Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

View Poll Results: Will flames make the playoffs in the 2016/2017 season
yes 175 63.18%
no 102 36.82%
Voters: 277. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-26-2016, 03:41 PM   #61
GullFoss
Franchise Player
 
GullFoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Exp:
Default

The team has 3 second round picks, and a 1st round pick. And they probably have 15m in cap space after resigning monahan and johnny. So, there are plenty of tools, not only to make the playoffs, but to build a contender.

If the team drafts top 3, if takes care of a top 6 winger. Even if they don't $15m and 3 second round picks is enough to take care of goaltending and a top 6.

Johnny (7.5) - Monahan (6) - Ferland (1)
Stamkos (9) - Bennett (2) - Frolik (4.5)
Bouma (2) - Backlund (3.5) - Colborne (2)
Jankowski (1) - Stajan (3) - Jooris (1)
Bollig (1)

Gio (7) - Brodie (4)
Hamilton (6) - Jokipakka (1)
Wideman (5) - Nakladal (1)
Engelland (3)

Vasilevskiy (1)
Ortio (1)

Forward: 44
Defense: 27
Goalie: 2

Total: $73m
GullFoss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2016, 03:47 PM   #62
hockey.modern
First Line Centre
 
hockey.modern's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GullFoss View Post
The team has 3 second round picks, and a 1st round pick. And they probably have 15m in cap space after resigning monahan and johnny. So, there are plenty of tools, not only to make the playoffs, but to build a contender.

If the team drafts top 3, if takes care of a top 6 winger. Even if they don't $15m and 3 second round picks is enough to take care of goaltending and a top 6.

Johnny (7.5) - Monahan (6) - Ferland (1)
Stamkos (9) - Bennett (2) - Frolik (4.5)
Bouma (2) - Backlund (3.5) - Colborne (2)
Jankowski (1) - Stajan (3) - Jooris (1)
Bollig (1)

Gio (7) - Brodie (4)
Hamilton (6) - Jokipakka (1)
Wideman (5) - Nakladal (1)
Engelland (3)

Vasilevskiy (1)
Ortio (1)

Forward: 44
Defense: 27
Goalie: 2

Total: $73m


Unless I'm completely missing something, where did this extra $15m come from after signing Gaudreau and Monahan?
__________________
Sam "Beard" Bennett
hockey.modern is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2016, 03:54 PM   #63
GC91
Crash and Bang Winger
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Exp:
Default

This question can't be addressed until the goaltending situation is dealt with. Solid goaltending could have had this team in the playoffs. That might not have been the best scenario for this franchise right now. I'm kind of excited at the possibilities of bringing in another high end draft pick and fixing the goaltending situation within the next two years. I think this team is only a few small moves away from being a lottery team to becoming a perennial playoff team. Few years away from contending though for sure
GC91 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2016, 03:55 PM   #64
Fire of the Phoenix
#1 Goaltender
 
Fire of the Phoenix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Northern Crater
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by killer_carlson View Post
I've lost confidence in BT for not addressing the goalie situation earlier in the year and essentially blowing the season.
Who should he have traded for and what would you stomach him giving up?

It's pretty easy to criticize but what do you think he should've done? Trade a 1st for Jones/Lehner? Just grab a different mediocre goalie? Bring Kiprusoff out of retirement?

You make it sound like he didn't feel like addressing the situation but the reality is that there likely wasn't anything available that wasn't a marginal upgrade, that didn't cost an arm and a leg.

The team is still re-building, I don't think Treliving should have to apologize for not acquiring a top 10 goalie during his second off season on the job.
Fire of the Phoenix is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Fire of the Phoenix For This Useful Post:
Old 03-26-2016, 03:57 PM   #65
GC91
Crash and Bang Winger
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fire of the Phoenix View Post
Who should he have traded for and what would you stomach him giving up?

It's pretty easy to criticize but what do you think he should've done? Trade a 1st for Jones/Lehner? Just grab a different mediocre goalie? Bring Kiprusoff out of retirement?

You make it sound like he didn't feel like addressing the situation but the reality is that there likely wasn't anything available that wasn't a marginal upgrade, that didn't cost an arm and a leg.

The team is still re-building, I don't think Treliving should have to apologize for not acquiring a top 10 goalie during his second off season on the job.
100 percent agree. There wasn't much options out there to address this situation right now... And kind of pointless considering the status of the franchise. It's a process to build a contender. Stay on coarse
GC91 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2016, 04:08 PM   #66
GullFoss
Franchise Player
 
GullFoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hockey.modern View Post
Unless I'm completely missing something, where did this extra $15m come from after signing Gaudreau and Monahan?
Ramo (4)
Hiller (4)
Hudler (4)
Jones (4)
Smid (4)
Russell (3)
Total is 23

Plus 1m spare cap space coming into the season. Plus savings from burying raymond. Monahan and jonny already had ~2m in cap hits each i think. So its an extra ~9m btwn the two of them to get monahan up to 6m and johnny up to 7.

23+1-9 = 15m

Calgary is a legitimate option for stamkos imo.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paulie Walnuts View Post
The fact Gullfoss is not banned for life on here is such an embarrassment. Just a joke.
GullFoss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2016, 04:10 PM   #67
GC91
Crash and Bang Winger
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Exp:
Default

Stamkos does not want to come to Calgary. Wouldn't get my hopes up for that
GC91 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2016, 04:14 PM   #68
hockey.modern
First Line Centre
 
hockey.modern's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GullFoss View Post
Ramo (4)
Hiller (4)
Hudler (4)
Jones (4)
Smid (4)
Russell (3)
Total is 23

Plus 1m spare cap space coming into the season. Plus savings from burying raymond. Monahan and jonny already had ~2m in cap hits each i think. So its an extra ~9m btwn the two of them to get monahan up to 6m and johnny up to 7.

23+1-9 = 15m

Calgary is a legitimate option for stamkos imo.
I'm really not understanding how $9 million between them equals 6M+7M. Following your same format it goes like this:

Quote:
Ramo (4)
Hiller (4)
Hudler (4)
Jones (4)
Smid (4)
Russell (3)
Total is 23
Smid might be back, but again i'll use your guidelines.

Gaudreau: $8M
Monahan: $6.5M
Total = $14.5M

23M-14.5M = $8.5M

Sign a 1A goalie that will probably want $4M and your left with $4.5M. No room for Stamkos at all.
__________________
Sam "Beard" Bennett
hockey.modern is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to hockey.modern For This Useful Post:
Old 03-26-2016, 04:20 PM   #69
gvitaly
Franchise Player
 
gvitaly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hockey.modern View Post
I'm really not understanding how $9 million between them equals 6M+7M. Following your same format it goes like this:



Smid might be back, but again i'll use your guidelines.

Gaudreau: $8M
Monahan: $6.5M
Total = $14.5M

23M-14.5M = $8.5M

Sign a 1A goalie that will probably want $4M and your left with $4.5M. No room for Stamkos at all.
Also don't forget the Gio $2.73M raise!
gvitaly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2016, 05:47 PM   #70
GullFoss
Franchise Player
 
GullFoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hockey.modern View Post
I'm really not understanding how $9 million between them equals 6M+7M. Following your same format it goes like this:



Smid might be back, but again i'll use your guidelines.

Gaudreau: $8M
Monahan: $6.5M
Total = $14.5M

23M-14.5M = $8.5M

Sign a 1A goalie that will probably want $4M and your left with $4.5M. No room for Stamkos at all.
Youre forgetting to subtract the $2m cap hits they each have this year from your 14.5m salary number...their getting paid 14.5m combined, buts its only a raise of 10.5m

Ive been told though the grapevine that Smid will not be back due to his injury.

Also, i dont think the flames should be spending cap on a goalie next year becaude there isnt anyone proven. If we spend 4m on a goalie like riemer and give him term...what happens if he turns into hiller? I think its better to give up a couple second round picks and take a chance on either of the young (and cap friendly) goalies in tampa or pitsburgh
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paulie Walnuts View Post
The fact Gullfoss is not banned for life on here is such an embarrassment. Just a joke.
GullFoss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2016, 05:57 PM   #71
Jason14h
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Exp:
Default

The issue with your proposal is the goalies .

We could afford stamkos with 2 one million goalies in net . But that's almost certain disaster unless we believe Ortio in a number 1. Which I don't
Jason14h is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2016, 06:03 PM   #72
hockey.modern
First Line Centre
 
hockey.modern's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GullFoss View Post
Youre forgetting to subtract the $2m cap hits they each have this year from your 14.5m salary number...their getting paid 14.5m combined, buts its only a raise of 10.5m

Ive been told though the grapevine that Smid will not be back due to his injury.

Also, i dont think the flames should be spending cap on a goalie next year becaude there isnt anyone proven. If we spend 4m on a goalie like riemer and give him term...what happens if he turns into hiller? I think its better to give up a couple second round picks and take a chance on either of the young (and cap friendly) goalies in tampa or pitsburgh
I still don't get this quote:
Quote:
Youre forgetting to subtract the $2m cap hits they each have this year from your 14.5m salary number...their getting paid 14.5m combined, buts its only a raise of 10.5m
This year they make a total of $1,850,000 together on their ELC. When they get they're new contracts, it has nothing to do with what they made before. Yes, that they make a raise of 10.5M together, but you don't subtract 2M from the previous year. It's a whole new contract. There isn't anyone proven on the market? Andersen, Elliot, Reimer etc.

Quote:
If we spend 4m on a goalie like riemer and give him term...what happens if he turns into hiller? I think its better to give up a couple second round picks and take a chance on either of the young (and cap friendly) goalies in tampa or pitsburgh
What happens if those goalies turn into Hiller as well? They are way more unproven then guys on the market. Plus, I highly doubt teams are willing to trade up their upcoming goalies with a possible expansion draft.
__________________
Sam "Beard" Bennett
hockey.modern is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2016, 06:07 PM   #73
Jason14h
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Exp:
Default

ELCs have bonuses that count against the cap . Up to 3.5 million total a tease I believe
Jason14h is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Jason14h For This Useful Post:
Old 03-26-2016, 07:22 PM   #74
alan21
Don't click that link!
 
alan21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Rural Alberta
Exp:
Default

There's little incentive for Lucic to come here as a few people have speculated unless we overpay. Everyone in here would be complaining his anchor of a contract by game 10 in the first year of his multi year deal.
alan21 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to alan21 For This Useful Post:
Old 03-26-2016, 07:47 PM   #75
Erick Estrada
Franchise Player
 
Erick Estrada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
Exp:
Default

Anything is possible but for playoffs to happen I believe the starting goaltender would have to be really, really good and I don't mean NHL average.
Erick Estrada is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2016, 07:59 PM   #76
Hockey
Franchise Player
 
Hockey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Pitt Meadows
Exp:
Default

If you guys get decent goaltending then yes.
Hockey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2016, 10:16 AM   #77
spuzzum
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Exp:
Default

I voted no. Good foundational core moving forward but too many glaring holes and team statistics. We've all mentioned it:

-Solid goaltender
-Dramatic improvement in PP and PK
-Supplementary scoring and depth
-Not as urgently needed: Getting bigger
spuzzum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2016, 10:55 AM   #78
Fire of the Phoenix
#1 Goaltender
 
Fire of the Phoenix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Northern Crater
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hockey View Post
If you guys get decent goaltending then yes.
This guy gets it. If this team can post a SLIGHTLY above average team sv% of .915, that alone will shave about 50 goals off the GA, giving the Flames a positive goal differential and put them right in the mix for a playoff spot IMO.

If the team acquires both an average starting and a top 6 forward, the playoffs are very, very likely. Teams like Minnesota, San Jose and Nashville aren't markedly better than Calgary, the Flames are a decent goalie goalie away from being on even footing with them. Add in a top 6 forward and internal improvement from guys like Bennett and Hamilton, and the Flames are BETTER than those teams IMO.

For as delusional the Oilers fans are about their team in a positive direction, the Flames fanbase seems almost the same way, just in a negative way. It's like we're trying to overcompensate for their brazen arrogance or something. As far as fanbases go, we are the frickin' Eeyore of the NHL.
Fire of the Phoenix is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2016, 11:04 AM   #79
Demetric
Scoring Winger
 
Demetric's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: 0° latitude, 0° longitude
Exp:
Default

If they win enough games yes. If not no.

Sent from my SM-G900W8 using Tapatalk
__________________
Let the Yutes play!
Demetric is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2016, 11:46 AM   #80
CliffFletcher
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2006
Exp:
Default

Doubt it. There are too many holes to patch with the money Treliving will have at his disposal. While I think the team will improve internally, it will probably still fall short. Hartley's message and methods are getting stale at this point.

And while the goaltending has been bad this season, a lot of other stuff has gone really well. Gaudreau and Monahan have played as well as we could hope. The team has been quite healthy. A team as top-heavy as the Flames is very vulnerable to injuries.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by fotze View Post
If this day gets you riled up, you obviously aren't numb to the disappointment yet to be a real fan.
CliffFletcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:09 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy