Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-23-2023, 09:51 AM   #61
Bingo
Owner
 
Bingo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny Makarov View Post
Andersson has been hot garbage for the past 90 games. Savard should be fired if he keeps putting him out there.
No over reaction there!

Calgary doesn't have a true offensive defenseman that is designed for the PP QB role.

Weegar bobbles pucks and doesn't get pucks to the net.
Hanifin has a muffin and telegraphs what he's doing.
Andersson over passes from the tip of the umbrella but has more of the skills needed than the other two.

I'd work with Andersson before firing people.
Bingo is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2023, 09:53 AM   #62
spotthefan
Farm Team Player
 
spotthefan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SutterBrother View Post
There's a long list of things the Flames need in order to rebuild, but perhaps first is a bonafide #1 defenceman. We've got good 2s+3s.

Adam Fox... wouldda, couldda, shouldda...

Reminds me of that old Elston cartoon with those words atop a picture of Gilmour, Hull, Selanne in Flames silks.
I apologize if this is sarcasm I misinterpreted, but Fox was never going to play for the Flames. They made the most of it.

I don't disagree with you otherwise. No Elite defence. BUt that is a symptom of the whole team. Solid players and if they were all able to go at the same time the team would be good. No game breakers.

The magic happens when you have a roster full of solid players, great role players at a cheap cost, and a game breaker or two.
spotthefan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2023, 10:00 AM   #63
Flamesfan05
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: Dallas
Exp:
Default

Team is mediocre. No game breaker, no PP QB, no top dman, one playmaker that doesn’t have chemistry. Not enough weapons to trade for one of those

Only solution is to draft one or two or three. Sure, have fun competing at the same time but don’t expect much from this group.
Flamesfan05 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Flamesfan05 For This Useful Post:
Old 11-23-2023, 10:01 AM   #64
Hot_Flatus
#1 Goaltender
 
Hot_Flatus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Uranus
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bingo View Post
No over reaction there!

Calgary doesn't have a true offensive defenseman that is designed for the PP QB role.

Weegar bobbles pucks and doesn't get pucks to the net.
Hanifin has a muffin and telegraphs what he's doing.
Andersson over passes from the tip of the umbrella but has more of the skills needed than the other two.

I'd work with Andersson before firing people.
Yep. There's a lot more wrong with the PP than Rasmus Anderson. It's weird that people point to the Flames lone defender on the PP as a primary reason for its struggles. If it were purely a distribution issue, sure. But this team can hardly set up and start to use the system in place on many nights.

Most of the forwards are incapable of shooting quickly and accurately, gaining zone entry without dumping and chasing, or doing little things like tipping pucks and deceiving defenders. What you're left with is an outnumbering situation, relying solely on hard work to get the job done and that doesn't cut it.

How in each of the last 2 seasons nobody has addressed this necessary skill position on the team is perplexing. You need to have a forward capable of bringing the puck up the ice and more often than not gaining zone entry without relying on dumping or making quick passes at the blue line that are often prayers. I don't even know who's in the system that might be capable of this because I don't see it, but it needs to be addressed for things to change. Even if a guy like Poirier comes up and is great on the PP, you still need a forward that can essentially dangle and skate the puck in the zone as well.
__________________
I hate to tell you this, but I’ve just launched an air biscuit
Hot_Flatus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2023, 10:02 AM   #65
gvitaly
Franchise Player
 
gvitaly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny Makarov View Post
Andersson has been hot garbage for the past 90 games. Savard should be fired if he keeps putting him out there.
Which D did a better job when Andersson missed 4 games? They tried both Hanifin and Weegar in that spot a couple of times this season. I think we might see a PP specialist on the 3rd pairing next year, but until then Andersson is the best option we have.
gvitaly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2023, 10:02 AM   #66
Johnny Makarov
Franchise Player
 
Johnny Makarov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bingo View Post
No over reaction there!

Calgary doesn't have a true offensive defenseman that is designed for the PP QB role.

Weegar bobbles pucks and doesn't get pucks to the net.
Hanifin has a muffin and telegraphs what he's doing.
Andersson over passes from the tip of the umbrella but has more of the skills needed than the other two.

I'd work with Andersson before firing people.
How many more games are you going to give him to figure it out? another 100?

Like he has the shot but he can't fathom the idea of shooting the puck at the net. It's so inept.

Maybe we should try 5 forwards out there. But I think if they gave Zadorov a chance he would be better than Ramsus by a mile.

Actually we do have the answer. As soon as Pourier is healthy they need to call him up asap.
__________________
Peter12 "I'm no Trump fan but he is smarter than most if not everyone in this thread. ”
Johnny Makarov is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Johnny Makarov For This Useful Post:
Old 11-23-2023, 10:04 AM   #67
Flamesfan05
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: Dallas
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gvitaly View Post
Which D did a better job when Andersson missed 4 games? They tried both Hanifin and Weegar in that spot a couple of times this season. I think we might see a PP specialist on the 3rd pairing next year, but until then Andersson is the best option we have.
Nobody can carry the puck to enter the zone and set up plays

It’s hilarious watching them try yesterday
Flamesfan05 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2023, 10:13 AM   #68
Enoch Root
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flamesfan05 View Post
Nobody can carry the puck to enter the zone and set up plays

It’s hilarious watching them try yesterday
This is the primary problem with the PP. We can argue about Andersson all we want, but their zone entries are beyond terrible. They went 3 full PPs last night where they were unable to enter the zone even once.

If you're the PP coach, and you're watching their ineptitude trying to enter the zone, and you can't improve upon what is currently going on, then just resign.
Enoch Root is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Enoch Root For This Useful Post:
Old 11-23-2023, 10:13 AM   #69
Hot_Flatus
#1 Goaltender
 
Hot_Flatus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Uranus
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny Makarov View Post
How many more games are you going to give him to figure it out? another 100?

Like he has the shot but he can't fathom the idea of shooting the puck at the net. It's so inept.

Maybe we should try 5 forwards out there. But I think if they gave Zadorov a chance he would be better than Ramsus by a mile.

Actually we do have the answer. As soon as Pourier is healthy they need to call him up asap.
And Poirier, a rookie, is going to just step in a take the PP from 12% to league average? It's not just the point position on the PP that is responsible. There are serious skill and lack of options on Flames PP that just make it way too easy to defend from zone entry all the way up to when they occasionally do set up. Andersson is not shooting because there is no lane for him to shoot into thanks to the terribly slow and predictable pace the Flames skill players are able to move the puck.

One thing is for sure, Zadorov is certainly not going to stir the drink lol.
__________________
I hate to tell you this, but I’ve just launched an air biscuit
Hot_Flatus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2023, 10:14 AM   #70
gvitaly
Franchise Player
 
gvitaly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flamesfan05 View Post
Nobody can carry the puck to enter the zone and set up plays

It’s hilarious watching them try yesterday
It was hard to watch. The predictable entries, the dump and chase and the puck handling really eats a lot of the PP time.

The PP is also way too static. The players were generating a lot more movement to start the year, but mostly reverted to standing still and watching the guy with the puck.

Kadri keeps whiffing on one timers.

Lindholm is never in position to use his shot.

Andersson is good at keeping the puck in the zone, but he doesn't walk the line or create any dangerous shots from the point.

Mangiapane/Lindholm don't create enough net front presence, so we don't get enough rebound or deflection attempts.

Huberdeau is trying to force passes because there are sticks in the lanes when everyone is standing still.

We keep losing face-offs and battles along the boards on the PP.
gvitaly is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to gvitaly For This Useful Post:
Old 11-23-2023, 10:16 AM   #71
Johnny Makarov
Franchise Player
 
Johnny Makarov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hot_Flatus View Post
And Poirier, a rookie, is going to just step in a take the PP from 12% to league average? It's not just the point position on the PP that is responsible. There are serious skill and lack of options on Flames PP that just make it way too easy to defend from zone entry all the way up to when they occasionally do set up. Andersson is not shooting because there is no lane for him to shoot into thanks to the terribly slow and predictable pace the Flames skill players are able to move the puck.

One thing is for sure, Zadorov is certainly not going to stir the drink lol.
So we do nothing and maintain the 12% average? lol
__________________
Peter12 "I'm no Trump fan but he is smarter than most if not everyone in this thread. ”
Johnny Makarov is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2023, 10:19 AM   #72
sss1
Backup Goalie
 
sss1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Exp:
Default

Happy when they win, happy when they lose. It is a strange feeling.
sss1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2023, 10:20 AM   #73
sss1
Backup Goalie
 
sss1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Exp:
Default

Sure Andersson can't QB, but the team can't even break in to the zone in the first place. There's so many missing pieces of the puzzle, why blame one of the most impactful players on the team?
sss1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2023, 10:22 AM   #74
Johnny Makarov
Franchise Player
 
Johnny Makarov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sss1 View Post
Sure Andersson can't QB, but the team can't even break in to the zone in the first place. There's so many missing pieces of the puzzle, why blame one of the most impactful players on the team?
This is why I would take the Dweeb back in a heart beat. It was so easy for us to gain the zone and set up.
__________________
Peter12 "I'm no Trump fan but he is smarter than most if not everyone in this thread. ”
Johnny Makarov is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2023, 10:38 AM   #75
Fan in Exile
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Exp:
Post

Nothing irritates me more on this board than all the hate Rasmus gets..."no offensive skill"..."hot garbage for 90 games"

Think back...way back to last frigging game. Who won it? Some of you deserve the misery you get out of the Flames struggling.

Treliving screwed up a lot but Rasmus is on one of the best contracts in the entire league.
Fan in Exile is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2023, 10:43 AM   #76
Hot_Flatus
#1 Goaltender
 
Hot_Flatus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Uranus
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny Makarov View Post
So we do nothing and maintain the 12% average? lol
The Flames are not a top end team, and rarely do mediocre to bad teams have quality PPs. It's a nature of the beast. You can hope to draft and develop more talent or you can make a trade (Hanifin, Lindholm) that nets you someone that can positively impact the PP in terms of puck possession, skill and zone entry.

This notion that there's another answer just being ignored in the Flames room or system is nonsense.
__________________
I hate to tell you this, but I’ve just launched an air biscuit
Hot_Flatus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2023, 10:45 AM   #77
chedder
Franchise Player
 
chedder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Exp:
Default

People might be overreacting but it is telling that the team and some fans think a 30 point per year defenceman should be our offensive saviour on the backend.
chedder is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2023, 10:48 AM   #78
The Yen Man
Franchise Player
 
The Yen Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Lol, I don't think taking our top point producing dman off the powerplay is going to improve it. Sounds kind of counter productive, no?
The Yen Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2023, 10:48 AM   #79
gvitaly
Franchise Player
 
gvitaly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fan in Exile View Post
Nothing irritates me more on this board than all the hate Rasmus gets..."no offensive skill"..."hot garbage for 90 games"

Think back...way back to last frigging game. Who won it? Some of you deserve the misery you get out of the Flames struggling.

Treliving screwed up a lot but Rasmus is on one of the best contracts in the entire league.
He's underpaid by about $4M for sure. He just isn't a top 10 - 15 D in the league, which is fine, but this fan base wants a player that will be one of the very top in his position. The lack of top end talent on this team is exactly what people get frustrated about. We don't have a go to guy when things get tough.
gvitaly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2023, 10:51 AM   #80
Calgary4LIfe
Franchise Player
 
Calgary4LIfe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Exp:
Default

Like it or not, Andersson is by far the best option there out of all defencemen. For the people that want him off, who do you want instead? Hanifin is much worse. I thought Weegar was going to take that job, but he hasn't shown himself to being as good. Maybe if Kylington was playing and continued developing, but he is essentially gone. Tanev? Zadorov? Gilbert? Desimone?


I just find it a bit strange to read: "Get him off the PP", when he is by far the best option there. Don't get me wrong - I don't have him as bona fide PP quarterback, but he is by far the best that the Flames have. Until Morin or Poirier or someone else steps up, Andersson is the best bet.



The only other option is to run with 5 forwards on PP1, but I am not sure that's the best scenario either, especially when you have to factor PP2.
Calgary4LIfe is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:51 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy