10-21-2015, 03:04 PM
|
#61
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hockeyguy15
How do you know those are system issues rather than player mistakes?
|
When Russell has to make a stretch pass because the forward is all the way at the red line trying to get a quick tip, that's the system.
When Wideman is down at the hash-marks and the opponent chips the puck off the glass and there's no one at the blueline (where Wideman would be) to stop the puck and keep it in, that's the system.
When the power play depends on Wideman/Gio/Hamilton taking long slappers through traffic instead of getting it down low to Johnny, that's the system. Actually, the zone entries themselves are so predictable. Too much is asked of Johnny in the neutral zone on the PP - this isn't 1985 and he isn't Wayne Gretzky. Good carry-in systems have multiple points of entry with multiple options, especially with a man-advantage.
__________________

"May those who accept their fate find happiness. May those who defy it find glory."
Last edited by GranteedEV; 10-21-2015 at 03:07 PM.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to GranteedEV For This Useful Post:
|
|
10-21-2015, 03:21 PM
|
#62
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: 403
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by polak
What exactly is working in it so far?
|
Nothing. This season anyway
|
|
|
10-21-2015, 03:23 PM
|
#63
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: West of Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mdubz
Just a few off the top of my head:
- Constantly trying stretch passes that no longer work
- Not being able to keep possession in the offensive zone
- Not shooting when a shooting lane is available
- Wasting an entire power play trying to enter the offensive zone by dumping the puck in
|
All four of those can be solved by actually skating and working hard...two things they are not doing. Changing the "system" is a ridiculous idea after 6 games.
__________________
This Signature line was dated so I changed it.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to BigFlameDog For This Useful Post:
|
|
10-21-2015, 08:05 PM
|
#64
|
I believe in the Pony Power
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by polak
What exactly is working in it so far?
|
The point is you don't change systems this early in the season. You adapt and make adjustments.
Just like you don't' stop trading for quality young dman because the one you got has come out of the gate slow.
Surely you know this stuff. So are you trolling or what is the deal?
|
|
|
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to JiriHrdina For This Useful Post:
|
|
10-21-2015, 10:38 PM
|
#65
|
Powerplay Quarterback
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by polak
Hamilton on the bottom pairing and rightfully so.
Flames need to stop trying to trade for "Can't lose" d-men...
|
What a truly preposterous comment.
__________________
"If the oceans was whiskey and I was a duck, I'd swim to the bottom and never come up, but the oceans ain't whiskey, and I ain't no duck, so I'll play the Jack of Diamonds and toast to my luck..."
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Jables16 For This Useful Post:
|
|
10-22-2015, 01:30 AM
|
#66
|
Scoring Winger
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Sweden
|
I like the look of the lines, while I still like to see Jones get a stab with Johnny and Monahan, and Hudler with Bennett. Russell - Hamilton would be preferrable, but that'd leave Smid and Engelland together, ouch. Hiller in goal is fine, perhaps he can take chargé now, if not, Ortio is waiting to pounce.
|
|
|
10-22-2015, 09:26 AM
|
#67
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JiriHrdina
The point is you don't change systems this early in the season. You adapt and make adjustments.
Just like you don't' stop trading for quality young dman because the one you got has come out of the gate slow.
Surely you know this stuff. So are you trolling or what is the deal?
|
I see your point but just to be argumentative I could just as easily say you don't trade your top draft picks in an exceptionally deep draft and you don't sign young players to huge contracts until you know they are worth it.
My point is the Hamilton deal and contract always carried risk. To call it a failure now though is incredibly premature.
|
|
|
10-22-2015, 09:30 AM
|
#68
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Thunder Bay Ontario
|
to that point, doesn't every contract carry a risk? Some contracts look like great deals but then the players play drops off for no reason. Hamilton improved every year, he had NHL experience and was what the team was missing. The draft pick could never play a game in the NHL.
__________________
Fan of the Flames, where being OK has become OK.
|
|
|
10-22-2015, 09:31 AM
|
#69
|
In the Sin Bin
|
I'm not calling it a failure yet. I'm laughing at our misfortunes as it reminds me of the J-Bo trade.
|
|
|
10-22-2015, 09:48 AM
|
#70
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: About 5200 Miles from the Dome
|
^ I'm sure you were proclaiming the Bouwmeester trade an absolute failure 6 games into the season as well??
__________________
You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life.
Winston Churchill
|
|
|
10-22-2015, 09:49 AM
|
#71
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by polak
I'm not calling it a failure yet. I'm laughing at our misfortunes as it reminds me of the J-Bo trade.
|
J-Bo was at a much different point in his career when we traded for him, for that perspective it's very different.
From how things went, J-Bo actually started very well for the first couple of months in Calgary. I believe he was actually paired with Gio to start, our 2nd pairing and it looked great. What wasn't going well was our first pairing of Reg and Phaneuf, and eventually Gio / Bow got split up (never to be tried again I might add.........perplexing).
Anyway, I'd rather Hamilton, at 22, struggle a little out the gate as he finds his stride with a new team and a new system, and as he and the team try to find the right partner for him as well. Doesn't have to be Gio.
|
|
|
10-22-2015, 10:11 AM
|
#72
|
In the Sin Bin
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chingas
^ I'm sure you were proclaiming the Bouwmeester trade an absolute failure 6 games into the season as well?? 
|
Did I say its an absolute failure?
I compared him in an offhand remark to Bouwmeester cause that was talked about as the worst case scenario in the offseason and that's how he's playing like. It's not like I formulated some big rant about it, calling for his head.
|
|
|
10-22-2015, 10:21 AM
|
#73
|
Could Care Less
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JiriHrdina
The point is you don't change systems this early in the season. You adapt and make adjustments.
Just like you don't' stop trading for quality young dman because the one you got has come out of the gate slow.
Surely you know this stuff. So are you trolling or what is the deal?
|
It really seems like other teams have figured out the Flames system. Agreed that they shouldn't change it but it's on Hartley to make these adjustments and so far we have nothing to show for it.
I actually think the two biggest issues this year have been goaltending and coaching. Coaching in the sense that whatever adjustments Hartley is trying to make aren't working. Whether it's a lack of player execution/buy-in or poor analysis by the coaching staff remains to be seen. Oh, and obviously chemistry issues on D and missing Brodie has been a huge factor, but in a sense that ties into coaching as well.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:13 AM.
|
|