Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-25-2018, 05:46 PM   #61
1qqaaz
Franchise Player
 
1qqaaz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Indiana
Exp:
Default

I would definitely go for Lehner

26 years old, over 200 games played.
His career 91.5% is higher than ever Flames goalie ever.

Plus the Flames need to address the goaltending situation as is. In my eyes, it's either Petr Mrazek or Robin Lehner. There's a good chance Smith doesn't play over 40 games. It's a huge gamble to expect Rittich to play that much.
1qqaaz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2018, 06:12 PM   #62
Party Elephant
First Line Centre
 
Party Elephant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Montréal, QC
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1qqaaz View Post
I would definitely go for Lehner

26 years old, over 200 games played.
His career 91.5% is higher than ever Flames goalie ever.

Plus the Flames need to address the goaltending situation as is. In my eyes, it's either Petr Mrazek or Robin Lehner. There's a good chance Smith doesn't play over 40 games. It's a huge gamble to expect Rittich to play that much.
No to Mrazek. There's a reason he failed to displace Jimmy Howard on multiple occasions despite being given every opportunity.
Party Elephant is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2018, 06:18 PM   #63
shadowlord
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Vancouver, BC
Exp:
Default

Which ones are vulnerable to offer sheets?
shadowlord is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2018, 06:28 PM   #64
Fire
Franchise Player
 
Fire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

The only player on the qualified list I expected not to be qualified was Shinkaruk. I think it's pretty obvious he will never be a full-time NHL player. Maybe they need the forward depth on the farm.

Probably didn't qualify Shore because they wanted to keep their options open in free agency (ex. Derek Ryan).
__________________

Fire is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2018, 06:36 PM   #65
FireGilbert
Franchise Player
 
FireGilbert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Brisbane
Exp:
Default

Good riddance to Hunter Smith. What a waste of a 2nd rounder.

I was hoping Poirier would be given another chance though but understand he may not be worth the roster spot. Hopefully Klimchuck keeps progressing to change the Iginla trade from horrible to just bad.

The 2013 and 2014 drafts were a major fail for the Flames.
__________________
The masses of humanity have always had to surf.
FireGilbert is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2018, 06:42 PM   #66
dammage79
Franchise Player
 
dammage79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

I figure Shore will get a deal. I figure Poirier may get an AHL contract or move on.

Overall I think that was right on the money of what to expect. We knew Pribyl was already going back to the Czech.


No real shocks.
__________________
"Everybody's so desperate to look smart that nobody is having fun anymore" -Jackie Redmond
dammage79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2018, 06:52 PM   #67
transplant99
Fearmongerer
 
transplant99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Wondering when # became hashtag and not a number sign.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fire View Post
The only player on the qualified list I expected not to be qualified was Shinkaruk. I think it's pretty obvious he will never be a full-time NHL player. Maybe they need the forward depth on the farm.

Probably didn't qualify Shore because they wanted to keep their options open in free agency (ex. Derek Ryan).
No doubt.

They have 13 guys under contract at this moment who you would think are Heat players.

BT has lots of work to do this summer yet.
transplant99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2018, 07:00 PM   #68
sureLoss
Some kinda newsbreaker!
 
sureLoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by shadowlord View Post
Which ones are vulnerable to offer sheets?
all of them except Jankowski, Rittich, and anyone who files for arbitration.

edit:
and Gillies maybe ineligible for an offer sheet, I am 95% confident that his first season where he played 8 pro games doesn't count towards a year of pro and therefore he has less than 3 years pro experience

Last edited by sureLoss; 06-25-2018 at 07:05 PM.
sureLoss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2018, 10:03 PM   #69
Calgary4LIfe
Franchise Player
 
Calgary4LIfe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Exp:
Default

I can see Poirier getting snapped up - may just need a change of scenery now, and hopefully he is still on the wagon. He had so much potential, and I really figured he was a 'can't miss' prospect.



Surprised Shinkaruk got qualified. I don't see an NHL'er in him. I guess the Farm needs experienced AHL'ers though.


Will be interesting to see Stockton take shape over the summer.
Calgary4LIfe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2018, 10:19 PM   #70
Enoch Root
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2012
Exp:
Default

I would think Montreal will jump all over Poirier. I would have qualified Poirier before Shinkaruk.
Enoch Root is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Enoch Root For This Useful Post:
Old 06-25-2018, 10:54 PM   #71
Geeoff
Franchise Player
 
Geeoff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Exp:
Default

So Wotherspoon is a UFA?
Geeoff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2018, 10:58 PM   #72
Roof-Daddy
Franchise Player
 
Roof-Daddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Geeoff View Post
So Wotherspoon is a UFA?
Yeap.
Roof-Daddy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2018, 12:00 AM   #73
Strange Brew
Franchise Player
 
Strange Brew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Exp:
Default

So they think $900k or so is too steep for Shore? Seems odd to me.
Strange Brew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2018, 12:36 AM   #74
topfiverecords
Franchise Player
 
topfiverecords's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Park Hyatt Tokyo
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Strange Brew View Post
So they think $900k or so is too steep for Shore? Seems odd to me.
Likely just avoiding the arbitration possibility.
topfiverecords is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to topfiverecords For This Useful Post:
Old 06-26-2018, 08:41 AM   #75
Strange Brew
Franchise Player
 
Strange Brew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by topfiverecords View Post
Likely just avoiding the arbitration possibility.
15 goals in 236 NHL games. Doesn't seem like there is much to fear in arbitration is there?

I'm guessing he's not coming back.
Strange Brew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2018, 09:27 AM   #76
Icon
Franchise Player
 
Icon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

My guess is Shore is still a plan B or C if they don't acquire who they're hoping to on July 1.
Icon is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Icon For This Useful Post:
Old 06-26-2018, 11:44 AM   #77
Cheese
Franchise Player
 
Cheese's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Exp:
Default

Updated Prospect Tracker
Cheese is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Cheese For This Useful Post:
Old 06-26-2018, 02:46 PM   #78
TheIronMaiden
Franchise Player
 
TheIronMaiden's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: ATCO Field, Section 201
Exp:
Default

Have the Flames given up on Nick Shore then? Can they still sign him before July 1?
TheIronMaiden is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2018, 04:38 PM   #79
Grimbl420
Crash and Bang Winger
 
Grimbl420's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Strange Brew View Post
So they think $900k or so is too steep for Shore? Seems odd to me.
Any RFA who's last contract was under 1mil needs to be qualified at a minimum of 105% of their last contract. Shore's minimum QO would have been a 1 million. He's also arbitration eligible so probably a factor in him not getting an offer.
Grimbl420 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2018, 07:45 PM   #80
getbak
Franchise Player
 
getbak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Today at 3:00pm MT was the deadline for RFAs to accept their qualifying offers. A few players around the league did so, but it would appear that none of the Flames did.

Klimchuk was signed just after 3:00pm (or at least that's when it was announced), but he signed for less than his QO, which likely means he took a better AHL salary in the exchange.


This leaves Hanifin, Gillies, and Shinkaruk as the remaining unsigned RFAs without scheduled arbitration dates.
  • Hanifin is presumably looking for a significant raise over what his QO would have been, and a multiyear deal.
  • Shinkaruk is likely looking for an AHL raise as well, and is also likely to take a little less on the NHL portion to make a call-up more appealing to the team.
  • Gillies will probably ultimately sign a similar deal to whatever Rittich signs. Rittich might get a one-way deal while Gillies will probably sign something with a larger guaranteed NHL+AHL total.

The other five RFAs have all filed for arbitration, so their deals will get finalized, one way or the other, in the next couple of weeks.
__________________
Turn up the good, turn down the suck!
getbak is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to getbak For This Useful Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:14 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy