Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-15-2021, 03:56 PM   #61
GreenLantern2814
Franchise Player
 
GreenLantern2814's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheScorpion View Post
I know they had to do it, but Ritchie is terrible.
If he’s on the team, he brings a certain element they lack beyond Lucic.

If he’s not, he barely registers against the cap.

Who cares.
__________________
”All you have to decide is what to do with the time that is given to you.”

Rowan Roy W-M - February 15, 2024
GreenLantern2814 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2021, 04:07 PM   #62
Jay Random
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GreenLantern2814 View Post
Who cares.
Everyone is required to care, because Treliving should be fired immediately.

Get with the program, Comrade.
__________________
WARNING: The preceding message may not have been processed in a sarcasm-free facility.
Jay Random is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Jay Random For This Useful Post:
Old 07-15-2021, 04:27 PM   #63
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheScorpion View Post
What is he here to do, exactly? Just being a big lunk isn't good enough in 2021.

The Flames got demonstrably worse in every single facet of the game during Ritchie's shifts.
Fill an expansion draft requirement. That’s it.
GioforPM is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to GioforPM For This Useful Post:
Old 07-15-2021, 04:29 PM   #64
djsFlames
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Exp:
Default

Of course we did.

Its fine, but he needs to play in the bottom 6 exclusively.
djsFlames is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2021, 04:30 PM   #65
TheScorpion
First round-bust
 
TheScorpion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: speculating about AHL players
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM View Post
Fill an expansion draft requirement. That’s it.
Yes. The issue is that the last time Calgary signed somebody solely for that purpose, they ended up playing him anyway. And he, like Ritchie, was no good.
__________________
Need a great deal on a new or pre-owned car? Come see me at Platinum Mitsubishi — 2720 Barlow Trail NE

TheScorpion is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to TheScorpion For This Useful Post:
Old 07-15-2021, 04:30 PM   #66
KootenayFlamesFan
Commie Referee
 
KootenayFlamesFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Small town, B.C.
Exp:
Default

ED requirement, tough. 13th forward. Ok, sure.

Besides that he’s pretty awful. My biggest concern I that he wont be a 4th liner because Sutter seems to like him. At least it’s only 1 year.
KootenayFlamesFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2021, 04:33 PM   #67
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheScorpion View Post
Yes. The issue is that the last time Calgary signed somebody solely for that purpose, they ended up playing him anyway. And he, like Ritchie, was no good.
Because the Flames always do everything exactly the same way every single time.

Who are you talking about anyway? I can only remember Tom McCollum.
GioforPM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2021, 04:38 PM   #68
1qqaaz
Franchise Player
 
1qqaaz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Indiana
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM View Post
Because the Flames always do everything exactly the same way every single time.

Who are you talking about anyway? I can only remember Tom McCollum.
How shocked would you be if Ritchie spent time on the top 3 lines this year?
I would actually be shocked if he didn't.

I think he'll get quite a bit of use for "someone only signed for expansion reasons."
1qqaaz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2021, 04:39 PM   #69
TheScorpion
First round-bust
 
TheScorpion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: speculating about AHL players
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM View Post
Because the Flames always do everything exactly the same way every single time.

Who are you talking about anyway? I can only remember Tom McCollum.
Bartkowski.
__________________
Need a great deal on a new or pre-owned car? Come see me at Platinum Mitsubishi — 2720 Barlow Trail NE

TheScorpion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2021, 04:40 PM   #70
FlamesAddiction
Franchise Player
 
FlamesAddiction's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM View Post
Fill an expansion draft requirement. That’s it.
And probably the best option out of the others, like Nordstrom, Leivo, Simon, Rinaldo, and whoever else. Assuming those guys haven't signed overseas yet anyway.
__________________
"A pessimist thinks things can't get any worse. An optimist knows they can."
FlamesAddiction is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2021, 04:40 PM   #71
Jay Random
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Exp:
Default

EDIT: Question answered while I was asking.
__________________
WARNING: The preceding message may not have been processed in a sarcasm-free facility.

Last edited by Jay Random; 07-15-2021 at 04:44 PM.
Jay Random is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2021, 04:48 PM   #72
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1qqaaz View Post
How shocked would you be if Ritchie spent time on the top 3 lines this year?
I would actually be shocked if he didn't.

I think he'll get quite a bit of use for "someone only signed for expansion reasons."
If he’s on a top 9 line it will be as a fill-in. That happens. Who would you have signed for expansion purposes?

BTW Bart was a bit different. He was signed for two years, indicating they were going to at least try him. Plus they wanted some flexibility to cut some underperformers like Wideman and Jokipaaka loose.
GioforPM is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to GioforPM For This Useful Post:
Old 07-15-2021, 04:50 PM   #73
Jay Random
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1qqaaz View Post
How shocked would you be if Ritchie spent time on the top 3 lines this year?
I would actually be shocked if he didn't.
I would be shocked if the Flames never had an injury, suspension, or game misconduct penalty on their top three lines all season, and therefore were able to go the whole season without using a 4th-line forward on a higher line.

Last year Ritchie was used intermittently as a top-6 RW because the team absolutely refused to move Lindholm back to the wing and all the other options, except Mangiapane, blew chunks. Ritchie wasn't noticeably worse than Leivo, Nordstrom, or Simon in that role. If Tkachuk really is being converted to RW full-time, as it currently appears, that is much less likely to happen again.

I fault the Flames' management and coaches for keeping Lindholm at C come hell or high water. That not only made RW a wasteland, it pushed Bennett out of his logical roster spot (the one they had previously promised to try him at) and ended in pushing him right off the team. It may have maximized Lindholm's performance for the year, but it did far more harm than good to the team as a whole. I would have told Lindholm, ‘So sorry, but we need at least one good player on the right side and you're it. We have other guys who can play centre.’
__________________
WARNING: The preceding message may not have been processed in a sarcasm-free facility.

Last edited by Jay Random; 07-15-2021 at 04:53 PM.
Jay Random is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2021, 04:50 PM   #74
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FlamesAddiction View Post
And probably the best option out of the others, like Nordstrom, Leivo, Simon, Rinaldo, and whoever else. Assuming those guys haven't signed overseas yet anyway.
Nordstrom did IIRC. Leivo has a better skill set but he has injury issues and also would have wanted more. Rinaldo actually doesn’t meet the games played criteria. And Simon was the biggest bust here IMO.
GioforPM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2021, 05:07 PM   #75
TOfan
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DeluxeMoustache View Post
https://frozenpool.dobbersports.com/.../brett-ritchie

Brett Ritchie spent 135 minutes or 37% of his ice time with Gaudreau and Monahan and got zero (0) points with that line. 7 of his 8 even strength points were when lined up with Derek Ryan

Also, there are other teams that slot guys like Spezza or Perry onto bottom lines at league min deals and get guys that are around .5 ppg in that role. But those are playoff teams
Spezza said himself he would play for the Leafs less than league min if he could. That's poor comparison, but I see you are willing to take the cheap shot anyway, no surprise.

If there happens to be a player out there with little tread left on the tire who is willing to play for the Calgary Flames for league min on a one year deal, by all means, let us know. Let Treliving know while you're at it. Any 37+ year old UFA's out there from Southern Alberta or Sask?....(honest question)
TOfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2021, 05:13 PM   #76
Goriders
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Exp:
Default

I don’t mind this. We need some forwards who weigh more than 135 lbs.

Just don’t play him on the first line please!!
Goriders is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2021, 05:13 PM   #77
FlamesAddiction
Franchise Player
 
FlamesAddiction's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TOfan View Post
Spezza said himself he would play for the Leafs less than league min if he could. That's poor comparison, but I see you are willing to take the cheap shot anyway, no surprise.

If there happens to be a player out there with little tread left on the tire who is willing to play for the Calgary Flames for league min on a one year deal, by all means, let us know. Let Treliving know while you're at it. Any 37+ year old UFA's out there from Southern Alberta or Sask?....(honest question)
Ryan Getzlaf fits the bill, but he is too young at 36.
__________________
"A pessimist thinks things can't get any worse. An optimist knows they can."
FlamesAddiction is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2021, 05:15 PM   #78
Knut
 
Knut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Exp:
Default

Sam Bennett is gone and we were running out of players to complain about. Good move.
Knut is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Knut For This Useful Post:
Old 07-15-2021, 05:17 PM   #79
Goriders
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FlamesAddiction View Post
And probably the best option out of the others, like Nordstrom, Leivo, Simon, Rinaldo, and whoever else. Assuming those guys haven't signed overseas yet anyway.
I didn’t mind Leivo in the bottom 6.

Top 6 made me nauseous at times.
Goriders is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2021, 05:33 PM   #80
TOfan
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FlamesAddiction View Post
Ryan Getzlaf fits the bill, but he is too young at 36.
Ryan Getzlaf doesn’t want to leave Anaheim.

The challenge here, which seems lost on DM, is the player has to want to play for your team. Especially those on league min deals. Of course the Flames could offer more than league min, but then we would be reading posts about how Treliving should be fired immediately for signing said player.
TOfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:06 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy