01-21-2015, 03:47 PM
|
#61
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dissentowner
So what do we prefer tonight? A Flames win and no 3 point game between LA and SJ obviously but which of those two are we hoping to win in regulation?
|
San Jose. Calgary doesn't need to pass them, but they need to finish ahead of LA.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by CroFlames
Before you call me a pessimist or a downer, the Flames made me this way. Blame them.
|
|
|
|
01-21-2015, 03:51 PM
|
#62
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dissentowner
So what do we prefer tonight? A Flames win and no 3 point game between LA and SJ obviously but which of those two are we hoping to win in regulation?
|
http://www.sportsclubstats.com/NHL/W...c/Calgary.html
According to that, LA in regulation gives us slightly more chance. Anything but a 3 point game that is.
|
|
|
01-21-2015, 04:12 PM
|
#63
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Salmon with Arms
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by codynw
San Jose. Calgary doesn't need to pass them, but they need to finish ahead of LA.
|
I disagree. SJ losing solidly puts 2 spots open for business which increases our odds
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Street Pharmacist For This Useful Post:
|
|
01-21-2015, 04:16 PM
|
#64
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by codynw
San Jose. Calgary doesn't need to pass them, but they need to finish ahead of LA.
|
SJ winning guarantees us a playoff spot beyond tonight. Calgary winning and LA winning puts the Flames in the top 3 in the pacific.
Moving forward I think the Kings have another gear and SJ doesn't long term
|
|
|
01-21-2015, 04:25 PM
|
#65
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: NC
|
Depends on if we win or lose.
If we win, we want the Sharks to win as well. It would leave a nice 3 point gap between us and the Kings, with the same GP.
If we lose tonight, I would prefer LA to win. It would have us focusing on winning the next game to get on top of both teams.
To make it less complicated, I just don't want a 3 point game tonight between LA and SJ.
|
|
|
01-21-2015, 04:57 PM
|
#66
|
Crash and Bang Winger
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Calgary
|
Average point percentage of opponents left:
Calgary: 0.548
LA Kings: 0.576
SJ Sharks: 0.569
With LA having a lot more road games left (22 out of 35) and their abysmal road record they definitely have the hardest schedule left. They also have Toffoli out with mono for at least one more week and Pearson just had surgery for a broken leg so is probably out for the season. Inconsistent play is the most likely thing to cause a drop as earlier in the year they couldn't score but now they can't keep the puck out of their net.
San Jose has about the same home/road games left as us so there isn't an advantage there. However they just lost Braun who plays on their shutdown pair and Wingels for a few weeks. Wingels is about equivalent to us losing glencross production wise however Wingels is extremely physical so Couture and Marleau won't have as much space to work with anymore. Nieto seems to be taking his place too so that weakens what has been used as their shutdown line so far. While Braun has not been having the best season so far the sharks have abysmal depth so they will be forced to promote Irwin or Hannan into their top 4. Marleau is playing badly lately with 4 points in his last 17 (2 against Calgary) and a -9.
While it seems we have a slight advantage schedule wise so far and the injuries to San Jose could drop them in the standings its still too early to take much from this. These 3 teams have about 18 games left before the trade deadline so changes in the standings may effect things. However the LA Kings only have $1.8 in capspace so they are most likely to add a bottom pairing defenseman in case Voynov doesn't return.
San Jose has about $5.5 in capspace but their gm has stated that he is moving towards a retool so they won't be likely to add anyone. However they aren't likely to move anyone out either unless Marleau/Thorton feel like waiving their contracts.
In Calgary a move is unlikely unless we are clearing space to call up a forward or goalie who deserves it. It is unlikely any of the moves at the deadline have a huge effect on these teams records short of Ortio coming up(if he gets sent down) and going on a Kipper esque run.
So I think San Jose is most likely to drop out of the 3 I didn't bother looking at Vancouver cause i think they will make it what do you guys think?
Edit: Also i don't think Glencross will be moved so i didn't consider that but if he is we have probably slipped in the standings already so this discussion would be moot
Last edited by YogiBerra; 01-21-2015 at 05:02 PM.
|
|
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to YogiBerra For This Useful Post:
|
|
01-21-2015, 05:20 PM
|
#67
|
Could Care Less
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by YogiBerra
While Braun has not been having the best season so far the sharks have abysmal depth so they will be forced to promote Irwin or Hannan into their top 4.
|
Yikes....that would be akin to Engelland/Smid moving into top 4. Shudder.
Good analysis, thanks for doing that!
I for one wouldn't mind taking a look at Vancouver as I'm not convinced they are a playoff team.
EDIT: speaking of the Canucks....
Last edited by heep223; 01-21-2015 at 05:24 PM.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to heep223 For This Useful Post:
|
|
01-21-2015, 07:47 PM
|
#68
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Helsinki, Finland
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by YogiBerra
So I think San Jose is most likely to drop out of the 3 I didn't bother looking at Vancouver cause i think they will make it what do you guys think?
|
Vancouver is not a great team under pressure. Would not be surprised if this year it killed them even before the playoffs.
I'm still amazed that Winnipeg is looking like they'll make it. From what I've seen this year, they sucked every time. Small sample size I guess.
|
|
|
01-21-2015, 07:57 PM
|
#69
|
Franchise Player
|
based on play this year
Corrado taking Bieksa's spot is a bonus for the Canucks
|
|
|
01-21-2015, 08:09 PM
|
#70
|
Franchise Player
|
sounds like Bieksa should be back in 4-6 though, so best case scenario is Corrado covers and then stays in lineup when hes back over Weber/Stanton
|
|
|
01-21-2015, 11:41 PM
|
#71
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Cape Breton Island
|
I asked siri on my fiances new iphone who the starting goaltender of the Winnipeg Jets is:
Jets are now 92.4 % for playoffs
__________________
|
|
|
01-22-2015, 06:51 AM
|
#72
|
Franchise Player
|
After Wednesday's games:
1. Winnipeg (26-14-8) 22 ROW, 60 pts
San Jose (25-17-6) 23 ROW, 56 pts--second in Pacific Division
Vancouver (26-16-3) 24 ROW, 55 pts--third in Pacific Division
2. Calgary (25-19-3) 22 ROW, 53 pts
3. Los Angeles (20-15-12) 19 ROW, 52 pts
4. Colorado (20-18-10) 14 ROW, 50 pts
5. Dallas (21-18-7) 19 ROW, 49 pts
6. Minnesota (20-20-6) 18 ROW, 46 pts
Jets and Sharks won
Flames and Kings lost
Avs won in the shootout
__________________
Remember this, TSN stands for Toronto's Sports Network! 
MOD EDIT: Removed broken image link.
|
|
|
01-22-2015, 07:07 AM
|
#73
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: SW Ontario
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Resurrection
I asked siri on my fiances new iphone who the starting goaltender of the Winnipeg Jets is:
Jets are now 92.4 % for playoffs
|
|
|
|
01-22-2015, 09:15 AM
|
#74
|
Unfrozen Caveman Lawyer
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Crowsnest Pass
|
LA's odds have dipped below 50%:
http://www.sportsclubstats.com/NHL/Western.html
DAL and COL are virtually done.
CGY, SJ and LA fighting over 7 and 8.
The Fan 960 was saying this morning that CGY has a brutal February schedule, but it is not showing up in these odds.
|
|
|
01-22-2015, 09:54 AM
|
#75
|
Scoring Winger
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Itse
Vancouver is not a great team under pressure. Would not be surprised if this year it killed them even before the playoffs.
I'm still amazed that Winnipeg is looking like they'll make it. From what I've seen this year, they sucked every time. Small sample size I guess.
|
Winnipeg has been a different team since Hutchinson took over the reins in goal and Byfuglein was moved back to D.
|
|
|
01-22-2015, 09:58 AM
|
#76
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by troutman
LA's odds have dipped below 50%:
http://www.sportsclubstats.com/NHL/Western.html
DAL and COL are virtually done.
CGY, SJ and LA fighting over 7 and 8.
The Fan 960 was saying this morning that CGY has a brutal February schedule, but it is not showing up in these odds.
|
Don't think that website takes schedule into account
|
|
|
01-22-2015, 10:24 AM
|
#77
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Salmon with Arms
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DJones
Don't think that website takes schedule into account
|
Actually it does. Also takes into account home/road split
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Street Pharmacist For This Useful Post:
|
|
01-22-2015, 10:33 AM
|
#78
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Calgary, AB
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by troutman
LA's odds have dipped below 50%:
http://www.sportsclubstats.com/NHL/Western.html
DAL and COL are virtually done.
CGY, SJ and LA fighting over 7 and 8.
The Fan 960 was saying this morning that CGY has a brutal February schedule, but it is not showing up in these odds.
|
Lots of home games would make the odds look better, but some tough teams are up.
January:
Sabres
Wild
Oilers
February:
Jets
Sharks
Penguins
@Sharks
@Kings
Canucks
Bruins
Wild
Ducks
@Rangers
@Devils
@Islanders
|
|
|
01-22-2015, 10:40 AM
|
#79
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Wow...Feb looks brutal.
|
|
|
01-22-2015, 10:48 AM
|
#80
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Section 120
|
LA Kings Schedule is pretty tough too.
January
Blackhawks
@ Bruins
February
@ Capitals
@ Panthers
@ Lightning
@ Blue Jackets
Flames
Capitals
Lightning
@ Avalanche
@ Sharks
Red Wings
Senators
@ Ducks
Vancouver's scheudle is also tough:
January
Ducks
Sabres
February
Wild
Jets
Sharks
Penguins
@Wild
@Blackhawks
Bruins
@Flames
Wild
@Rangers
@Devils
@Islanders
@Bruins
@Sabres
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Bourque's Twin For This Useful Post:
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:49 AM.
|
|