Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

View Poll Results: Who would you rather trade?
Wideman 166 53.72%
Russell 78 25.24%
Don't care. just shake up this team! 65 21.04%
Voters: 309. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-27-2015, 08:16 PM   #61
442scotty
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Exp:
Default

The Flames will play hard to get for both especially Russell claiming that they want to resign him.... Hes a great skater once he has the puck but he's too small for defence on a team loaded with smaller D already... Move them both if you can get a great return... Lots of others to fill their shoes..
442scotty is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to 442scotty For This Useful Post:
Old 10-27-2015, 08:17 PM   #62
442scotty
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by budblazer View Post
iggy with gaudreau would be awesome
Please... no more we want Iggy... Arggg
442scotty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2015, 08:20 PM   #63
Strange Brew
Franchise Player
 
Strange Brew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss View Post
Insider Trading:
http://www.tsn.ca/nhl/video/insider-trading~736500

McKenzie claims Wideman is the most likely tradebait and the Flames would prefer not to move Russell and re-sign him.

Claims a lot of teams have interest in Russell.
So for sake of argument we trade Wideman and retain $2 million and sign Russell to a contract at $3.5 per. Keeps us in cap jail until end of next year when almost all the crap disappears. And really locks us into our top 4 on defense.

I don't know. Return on Wideman would have to be good.
Strange Brew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2015, 08:21 PM   #64
Lanny_McDonald
Franchise Player
 
Lanny_McDonald's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Exp:
Default

Trade both. I believe we have better long term options in the minors.
Lanny_McDonald is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Lanny_McDonald For This Useful Post:
Old 10-27-2015, 08:23 PM   #65
Badgers Nose
Franchise Player
 
Badgers Nose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss View Post
Insider Trading:
http://www.tsn.ca/nhl/video/insider-trading~736500

McKenzie claims Wideman is the most likely tradebait and the Flames would prefer not to move Russell and re-sign him.

Claims a lot of teams have interest in Russell.
Smart negotiation tactic to drive up the price on Russell? If they get a good asset for him that would be pretty sweet given the low cost of acquisition in the first place. Same with Wideman, really.
Badgers Nose is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2015, 08:25 PM   #66
Major Major
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cali Panthers Fan View Post
Watching Iginla tonight against the Panthers. He doesn't stand out in any way. Iginla will always be able to shoot, and he does some other things relatively well, but he's well past his prime and I doubt he improves anything for the Flames.
We certainly wouldn't want anyone who can shoot on this team.

He will score 25-30 this season and next for whoever he plays for. Why not the Flames?
Major Major is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2015, 08:28 PM   #67
Vinny01
Franchise Player
 
Vinny01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

No need to trade Russell right now so if a team really wants him they will have to pay up or wait until the deadline if we are selling and he goes to the highest bidder. Treliving is definitely in a position of strength when it comes to trading Russell
Vinny01 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Vinny01 For This Useful Post:
Old 10-27-2015, 08:46 PM   #68
theTrumanShow
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stud_McCool View Post
Bad time to trade either. Their trade value has plummeted, so the return will be underwhelming.
Player's values do not plummet 10 games into a season....
theTrumanShow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2015, 09:04 PM   #69
The Original FFIV
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vinny01 View Post
No need to trade Russell right now so if a team really wants him they will have to pay up or wait until the deadline if we are selling and he goes to the highest bidder. Treliving is definitely in a position of strength when it comes to trading Russell
Always risk of injury though so if you can get deal done earlier that you are content with, all the more better. Given the shortage of d on the market, should fetch a nice return now, let alone closer to deadline.
The Original FFIV is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2015, 09:15 PM   #70
Iceman90
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Iceman90's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Behind the microphone
Exp:
Default

I think we'll get more for Russell if we wait and deal him at the deadline.
__________________
Fireside Chat - Official Podcast for the C of Red
New Episode Weekly! Listen Now: FiresideChat.ca
Iceman90 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2015, 09:22 PM   #71
AcGold
Self-Suspension
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Exp:
Default

Jones, Bollig, Smid, Wideman and Russell should all be on the trading block. Wideman and Russell probably peak in value now and start steadily declining. No way Wideman gets better and Russell is too small for what he brings.
AcGold is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2015, 09:27 PM   #72
Erick Estrada
Franchise Player
 
Erick Estrada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
Exp:
Default

I'm actually very surprised the Flames want to retain Russell. He's really not very good defensively at all. I suppose Treliving and Hartley know more than I do but then again they decided it was a good idea to bring back Ramo at over $3 million. I would hope that Wideman's salary is prohibitive to a trade and Russell is the guy that is moved as I feel this would save the organization from making a bad move and locking the guy up long term.
Erick Estrada is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to Erick Estrada For This Useful Post:
Old 10-27-2015, 09:34 PM   #73
Vinny01
Franchise Player
 
Vinny01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Original FFIV View Post
Always risk of injury though so if you can get deal done earlier that you are content with, all the more better. Given the shortage of d on the market, should fetch a nice return now, let alone closer to deadline.
I agree with you but I am debunking the notion that the Flames are dealing from a position of weakness because of the slow start. If the offers for Russell are low ball then he doesn't have to trade him and has the option to hold onto him until the deal he likes comes along.

If he can get a 20-27 year old top 6 winger (or potential top 6 winger) pull the trigger immediately
Vinny01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2015, 09:45 PM   #74
Fire of the Phoenix
#1 Goaltender
 
Fire of the Phoenix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Northern Crater
Exp:
Default

Poll should have an option for both. Neither will be around by the time this team is a contender.
Fire of the Phoenix is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2015, 09:49 PM   #75
The Original FFIV
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Exp:
Default

Posting this quote in this thread.

5. As Calgary continues to struggle, GM Brad Treliving holds some sway over the defensive market. There are blueliners available, but few that are overly appetizing. Dennis Wideman’s played very well for them, one of the few who’s been above water during this ugly start.

“I’ve changed my opinion of him,” another GM said last week.

Maybe this anonymous gm is Bryan Murray. Perhaps that's why Eklund is 'linking' Ottawa to Wideman. More than likely him guessing but Murray is one of those gms that does leak info to the media.

Not much on the roster that's intriguing and we'd probably have to take money back. Puempel has always been an intriguing prospect, interesting that he's called up for the game vs us. Get a first hand viewing. Big g scorer in Jr. But not made the jump yet. Decent size and good shot.
The Original FFIV is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to The Original FFIV For This Useful Post:
Old 10-27-2015, 11:02 PM   #76
Harry Lime
Franchise Player
 
Harry Lime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Exp:
Default

I'd be very happy with Wideman for Puempel.
__________________
"By Grabthar's hammer ... what a savings."
Harry Lime is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2015, 11:38 PM   #77
ScorchyScorch
Scoring Winger
 
ScorchyScorch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Exp:
Default

Hey, if you can get a 25-30 goal Iginla in a trade without hurting our future to do it then I'm all for it. There's a new leadership group here, he's not re-claiming the C at any point. Gaudreau could set him up on the PP all day long.

But that's just my thought on it, don't think it's happening.

I don't care if we deal one of Russell or Wideman. We have a legitimate top 3 and guys like Hickey, Andersson, Kylington, Kulak and Nakladal could fill in the gaps in the coming seasons. Honestly not worried.

It's insane how much Russell is being ragged on though. He's been bad this season. But the guy I saw last spring from January until they bowed out against Anaheim was a solid #4 d-man. I think on an individual level he's having a slow start. These 9 games don't define him as a player and what he's capable of though.
ScorchyScorch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2015, 12:48 AM   #78
Calgary4LIfe
Franchise Player
 
Calgary4LIfe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Exp:
Default

Tough to move either/both right now.

Flames are trying to get their game back together. Wideman and Russell were both huge reasons why the Flames were good last year. Together with Giordano and Brodie, they comprised the top 4 highest scoring defence from any team. They also stepped up immensely when Giordano went down and helped this team into the playoffs, and out of round one. I thought Russell was fantastic against Vancouver.

Also, Wideman is the 15th highest scoring defencemen in the last 3 seasons (+ the start of this one). He also has done it in many less games than the guys in front of him over that same time period.

http://www.nhl.com/stats/player?repo...regate=1&pos=D

Now, I won't claim that he is elite, but he is elite or near elite offensively. That is worth quite a lot. If the Flames trade Wideman, their PP is going to suffer I would think. There is nobody able to get pucks consistently on net and with that kind of velocity.

Russell is elite at blocking shots. Now, people may role their eyes and counter with stuff like: "That just means he doesn't possess the puck enough", etc. Sure, valid argument. However, the Flames play a system where shot blocking is the backbone to the defending. Keep shots to the outside, block everything that comes through, jump on the rebounds and make a good first pass or skate the puck out. Russell does this pretty well.

Now, you may counter with the "Chris Butler was also a league leader in shots blocked". Fair enough. However, he sucked at it. He was good at getting in front of them. He absolutely sucked at everything else. Butler was horrible at deflections causing goals (so was Pardy as well). Kipper bailed them out quite a lot. I cringed when they would block shots. Anyone remember Butler's first pass out of the zone? Yeah, it wasn't good. Anyone remember Butler skating the puck out of the zone himself? Yeah, wasn't very good at that either. Russell is very good at both. He won't go to the corners and battle on the boards and come out with the puck - that is his biggest (and in my opinion, only) weakness as a defencemen. However, shot blocking is so underrated - especially on a team that uses it as a system.

There is literally nobody that is able to come in and replace what these two provide the team with.

With that being said, I think the Flames wait until mid-November. If they don't turn this ship around in the next couple of weeks, then a miracle is the only thing that will save this season. Like I said, these two were integral parts of why the Flames experienced a lot of success last season. You don't trade either of them until you think the season is lost.

The trade market for defencemen in mid-November should be just as good if not better than it is now. Teams will suffer injuries on top of not starting to separate from the pack. Good defencemen are always so highly valued.

If by mid November, the Flames are by all intents and purposes out of it, I think it would be wise to trade both. Wideman is getting older. Russell is undersized. Though there is absolutely NOBODY in the system that can replace either of these guys this season, I believe that in the upcoming seasons there will be. Kylington is probably a year or two out from starting to get NHL action. Kulak and Wotherspoon are near NHL-ready, but need a season or two of sheltering. Nakladal is probably the most NHL-ready - he may end up being a solid top 4 guy with a rocket of a shot, but it would be a gamble to think he can replace either one of those guys right now. Morrison should be ready, but he hardly looked like it pre-season - though I do think there is definite potential. Culkin is injured and will probably be ramping-up in the AHL again for at least a month once he returns. I won't even bring up anyone else (who I love) that are not playing pro hockey right now - I feel you need a least a season playing pro as a defencemen. It is a huge stretch to think that you can replace either/both Russell and Wideman internally at the moment.

Also, keep in mind that once Russell and/or Wideman are traded, you are now unable to shelter Engelland and Smid in the lineup. You are unable to properly shelter the incoming young defencemen as well either. Would have been great if Hamilton is further ahead defensively than he is now, but he isn't. According to Boston fans, he isn't playing 'badly' defensively - that is who he was and a lot of Boston fans hated him in the defensive zone, but freely admit that he is awesome offensively and that it would just be a matter of time before Hamilton becomes better in his own zone. By the looks of things, it seems Hamilton needs some sheltering of his own probably for the majority of this season.

In my opinion, you trade either one of Russell or Wideman (and especially both!), you may be giving up on the season. I don't think I am ready to do that at least until the mid-point of November if the Flames are really indeed out of it. They are not looking good right now (both on the ice, and in terms of the standings and how difficult it is to work your way back up into a playoff position), but they don't need a 'miracle run' at the moment. A couple more weeks of not turning it around, and they will need a miracle - and I would bet against a miracle and start trading away vets for futures again continuing with the rebuild.

I think they are both very attractive commodities. They both move the puck extremely well, and they are both capable skating the puck out of pressure - even though Wideman isn't fast. They are both capable of either leading the 1st unit of a team's powerplay, or leading the 2nd unit (Russell has a great shot). I can't imagine there wouldn't be a long list of teams trying to obtain either of them.

This is still a rebuild. Maybe last year is an aberration. Maybe the aberration is this year. Either way, rebuilds take time. If the Flames are out of it, I am definitely on board with trading both. Until then, I will argue until I am blue in the face that they are both part of the solution today. Neither one is part of the solution tomorrow, however. Not with Wideman's age, and Russell's size.

I do think they would fetch a healthy return. For me, win or lose, this will be yet another very interesting season to follow as a fan.
Calgary4LIfe is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Calgary4LIfe For This Useful Post:
Old 10-30-2015, 08:12 AM   #79
sureLoss
Some kinda newsbreaker!
 
sureLoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
Exp:
Default

Friedman on 960 says he honestly believes the Flames are going to try to re-sign Russell.

Also says he is not convinced Wideman will be moved yet.
sureLoss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2015, 08:37 AM   #80
Dajazz
Scoring Winger
 
Dajazz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Sweden
Exp:
Default

Where Wideman is severely underrated, Russell is overrated. Both are pretty solid hockey players and played really well down the stretch for us last season.

I am glad that Russell is good at defending, because that is what he ends up doing all the time. He needs to play on the bottom pairing to be efficient consistently. Sure he can move the puck up at times, he's a good shot blocker and a hard worker. But he lacks size, shot, puck skills and strength.

As for Wideman, he is what he is, a very good offensive d-man who's average in his own zone. Watch him play with Gio and you'll see how good he is, if anything, it's Russell that is the weak link on that pairing.

Keep them both, but shuffle the pairings. Gio won't work with Hamilton, at least not now, so spread out the minutes and put him with Wideman and get Brodie to breathe some life in to Hamilton.

Russell is good enough to lift either Smid or Engelland and makes a solid third pairing.

In the long term we have options, sure, but we don't know whom or when. There isn't one single player not on the flames that will make the blueline better. Nakladal? Borderline improvement on Smid or Engelland maybe, as for the rest, neither Kulak or Wotherspoon, or anyone else for that matter has succeded to lock down a spot in the NHL. Unless we are giving up on the season, we need both Wideman and Russell.
Dajazz is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:29 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy