Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-03-2015, 11:11 PM   #61
sworkhard
First Line Centre
 
sworkhard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Slava View Post
Is it though? I mean I get with a single policy or single government where you have a group of criminals (Devine in Saskatchewan kind of thing). But when I look at the NDP I don't see successful governments in prosperous provinces? That continued mediocrity or worse makes me think its policy related and not just a single occurrence?
Saskatchewan was held back by red tape and a lack of developed oil infrastructure more than anything else. Other than that, IMO, the NDP did a pretty good job living within their means there. Their record in Saskatchewan is a positive more than a negative IMO. When the Saskatchewan party came in and cut the red tape, combined with the Stelmach royalty rate increases in Alberta, investment there finally took off. If anything, this shows that while they may not have made the necessary decisions to start taking advantage of their resources, they left the province set up for success when the next government finally made some necessary changes. Ontario, IMO, is a prime case of a NDP failure if your looking for one.

However, despite having the same names, the Alberta NDP reflects the ideals of Albertan's far more than the parties of the same name in other provinces. At this point I'm not worried about the NDP causing long term economic harm, at least not in the next 4 years. If they win a majority, I'll evaluate their performance in 2019, and if it's mediocre given the circumstances, I'll switch my vote to a more economically conservative party not called the Wild Rose (unless they change their education policy) at that time.

Last edited by sworkhard; 05-03-2015 at 11:16 PM.
sworkhard is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to sworkhard For This Useful Post:
Old 05-03-2015, 11:16 PM   #62
GGG
Franchise Player
 
GGG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: California
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Slava View Post
Is it though? I mean I get with a single policy or single government where you have a group of criminals (Devine in Saskatchewan kind of thing). But when I look at the NDP I don't see successful governments in prosperous provinces? That continued mediocrity or worse makes me think its policy related and not just a single occurrence?
If you look at Alberta's governments you had 2 good Klein governments that fixed problems created by the previous bad PC governments. Then you had an average to bad Klein government (Ralph bucks), a bad Stelmech government, a bad Redford government.

So in my politically knowlegable lifetime you had two good PC terms in office, 1 average, and 2 bad. So that's batting 50%. And that's not counting the PC governments pre-Klein that drove this province toward bankruptcy.

So how many of the years of Tory rule would you call good governance?
GGG is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to GGG For This Useful Post:
Old 05-04-2015, 07:45 AM   #63
Slava
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GGG View Post
If you look at Alberta's governments you had 2 good Klein governments that fixed problems created by the previous bad PC governments. Then you had an average to bad Klein government (Ralph bucks), a bad Stelmech government, a bad Redford government.

So in my politically knowlegable lifetime you had two good PC terms in office, 1 average, and 2 bad. So that's batting 50%. And that's not counting the PC governments pre-Klein that drove this province toward bankruptcy.

So how many of the years of Tory rule would you call good governance?
I didn't support the Tories either though. Really, we should have this discussion in the other thread, but because the Tories were bad we should voite NDP here who have been bad elsewhere? That's a tough one to convince me of. I see why you don't want to bring other provinces into the discussion, and largely its because it looks terrible for the NDP when you do.
Slava is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2015, 11:41 AM   #64
OBCT
Powerplay Quarterback
 
OBCT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Medicine Hat
Exp:
Default

NDP: 37
WRP: 23
PC: 23
LIB: 3
AP: 1


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
OBCT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2015, 11:52 AM   #65
rubecube
Franchise Player
 
rubecube's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Victoria
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Slava View Post
I didn't support the Tories either though. Really, we should have this discussion in the other thread, but because the Tories were bad we should voite NDP here who have been bad elsewhere? That's a tough one to convince me of. I see why you don't want to bring other provinces into the discussion, and largely its because it looks terrible for the NDP when you do.
Again though, you have had terrible Tory governments in Ontario and Alberta, a mediocre to poor Liberal (which is a right-wing or centre-right government) in B.C., and countless other examples across other provinces. It's a silly and lazy exercise engaged in by those who don't want to do the legwork to get informed on the actual policies being proposed in the current election cycle.
rubecube is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2015, 12:00 PM   #66
foshizzle11
#1 Goaltender
 
foshizzle11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by OBCT View Post
NDP: 37
WRP: 23
PC: 23
LIB: 3
AP: 1
I think the vote will be more along these lines and I believe we will see a minority government. No way I see a whole party walk across the floor (ie WR crossing to PC to form a majority). If that happens, NDP will get a majority at the next election.

Seems like more people want accountability and transparency from the next government. Apparently this type of tactic won't be viewed well by Alberta voters and I tend to agree.

All the statistics are very interesting, thank you all for posting.
__________________
"You're worried about the team not having enough heart. I'm worried about the team not having enough brains." HFOil fan, August 12th, 2020. E=NG
foshizzle11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2015, 12:49 PM   #67
MoneyGuy
Franchise Player
 
MoneyGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Exp:
Default

NDP: 36
PC: 24
WRP: 23
Lib: 3
AP: 1
MoneyGuy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2015, 10:52 PM   #68
Bunk
Franchise Player
 
Bunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Exp:
Question

Gonna change my prediction to an NDP majority.

One thing Alberta has never done is elect a minority government - if it goes for a change it really goes for it.

NDP 48
Wildrose 25
PC 12
LIB 1
AP 1
__________________
Trust the snake.
Bunk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2015, 04:49 AM   #69
Iowa_Flames_Fan
Referee
 
Iowa_Flames_Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Over the hill
Exp:
Default

My prediction is:

NDP: 49
WRP: 25
PC: 10
ALP: 2
AP: 1
Iowa_Flames_Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2015, 07:20 AM   #70
FlamesAddiction
Franchise Player
 
FlamesAddiction's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

When was the last time that Alberta had anything but some type of conservative government?

I will be shocked if one of the PCs or WR do not win.

Also, I haven't followed the provincial politics of Alberta for quite some time, but what is it about the provincial Liberal Party that people are afraid of that the NDP isn't likely to implement on an even more severe level?
__________________
"A pessimist thinks things can't get any worse. An optimist knows they can."
FlamesAddiction is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2015, 07:33 AM   #71
Senator Clay Davis
Franchise Player
 
Senator Clay Davis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Maryland State House, Annapolis
Exp:
Default

Final Prediction

NDP 39
PC 23
WR 21
LIB 3
AP 1

Prentice resigns, Rick Hanson is the next PC leader.
__________________
"Think I'm gonna be the scapegoat for the whole damn machine? Sheeee......."
Senator Clay Davis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2015, 07:57 AM   #72
Nehkara
Franchise Player
 
Nehkara's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Exp:
Default

Final prediction:

NDP: 52
WR: 19
PC: 14
LIB: 1
AP: 1
__________________

Huge thanks to Dion for the signature!
Nehkara is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2015, 08:09 AM   #73
gpflamesfan
Farm Team Player
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Grande Prairie
Exp:
Default

My projection:

WR: 38
NDP: 27
PC: 21
AP: 1


It looks like I'm alone in this but I think when the dust settles, after a number of tight races, we will see the Wildrose form a minority government.
gpflamesfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2015, 04:55 PM   #74
Slava
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Exp:
Default

I'm predicting:

NDP : 40
PC's: 19
Wildrose: 24
Liberals : 3
Alberta Party : 1
Slava is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2015, 05:06 PM   #75
crazy_eoj
Powerplay Quarterback
 
crazy_eoj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Exp:
Default

Late prediction:

PC: 32
ND: 34
WR: 18
LIB: 2
AB: 1
crazy_eoj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2015, 05:13 PM   #76
octothorp
Franchise Player
 
octothorp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: not lurking
Exp:
Default

My prediction now is:
NDP: 41
WRP: 33
PC: 10
LIB: 2
AP: 1
octothorp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2015, 05:24 PM   #77
Ozy_Flame

Posted the 6 millionth post!
 
Ozy_Flame's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Senator Clay Davis View Post
Final Prediction


Prentice resigns, Rick McIver is the next PC leader.
Fixed!
Ozy_Flame is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2015, 07:34 PM   #78
edslunch
Franchise Player
 
edslunch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Exp:
Default

Ndp 38
pc 24
wr 21
lib 3
ap 1
edslunch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2015, 12:30 AM   #79
CaptainYooh
Franchise Player
 
CaptainYooh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nehkara View Post
Final prediction:

NDP: 52
WR: 19
PC: 14
LIB: 1
AP: 1
Nehkara's final prediction wins the contest as the closest to actual results. Bunk and Iowa_Flames_Fan split the second closest predictions. In fairness, all three predictions have been revised quite late, but still count, so you guys have the bragging rights.
__________________
"An idea is always a generalization, and generalization is a property of thinking. To generalize means to think." Georg Hegel
“To generalize is to be an idiot.” William Blake
CaptainYooh is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:05 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy