03-11-2014, 06:39 PM
|
#61
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Calgary - Centre West
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ricosuave
I thought Heatley had a NMC clause or something, that he didnt want to come back and face the pressure of playing in his hometown, thought I read that a few years ago when Edm tried to sign him?
|
His hometown is Calgary.
__________________
-James
GO FLAMES GO.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Azure
Typical dumb take.
|
|
|
|
03-11-2014, 06:56 PM
|
#62
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CalgaryFan1988
I remember reading CP on deadline day and someone mentioned rumours of Heatley becoming a Flame as part of a 3 way trade (Anaheim, Minnesota, Calgary).
Fell apart when Vanek went to Ottawa.
|
That doesn't make sense based on what Burke said. He said that the Flames had a deal in place that would have seen them take on a bad contract as part of a three-way deal, but it fell apart because the team that was going to send the contract to the Flames didn't get their other deal done.
__________________
Turn up the good, turn down the suck!
|
|
|
03-11-2014, 07:00 PM
|
#63
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by devo22
not sure why Minnesota would get a 3rd in that scenario. IMO Calgary would have received Heatley, MINs 2nd for taking on Heatley's salary and ANAs 3rd and ANAs 5th for Cammalleri (probably a fair price considering the prices that were paid on deadline day). Minnesota gets future considerations or a useless contract like James Martin or something like that.
|
It's all speculation, so not much to discuss. Heatley had value, no matter what you think though.
Heatley - 64gp, 25 points
Cammalleri - 48gp, 25 points
Hemsky - 58gp, 32 points
The difference in value between the 3 isn't that great, especially all being UFA's in a couple months.
|
|
|
03-11-2014, 07:02 PM
|
#64
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by getbak
That doesn't make sense based on what Burke said. He said that the Flames had a deal in place that would have seen them take on a bad contract as part of a three-way deal, but it fell apart because the team that was going to send the contract to the Flames didn't get their other deal done.
|
Yes, because Minnesota lost out on Vanek. If Minnesota would have got Vanek, they needed to get rid of Heatley.
Anaheim wasn't offering enough for Cammalleri straight across.
All speculation, but it makes sense.
|
|
|
03-11-2014, 07:04 PM
|
#65
|
#1 Goaltender
|
I could see it being a trade for vanek from the islanders while shipping heatley to Calgary but the flames would probably want something like a 2nd pick to take on the contract. I could see the islanders probably wanting that 2nd round pick for themselves for giving up vanek the deal couldn't get done.
|
|
|
03-11-2014, 07:47 PM
|
#66
|
Crash and Bang Winger
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Cgy
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by codynw
Do "reclamation projects" ever work out for veteran players? I know it happens with prospects sometimes, but I can't think of any examples of it happening with a player in their 30s.
|
Jarome Iginla in Boston. He doesn't float there like he did in Calgary which made him look slow in Pitt when he was counted on to skate again.
|
|
|
03-11-2014, 08:00 PM
|
#67
|
Threadkiller
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: 51.0544° N, 114.0669° W
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by TorqueDog
His hometown is Calgary.
|
I know it is.
I just heard it come out when Edm tried to trade for him
Last edited by ricosuave; 03-11-2014 at 08:45 PM.
|
|
|
03-11-2014, 08:09 PM
|
#68
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by stemit14
I could see it being a trade for vanek from the islanders while shipping heatley to Calgary but the flames would probably want something like a 2nd pick to take on the contract. I could see the islanders probably wanting that 2nd round pick for themselves for giving up vanek the deal couldn't get done.
|
The deal wasn't for Vanek. In the chat Russo is referencing a Stafford deal so the deal would have been Heatley to Cgy with pick, Stafford to Minny and a prospect or pick to Buffalo.
|
|
|
03-11-2014, 08:12 PM
|
#69
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ricosuave
I know it is.
I just heard it come out when Edm tried to sign him as a free agent.
|
He wasn't a free agent at the time
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to albertGQ For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-11-2014, 08:16 PM
|
#70
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Salmon with Arms
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dienasty
Jarome Iginla in Boston. He doesn't float there like he did in Calgary which made him look slow in Pitt when he was counted on to skate again.
|
Jarome Iginla was not reclamation project
|
|
|
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Street Pharmacist For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-11-2014, 08:45 PM
|
#71
|
Threadkiller
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: 51.0544° N, 114.0669° W
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by albertGQ
He wasn't a free agent at the time
|
erg corrected, jeezus
|
|
|
03-11-2014, 08:56 PM
|
#72
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: STH since 2002
|
I would not want Heatley on the Flames. He has lost more than just a step his desire to work hard shift to shift is not there anymore.
__________________
|
|
|
03-11-2014, 09:07 PM
|
#73
|
Franchise Player
|
too bad it didn't work out....he's a ####ing all star
|
|
|
03-11-2014, 09:57 PM
|
#74
|
Appealing my suspension
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Just outside Enemy Lines
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ricosuave
I thought Heatley had a NMC clause or something, that he didnt want to come back and face the pressure of playing in his hometown, thought I read that a few years ago when Edm tried to trade for him?
|
As his contract aged, I think the no trade clause eased up. It happens where the first 2-3 years are full no trade and than it moves to a limited clause. When he asked Ottawa to trade him I believe it was a full no trade where he could veto any deal. But when San Jose traded him, I think it was a limited No trade at that time where he had to provide a list of 10 teams, who he couldn't be traded to. You can bet Winnipeg, Ottawa, and Edmonton are on that list.
__________________
"Some guys like old balls"
Patriots QB Tom Brady
|
|
|
03-12-2014, 01:02 AM
|
#75
|
Franchise Player
|
not Dany Heatley @DanyAllStar15 Apr 30 yeah, packing a fat bomb yup its chew thirty in the press box #### a spitter I'm spittin all over the floor I'm an allstar who gives a ####
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to cam_wmh For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-12-2014, 08:17 AM
|
#76
|
Everybody's favourite Wild fan!
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: New York
|
I have already advocated against Heatley on this board, and I'm not changing that stance now. But, his lack of production does not appear to be from lack of effort or heart. That's what it looks like on tv, and that's how it's being reported as well.
It has been reported that he finished rehabbing the shoulder that ended his season early last year (thanks, Vlasic) and then kept on working out hard all summer. Reported to camp in great shape...and just didn't have it anymore.
It is reported that he is loved in the room, and he has certainly taken his demotions to the 4th line with professionalism and maturity. Granted, that's easy to do when you make north of $7M per, but on a team with as many impressionable kids as the Wild has, I would be extremely uncomfortable if it was being reported that he was moping around and whining about his situation.
I'm STILL NOT saying you should want him on your team next season, unless you have an opening on your TV or radio broadcast teams I suppose. But it's not because he's the locker room cancer that he's been portrayed as.
|
|
|
03-12-2014, 08:44 AM
|
#77
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Halifax
|
If we could've gotten a 2nd or prospect, sure, why not. No harm in it
|
|
|
03-12-2014, 12:29 PM
|
#78
|
Appealing my suspension
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Just outside Enemy Lines
|
The way I see it, rather than spend 2 million dollars to bring in a single second round draft pick by assuming a lousy contract....take that money and put it into the entire scouting budget for next year and get better results from the picks you do have. I understand that it's s lottery and that you you need tickets to play. But you have to think you really should use players as currency to get the picks, and use the money to get people who will find you better players.
__________________
"Some guys like old balls"
Patriots QB Tom Brady
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Sylvanfan For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-12-2014, 01:04 PM
|
#79
|
In the Sin Bin
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sylvanfan
The way I see it, rather than spend 2 million dollars to bring in a single second round draft pick by assuming a lousy contract....take that money and put it into the entire scouting budget for next year and get better results from the picks you do have. I understand that it's s lottery and that you you need tickets to play. But you have to think you really should use players as currency to get the picks, and use the money to get people who will find you better players.
|
The two aren't mutually exclusive. Getting a 2nd rounder for 2 million is using cap space to our advantage. Scouting budget does not eat into cap space so the two have no relationship.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Flames Draft Watcher For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-12-2014, 01:34 PM
|
#80
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flames Draft Watcher
The two aren't mutually exclusive. Getting a 2nd rounder for 2 million is using cap space to our advantage. Scouting budget does not eat into cap space so the two have no relationship.
|
He's talking about the opportunity cost. He'd rather have two million going to scouting then spending it on a bad contract for a 2nd. If they money is put into scouting then I agree with him.
Edited. they aren't mutually exclusive but its about the opportunity cost.
Last edited by Da_Chief; 03-12-2014 at 01:43 PM.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:08 AM.
|
|