Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-01-2016, 12:29 PM   #61
neo45
#1 Goaltender
 
neo45's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GranteedEV View Post
Hamilton plays well against the East in general. He's got the book on East players.
Yes that is a good point. He is visibly more comfortable against Eastern teams
neo45 is offline  
Old 03-01-2016, 12:32 PM   #62
genetic_phreek
First Line Centre
 
genetic_phreek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: VanCity
Exp:
icon57

Engelland may have some terrible numbers but one factor people seem to overlook is that with his presence it allows other players to play the way they want.

This is what I noticed from last night: after Simmonds hit Gio into the boards, I saw Engelland rough him up quite a bit in the corners and Simmonds had no physical presence after that. Not sure how you would quantify such a thing as playing with confidence or no fear or whatever you want to call it. These are factors that can never be measured with time or percentage. Not to say Gio would change the way he plays but it certainly changed the way Simmonds played the rest of the game.

I'm sure some other people could find other situations or examples but in my opinion I think having that presence is needed with a young team developing. Don't get me wrong, I scream about some bad defensive plays Engelland makes but I think what he does in terms of leadership presence is still valuable.
genetic_phreek is offline  
The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to genetic_phreek For This Useful Post:
Old 03-01-2016, 12:39 PM   #63
Flames Draft Watcher
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by genetic_phreek View Post
Engelland may have some terrible numbers but one factor people seem to overlook is that with his presence it allows other players to play the way they want.

This is what I noticed from last night: after Simmonds hit Gio into the boards, I saw Engelland rough him up quite a bit in the corners and Simmonds had no physical presence after that. Not sure how you would quantify such a thing as playing with confidence or no fear or whatever you want to call it. These are factors that can never be measured with time or percentage. Not to say Gio would change the way he plays but it certainly changed the way Simmonds played the rest of the game.

I'm sure some other people could find other situations or examples but in my opinion I think having that presence is needed with a young team developing. Don't get me wrong, I scream about some bad defensive plays Engelland makes but I think what he does in terms of leadership presence is still valuable.
Yep. Anyone who relies too much on stats misses dynamics like big, strong players making your other players feel safer, or bigger or tougher, just cause they know guys like Ferland, Engelland, Bollig and Bouma have their back. Easy to spot which fans don't understand that dynamic as they constantly question the need for those types of players in our lineup.

This is part of why I say you can't scratch the only big, strong, tough defenseman you have. We become too easy to play against back there. That team toughness means something even though you can't measure it easily. Engelland plastering guys along the boards is good for morale. Team morale, fan morale. Engelland stepping in and taking exception to another team's forward running around is a good thing. Having guys like Bollig and Engelland keeps certain players and teams more honest. They are potentially reducing the amount of liberties other physical players will take with our young players.

We need more toughness on the backend not less. We're not going to scratch the only guy providing it, that's silly.

Last edited by Flames Draft Watcher; 03-01-2016 at 12:41 PM.
Flames Draft Watcher is offline  
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Flames Draft Watcher For This Useful Post:
Old 03-01-2016, 12:47 PM   #64
Red
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flames Draft Watcher View Post
Yep. Anyone who relies too much on stats misses dynamics like big, strong players making your other players feel safer, or bigger or tougher, just cause they know guys like Ferland, Engelland, Bollig and Bouma have their back. Easy to spot which fans don't understand that dynamic as they constantly question the need for those types of players in our lineup.

This is part of why I say you can't scratch the only big, strong, tough defenseman you have. We become too easy to play against back there. That team toughness means something even though you can't measure it easily. Engelland plastering guys along the boards is good for morale. Team morale, fan morale. Engelland stepping in and taking exception to another team's forward running around is a good thing. Having guys like Bollig and Engelland keeps certain players and teams more honest. They are potentially reducing the amount of liberties other physical players will take with our young players.

We need more toughness on the backend not less. We're not going to scratch the only guy providing it, that's silly.
Plus opposing players try to avoid such bruisers and tend to turn the other way, essentially changing their game. We heard all about that when we had guys like Reggie or even Gauthier back in the day. Not going to show on any stat sheets, that's for sure.
Red is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to Red For This Useful Post:
Old 03-01-2016, 01:10 PM   #65
dammage79
Franchise Player
 
dammage79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss View Post
His status must have changed, otherwise as an emergency recall he has to be sent down as the emergency does not exist anymore. Unless he has already been sent down and it hasn't been announced.
He's been sent down. But you know that by now haha.
dammage79 is offline  
Old 03-01-2016, 01:12 PM   #66
Super-Rye
First Line Centre
 
Super-Rye's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

So Wotherspoon has been re-assigned to the AHL. Reason being that he was actually an emergency recall for the Flames and nowbthat Jokipakka is on the roster they had to send him back.

Ortio is also an emergency recall and will have to be sent back when Backstrom is on the roster. So tonight might be the last time we see Ortio for a bit.
Super-Rye is offline  
Old 03-01-2016, 01:16 PM   #67
Flames Draft Watcher
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Super-Rye View Post
Ortio is also an emergency recall and will have to be sent back when Backstrom is on the roster. So tonight might be the last time we see Ortio for a bit.
Eh. Treliving basically said they want Ortio to get the bulk of the starts the rest of the season. So somehow they're going to get him back up here.
Flames Draft Watcher is offline  
Old 03-01-2016, 01:22 PM   #68
Super-Rye
First Line Centre
 
Super-Rye's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flames Draft Watcher View Post
Eh. Treliving basically said they want Ortio to get the bulk of the starts the rest of the season. So somehow they're going to get him back up here.
Yeah they'll probably paper transaction him to Stockton then burn one of their 3 remaining recalls on him.

Last edited by Super-Rye; 03-01-2016 at 01:26 PM.
Super-Rye is offline  
Old 03-01-2016, 02:54 PM   #69
FlameFan21
#1 Goaltender
 
FlameFan21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Exp:
Default

So, who's getting the hatty this time? Bergeron? Krejci? Eriksson...?
FlameFan21 is offline  
Old 03-01-2016, 02:55 PM   #70
codynw
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FlameFan21 View Post
So, who's getting the hatty this time? Bergeron? Krejci? Eriksson...?
Rask?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by CroFlames View Post
Before you call me a pessimist or a downer, the Flames made me this way. Blame them.
codynw is offline  
Old 03-01-2016, 03:07 PM   #71
bob-loblaw
First Line Centre
 
bob-loblaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FlameFan21 View Post
So, who's getting the hatty this time? Bergeron? Krejci? Eriksson...?
Rinaldo.
bob-loblaw is offline  
Old 03-01-2016, 03:25 PM   #72
JurassicTunga12
Franchise Player
 
JurassicTunga12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Exp:
Default

One thing when looking at the roster list on the Flames website is that the Flames now only have one player under 6'0, and that is Gaudreau.

Last edited by JurassicTunga12; 03-01-2016 at 03:28 PM.
JurassicTunga12 is online now  
Old 03-01-2016, 03:34 PM   #73
GranteedEV
Franchise Player
 
GranteedEV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flames Draft Watcher View Post
Yep. Anyone who relies too much on stats misses dynamics like big, strong players making your other players feel safer, or bigger or tougher, just cause they know guys like Ferland, Engelland, Bollig and Bouma have their back. Easy to spot which fans don't understand that dynamic as they constantly question the need for those types of players in our lineup.

This is part of why I say you can't scratch the only big, strong, tough defenseman you have. We become too easy to play against back there. That team toughness means something even though you can't measure it easily. Engelland plastering guys along the boards is good for morale. Team morale, fan morale. Engelland stepping in and taking exception to another team's forward running around is a good thing. Having guys like Bollig and Engelland keeps certain players and teams more honest. They are potentially reducing the amount of liberties other physical players will take with our young players.

We need more toughness on the backend not less. We're not going to scratch the only guy providing it, that's silly.
All conjecture and opinion. WHich you're welcome to, but just recognize that there's no proof, other than anecdote, of what you're saying.

Quote:
Hjalmarsson is one of the best physical defensive defensemen in the entire league. A very underrated part of the reason why they are successful.

We badly need a player like Hjalmarsson. Add that and a real goalie and suddenly most of our problems would be gone.
Hjalmarsson isn't physical. He's effective, and he skews towards defensive(though his actual production is pretty close to Kris Russell), but he's not especially physical. No more than Gio or Hamilton. And yes we badly need a player as GOOD as Hjalmarsson on our second pair. I'll be the first to say that much.

Last edited by GranteedEV; 03-01-2016 at 03:37 PM.
GranteedEV is offline  
Old 03-01-2016, 03:40 PM   #74
Lanny'sDaMan
Franchise Player
 
Lanny'sDaMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Nachodamus.
Exp:
Default

Making your way in the NHL
Takes everything You've got!
Taking a break from the Deadline worries
Sure would help a lot.

Wouldn't you like the Flames to win?

Sometime you need a goal
And the crowd screams Johnny's name.
And Monahan's passing just the same.
You wanna see the red lamp light
Over top of Tukka's head.

You wanna see Johnny score that goal again....

Again!!!!!


Spoiler!
Lanny'sDaMan is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to Lanny'sDaMan For This Useful Post:
Old 03-01-2016, 03:46 PM   #75
Flames Draft Watcher
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GranteedEV View Post
All conjecture and opinion. WHich you're welcome to, but just recognize that there's no proof, other than anecdote, of what you're saying.
Everything you can't measure doesn't exist right?

Quote:
Originally Posted by GranteedEV View Post
Hjalmarsson isn't physical. He's effective, and he skews towards defensive(though his actual production is pretty close to Kris Russell), but he's not especially physical. No more than Gio or Hamilton. And yes we badly need a player as GOOD as Hjalmarsson on our second pair. I'll be the first to say that much.
Hjalmarsson uses his strength and size to shut down the opposition. He's a shutdown defender. Part of how he does it is his size. He may not be a big open ice hitter but part of what I mean when I talk about physicality is how a player uses their size to shut down an opposing player through subtle holds, hooks, pushes, leans, etc.

We need a top 4 shutdown defender. That much has been obvious for a while. You have been suggesting scratching one of our only shutdown defenders in Engelland which would be crazy talk since we're so short of them and don't possess a top 4 shutdown defender anymore.
Flames Draft Watcher is offline  
Old 03-01-2016, 04:20 PM   #76
1qqaaz
Franchise Player
 
1qqaaz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Indiana
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flames Draft Watcher View Post
Everything you can't measure doesn't exist right?



Hjalmarsson uses his strength and size to shut down the opposition. He's a shutdown defender. Part of how he does it is his size. He may not be a big open ice hitter but part of what I mean when I talk about physicality is how a player uses their size to shut down an opposing player through subtle holds, hooks, pushes, leans, etc.

We need a top 4 shutdown defender. That much has been obvious for a while. You have been suggesting scratching one of our only shutdown defenders in Engelland which would be crazy talk since we're so short of them and don't possess a top 4 shutdown defender anymore.
Speaking of size, I thought I would point that everyone playing on the Flames tonight is at least 6'1 or taller except Giordano and Gaudreau.

With Russell, Granlund and Hudler gone, I wonder if we'll be more physical for the rest of the year.
1qqaaz is offline  
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to 1qqaaz For This Useful Post:
Old 03-01-2016, 04:32 PM   #77
Flames Draft Watcher
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1qqaaz View Post
Speaking of size, I thought I would point that everyone playing on the Flames tonight is at least 6'1 or taller except Giordano and Gaudreau.

With Russell, Granlund and Hudler gone, I wonder if we'll be more physical for the rest of the year.
Raymond demoted too. Granlund, Raymond and Hudler were the smallest/softest players on the team.

Good catch. Management is slowly building towards a larger, stronger team. It's the only way we can hope to compete in the Pacific with the size/strength of the Ducks, Kings and Sharks.

Johnny and the Giants.
Flames Draft Watcher is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to Flames Draft Watcher For This Useful Post:
Old 03-01-2016, 04:41 PM   #78
MissTeeks
Franchise Player
 
MissTeeks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Jesus, every thread on here seems to have become a giant fight. It's driving me crazy. Some actual game day news:

Wes Gilbertson
Wes Gilbertson – Verified account ‏@WesGilbertson

#Flames RW Garnet Hathaway working with LW Johnny Gaudreau and C Sean Monahan in pre-game line rushes. Farmhand to first-liner in two days.
__________________
The Quest stands upon the edge of a knife. Stray but a little, and it will fail, to the ruin of all. Yet hope remains while the Company is true. Go Flames Go!

Pain heals. Chicks dig scars. Glory... lasts forever.
MissTeeks is online now  
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to MissTeeks For This Useful Post:
Old 03-01-2016, 04:46 PM   #79
dash_pinched
Franchise Player
 
dash_pinched's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Maple Bay, B.C.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bob-loblaw View Post
Rinaldo.
Man, that would be quite the feat all the way from Providence (plus a suspension), but nothing would surprise me anymore.
dash_pinched is offline  
Old 03-01-2016, 04:48 PM   #80
GranteedEV
Franchise Player
 
GranteedEV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flames Draft Watcher View Post
Everything you can't measure doesn't exist right?
Something that can't be consistently and reliably observed in conditions free from bias, likely doesn't exist.

You have an opinion/theory and all I'm saying is, you should still admit that's what it is. I don't mind your opinion and it's something that is probably shared by many - but I'm just pointing out that it's not a fact.

Last edited by GranteedEV; 03-01-2016 at 04:51 PM.
GranteedEV is offline  
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:51 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy