Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-21-2020, 05:27 PM   #61
TheIronMaiden
Franchise Player
 
TheIronMaiden's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: ATCO Field, Section 201
Exp:
Default

Not having to expose Valimaki is a great feeling. As it stands now, Kyllington is the most likely to get picked up by Seattle. The only way that changes imo, is if he has a break out year and he forces the Flames to protect him.
TheIronMaiden is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2020, 05:37 PM   #62
Nelson
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Exp:
Default

F: Monahan, Gaudreau, Lindholm, Tkachuk, Bennett, Mangiapane, Dube

D: Hanifin, Andersson, Kylington, (Valimaki)

G: Markstrom

-I’m assuming Lucic waives his NMC for the expansion draft.
-I wouldn’t protect Backlund, Ryan, Gio or Tanev because I’m taking a long view.
Nelson is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Nelson For This Useful Post:
Old 10-21-2020, 06:07 PM   #63
powderjunkie
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Exp:
Default

Preference of who we lose:
Rittich
Kylington
Backlund


Jake Allen seems like the ideal 1A for SEA. I imagine they’d try for a couple of 25-27 yo to compete for the 1B/2G, but if they think they can be immediately competitive, Rittich might be the next best guy available for a platoon (and is young enough). I think we’d be better off with a cheaper and more stable vet as backup.

I’m a toss up between the Swedes...I’m not convinced this org has the patience to develop Kylington properly, but he certainly has breakout potential.

If we’re lucky enough for Backlund to become expendable (for good reasons), then he should have the highest trade value of the lot. If he falls off early this team is screwed anyways.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
CP's 15th Most Annoying Poster! (who wasn't too cowardly to enter that super duper serious competition)
powderjunkie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2020, 06:15 PM   #64
Jiri Hrdina
Franchise Player
 
Jiri Hrdina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Exp:
Default

Kylington has done nothing to earn being protected. Maybe that changes this year - though I personally doubt it.
At some point potential has to translate into performance.
Jiri Hrdina is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Jiri Hrdina For This Useful Post:
Old 10-21-2020, 07:13 PM   #65
SeanCharles
First Line Centre
 
SeanCharles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Exp:
Default

I really hope to see Kylington’s game take off next season. Play him on the right side (he played there throughout his entire career prior to coming to Stockton) and give him some PP mins..

Tkachuk
Gaudreau
Lindholm
Monahan
Mangipane
Dube
Bennett

Andersson
Hanifin
Kylington

Markstrom

I don’t expect it to happen because I have a feeling the team will protect Backlund and Gio out of respect.

We will lose a good player no matter how it shakes out it seems.

If it’s me, I protect the guys on the right side of 30, unless Kylington shows no signs of progress.
SeanCharles is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2020, 07:17 PM   #66
kyuss275
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by powderjunkie View Post
Preference of who we lose:
Rittich
Kylington
Backlund


Jake Allen seems like the ideal 1A for SEA. I imagine they’d try for a couple of 25-27 yo to compete for the 1B/2G, but if they think they can be immediately competitive, Rittich might be the next best guy available for a platoon (and is young enough). I think we’d be better off with a cheaper and more stable vet as backup.

I’m a toss up between the Swedes...I’m not convinced this org has the patience to develop Kylington properly, but he certainly has breakout potential.

If we’re lucky enough for Backlund to become expendable (for good reasons), then he should have the highest trade value of the lot. If he falls off early this team is screwed anyways.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Rittich is ufa.
kyuss275 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2020, 07:21 PM   #67
MisterJoji
Franchise Player
 
MisterJoji's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: The toilet of Alberta : Edmonton
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kyuss275 View Post
Rittich is ufa.

I don’t think that matters. Engelland was picked and was going to be a UFA days later.
__________________
"Illusions Michael, tricks are something a wh*re does for money ....... or cocaine"
MisterJoji is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2020, 07:23 PM   #68
kyuss275
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterJoji View Post
I don’t think that matters. Engelland was picked and was going to be a UFA days later.
True, but the players that were exposed were pretty bad .
kyuss275 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2020, 07:24 PM   #69
CalgaryFan1988
Franchise Player
 
CalgaryFan1988's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterJoji View Post
I don’t think that matters. Engelland was picked and was going to be a UFA days later.
Engelland was a special circumstance though.
CalgaryFan1988 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2020, 07:39 PM   #70
codynw
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jiri Hrdina View Post
Kylington has done nothing to earn being protected. Maybe that changes this year - though I personally doubt it.
At some point potential has to translate into performance.

At some point they need to give him the opportunity to reach his potential. Just like Bennett. Give him regular ice time, a good partner and a bunch of powerplay time, since that's supposed to be one of his biggest strengths anyways. Not gonna see what he can do if you don't give him the chance.


And I cannot see this team risking letting Gio go to Seattle. They'll give up a pick to keep him if they have to, but Gio is definitely going to stay in Calgary for the rest of his career.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by CroFlames View Post
Before you call me a pessimist or a downer, the Flames made me this way. Blame them.
codynw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2020, 08:04 PM   #71
Phaneuf_Phan
Scoring Winger
 
Phaneuf_Phan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Exp:
Default

Let Gio go! Free up some big cap space and let's move on. This is a business of winning. He's had enough chances.
Phaneuf_Phan is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Phaneuf_Phan For This Useful Post:
Old 10-21-2020, 08:08 PM   #72
Flamenspiel
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Exp:
Default

Gio will be protected if he is good enough to be protected, there will be no sentiments.
Flamenspiel is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Flamenspiel For This Useful Post:
Old 10-21-2020, 08:16 PM   #73
chubeyr1
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by codynw View Post
At some point they need to give him the opportunity to reach his potential. Just like Bennett. Give him regular ice time, a good partner and a bunch of powerplay time, since that's supposed to be one of his biggest strengths anyways. Not gonna see what he can do if you don't give him the chance.


And I cannot see this team risking letting Gio go to Seattle. They'll give up a pick to keep him if they have to, but Gio is definitely going to stay in Calgary for the rest of his career.
Why would you protect Gio? He is 37 years old right now. Unlikely Seattle would claim him. They want young skilled players for the future.

Yet if they did claim him all of a sudden we have a lot of cap space. They would be doing us a favour.
I like Gio and hope he retires as a Flame. No way I protect him though.

Flames probably protect Hanifin Andersson and Tanev.

Kylington is probably exposed. Hasn’t shown enough to be protected or given the opportunity. Exactly the type of player Seattle should be looking at.

For forward if Backlund is exposed they might take him. Shift Lindholm to 2c and you have Backlunds cap hit to spend on a Rwinger for the top line.

Protecting Gio is what heart wants to do, the brain says no.
chubeyr1 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to chubeyr1 For This Useful Post:
Old 10-21-2020, 08:23 PM   #74
VilleN
First Line Centre
 
VilleN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Phaneuf_Phan View Post
Let Gio go! Free up some big cap space and let's move on. This is a business of winning. He's had enough chances.

He’s had enough chances? He won the Norris a year ago.
__________________
Quote:
Can I offer you a nice egg in these trying times?
VilleN is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to VilleN For This Useful Post:
Old 10-21-2020, 08:31 PM   #75
AC
Resident Videologist
 
AC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by VilleN View Post
He’s had enough chances? He won the Norris a year ago.
Gio is becoming the next star captain that parts of this fanbase turn on it seems...
AC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2020, 08:35 PM   #76
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GettinIggyWithIt View Post
This seems pretty close to me based on what we know today.

I'd say that who gets exposed between Mangiapane, Dube, Backlund and Bennett will depend on a) if we add a forward without giving up one of the 7 above, and b) how their season progresses next year. I can't see it being Dube. But could see it being one of the other 3 depending on their season. I could also see a Gaudreau trade as well though, so there's a few what if's there.

I have to believe - that at 38, they would strongly consider making Gio available if they acquired another dman or Kylington really stepped it up this year.
Yeah, to me it may end up being Backlund vs. Bennett, mostly based on Bennett improving as a regular season player.
GioforPM is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to GioforPM For This Useful Post:
Old 10-21-2020, 08:39 PM   #77
You Need a Thneed
Voted for Kodos
 
You Need a Thneed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Exp:
Default

If Gio has a better year this coming year than he had last year, you consider protecting him, but if he plays the same or worse, you don’t even consider protecting him.

Why would Seattle pick a 38 year old defenseman with only 1 year left on the contract, who has almost certainly had his best years behind him.

If you think you can be as good as Vegas was in their first year, sure you might want his veteran leadership to bring the team together. But that’s unlikely.
__________________
My LinkedIn Profile.
You Need a Thneed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2020, 08:48 PM   #78
Kipper_3434
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by You Need a Thneed View Post
If Gio has a better year this coming year than he had last year, you consider protecting him, but if he plays the same or worse, you don’t even consider protecting him.

Why would Seattle pick a 38 year old defenseman with only 1 year left on the contract, who has almost certainly had his best years behind him.

If you think you can be as good as Vegas was in their first year, sure you might want his veteran leadership to bring the team together. But that’s unlikely.
Seattle MIGHT pick Gio as a first captain, leader and top 4 defenseman. His name might be big enough to sell a few extra tickets too. Oh and he could net an early draft pick if moved at the deadline to a contender. I think they'll pick the most valuable players overall and trade excess vets for futures.
Kipper_3434 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2020, 08:49 PM   #79
MrMike
Franchise Player
 
MrMike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Van Island
Exp:
Default

If Kylington has a good enough season I’d trade him for a pick rather than just get scooped up. Some team will trade a pick for him before the expansion draft.
MrMike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2020, 09:23 PM   #80
getbak
Franchise Player
 
getbak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Just because of their ages, I think you have to expose Gio and Backlund.

There can be an argument for protecting Backlund over Bennett, especially depending on the status of contract negotiations with Bennett as the season progresses. I think this is either the year that Bennett breaks out and moves into the core group of the team and signs a long-term deal, or it will be his last season with the Flames. I don't think there will be a middle ground on that.

As of right now, I think you protect Tanev over Kylington, but that could change depending on what happens over the course of the season.
__________________
Turn up the good, turn down the suck!
getbak is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to getbak For This Useful Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:22 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy