine what could have been if we'd moved guys earlier and played most of the season with an AHL team and no Markstrom keeping us in evey game. Like, it seems to me getting Celebrini would have been worth getting lousier returns from our trades.)

But again, though, I do feel better if the whole first round is as deep as Sandman says.
FanIn80 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2024, 11:22 AM   #65
Braden
Crash and Bang Winger
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Exp:
Default

Sec just told us Fitz re-engaged, yeah it felt like it was going places and it was exciting. He also put a time frame he could stand behind of Markstrom likely not being here for the start of next season. I get it can be disappointing it hasn't materialized yet /at all but I much prefer the excitment and hope of the last week as opposed to the alternative, which is complete crickets in every direction. I for one love hearing any little extra bit of information wherever it comes from especially from Sec and a few others on this board.
Braden is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Braden For This Useful Post:
Old 02-18-2024, 11:40 AM   #66
butterfly
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Apr 2022
Location: California
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FanIn80 View Post
(I still can't help but imagine what could have been if we'd moved guys earlier and played most of the season with an AHL team and no Markstrom keeping us in evey game. Like, it seems to me getting Celebrini would have been worth getting lousier returns from our trades.)

But again, though, I do feel better if the whole first round is as deep as Sandman says.
There's no way to just "get Celebrini". The Flames have a 95% chance of not getting him and San Jose has a 86.5% chance of not getting him.
butterfly is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to butterfly For This Useful Post:
Old 02-18-2024, 11:59 AM   #67
GUnit
Backup Goalie
 
GUnit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2021
Exp:
Default

Noah Norris Godspeed
GUnit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2024, 12:14 PM   #68
FanIn80
GOAT!
 
FanIn80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by butterfly View Post
There's no way to just "get Celebrini". The Flames have a 95% chance of not getting him and San Jose has a 86.5% chance of not getting him.
Jesus Christ dude. There's a better chance of getting him when you finish in the bottom 5 than there is when you finish 12th-17th.

I can't believe the things that need to be explained to people sometimes.
FanIn80 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2024, 12:17 PM   #69
Mass_nerder
Franchise Player
 
Mass_nerder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Barthelona
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FanIn80 View Post
I'm not saying that. I'm just irked a bit that it seems our only trading options are in the top third of the standings.

CBJ got the 6th overall and 12th overall in back to back drafts from CHI (who were not a playoff team) for Seth Jones. The only thing is I'm not sure if his MNTC kicked in before the trade or not. If it did, then maybe he didn't care about going to a non-playoff team or something (which Hanifin very much will care about).

VAN's pick is going to be mid-to-high 20's. If we send Marky to NJD, then they're going to move up the standings and maybe even win a round or two, which will be low-20s.

I don't even know what we're doing with Hanifin, but I doubt he's gonna waive to go to ANA or OTT or... actually isn't he from BUF? (nope he's from BOS lol).

Tanev, I'm not certain we'd get a 1st for him unless it was to another top team who's desparate for a defensive, shot-blocking D to help them go deep in the playoffs (so another pick in the 20s at best).


Like, I get it... I'm just bitching about "cleaning house, but still not picking even once in the top 10."

I was under the impression that this draft sucked outside the top 13ish, but Sandman says the whole first round is good, and he knows his stuff, so I feel a bitt better.

(I still can't help but imagine what could have been if we'd moved guys earlier and played most of the season with an AHL team and no Markstrom keeping us in evey game. Like, it seems to me getting Celebrini would have been worth getting lousier returns from our trades.)

But again, though, I do feel better if the whole first round is as deep as Sandman says.
Based on some of the comments from Conny, it sounds like he would be open to using the assets to find younger players (22-25) who haven't necessarily popped, but who have strong potential.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by snipetype View Post
k im just not going to respond to your #### anymore because i have better things to do like #### my model girlfriend rather then try to convince people like you of commonly held hockey knowledge.
Mass_nerder is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Mass_nerder For This Useful Post:
Old 02-18-2024, 12:24 PM   #70
butterfly
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Apr 2022
Location: California
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FanIn80 View Post
Jesus Christ dude. There's a better chance of getting him when you finish in the bottom 5 than there is when you finish 12th-17th.

I can't believe the things that need to be explained to people sometimes.
So take a lower return for a, I don't know, 3.5% increased chance at winning the lottery. Flames still would be better than ANA, CHI, SJ, CLS anyway.

No thanks.
butterfly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2024, 12:26 PM   #71
TrentCrimmIndependent
Franchise Player
 
TrentCrimmIndependent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2021
Location: Richmond upon Thames, London
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FanIn80 View Post
Jesus Christ dude. There's a better chance of getting him when you finish in the bottom 5 than there is when you finish 12th-17th.

I can't believe the things that need to be explained to people sometimes.
And if you don't win the lottery, which no one has a strong chance of, you still pick in the top 5 or 10 and get a better player.

Either way its of benefit to be closer to the bottom of the pack. Especially in a draft year that isn't as strong as most.
TrentCrimmIndependent is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2024, 12:30 PM   #72
butterfly
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Apr 2022
Location: California
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TrentCrimmIndependent View Post
And if you don't win the lottery, which no one has a strong chance of, you still pick in the top 5 or 10 and get a better player.

Either way its of benefit to be closer to the bottom of the pack. Especially in a draft year that isn't as strong as most.
The Flames already have a bottom 10 points percentage without doing that. It's a pretty weak argument to trade your trade chips for something less than the maximum return. Putting them in the press box might even make more sense.
butterfly is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to butterfly For This Useful Post:
Old 02-18-2024, 12:42 PM   #73
TrentCrimmIndependent
Franchise Player
 
TrentCrimmIndependent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2021
Location: Richmond upon Thames, London
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by butterfly View Post
The Flames already have a bottom 10 points percentage without doing that. It's a pretty weak argument to trade your trade chips for something less than the maximum return. Putting them in the press box might even make more sense.
Oh, if that was the argument being made then yes I agree.

Even though that may be frowned upon by some.

Good to see they've cracked the bottom 10. They absolutely need that next pick equivalent of what Monahan/tkachuk wound up being for them
TrentCrimmIndependent is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to TrentCrimmIndependent For This Useful Post:
Old 02-18-2024, 12:47 PM   #74
butterfly
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Apr 2022
Location: California
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TrentCrimmIndependent View Post
Oh, if that was the argument being made then yes I agree.

Even though that may be frowned upon by some.

Good to see they've cracked the bottom 10. They absolutely need that next pick equivalent of what Monahan/tkachuk wound up being for them
Yeah, they'd pick #9 based on points percentage right now. https://www.tankathon.com/nhl
butterfly is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to butterfly For This Useful Post:
Old 02-18-2024, 02:45 PM   #75
activeStick
Franchise Player
 
activeStick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by butterfly View Post
Yeah, they'd pick #9 based on points percentage right now. https://www.tankathon.com/nhl
Recent players in the last number of drafts taken at 9th. Sergachev, Meier, Ehlers, Horvat, Trouba, Dougie, Granlund, Jared Cowen, Bailey, Couture, James Sheppard, Brian Lee, Smid, Dion.
activeStick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2024, 02:51 PM   #76
TrentCrimmIndependent
Franchise Player
 
TrentCrimmIndependent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2021
Location: Richmond upon Thames, London
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by activeStick View Post
Recent players in the last number of drafts taken at 9th. Sergachev, Meier, Ehlers, Horvat, Trouba, Dougie, Granlund, Jared Cowen, Bailey, Couture, James Sheppard, Brian Lee, Smid, Dion.
I'll-take-it.gif
TrentCrimmIndependent is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2024, 03:14 PM   #77
kipperiggy
First Line Centre
 
kipperiggy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Sask (sorry)
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by activeStick View Post
Recent players in the last number of drafts taken at 9th. Sergachev, Meier, Ehlers, Horvat, Trouba, Dougie, Granlund, Jared Cowen, Bailey, Couture, James Sheppard, Brian Lee, Smid, Dion.
I don’t think Dion can be called recent anymore and that was possibly the deepest draft of all time.
__________________

Thanks AC!
kipperiggy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2024, 03:18 PM   #78
dino7c
Franchise Player
 
dino7c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kipperiggy View Post
I don’t think Dion can be called recent anymore and that was possibly the deepest draft of all time.
It was only 21 years ago, basically yesterday lol
__________________
GFG
dino7c is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to dino7c For This Useful Post:
Old 02-18-2024, 03:28 PM   #79
activeStick
Franchise Player
 
activeStick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kipperiggy View Post
I don’t think Dion can be called recent anymore and that was possibly the deepest draft of all time.
Totally fair comment hhaa. Crap, I'm old. Using the word 'recent' was probably the wrong choice by me too, as I left out the actual recent ones given we don't quite know how they'll turn out. I'm dumb.
activeStick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2024, 04:09 PM   #80
Brick
#1 Goaltender
 
Brick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Exp:
Default

Veteran defenseman (Noah Hanifin) likely to test free agency:

https://www.msn.com/en-ca/sports/nhl...a115f9cb&ei=16
Brick is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:22 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy