Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-17-2016, 07:35 AM   #61
bubbsy
Franchise Player
 
bubbsy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mister Yamoto View Post
Great. Paying players to NOT play for the Flames. Shane O'Brian and Mason Raymond collecting a nice cheque while Bob Hartley laughs his ass off. All three of them being paid handsomely to do nothing more than to stay away. What a joke.
What does Hartley getting paid have to do with anything??
bubbsy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2016, 08:29 AM   #62
the2bears
Franchise Player
 
the2bears's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: The Bay Area
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mister Yamoto View Post
Great. Paying players to NOT play for the Flames. Shane O'Brian and Mason Raymond collecting a nice cheque while Bob Hartley laughs his ass off. All three of them being paid handsomely to do nothing more than to stay away. What a joke.
Even funnier is your huge overreaction.
the2bears is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2016, 08:43 AM   #63
Freeway
Franchise Player
 
Freeway's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

FWIW: $600,000 is what a relatively healthy Flames club spent on short-term injury replacements last season.
__________________
PHWA Member // Managing Editor @ FlamesNation // Author of "On The Clock: Behind The Scenes with the Calgary Flames at the NHL Draft" // Twitter

"Does a great job covering the Flames" - Elliotte Friedman
Freeway is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2016, 08:45 AM   #64
Robbob
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Fonz View Post
Is there Smid/LTIR news that I'm not aware of?

Everyone else seems confident he'll go to LTIR - me, not so much. I get the feeling that Smid has every intention of being ready for game 1.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Weitz View Post
I'm with you Fonz. He has been skating all summer hasn't he? I mean this isn't a Ference situation where he has said his injury is career ending.
Unless something new has come out he hasn't been skating. When Haynes had Leslie on his podcast they talked about Smid and commented that he wasn't cleared to skate. In the previous season he was part of those vets skating at winsport. I don't recall him being named in any article recently as part of that group. IMO he will be put on Ltir, he has 3.5 million reasons not to file his retirement papers.
Robbob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2016, 08:51 AM   #65
Freeway
Franchise Player
 
Freeway's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

https://twitter.com/Kristen_Odland/s...54404058324992

He skated a few days ago.
__________________
PHWA Member // Managing Editor @ FlamesNation // Author of "On The Clock: Behind The Scenes with the Calgary Flames at the NHL Draft" // Twitter

"Does a great job covering the Flames" - Elliotte Friedman
Freeway is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Freeway For This Useful Post:
Old 09-17-2016, 08:57 AM   #66
Robbob
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Exp:
Default

Would be interesting to see how long he has been in town. If he is just starting to skate then he is still way behind schedule.
Robbob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2016, 09:00 AM   #67
Freeway
Franchise Player
 
Freeway's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Camp rosters come out later this week (Tuesday/Wednesday, probably). If Smid's listed as "not skating" or not part of the practice groups, he MAY be an LTIR candidate. Maybe. But if he's in a main group and taking contact, LTIR may be a pipe dream.
__________________
PHWA Member // Managing Editor @ FlamesNation // Author of "On The Clock: Behind The Scenes with the Calgary Flames at the NHL Draft" // Twitter

"Does a great job covering the Flames" - Elliotte Friedman
Freeway is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2016, 09:01 AM   #68
getbak
Franchise Player
 
getbak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Smid was skating on Thursday (from the Herald's story on Grossmann signing his PTO)...

__________________
Turn up the good, turn down the suck!
getbak is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2016, 09:05 AM   #69
Robbob
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Freeway View Post
Camp rosters come out later this week (Tuesday/Wednesday, probably). If Smid's listed as "not skating" or not part of the practice groups, he MAY be an LTIR candidate. Maybe. But if he's in a main group and taking contact, LTIR may be a pipe dream.
That is true. If he has been cleared for contact there is no way he willbe on LTIR.
Robbob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2016, 09:09 AM   #70
Freeway
Franchise Player
 
Freeway's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

The "general" phases a recovering injured player goes through are:
-Not skating at all
-Skating without equipment in private
-Skating with equipment before practice
-Skating with equipment during practice (but with the caution jersey)
-Skating with equipment during practice (and cleared for contact)
-Conditioning skating

Especially if there was an injury that kept him from doing cardio, players typically need to get up to game speed and get their cardio back before they get thrown in (and officially activated).
__________________
PHWA Member // Managing Editor @ FlamesNation // Author of "On The Clock: Behind The Scenes with the Calgary Flames at the NHL Draft" // Twitter

"Does a great job covering the Flames" - Elliotte Friedman
Freeway is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2016, 10:50 AM   #71
Enoch Root
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2012
Exp:
Default

Smid's issues have little to do with skating.

The question is when or if he will be cleared for physical contact
Enoch Root is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2016, 11:15 AM   #72
Cleveland Steam Whistle
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mister Yamoto View Post
Great. Paying players to NOT play for the Flames. Shane O'Brian and Mason Raymond collecting a nice cheque while Bob Hartley laughs his ass off. All three of them being paid handsomely to do nothing more than to stay away. What a joke.
One of those is an Old management decision, that guy is no longer here. Unless you are an owner, what do you care about Hartley getting paid?

As for Raymond sure, fair to be critical if you like. But how quickly people forget just where this team was exactly 2 years ago. The fact you care about wasted money on Raymond right now, and we care about $600K in penalties is a testament to just how well things have gone and how quickly current management has helped right our ship and speed up this rebuild. You're basically pissed cause things have gone too well and it's causing us hiccups that aren't allowing us push the gas on the rebuild even further.
Cleveland Steam Whistle is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Cleveland Steam Whistle For This Useful Post:
Old 09-17-2016, 11:25 AM   #73
burnitdown
Scoring Winger
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cleveland Steam Whistle View Post
One of those is an Old management decision, that guy is no longer here. Unless you are an owner, what do you care about Hartley getting paid?

As for Raymond sure, fair to be critical if you like. But how quickly people forget just where this team was exactly 2 years ago. The fact you care about wasted money on Raymond right now, and we care about $600K in penalties is a testament to just how well things have gone and how quickly current management has helped right our ship and speed up this rebuild. You're basically pissed cause things have gone too well and it's causing us hiccups that aren't allowing us push the gas on the rebuild even further.
Just because we're up against the cap today when we didn't expect it two years ago doesn't mean our rebuild has gone too well. Hopefully the off-season moves pay off but if we finish near the bottom again while being up against the cap, the rebuild hasn't been sped up...instead, it just means we lost all wiggle room to buy some help after over-paying players or choosing the wrong free agents.
burnitdown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2016, 11:33 AM   #74
Cleveland Steam Whistle
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by burnitdown View Post
Just because we're up against the cap today when we didn't expect it two years ago doesn't mean our rebuild has gone too well. Hopefully the off-season moves pay off but if we finish near the bottom again while being up against the cap, the rebuild hasn't been sped up...instead, it just means we lost all wiggle room to buy some help after over-paying players or choosing the wrong free agents.
You are missing the point. The Flames paid players 2 years ago, likely a premium to come play on a team slotted to finish at the bottom for years to come, because they were going to treat the rebuild differently. They wanted the young guys surrounded by competition, not just given their duties.

The Flames didn't spend close to the cap because they thought those moves were going to be what made us a contender, they spent the money to help our future develop. It seems to be working. People need to stop looking at where we spent and assuming it meant we expected results. We didn't pick the wrong free agents, we likely picked the best ones that would come to a team just starting what looked like a bleak rebuild, and we likely knowingly overpaid them to come here. But the people making those moves did them eyes wide open.

The only reason you are worried about flexibility thus year is because your expectations have gone from this might take 5 years, to if we had that flexibility, maybe we could do it this year. Again, that's only a concern because things went so well. And any cap woes go away next season any way, the plan is being followed very well.
Cleveland Steam Whistle is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Cleveland Steam Whistle For This Useful Post:
Old 09-17-2016, 11:51 AM   #75
calgarygeologist
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Exp:
Default

Looks like the cap situation has changed pretty rapidly. Wasn't it just two years ago that the Flames had the most cap space in the NHL (or they were right near the top?)
calgarygeologist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2016, 11:59 AM   #76
Robbob
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by calgarygeologist View Post
Looks like the cap situation has changed pretty rapidly. Wasn't it just two years ago that the Flames had the most cap space in the NHL (or they were right near the top?)
The progression for the kids has been exponential. It's good because that means they are a home run pick, it's bad because it skips the cheaper bridge which can handcuff you a lot sooner then expected.
Robbob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2016, 12:12 PM   #77
burnitdown
Scoring Winger
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cleveland Steam Whistle View Post
You are missing the point. The Flames paid players 2 years ago, likely a premium to come play on a team slotted to finish at the bottom for years to come, because they were going to treat the rebuild differently. They wanted the young guys surrounded by competition, not just given their duties.

The Flames didn't spend close to the cap because they thought those moves were going to be what made us a contender, they spent the money to help our future develop. It seems to be working. People need to stop looking at where we spent and assuming it meant we expected results. We didn't pick the wrong free agents, we likely picked the best ones that would come to a team just starting what looked like a bleak rebuild, and we likely knowingly overpaid them to come here. But the people making those moves did them eyes wide open.

The only reason you are worried about flexibility thus year is because your expectations have gone from this might take 5 years, to if we had that flexibility, maybe we could do it this year. Again, that's only a concern because things went so well. And any cap woes go away next season any way, the plan is being followed very well.
I think we just fundamentally disagree and that's fair. You think the overpaid free agents were great cause they came in, pushed the young guys, and we had lots of cap room so who cares if we spent way more than needed. Maybe they did, but I think our rebuild has been driven by our young guns and trades...despite the overpaid and/or unnecessary free agency missteps.

Just because we're against the cap now doesn't make us a better team and it certainly doesn't mean the rebuild is moving way faster than expected. It could just mean we spent some money improperly. The progress of our rebuild should be judged on the improvement in our position in the standings...that's why I'm saying this up-coming year is a big one!
burnitdown is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to burnitdown For This Useful Post:
Old 09-17-2016, 12:26 PM   #78
MarkGio
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Exp:
Default

I don't understand this ownership sometimes. They won't retain salary, yet they're OK with signing Stajan to 5 years or Engelland to over 3 million. And they'll trade for Riberio? Be prudent with Gaudreau, the franchise forward?
MarkGio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2016, 12:33 PM   #79
MarkGio
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by burnitdown View Post
I think we just fundamentally disagree and that's fair. You think the overpaid free agents were great cause they came in, pushed the young guys, and we had lots of cap room so who cares if we spent way more than needed. Maybe they did, but I think our rebuild has been driven by our young guns and trades...despite the overpaid and/or unnecessary free agency missteps.

Just because we're against the cap now doesn't make us a better team and it certainly doesn't mean the rebuild is moving way faster than expected. It could just mean we spent some money improperly. The progress of our rebuild should be judged on the improvement in our position in the standings...that's why I'm saying this up-coming year is a big one!
Agreed. If the Flames win a cup, it won't be due to Frolik, Brouwer, Engelland, Wideman, Bollig or Stajan, which are all bottom six/bottom pair guys, it will be based on Monahan, Gaudreau, Hamilton, Brodie, Bennett, etc. showing up in the playoffs or taking those next steps.

That's true for any cup winning team. When Crosby and Malkin show up, they win a cup. The last guy to win a Con Smyth who wasn't a franchise player was Justin Williams, but he can put up points in the regular season
MarkGio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2016, 12:33 PM   #80
the2bears
Franchise Player
 
the2bears's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: The Bay Area
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MarkGio View Post
I don't understand this ownership sometimes. They won't retain salary, yet they're OK with signing Stajan to 5 years or Engelland to over 3 million. And they'll trade for Riberio? Be prudent with Gaudreau, the franchise forward?
It's almost as if we're all dealing with a very incomplete and limited set of the data.
the2bears is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to the2bears For This Useful Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:29 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy