Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-02-2021, 07:09 PM   #61
GGG
Franchise Player
 
GGG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: California
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by powderjunkie View Post
How do you figure?

Bad teams can get better returns for their assets and it keeps fans more engaged. Shrewd teams leverage their cap space effectively

And LTIR is the only place where tweaks are needed.

I don't know anything about the salary cap in NFL, but if you put a player on IR they are done for the season. The NHL already has IR and LTIR (TBH I've never dug into the difference)...doesn't seem like it would be hard to implement a rule where you 'earn' playoff eligibility for contracts over a certain threshold.
The trade deadline shortens windows and increases the high and low cycles.

So a team that is a contender gives up future assets to add extra short term assets. You are less competitive if you don’t. So cup contenders add. This causes their farm system to be depleted and eventually lead to there run ending.

On the other side teams that acquire multiple first round picks increase the chances of having multiple impact players. Over multiple years this leads to having more high quality players which causes them to overshoot and become a contender AND those who don’t follow this add and rebuild process won’t win.

So in general it increases the height of the cycles teams go through and as opposed to managing to be competitive over years you encourage the tank.

For a far worse version of it the NBA buyout market is even more ridiculous
GGG is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to GGG For This Useful Post:
Old 04-02-2021, 08:03 PM   #62
powderjunkie
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GGG View Post
The trade deadline shortens windows and increases the high and low cycles.

So a team that is a contender gives up future assets to add extra short term assets. You are less competitive if you don’t. So cup contenders add. This causes their farm system to be depleted and eventually lead to there run ending.

On the other side teams that acquire multiple first round picks increase the chances of having multiple impact players. Over multiple years this leads to having more high quality players which causes them to overshoot and become a contender AND those who don’t follow this add and rebuild process won’t win.

So in general it increases the height of the cycles teams go through and as opposed to managing to be competitive over years you encourage the tank.

For a far worse version of it the NBA buyout market is even more ridiculous
Fair assessment. There isn't a gun to anybody's head at the TDL, and the biggest trades rarely pay off (at least to the cup).

Superteams are fun. The NBA is a bit ridiculous, but it's also fun. For a lot of people (myself included) the wheeling/dealing is often more interesting/intriguing than the product on the ice.
powderjunkie is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:45 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy