11-23-2017, 10:41 AM
|
#61
|
Retired
|
Ever since Hughson said, "the Legend of Lack" during a Flames-Canucks game a few years ago I couldn't stand the guy. The Legend Lacks is more appropriate.
You don't want to hate on a player on your team but I've never liked him being a Flame.
|
|
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Kjesse For This Useful Post:
|
|
11-23-2017, 10:42 AM
|
#62
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by tvp2003
I'm curious: what happens if somebody claims him? Are they on the hook for his whole salary or just the portion Calgary is paying (with Carolina paying the rest)?
|
Just the Calgary portion. Once Carolina retained, that portion is locked in for them.
Another oddity to that, I believe the Flames could trade him and retain 50% of their portion and the new team would only end up paying 25% of his salary.
__________________
Turn up the good, turn down the suck!
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to getbak For This Useful Post:
|
|
11-23-2017, 10:42 AM
|
#63
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: City by the Bay
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kjesse
Ever since Hughson said, "the Legend of Lack" during a Flames-Canucks game a few years ago I couldn't stand the guy. The Legend Lacks is more appropriate.
You don't want to hate on a player on your team but I've never liked him being a Flame.
|
This is largely my issue too.
|
|
|
11-23-2017, 10:43 AM
|
#64
|
Scoring Winger
|
Agree with the above 2 posters. We also have no more assets to give up nor should we.
|
|
|
11-23-2017, 10:44 AM
|
#65
|
Powerplay Quarterback
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: ...the bench
|
is it wrong I'm sort of hoping he gets claimed?
|
|
|
11-23-2017, 10:45 AM
|
#66
|
Franchise Player
|
Yeah, this makes sense.
Gillies and Rittich can and should be cycled in and out of the AHL/NHL for the remainder of the year. Let’s see what those two guys can do at the NHL level, while also allowing Parsons to get up into some AHL action.
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to ComixZone For This Useful Post:
|
|
11-23-2017, 10:45 AM
|
#67
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Benched
is it wrong I'm sort of hoping he gets claimed?
|
Lack has really struggled, I don't see any chance he is claimed.
Guessing the Flames will send him down to give him playing time.
|
|
|
11-23-2017, 10:46 AM
|
#68
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Sector 7-G
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheScorpion
I'd be shocked if Chad Johnson isn't a flame by the end of this week.
|
Only if Buffalo retains some salary. If not I don't want any part of Johnson on the Flames again. IMO it's time to graduate Rittich/Gillies and get Parsons some AHL time.
|
|
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Otto-matic For This Useful Post:
|
|
11-23-2017, 10:46 AM
|
#69
|
Acerbic Cyberbully
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: back in Chilliwack
|
Wow.
|
|
|
11-23-2017, 10:47 AM
|
#70
|
Taking a while to get to 5000
|
Worth noting that if Niemi can be claimed several times, its not out of the realm of possibility to see Lack claimed as well.
|
|
|
11-23-2017, 10:47 AM
|
#71
|
Acerbic Cyberbully
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: back in Chilliwack
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheScorpion
I'd be shocked if Chad Johnson isn't a flame by the end of this week.
|
I sure hope not.
|
|
|
The Following 21 Users Say Thank You to Textcritic For This Useful Post:
|
1Nite,
3thirty,
Anduril,
btimbit,
D as in David,
Erick Estrada,
GioforPM,
Hey Connor, It's Mess,
Jay Random,
jg13,
John Doe,
kirant,
OffsideSpecialist,
OldDutch,
rotten42,
socalwingfan,
thymebalm,
TopChed,
topfiverecords,
UKflames,
vennegoor of hesselink
|
11-23-2017, 10:48 AM
|
#72
|
aka Spike
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: The Darkest Corners of My Mind
|
Really disappointed to hear this. Lack seems like a great guy and I was hoping he'd rebound with fresh start in Calgary.
|
|
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to CMPunk For This Useful Post:
|
|
11-23-2017, 10:48 AM
|
#73
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: St. George's, Grenada
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheScorpion
I'd be shocked if Chad Johnson isn't a flame by the end of this week.
|
With that contract I sure hope not
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to btimbit For This Useful Post:
|
|
11-23-2017, 10:50 AM
|
#74
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
|
Wondering if this is an internal move to get Parsons up to the AHL and have Rittich ride the pine while Gillis and Parsons share the net.
Edit:nvm, lack still has to go somewhere.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to dammage79 For This Useful Post:
|
|
11-23-2017, 10:51 AM
|
#75
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Weitz
Probably need to add a 1st and prospect at least. Kane will get a kings ransom this season. I don't think Brouwer retained and Lack get you Johnson.
|
I'm likely undervalued Kane in terms of signing him (although he has only scores 30 goals once and never plays a full season) but in trade value he is a UFA at the end of the season, and so a contract controlled Bennett has significant value for a team like Buffalo, unless you really believe his start to this year is the type of player he is.
|
|
|
11-23-2017, 10:51 AM
|
#76
|
First Line Centre
|
Chad Johnson:
GAA: 3.59
W:1
L: 4
OTL: 2
Save %: 0.885
Eddie Lack
GAA:5.29
W:1
L:2
OTL:0
Save %: 0.813
Pick your poison! The only problem I have with Rittich is his inexperience, but you can't get NHL experience playing in the "A"!
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Since1984 For This Useful Post:
|
|
11-23-2017, 10:53 AM
|
#77
|
I believe in the Jays.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Weitz
Probably need to add a 1st and prospect at least. Kane will get a kings ransom this season.
|
Not sure it would be a "kings ransom" but I agree it'd be more then what Infinit47 muses. Yeah, he's racking up points this year... but he's been a .66PPG player the rest of his career + "make-up" concerns in his past + plus no term remaining on his contract means that it's gonna be less then the ransom worthy of a king.
Maybe Bennett + Fox + Stone get's it done. I don't think they'd want Brouwer (even with 25% retained) and they have injury needs on the blueline. So Stone to balance out the dollars
Bennett/Stone/Fox/Lack -> Kane(with Extension)/Johnson (Andersson called up to replace Stone)
|
|
|
11-23-2017, 10:53 AM
|
#78
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Bay Area
|
If it's not Rittich, then whats the point of having several goalies in the system and marinating in the minors? Guy has shown he could be ready. And 25 seems to be in the right age range for his shot.
|
|
|
11-23-2017, 10:54 AM
|
#79
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: St. George's, Grenada
|
I'm A-OKAY with flipping between Gillies and Rittich in that role for the rest of the year
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to btimbit For This Useful Post:
|
|
11-23-2017, 10:57 AM
|
#80
|
Powerplay Quarterback
|
Good call putting Lack on waivers and I hope to see both Rittich and Gillies see some time as backup and get some NHL starts this season.
Lack could still turn things around a bit,but he needs playing time in the AHL.
I wasn't a big fan of the trade but I considered it to be low risk and Lack certainly had (has?) upside if he can get it together.
Good luck Eddie.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Loyal and True For This Useful Post:
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:39 AM.
|
|