Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-13-2022, 10:22 PM   #61
Yoho
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: North America
Exp:
Default

No injuries tonight is key.

Go get that rest Flames.
Yoho is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2022, 10:23 PM   #62
TheCommodoreAfro
First Line Centre
 
TheCommodoreAfro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Yokohama
Exp:
Default

Keen to seen Daryl’s presser tonight.
TheCommodoreAfro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2022, 10:23 PM   #63
Locke
Franchise Player
 
Locke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Income Tax Central
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Cobra View Post
You can’t win them all, the Flames plated great.
I mean, they didnt exactly set the table how we'd have ideally preferred, but it was still okay I guess.
__________________
The Beatings Shall Continue Until Morale Improves!

This Post Has Been Distilled for the Eradication of Seemingly Incurable Sadness.

The World Ends when you're dead. Until then, you've got more punishment in store. - Flames Fans

If you thought this season would have a happy ending, you haven't been paying attention.
Locke is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Locke For This Useful Post:
Old 03-13-2022, 10:24 PM   #64
calgaryred
Franchise Player
 
calgaryred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Chilliwack, B.C
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Manhattanboy View Post
The guys on the radio last week said COL had some concerns about Kuemper but he was solid tonight.
I think the concerns is he is dominant at home, but on the road he let's in stinkers now and again.
calgaryred is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2022, 10:29 PM   #65
Inferno
Franchise Player
 
Inferno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: The Pas, MB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Locke View Post
I mean, they didnt exactly set the table how we'd have ideally preferred, but it was still okay I guess.
Yeah, for a tired team they played about as good as you could hope for. But they just couldn't generate the same chances they had yesterday. Most of the shots Kuemper stopped were stops an NHL goalie should make.
Inferno is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2022, 10:39 PM   #66
minnow
#1 Goaltender
 
minnow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Erie
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Locke View Post
I mean, they didnt exactly set the table how we'd have ideally preferred, but it was still okay I guess.
And the bread man didn't deliver today.
__________________
Go Flames Go!
minnow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2022, 10:50 PM   #67
memphusk
Franchise Player
 
memphusk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

Good effort tonight. Just time for some rest.
__________________
I hate just about everyone and just about everything.
memphusk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2022, 10:52 PM   #68
Tron_fdc
In Your MCP
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Watching Hot Dog Hans
Exp:
Default

We held the best team in the nhl and hands down cup favourite to almost a dead heat on the end of a brutal back to back schedule.

I’m ok with the result. Team played hard and you could see gave 100%.


I can’t wait for playoffs. This team is going to F someone up.
Tron_fdc is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Tron_fdc For This Useful Post:
Old 03-13-2022, 10:56 PM   #69
ComixZone
Franchise Player
 
ComixZone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Exp:
Default

https://twitter.com/user/status/1503217728856887300

Critical of Vladar for the first goal. Calls it a weak one, which is spot on. Vladar picked himself up after that one and put in a good game, but 1st goals are momentum swingers that's for sure.

"Their big guys scored, ours didn't"
ComixZone is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to ComixZone For This Useful Post:
Old 03-13-2022, 11:05 PM   #70
imeubu
Draft Pick
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Default

We've all heard the adage “hope for the best and plan for the worst”.

Regarding Claude Giroux. A few days ago I posted a question. “Why can't Calgary find a way to “rent” him?” You folks, in chorus, explained why there was “no hope” of that happening.

I want to assure everyone that I received your feedback sheepishly, immediately assuming the requisite “hound dog” body language while mumbling “yes of course, how silly of me, don't get up, I'll show myself out”.

Now that I'm able to sit up and take nourishment again I find myself confronting the other side of that coin. So, if the Flames indeed have no “hope for the best” Giroux wise, what is the most effective and responsible way for them to “prepare for the worst”?

IMO the “worst” scenario for Calgary has Giroux going to Colorado. A reasonably probable eventuality, again IMO. Colorado is a Cup favorite and they are conveniently able to exploit the LTIR via Landeskog and Girard).

My understanding is that the majority of those who “know hockey” say the Flames need more strength up the middle and more depth in their defense.

BTW, not that it matters, IMO the former is much more important.

Here's my question.

“What are the top 3 options available for the Flames to add strength up the middle between now and Trade Deadline?”

I don't know enough about the talent that might be available nor can I calculate the probabilities because I don't fully understand the various “currencies” NHL teams seem to use when they barter (no trade clauses, cap, character, connections and what seems like dozens of other types of data available only to those with “inside” information.

From my experience on this site a lot of you seem to stay up to date about such things.
__________________
In individuals, insanity is rare; but in groups, parties, nations and epochs, it is the rule.
imeubu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2022, 11:15 PM   #71
AC
Resident Videologist
 
AC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dino7c View Post
"week of hell"
Flames play .666 hockey
Team is awesome
See? I was right all along.

Hail Satan.
AC is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 13 Users Say Thank You to AC For This Useful Post:
Old 03-14-2022, 12:12 AM   #72
Steve Macfarlane
Crash and Bang Winger
 
Join Date: Oct 2021
Exp:
Default

The entire Flames group was a little off - but had to be expected with the schedule they've endured lately.

It was pretty much guaranteed loss night.

https://calgaryhockeynow.com/calgary...han-mackinnon/

Last edited by Steve Macfarlane; 03-14-2022 at 12:14 AM. Reason: wrong URL
Steve Macfarlane is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2022, 12:19 AM   #73
bigrangy
Franchise Player
 
bigrangy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Exp:
Default

Caught the first live, thought the Flames played ok. Solid road period. Went to hockey, so watched the highlights of the rest. Flames didn’t seem to get much for chances in the highlight pack and Vladar made some huge saves. Sounds like it could have pretty much went either way which is solid for the schedule challenge.

Still think the Flames need to add one more good piece this week, but they can definitely hang with anyone as it is.
__________________
Oliver Kylington is the greatest and best player in the world
bigrangy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2022, 12:32 AM   #74
oldschoolcalgary
Franchise Player
 
oldschoolcalgary's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Exp:
Default

Calgary played pretty well, considering they played the night before and then had to travel to Colorado...

Vladar played really well. The Avs were rested and still smarting from the previous home loss, so I am not particularly surprised nor disappointed with the result.
oldschoolcalgary is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2022, 12:32 AM   #75
Yoho
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: North America
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by imeubu View Post
We've all heard the adage “hope for the best and plan for the worst”.

Regarding Claude Giroux. A few days ago I posted a question. “Why can't Calgary find a way to “rent” him?” You folks, in chorus, explained why there was “no hope” of that happening.

I want to assure everyone that I received your feedback sheepishly, immediately assuming the requisite “hound dog” body language while mumbling “yes of course, how silly of me, don't get up, I'll show myself out”.

Now that I'm able to sit up and take nourishment again I find myself confronting the other side of that coin. So, if the Flames indeed have no “hope for the best” Giroux wise, what is the most effective and responsible way for them to “prepare for the worst”?

IMO the “worst” scenario for Calgary has Giroux going to Colorado. A reasonably probable eventuality, again IMO. Colorado is a Cup favorite and they are conveniently able to exploit the LTIR via Landeskog and Girard).

My understanding is that the majority of those who “know hockey” say the Flames need more strength up the middle and more depth in their defense.

BTW, not that it matters, IMO the former is much more important.

Here's my question.

“What are the top 3 options available for the Flames to add strength up the middle between now and Trade Deadline?”

I don't know enough about the talent that might be available nor can I calculate the probabilities because I don't fully understand the various “currencies” NHL teams seem to use when they barter (no trade clauses, cap, character, connections and what seems like dozens of other types of data available only to those with “inside” information.

From my experience on this site a lot of you seem to stay up to date about such things.
Yoho is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Yoho For This Useful Post:
Old 03-14-2022, 01:31 AM   #76
3rd liner
Franchise Player
 
3rd liner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Exp:
Default

No issues with the game tonight. Other than kadri is a whiny little b*tch. But we all knew that already. Flames gave a hell of an effort. If Colorado had played 5 in 7 and was in the flames barn the flames would have smoked them. Get some rest boys, no need to be scared of the avs anymore.
3rd liner is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to 3rd liner For This Useful Post:
Old 03-14-2022, 02:12 AM   #77
DeluxeMoustache
 
DeluxeMoustache's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ComixZone View Post
https://twitter.com/user/status/1503217728856887300

Critical of Vladar for the first goal. Calls it a weak one, which is spot on. Vladar picked himself up after that one and put in a good game, but 1st goals are momentum swingers that's for sure.

"Their big guys scored, ours didn't"

I find this a bit bizarre

“spot on”

Meaghan says you can’t give an elite player like MacKinnon time and space

Darryl calls the goal weak (didn’t call out the goalie directly, but you go ahead and call out the implication)

Then he says entering the third 1-0 is perfect

I am absolutely certain that all goalies let in some goals, based on play situation, shooter location, shot placement (dependent on time and space), goalie positioning, time to respond, and their subsequent reaction (if it’s even a factor, which depends on physics)

The case in favour of goal “weakness”:
There is a disturbing trend with Vladar. When you give Ovechkin and MacKinnon time and space, ability to place their shots, it’s on the goalie?

It’s kind of comical. These guys aren’t among the top 10 in the NHL because they have trouble scoring when given all the time and space in the world
DeluxeMoustache is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to DeluxeMoustache For This Useful Post:
Old 03-14-2022, 02:27 AM   #78
FlamesAddiction
Franchise Player
 
FlamesAddiction's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

This was about as much of a throw away game as you can get. Back-to-back, on the road, 5 games in 7 nights, not likely to have huge playoff implications, and day light savings time to boot.

I am just glad that they battled hard and looked seriously pissed off to lose tonight. They expect to win every night no matter what the obstacles are, which is a really good sign of a great team.
__________________
"A pessimist thinks things can't get any worse. An optimist knows they can."

Last edited by FlamesAddiction; 03-14-2022 at 02:31 AM.
FlamesAddiction is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to FlamesAddiction For This Useful Post:
Old 03-14-2022, 04:39 AM   #79
Roof-Daddy
Franchise Player
 
Roof-Daddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Exp:
Default

With all things considered, that was a moral victory for the Flames. An almost impossible situation thrust upon them by league that has been boning them all season with a disgusting schedule.

The Flames have had moral victories in the past, and they usually ring hollow but this one is just fine while sitting atop the division by 5 points and 2 games in hand.
Roof-Daddy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2022, 05:31 AM   #80
Huntingwhale
Franchise Player
 
Huntingwhale's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Exp:
Default

Seeing the Flames hang around the best team in the league and put up a fight, after all the games they have played, definitely cannot fault that effort. Flames went down swinging.

This game was pretty much an automatic loss, but even good teams are allowed to lose to even greater teams like the Avs. Onto the next.
Huntingwhale is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:09 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy