Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

View Poll Results: If Bennett's OHL career ends this weekend what should the Flames do with him?
AHL 122 27.98%
NHL 288 66.06%
Off Season 26 5.96%
Voters: 436. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-01-2015, 12:53 PM   #61
442scotty
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Exp:
Default

I would be surprised if he ever plays a game in the AHL. Mony didn't, Johnny didn't either . 18 or not Im pretty sure they can ease him in this year...
442scotty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2015, 12:54 PM   #62
Camronius
Scoring Winger
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Exp:
Default

no question AHL first, if he earns it bringing him up to the NHL. These games are too important to have an inexperienced rookie thrown into the lineup.

To a lesser extent I don't think it sends the right message to the other AHL'ers, -Poirier primarily- if we inject him in the NHL lineup immediately.
Camronius is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2015, 01:01 PM   #63
Cleveland Steam Whistle
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by polak View Post
Bennett is better than at least 80% of our team.
If the Flames shared this view, would he not be here already though? Don't get me wrong, I know he was coming off an injury so maybe that's why they didn't, but I'd assume that if the Flames actually thought he was better than 80% of our line up! they'd have kept him up. That would have had to be what was best for his development if that were the case.

I'm excited for the optimism around him, and if I'm being honest (caveat being I don't think I'm anywhere close to an expert on prospects) Bennett is the big name prospect I felt had the best shot to make it year one compared to my thoughts on Monahan and Gaudreau going into year one, but I'm also worried about over expectations on this kid, just because how well Monahan and Gaudreau transitioned, and how quickly.

I think that puts immense pressure on Bennett to at least match their early success and be third musketeers or the trifecta in what is quickly becoming the expectation of a hyper driver rebuild. Just nervous about expectations and pressure on the kid who hasn't even played a pro game yet.
Cleveland Steam Whistle is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Cleveland Steam Whistle For This Useful Post:
Old 04-01-2015, 01:09 PM   #64
Tron_fdc
In Your MCP
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Watching Hot Dog Hans
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gaudreau View Post
As long as they bring him in against the oilers or coyotes I'm all for it.
Fill the net, gain some confidence, while rubbing Edmontons nose in our draftee and get two points closer to a playoff spot.

I'm all over it.

ENG
Tron_fdc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2015, 01:10 PM   #65
polak
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Camronius View Post
To a lesser extent I don't think it sends the right message to the other AHL'ers, -Poirier primarily- if we inject him in the NHL lineup immediately.
They can deal with it.

He's a highly touted first overall pick that absolutely destroyed in the OHL when he returned and was never actually cut from camp.

If any player is mad that he got called up before them than they need to give their head a shake,
polak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2015, 01:17 PM   #66
burnitdown
Scoring Winger
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cleveland Steam Whistle View Post
I think that puts immense pressure on Bennett to at least match their early success and be third musketeers or the trifecta in what is quickly becoming the expectation of a hyper driver rebuild. Just nervous about expectations and pressure on the kid who hasn't even played a pro game yet.
I agree - the expectations are sky high and to think he can come in and be better than 80% of the team is unrealistic. Not entirely impossible, but unrealistic. One tweet I saw put things in perspective - Draisaitl had an 11 game stretch with 23 points (similar to Bennett's 24 points in 11 games)...and he didn't bring anything to the table for the Oilers when he was in the NHL. Different scenario cause the Oilers are way worse...but still a good reminder that it's hard for any 18 year old to come in and be a major contributor. I'd call him up and let him sit and absorb the atmosphere...but barring injury, I wouldn't put him in and expect much (this year).
burnitdown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2015, 01:20 PM   #67
polak
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Exp:
Default

No one is saying you ride him as your #1 center from now on.

But you sure as hell give him a shot. He COULD realistically be the legitimate second line scoring threat we're in desperate need of right now.
polak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2015, 01:26 PM   #68
SportsJunky
Uncle Chester
 
SportsJunky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Exp:
Default

We need a "I don't know!" option. I want to have him up here but I don't want to break another new toy by rushing him. Personally, I think the kid would get a lot out of being up here around the guys again.
SportsJunky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2015, 01:28 PM   #69
SuperMatt18
Franchise Player
 
SuperMatt18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Do we actually use a recall to get Bennett up or do we just assign him to our NHL roster.

Seems weird that a recall would be needed since we are just assigning him somewhere once his season finishes.
SuperMatt18 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2015, 01:43 PM   #70
Coach
Franchise Player
 
Coach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by polak View Post
No one is saying you ride him as your #1 center from now on.

But you sure as hell give him a shot. He COULD realistically be the legitimate second line scoring threat we're in desperate need of right now.
Or actually DO things, rather than just being a null spot in the lineup like Raymond or Bollig.

I think taking Raymond out and inserting Bennett with the third group makes this team better.
__________________
Coach is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Coach For This Useful Post:
Old 04-01-2015, 01:49 PM   #71
getbak
Franchise Player
 
getbak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperMatt18 View Post
Do we actually use a recall to get Bennett up or do we just assign him to our NHL roster.

Seems weird that a recall would be needed since we are just assigning him somewhere once his season finishes.
It should not use one of the four recalls if he goes straight from Kingston to Calgary.

This is from the CBA, Article 13.12(l):
Quote:
During the period following 3:00 p.m. New York time of the fortieth (40th) day immediately preceding the final day of the Regular Season, and continuing through and including the last day of the Regular Season, no Player may be Recalled from Loan to a club of any league affiliated with the NHL, except that:
(i) A Club may exercise four (4) regular Recalls from a club or clubs of any league affiliated with the NHL, of Player(s) listed on its own Reserve List.
(ii) Players may be Recalled under Article 13.12(m). (Emergency recall)
(iii) Players may be Recalled upon completion of the regular season and playoff schedule of the club to which they were Loaned.
The regular season and playoff schedule of the team he was loaned to (Kingston) would be complete, so he should be free to be recalled without restriction or burning one of the four AHL recalls.

If they send him to Adirondack from Kingston, they would have to wait until Adirondack's season was finished before they could recall him, or they would burn their fourth recall.
__________________
Turn up the good, turn down the suck!
getbak is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to getbak For This Useful Post:
Old 04-01-2015, 01:50 PM   #72
H2SO4(aq)
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Exp:
Default

I think he has made it very clear to the coaching staff that the injury didnt slow him down. He is by all accounts stronger than he was in preseason and had he not been injured he probably would have started in the show.

Bring him up, and let the caged tiger loose.
H2SO4(aq) is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2015, 02:23 PM   #73
ForeverFlameFan
Franchise Player
 
ForeverFlameFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: NC
Exp:
Default

If he did get called up here after Kingston elimination, I think we wouldn't play him until we knew for sure that we were in the playoffs. So if we have clinched a spot prior to the Winnipeg game, that would be a good game to start him.
ForeverFlameFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2015, 02:31 PM   #74
Azhouse
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Azhouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Camronius View Post
no question AHL first, if he earns it bringing him up to the NHL. These games are too important to have an inexperienced rookie thrown into the lineup.

To a lesser extent I don't think it sends the right message to the other AHL'ers, -Poirier primarily- if we inject him in the NHL lineup immediately.
The message to Poirier will be "welcome to the NHL Emile (where only the very best make it)"

Sam could be ready, Poirier is not.
Azhouse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2015, 02:36 PM   #75
Buster
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MattyC View Post
Or actually DO things, rather than just being a null spot in the lineup like Raymond or Bollig.

I think taking Raymond out and inserting Bennett with the third group makes this team better.
I'm pretty sure Bennett's hands don't look like frying pans, like Raymond's do. So yes.
Buster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2015, 02:45 PM   #76
jar_e
Franchise Player
 
jar_e's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Do people forget he would have made this team post-camp if it wasn't for his shoulder surgery?

The coaches and management had some faith in him then and I would have no reason to believe that they've lost their faith after his rehab and stint in the OHL. His shoulder is obviously now fine and I'd have no doubt that Hartley would give him sheltered minutes as he did with other young players.
jar_e is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2015, 02:50 PM   #77
Oling_Roachinen
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Camronius View Post
To a lesser extent I don't think it sends the right message to the other AHL'ers, -Poirier primarily- if we inject him in the NHL lineup immediately.
But Bennett wasn't eligible for the AHL. It's not like it's a necessary first step for everyone (see Gaudreau and Monahan). If they deemed Bennett ready from watching his junior games, who's to say he hasn't earned it?
Oling_Roachinen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2015, 03:03 PM   #78
Gaudfather
Franchise Player
 
Gaudfather's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Right behind you.
Exp:
Default

The other advantage of bringing in Bennett, just before the Flames playoff run (hopefully) is that it will take some focus and media pressure off Johnny and may result in Johnny being even more productive.
Gaudfather is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Gaudfather For This Useful Post:
Old 04-01-2015, 03:10 PM   #79
GranteedEV
Franchise Player
 
GranteedEV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

There's a case to be made for either:

- The forward logjam right now is not great in the NHL, more minutes in the AHL. There's a strong chance Hartley doesn't even play Sam (see: Poirier, Baertschi, Wolf)

- Sam can be an impact player right now in the NHL, especially if we put him on Backlund or Stajan's wing. Could be exactly what our 2nd PP unit needs

- The AHL Flames could really use an offensive spark to even make the playoffs. They've got a lot of good wingers but right now Bill Arnold is the only NHL-calibur natural center on the team.

- The AHL Flames might not make the playoffs anyways. They're a good few points out of a spot and haven't been playing amazing - they've been the definition of inconsistent. Losing Baertschi, Granlund, Ferland, Shore, and Ortio has really depleted them. Sending Sam there might just be for a game or two before they're officially eliminated.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Camronius View Post
no question AHL first, if he earns it bringing him up to the NHL. These games are too important to have an inexperienced rookie thrown into the lineup.

To a lesser extent I don't think it sends the right message to the other AHL'ers, -Poirier primarily- if we inject him in the NHL lineup immediately.
Poirier knew he was a reach at #22 overall. Many would argue Sam was a steal at #4 overall. It's not apples-to-apples.
__________________

"May those who accept their fate find happiness. May those who defy it find glory."

Last edited by GranteedEV; 04-01-2015 at 03:13 PM.
GranteedEV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2015, 03:14 PM   #80
PugnaciousIntern
First Line Centre
 
PugnaciousIntern's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Exp:
Default

The argument of "sending the right message to other prospects" is flawed. The message you should send is that you want to win. Best players play.
PugnaciousIntern is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:01 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy