Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-29-2017, 01:07 PM   #61
CaptainCrunch
Norm!
 
CaptainCrunch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Exp:
Default

But the North Koreans have the Pulgasari

__________________
My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings;

Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!
CaptainCrunch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-2017, 01:25 PM   #62
Snuffleupagus
Franchise Player
 
Snuffleupagus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by calgaryblood View Post
No they couldn't. Maybe a small unarmed country but you really think China or any country could wipe out the U.S or even Canada with conventional bombs?
LOL, the U.S or Russia could end our existence within a week without nukes

Quote:
Originally Posted by calgaryblood View Post
"Wacko countries" are countries you disagree with? Only thing wacko is your opinion on a lot of subjects. Thank god you're not in any position in the government. Your opinions are downright scary and as extreme as the people you hate across the oceans.
Actually the UN shares my opinion on who should never possess nuclear weapons, personally attacking me doesn't make you right, and FYI I don't hate any race of people! can you say the same?

Quote:
Originally Posted by calgaryblood View Post
Yes, NK should have nukes if other countries have and Iran as well. Self defence is not just for Western countries you share the same language with.
This opinion is downright frightening, sure pal, lets allow the same people that have no problem blowing themselves up to kill innocent people in churches, malls and rock concerts in the name of allah to possess nukes.

Country leaderships in places like Iran,Syria,Sudan and many more could never be trusted these weapons period.

And by allowing Kim Jong-un nukes the whole region will destabilize, S-Korea and Japan will have to have them and soon after places like the Philippines,Malaysia and Indonesia will feel the need to follow
Snuffleupagus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-2017, 01:33 PM   #63
Sliver
evil of fart
 
Sliver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Snuffleupagus View Post
This opinion is downright frightening, sure pal, lets allow the same people that have no problem blowing themselves up to kill innocent people in churches, malls and rock concerts in the name of allah to possess nukes.
Why is it up to "us" to "allow" anybody to have nukes? That's so ethnocentric it's laughable. Pakistan has nukes already, btw.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Snuffleupagus View Post
And by allowing Kim Jong-un nukes the whole region will destabilize, S-Korea and Japan will have to have them and soon after places like the Philippines,Malaysia and Indonesia will feel the need to follow
Kim Jong-Un would have to be the dumbest guy on the planet if he didn't try to get nuclear weapons. The USA is absolutely a nuclear threat to his country and the only real defense is having nuclear weapons of his own.

Also, not sure if you wrote the post from 1987 or what, but he already has nukes, anyway.
Sliver is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Sliver For This Useful Post:
Old 08-29-2017, 01:39 PM   #64
CaptainCrunch
Norm!
 
CaptainCrunch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sliver View Post

Kim Jong-Un would have to be the dumbest guy on the planet if he didn't try to get nuclear weapons. The USA is absolutely a nuclear threat to his country and the only real defense is having nuclear weapons of his own.

Also, not sure if you wrote the post from 1987 or what, but he already has nukes, anyway.
I think your wrong on this.

Without Nukes, America would reply to threats conventionally, currently under their rules of engagement Nukes would really only be used in the event of an attack using weapons of mass destruction on a ally.

With Nukes the forces dimension completely changes.

But now, Japan will certainly look at a nuclear curtain, especially since North Korea has seemingly reached the warhead stage of their nuclear program. North Korea will probably also now have a SIOP plan dedicated to it.

The minute that you join the nuclear club you open yourself up to being nuked.
__________________
My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings;

Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!
CaptainCrunch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-2017, 01:44 PM   #65
Sliver
evil of fart
 
Sliver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainCrunch View Post
I think your wrong on this.

Without Nukes, America would reply to threats conventionally, currently under their rules of engagement Nukes would really only be used in the event of an attack using weapons of mass destruction on a ally.

With Nukes the forces dimension completely changes.

But now, Japan will certainly look at a nuclear curtain, especially since North Korea has seemingly reached the warhead stage of their nuclear program. North Korea will probably also now have a SIOP plan dedicated to it.

The minute that you join the nuclear club you open yourself up to being nuked.
There's no such thing as a preemptive strike on NK. Bannon said it perfectly:

Quote:
Top White House official Steve Bannon said Wednesday that there is “no military solution” to North Korea.

“Forget it,” he told American Prospect magazine in an August 16 interview. “Until somebody solves the part of the equation that shows me that ten million people in Seoul don’t die in the first 30 minutes from conventional weapons, I don’t know what you’re talking about, there’s no military solution here, they got us.”
NK having nukes strengthens their defensive position, which is all they care about. Now instead of just Seoul being obliterated in a war, they can reach out to more places, further diminishing the appetite for any strikes against them.
Sliver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2017, 01:11 AM   #66
Otto-matic
Franchise Player
 
Otto-matic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Sector 7-G
Exp:
Default

http://www.cnn.com/2017/09/03/asia/n...tes/index.html

Quote:
North Korea has successfully tested a hydrogen bomb, the country's state broadcaster reported Sunday.

Latest developments:

This is the country's sixth nuclear test.
Earlier, United States Geological Survey detected "possible explosion" that caused a 6.3-magnitude quake.
Tremor was detected in near North Korea's Punggye-ri nuclear test site.
Otto-matic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2017, 01:13 AM   #67
Otto-matic
Franchise Player
 
Otto-matic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Sector 7-G
Exp:
Default

Jacob Wohl‏Verified account @JacobAWohl 3h3 hours ago
More
The 6.3 Magnitude tremor detected at a #NorthKorea test site would be consistent with the detonation of a hugely powerful Hydrogen Bomb

Jeffrey Lewis‏Verified account
@ArmsControlWonk
Follow
More
Just for reference: 5.6 is ~100 kilotons. 6.3 is a megaton. Just using Mb=4.05+.75Log(W). YMMV 3/

Replying to @ArmsControlWonk
6.3 puts us up around a megaton. That would be a staged thermonuclear weapon folks. 4/

Jeffrey Lewis‏Verified account @ArmsControlWonk 2h2 hours ago
More
Ok, the better equation to use is probably Mb = 1.0125 log (Y) – 0.7875 log (H) + 5.887 where H is depth. 7/

Last edited by Otto-matic; 09-03-2017 at 01:25 AM.
Otto-matic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2017, 02:38 AM   #68
SebC
tromboner
 
SebC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: where the lattes are
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sliver View Post
Why is it up to "us" to "allow" anybody to have nukes? That's so ethnocentric it's laughable. Pakistan has nukes already, btw.
"Us" isn't ethnicity. It's values and beliefs. The people who should have nukes (if anyone) are those who would be reluctant to use them because they value civilian lives.

Maybe it's just the circles I'm in, but I've seen far more concern over Trump having nukes than Obama, by the way.
SebC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2017, 02:56 AM   #69
Sluggo
Scoring Winger
 
Sluggo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Exp:
Default

Who wants to bet that Russia is donating tech to North Korea in order to distract from their election meddling?
Sluggo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2017, 03:21 AM   #70
longsuffering
First Line Centre
 
longsuffering's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SebC View Post
"Us" isn't ethnicity. It's values and beliefs. The people who should have nukes (if anyone) are those who would be reluctant to use them because they value civilian lives.
Hmm, remind me again who dropped 2 atom bombs on civilian populations?

Value civilian lives? Drone strikes anyone?



Sent from my Pixel XL using Tapatalk
longsuffering is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to longsuffering For This Useful Post:
Old 09-03-2017, 10:26 AM   #71
CaptainCrunch
Norm!
 
CaptainCrunch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sluggo View Post
Who wants to bet that Russia is donating tech to North Korea in order to distract from their election meddling?


I don't doubt that they're getting help from somewhere, this program is advancing generations in months, they've made the leap from simple Bombs to miniaturization to multi-stage devices to miniaturization, they're also moving ahead really fast in terms of their delivery and range.

I think its just as likely that while they might be getting materials from elsewhere, the Russians aren't likely to want to get exposed as a nation marketing in bomb making material.

I believe that the help is more likely coming from the Iranian side of the equation and probably in the form of expertise and personal. It just seems to be more in their playbook.
__________________
My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings;

Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!
CaptainCrunch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2017, 02:05 PM   #72
Ozy_Flame

Posted the 6 millionth post!
 
Ozy_Flame's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Exp:
Default

I thought they were getting help from Pakistan, that one guy who sold them secrets years ago? Something Khan ...
Ozy_Flame is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2017, 02:11 PM   #73
nik-
Franchise Player
 
nik-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Exp:
Default

AQ Khan, but Pakistan doesn't have two stage bombs.

edit: it looks like this last test is estimated at around 120KT. So it looks like North Korea doesn't have them yet either. I wish they would stop calling these hydrogen bombs.

Last edited by nik-; 09-03-2017 at 02:14 PM.
nik- is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2017, 02:28 PM   #74
photon
The new goggles also do nothing.
 
photon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Where did you see 120kt? I've seen all kinds of different reports, some saying in the megaton range which would be a hydrogen bomb.
__________________
Uncertainty is an uncomfortable position.
But certainty is an absurd one.
photon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2017, 02:41 PM   #75
nik-
Franchise Player
 
nik-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Exp:
Default

https://www.norsar.no/press/latest-p...e1534-984.html

I don't see anyone saying megaton range. The highest estimate I've seen is "between 100-500".
nik- is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to nik- For This Useful Post:
Old 09-14-2017, 11:57 PM   #76
fanman
First Line Centre
 
fanman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Sagami Bay, Japan
Exp:
Default

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/09/14/w...e.html?mcubz=1

Another missile test this morning, courtesy of our crazy neighbours. It certainly has people talking over here.
fanman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2017, 01:16 AM   #77
Manhattanboy
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2004
Exp:
Default

Wonder what the dialogue is between North Korea and Iran.
Manhattanboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2017, 02:22 AM   #78
Snuffleupagus
Franchise Player
 
Snuffleupagus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Manhattanboy View Post
Wonder what the dialogue is between North Korea and Iran.
Jong-un to Iran:

Aim 10,000 artillery shells at Israel and start building your nukes, nobody has the balls to try an stop you
Snuffleupagus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2017, 07:47 AM   #79
killer_carlson
Franchise Player
 
killer_carlson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by snuffleupagus View Post
jong-un to iran:

Aim 10,000 artillery shells at israel and start building your nukes, nobody has the balls to try an stop you except the israelis mind you
fyp, but your point is clear.
__________________
"OOOOOOHHHHHHH those Russians" - Boney M
killer_carlson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2017, 11:52 AM   #80
Otto-matic
Franchise Player
 
Otto-matic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Sector 7-G
Exp:
Default

http://www.calgarysun.com/2017/09/14...nother-missile

Quote:
SEOUL, Korea, Republic Of — North Korea conducted its longest-ever test flight of a ballistic missile Friday, sending an intermediate-range weapon hurtling over U.S. ally Japan into the northern Pacific Ocean in a launch that signals both defiance to its rivals and a big technological advance.
Kim sure is playing with fire right now.
Otto-matic is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:50 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy