Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-03-2016, 01:32 PM   #61
Hot_Flatus
#1 Goaltender
 
Hot_Flatus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Uranus
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by polak View Post
This team is not rebuilding anymore.

We're more likely to trade picks for talent than the other way around. Regression now is a failure.
The rebuild is over? When you're drafting in the lottery, rolling raw rookies and PTO players into the top end of your lineup every season, you're most definitely still rebuilding.

It is flat out, not at all reasonable to expect the team to go from the cellar of the western conference last year to 8th. The last thing I would want this team to do is start panicking because fans are getting butt hurt that the rebuild process isn't as glamorous as it seemed. The Flames have two really promising forwards on every line. Bigger things are not far off at this point but there are enough gaping holes on the wing that you can't cover them all up.

I'll take this team now any day of the week over the last few Iggy years - a time when watching a game was actually comparable to taking a really bad dump. For 3 hours.
__________________
I hate to tell you this, but I’ve just launched an air biscuit

Last edited by Hot_Flatus; 11-03-2016 at 01:46 PM.
Hot_Flatus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2016, 01:36 PM   #62
polak
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dino7c View Post
How many playoff teams top two offensive players are under 24? they are certainly still a building team
Currently is cherry picking stats. Pens and Chicago won cups, Edmonton is making waves now, I'm sure there are other teams too throughout the last decade or so that have competed with their top scorers under 24.

No one is saying we're out of time here or that the window is closing but this is the first real year with the window open and the Flames are currently crapping the bed.

Saying we're rebuilding still is just trying to make yourself feel better. Were you expecting a bottom 10 finish? Were you expecting them to be sellers at the deadline? If the answer to either of those is "no" then they're not rebuilding.

5 years of "rebuilding" is starting to get into "extended rebuild" range and if they regress this year then it's not going to look great.

Last edited by polak; 11-03-2016 at 01:44 PM.
polak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2016, 01:42 PM   #63
Robbob
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Exp:
Default

4-5 years is a standard rebuild. The Flames just got really lucky in that 3rd year because everything went their way.
Robbob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2016, 01:46 PM   #64
Frank MetaMusil
RANDOM USER TITLE CHANGE
 
Frank MetaMusil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: South Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by polak View Post
Currently is a cherry picked stats. Pens and Chicago won cups, Edmonton is making waves now, I'm sure there are other teams too.

No one is saying we're out of time here or that the window is closing but this is the first real year with the window open and the Flames are currently crapping the bed.

Saying we're rebuilding still is just trying to make yourself feel better. Were you expecting a bottom 10 finish? Were you expecting them to be sellers at the deadline? If the answer to either of those is "no" then they're not rebuilding.
Did they make a coaching change because in the GM's words Bob "took them as far as he could"? Yes.

Did they go big game hunting on July 1 for a UFA winger with playoff experience and tons of awesome leadership? Yes.

Did they clean out the awful goaltending from last season? Yes.

The rebuild is clearly almost over. I'm inclined to agree with you. This is a cap team, they can't be picking at 6 or higher again at the draft.

Last edited by Frank MetaMusil; 11-03-2016 at 01:50 PM.
Frank MetaMusil is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Frank MetaMusil For This Useful Post:
Old 11-03-2016, 01:53 PM   #65
polak
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Exp:
Default

Most importantly, any player they draft this year is likely 4 or 5 years away from being an impact player. Our team will be at the end of their cycle, Gio will be a 38 year old anchor by then, Brodie will be in his 30's and Gaudreau and Monahan will be at the end of their contracts.

If we finish poorly, chances are who ever we pick will be leading the next core of the Flames, not this core.
polak is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to polak For This Useful Post:
Old 11-03-2016, 02:36 PM   #66
Armchair Quarterback
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Armchair Quarterback's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Saskatoon
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CroFlames View Post
This is loser talk. You have three highly paid defencemen, 2 highly paid forwards and a bonafide #1. With that kind of money already being paid to the core players, this should be a playoff team.

Anything else is an excuse and allows loser culture to take hold.
Bryan Cranston agrees

__________________
"Two-liner!"
-Terry
Armchair Quarterback is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Armchair Quarterback For This Useful Post:
Old 11-03-2016, 02:42 PM   #67
dino7c
Franchise Player
 
dino7c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by polak View Post
Currently is cherry picking stats. Pens and Chicago won cups, Edmonton is making waves now, I'm sure there are other teams too throughout the last decade or so that have competed with their top scorers under 24.

No one is saying we're out of time here or that the window is closing but this is the first real year with the window open and the Flames are currently crapping the bed.

Saying we're rebuilding still is just trying to make yourself feel better. Were you expecting a bottom 10 finish? Were you expecting them to be sellers at the deadline? If the answer to either of those is "no" then they're not rebuilding.

5 years of "rebuilding" is starting to get into "extended rebuild" range and if they regress this year then it's not going to look great.
remains to be seen, besides their top two offensive players aren't under 24...They have McDavid who they won in a lottery during a 10 year rebuild
__________________
GFG
dino7c is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2016, 02:47 PM   #68
dino7c
Franchise Player
 
dino7c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

saying they are not done rebuilding is not excusing a bottom 5 finish

they "should" be a playoff bubble team IMO

They certainly shouldn't be or have been considered a lock for the playoffs
__________________
GFG
dino7c is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2016, 02:52 PM   #69
dino7c
Franchise Player
 
dino7c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by polak View Post
Currently is cherry picking stats. Pens and Chicago won cups, Edmonton is making waves now, I'm sure there are other teams too throughout the last decade or so that have competed with their top scorers under 24.

No one is saying we're out of time here or that the window is closing but this is the first real year with the window open and the Flames are currently crapping the bed.

Saying we're rebuilding still is just trying to make yourself feel better. Were you expecting a bottom 10 finish? Were you expecting them to be sellers at the deadline? If the answer to either of those is "no" then they're not rebuilding.

5 years of "rebuilding" is starting to get into "extended rebuild" range and if they regress this year then it's not going to look great.
Speaking of cherry picking...Those 3 teams all picked 1st overall and had multiple top 3 picks.

Crosby, Kane, McDavid, picks all won in lotteries

Yet the Flames who have never picked in the top 3 in franchise history are in the same boat
__________________
GFG
dino7c is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2016, 02:55 PM   #70
bucksmasher
Scoring Winger
 
bucksmasher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Exp:
Default

no
bucksmasher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2016, 02:55 PM   #71
smiggy77
Powerplay Quarterback
 
smiggy77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

No to this thread, no to this powerplay, no to the pk, no to losing, no to johnny and monnys slow start...

...no to everything........




sorry i need a god damn snickers
smiggy77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2016, 02:55 PM   #72
flamesforcup
Powerplay Quarterback
 
flamesforcup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Exp:
Default

Honestly our rebuild shouldve been over. Our offense is looking ok but what was once our strenght on defense is looking bad. We need to rebuild our defense core.
flamesforcup is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2016, 03:11 PM   #73
Wiggum_PI
Scoring Winger
 
Wiggum_PI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by flamesforcup View Post
Honestly our rebuild shouldve been over. Our offense is looking ok but what was once our strenght on defense is looking bad. We need to rebuild our defense core.
Treliving seemed pretty confident that this is a great D core, he re-signed Gio and Hamilton for 6 years, and Brodie for 5. It'll be interesting to see what he does with Wideman and Engelland as both are UFAs next season.
Wiggum_PI is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Wiggum_PI For This Useful Post:
Old 11-03-2016, 03:27 PM   #74
Robbob
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wiggum_PI View Post
Treliving seemed pretty confident that this is a great D core, he re-signed Gio and Hamilton for 6 years, and Brodie for 5. It'll be interesting to see what he does with Wideman and Engelland as both are UFAs next season.
If he can, he will ship Wideman out sometime during this year. For Engelland, they will shake his hand and thank him for the three years. I don't foresee any situation where either is back in a Flames uniform next year.
Robbob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2016, 03:35 PM   #75
-TC-
Franchise Player
 
-TC-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Glastonbury
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Robbob View Post
If he can, he will ship Wideman out sometime during this year. For Engelland, they will shake his hand and thank him for the three years. I don't foresee any situation where either is back in a Flames uniform next year.
If he can't ship Wideman, I'd like to see him sent down. He's a liability at this point and I'd rather see Kulak every game
__________________
TC

-TC- is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2016, 03:41 PM   #76
Karl
Franchise Player
 
Karl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Toronto
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by -TC- View Post
If he can't ship Wideman, I'd like to see him sent down. He's a liability at this point and I'd rather see Kulak every game
Can't. Because NMC.
Karl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2016, 03:41 PM   #77
Redliner
Franchise Player
 
Redliner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Conquering the world one 7-11 at a time
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Robbob View Post
If he can, he will ship Wideman out sometime during this year. For Engelland, they will shake his hand and thank him for the three years. I don't foresee any situation where either is back in a Flames uniform next year.
Engelland has actually been surprisingly good so far this season and I would not be averse to seeing him re-signed at a smaller price tag. If he wants more money, see ya.

Wideman....that ship has sailed. All aboard the next rocket to the sun.
__________________
"There will be a short outage tonight sometime between 11:00PM and 1:00AM as network upgrades are performed. Please do not panic and overthrow society. Thank you."
Redliner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2016, 03:54 PM   #78
Locke
Franchise Player
 
Locke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Income Tax Central
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mrdonkey View Post
PP: 28th
PK: 28th
GA/G: 26th

Those sure don't look like the numbers of a playoff team to me.
These numbers pretty much have to be middle to top-third of the pack or its a done deal. Without that the playoffs are a pipe dream.
__________________
The Beatings Shall Continue Until Morale Improves!

This Post Has Been Distilled for the Eradication of Seemingly Incurable Sadness.

The World Ends when you're dead. Until then, you've got more punishment in store. - Flames Fans

If you thought this season would have a happy ending, you haven't been paying attention.
Locke is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Locke For This Useful Post:
Old 11-03-2016, 03:57 PM   #79
Robbob
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Locke View Post
These numbers pretty much have to be middle to top-third of the pack or its a done deal. Without that the playoffs are a pipe dream.
*knock on wood*
I don't think those numbers will stay remotely near that. This team is a lot better than that. That GA/G I know for certain will be much better 20 games from now.
Robbob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2016, 03:58 PM   #80
Robo
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Edmonton,AB
Exp:
Default

nope
Robo is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:06 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy