View Poll Results: What will the Flames do with Ortio?
|
Active Ramo, and send Ortio back today
|
  
|
20 |
6.94% |
Active Ramo, and run with three goaltenders until Ortio loses
|
  
|
131 |
45.49% |
Active Ramo, and keep Ortio until the all star break
|
  
|
73 |
25.35% |
Trade a goaltender and keep Ortio for the year
|
  
|
64 |
22.22% |
01-16-2015, 01:37 PM
|
#61
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
|
Keep playing Ortio until things even out and he falls down to earth then send him back to the farm until Ramo is possibly moved or next offseason where he can come to camp to compete with Hiller for the starting job.
|
|
|
01-16-2015, 02:15 PM
|
#62
|
Could Care Less
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Imported_Aussie
Keep Ortio up for an extended run. Glencross goes onto IR, the team rolls with only 1 spare forward (either Granlund or Raymond draw in for Glencross) and the Flames get a good look at Ortio.
|
The Flames don't need a good look at Ortio so that's not a reason for keeping him up. They know what they have and next year his contract is 1-way so he will be on the Flames next year in a split with either Hiller or Ramo. The questions they have to answer are a) what's best for Ortio's development right now and b) which one of Hiller/Ramo is going to be a Flame next year. If they're going to trade Ramo before he becomes a UFA then it may make sense to get him playing so that they can showcase him. Which would mean sending Ortio down.
|
|
|
01-16-2015, 02:19 PM
|
#63
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
|
People still think Ramo will be a Flame next year? His stats are inferior to Hiller's and his contract is expiring. He's good as gone.
|
|
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Erick Estrada For This Useful Post:
|
|
01-16-2015, 02:24 PM
|
#64
|
Ate 100 Treadmills
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Erick Estrada
People still think Ramo will be a Flame next year? His stats are inferior to Hiller's and his contract is expiring. He's good as gone.
|
Agreed.
If someone is willing to offer anything descent for Ramo, we should jump all over it.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to blankall For This Useful Post:
|
|
01-16-2015, 02:31 PM
|
#65
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Erick Estrada
People still think Ramo will be a Flame next year? His stats are inferior to Hiller's and his contract is expiring. He's good as gone.
|
He also makes about 2 million less and should be a cheap resign, and can deliver more years as a backup as he is still in his twenties.
I prefer Hiller over Ramo, but I think Ramo is a better choice as a backup going forward. He's still good enough to give the Flames a chance to win on a given night.
__________________

"May those who accept their fate find happiness. May those who defy it find glory."
|
|
|
01-16-2015, 02:35 PM
|
#66
|
Could Care Less
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GranteedEV
He also makes about 2 million less and should be a cheap resign, and can deliver more years as a backup as he is still in his twenties.
I prefer Hiller over Ramo, but I think Ramo is a better choice as a backup going forward. He's still good enough to give the Flames a chance to win on a given night.
|
A pro for Hiller though is that he has extensive experience in the NHL and can be a mentor to Ortio.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to heep223 For This Useful Post:
|
|
01-16-2015, 02:42 PM
|
#67
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GranteedEV
He also makes about 2 million less and should be a cheap resign, and can deliver more years as a backup as he is still in his twenties.
I prefer Hiller over Ramo, but I think Ramo is a better choice as a backup going forward. He's still good enough to give the Flames a chance to win on a given night.
|
You can argue that the tandem in a couple of years may be Ortio and Gillies so I would prefer Hiller to stick for the duration of his contract to ensure some stability in net and see where they are with Ortio after a season and where Gillies is with his development. Besides you have to consider that Ramo may have higher aspirations than just being the Flames backup and may want to test the market. I certainly would if I was him before accepting a backup role. Money isn't an issue for the Flames so I don't really think salaries come into play.
|
|
|
01-16-2015, 03:00 PM
|
#68
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Erick Estrada
you have to consider that Ramo may have higher aspirations than just being the Flames backup and may want to test the market. I certainly would if I was him before accepting a backup role.
|
Well, you don't outright say to Karri that he's a backup. He knows as well as anyone that if he wins, he plays again and if Ortio loses he plays. He's been given that opportunity to play when he's won and when another goalie has lost. Even if Ortio is looking good, it's not like he's going to go undefeated or be given the #1 spot on a silver platter by Hartley. Unless we make the playoffs and Hartley switches to a playoff-coaching mode and sticks with one guy.
I do think Ramo will test the market, but I think if we do trade away Hiller, it's a sign of confidence in him that won't go un-noticed - especially since it was Feaster that brought him in and Treliving that brought Hiller in.
Quote:
Money isn't an issue for the Flames so I don't really think salaries come into play.
|
I agree that money isn't an issue, but if Ortio is the real deal, then it doesn't hurt to have less cap hit on the backup. Plus we might be able to resign ramo for ~3Y term at a discount, which would be some good stability as we transition to paying all the forwards big extension money. Flames know Ramo better than anyone in the league so they can also be most or least comfy signing him to a longer term.
__________________

"May those who accept their fate find happiness. May those who defy it find glory."
Last edited by GranteedEV; 01-16-2015 at 03:11 PM.
|
|
|
01-16-2015, 03:10 PM
|
#69
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GranteedEV
I do think Ramo will test the market, but I think if we do trade away Hiller, it's a sign of confidence in him that won't go un-noticed - especially since it was Feaster that brought him in and Treliving that brought Hiller in.
|
There you go. That's all you really need to know as it's pretty obvious how things are going to play out here. I just don't know how much teams are going to be needing a goaltender at the deadline so it will be interesting to see if there's a market for Ramo and if there is what the return will be.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Erick Estrada For This Useful Post:
|
|
01-16-2015, 03:13 PM
|
#70
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Erick Estrada
That's all you really need to know as it's pretty obvious how things are going to play out here.
|
If that's the kind of me-first attitude Treliving is going to bring, I'd be pretty disappointed.
__________________

"May those who accept their fate find happiness. May those who defy it find glory."
|
|
|
01-16-2015, 03:29 PM
|
#71
|
Could Care Less
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Erick Estrada
There you go. That's all you really need to know as it's pretty obvious how things are going to play out here.
|
No....no it's really not. Hartley also was brought in by Feaster. Treliving has been doing what's best for the organization not what is best for his ego.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to heep223 For This Useful Post:
|
|
01-16-2015, 03:36 PM
|
#72
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Houston, TX
|
Nothing is decided, but if Ortio wants to win a roster spot for next year, now is the time. The last thing u want is Treliving to go looking for a UFA starter because he's not confident in Ortio. This is why I want to see Ortio get at least another 5 games this season.
|
|
|
01-16-2015, 03:38 PM
|
#73
|
Crash and Bang Winger
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: England
|
I chose option B, but I meant to choose A. Send Ortio down with confidence - yeah, it's pretty enhanced numbers that aren't sustainable, but he'll have the belief that he can come up in the very near future and perform well.
Me personally, I'd keep Ramo and trade Hiller.
__________________
Anders Rasmussen's biggest fan
|
|
|
01-16-2015, 04:36 PM
|
#74
|
#1 Goaltender
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Perth Australia
|
No rush to trade away a goaltender right now.
|
|
|
01-16-2015, 04:46 PM
|
#75
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Calgary, Alberta
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Erick Estrada
People still think Ramo will be a Flame next year? His stats are inferior to Hiller's and his contract is expiring. He's good as gone.
|
Hiller sucks EE.
|
|
|
01-16-2015, 04:56 PM
|
#76
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Calgary
|
For me, it depends 100% on the highest return for whichever goalie that you would look to move.
If you can get more for Hiller, move Hiller. If you can get more for Ramo, move Ramo. There isn't much of a difference between the two stats wise and neither guy is going to be "the guy" moving forward beyond next season. Ortio needs the opportunity to see if he can become the starter. He is getting that opportunity now and next season. If he can't take the job, then Gillies is next up, and then MacDonald after that.
__________________
Fireside Chat - The #1 Flames Fan Podcast - FiresideChat.ca
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Caged Great For This Useful Post:
|
|
01-16-2015, 07:41 PM
|
#77
|
Franchise Player
|
Flames' short term (current) goal: compete for a playoff spot. Best solution right now: keep playing Ortio while he's hot
Flames' long term goal: remain focused on developing players and building for the future. Best solution right now: keep playing Ortio while he's hot
Flames' organizational/philosophical goal: reward players who have earned ice-time. Best solution right now: run with Ortio
You simply have to keep playing him. While 3 goalies isn't ideal, it isn't a problem for a short period.
In all likelihood, the run ends and they send him back down and it was a nice story.
But there is also the off chance that he simply knocks it out of the park and becomes the new starter (ala Kipper in 2004). Unlikely, but if it happens, it's a huge win for the organization. Why would you simply close the door to that possibility?
|
|
|
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Enoch Root For This Useful Post:
|
|
01-16-2015, 08:20 PM
|
#78
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by the_only_turek_fan
Hiller sucks EE.
|
He is better than Ramo and would be a better mentor for Ortio.
|
|
|
01-16-2015, 08:38 PM
|
#79
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
|
Just contract length and experience wise you get more for Hiller than Ramo.
|
|
|
01-16-2015, 09:28 PM
|
#80
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Houston, TX
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by kyuss275
He is better than Ramo and would be a better mentor for Ortio.
|
Partially disagree. We know nothing about his leadership, presence in the lockerroom or teaching skills.
It also speaks volumes how he lost the net in Anaheim, to the point where he became 3rd string behind 2 rookies. History looks to be (possibly repeating itself. Mechanically he is not great and I don't see consistency. He is streaky at best, and his good streaks are usually earlier in the year. He breaks down
Ramo hasn't shown the durability to play every day in the NHL but capable of 40-50 starts. Also cheaper. The Finn factor can't be dismissed. Also streaky, but his best streak was towards the end of the year.
Also keep in mind that if we trade a goalie, by rule we must have 3 goalies under contract playing pro.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:02 AM.
|
|