View Poll Results: Choose 14 forwards
|
Bergeron
|
  
|
341 |
87.44% |
Carter
|
  
|
97 |
24.87% |
Couture
|
  
|
214 |
54.87% |
Crosby
|
  
|
381 |
97.69% |
Duchene
|
  
|
258 |
66.15% |
Eberle
|
  
|
18 |
4.62% |
Getzlaf
|
  
|
370 |
94.87% |
Giroux
|
  
|
289 |
74.10% |
Hall
|
  
|
54 |
13.85% |
Kunitz
|
  
|
141 |
36.15% |
Ladd
|
  
|
44 |
11.28% |
Lucic
|
  
|
114 |
29.23% |
Marchand
|
  
|
36 |
9.23% |
Nash
|
  
|
110 |
28.21% |
Neal
|
  
|
125 |
32.05% |
Perry
|
  
|
354 |
90.77% |
M. Richards
|
  
|
118 |
30.26% |
Sharp
|
  
|
269 |
68.97% |
E. Staal
|
  
|
201 |
51.54% |
J. Staal
|
  
|
16 |
4.10% |
St. Louis
|
  
|
273 |
70.00% |
Stamkos
|
  
|
370 |
94.87% |
Tavares
|
  
|
354 |
90.77% |
Thornton
|
  
|
208 |
53.33% |
Toews
|
  
|
377 |
96.67% |
(not on list)
|
  
|
128 |
32.82% |
01-05-2014, 04:07 PM
|
#61
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Calgary
|
Bergeon
Carter
Coutoure
Crosby
Eberle
Getzlaf
Ladd
Marchand
Perry
Sharp
St. Louis
Stamkos
Thornton
Toews
|
|
|
01-05-2014, 04:09 PM
|
#62
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JobHopper
Bergeon
Carter
Coutoure
Crosby
Eberle
Getzlaf
Ladd
Marchand
Perry
Sharp
St. Louis
Stamkos
Thornton
Toews
|
where is tavares
|
|
|
01-05-2014, 04:10 PM
|
#63
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jg13
where is tavares
|
I'm just not a fan I guess.
I went with the guys I like.
|
|
|
01-05-2014, 04:11 PM
|
#64
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Halifax
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JobHopper
Bergeon
Carter
Coutoure
Crosby
Eberle
Getzlaf
Ladd
Marchand
Perry
Sharp
St. Louis
Stamkos
Thornton
Toews
|
Eberle? Marchand? Good God no.
|
|
|
01-05-2014, 04:18 PM
|
#65
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by $ven27
Eberle? Marchand? Good God no.
|
You have to take Eberle, one of the most skilled guys in the league.
Marchand is type of player that compliments the skilled guys nicely so you have to take him as well.
|
|
|
01-05-2014, 04:23 PM
|
#66
|
Franchise Player
|
Eberle has been pretty bad the last couple seasons, and is regressing if anything. You definitely don't take him because of what he did in the World Juniors years ago; that's ancient history at this point.
|
|
|
01-05-2014, 04:23 PM
|
#67
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lethbridge
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JobHopper
You have to take Eberle, one of the most skilled guys in the league.
Marchand is type of player that compliments the skilled guys nicely so you have to take him as well.
|
One of the most skilled guys in the league? He sure doesn't play like it .
And then why leave the much more skilled Tavares at home?
Eberle, Marchand, Lucic and Ladd all should be automatic guys who stay at home.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to moon For This Useful Post:
|
|
01-05-2014, 04:24 PM
|
#68
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Calgary
|
I picked 2 of the least popular guys in that poll but I'll stick with them though cause I have to think that they'll both make team Canada, one of them for sure.
|
|
|
01-05-2014, 04:27 PM
|
#69
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by moon
One of the most skilled guys in the league? He sure doesn't play like it .
And then why leave the much more skilled Tavares at home?
Eberle, Marchand, Lucic and Ladd all should be automatic guys who stay at home.
|
Keep in mind this is an international best of tournament, the Olympics.
Tavares has a few flaws, average skater, defensive player and lacks size.
He may make it but I just didn't pick him.
|
|
|
01-05-2014, 04:28 PM
|
#70
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JobHopper
I picked 2 of the least popular guys in that poll but I'll stick with them though cause I have to think that they'll both make team Canada, one of them for sure.
|
I would give you pretty good odds that not one of those four is anywhere near the Olympics.
|
|
|
01-05-2014, 04:30 PM
|
#71
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lethbridge
|
Eberle is by far the worst defensive player in the list a mediocre skater at best and soft as butter.
Tavares is a lock and arguably a top 5 forward in the game behind Crosby, Stamkos and Malkin.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to moon For This Useful Post:
|
|
01-05-2014, 04:31 PM
|
#72
|
In the Sin Bin
|
jobhopper is a real headscratcher. man do you come up with some bizarre @#$@
|
|
|
01-05-2014, 04:32 PM
|
#73
|
Franchise Player
|
What I really want to know is, who are the jabronis that left Toews and Crosby off their lineup?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by CroFlames
Before you call me a pessimist or a downer, the Flames made me this way. Blame them.
|
|
|
|
01-05-2014, 04:39 PM
|
#74
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lethbridge
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by codynw
What I really want to know is, who are the jabronis that left Toews and Crosby off their lineup?
|
Add Getzlaf, Tavares and Perry to that list. Those guys are locks.
I will give a pass if someone left Stamkos off due to injury but even that is a stretch.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to moon For This Useful Post:
|
|
01-05-2014, 04:40 PM
|
#75
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by codynw
What I really want to know is, who are the jabronis that left Toews and Crosby off their lineup?
|
Not to be a tattletale but flameswin had neither.
|
|
|
01-05-2014, 05:00 PM
|
#76
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Halifax
|
Don't feed the troll, please.
|
|
|
01-05-2014, 05:15 PM
|
#77
|
Powerplay Quarterback
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by AltaGuy
I think Marleau is a lock personally. Babcock used him a lot last Olympics, and together with Couture they play all the tough minutes in SJ. Marleau is also one of the fastest players on Canada.
|
Marleau wasn't even invited to orientation camp. I'd be surprised if he made it.
http://www.hockeycanada.ca/en-ca/Tea...on-Camp/Roster
|
|
|
01-05-2014, 06:08 PM
|
#78
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Boca Raton, FL
|
97.81% for Crosby.
Who the #### isn't picking Sidney ####ing Crosby for Team Canada?
__________________
"You know, that's kinda why I came here, to show that I don't suck that much" ~ Devin Cooley, Professional Goaltender
|
|
|
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Cali Panthers Fan For This Useful Post:
|
|
01-05-2014, 06:14 PM
|
#79
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Here we go. Please note that, though ostensibly designated lines 1-4, these are in fact three first lines and a line I call the "Nightmare" line. Crosby's will no doubt see the most ice, but it'd be nice if they could all play quite a bit; these lines are designed to be rolled.
The point is to have one line whose general purpose is to match up against the opposition's best players, and at all other times be rolling three lines who are more or less equally lethal as offensive threats. This is the rationale for not having Stamkos out when Crosby is, except on the power play. For me, this is particularly important in a tournament where the biggest advantage Canada has is depth, especially on defense.
As I have said before, what I want from team Canada is never to feel like I'm waiting for the truly dangerous players to be on the ice - which happens all too often with HC teams. This lineup is designed to make that a reality. In other words, if you're the opposition coach, whatever defense pair you decide to put on the ice, they should never once be thinking "well, at least we don't have to deal with that other line". Instead, I want them thinking "wow, thank God we got through that shift, now who are they putting out nex- Oh, f%*@!"
I just want them all to hate life. Is that too much to ask? I think not. So with that in mind,
Tavares - Crosby - Giroux
Basically, this is the "Crosby" line, and given that whoever makes this team will be elite, it's sort of a "fill in the blanks" on his wings. However, given where others fit in on this lineup, I think the fill-ins turned out rather well. Giroux, after his slow start, has been carrying the Flyers to a playoff spot, and Tavares has been consistently elite for three seasons. The added bonus here is you have three guys who can not only create plays at the highest level, but can finish at the highest level, too. It's tough to know who's going to be taking the shot. The other bonus is Tavares shoots left and Giroux right.
But in any event, it's the "Crosby" line, there's no particular worry that it won't be productive.
Duchene - Stamkos - St. Louis
While this is the second line nominally, it might play the fewest total minutes, though given my team concept I hope that the ice time will be pretty well spread out. Whatever minutes this line gets, though, it should play them against the weakest competition possible, starting shifts against third and fourth lines and less-than-elite D men... and devour them. This line is absurdly fast, deadly in transition, and boasts maybe the best pure scorer in the world alongside the guy who routinely sets him up for 60ish goals. I love Duchene on international ice where he has more room to do what he does (guy is lights out below the face off dot), and I like St. Louis for his creativity and playmaking ability with wider passing lanes. Imagine having to play Volchenkov and some KHL'er against this line? Terrifying.
E. Staal - Getzlaf - Perry
I'm pretty sure Getzlaf and Perry is a line on everyone's team and it would be a pretty big shock for something like this not to happen. The LW on the line is up for debate, but I'm taking Eric Staal over Rick Nash based on his last 10 games - barring injury, as he's currently day to day. This line is an absolute freight train and should be asked to play a wrecking-ball style, which is exactly what the Ducks guys are good at. It's nice being able to have two of the top 10 scorers in the NHL on your 3rd first line, isn't it?
Benn - Toews - Bergeron
This is the one I call the "Nightmare" line, simply because it sounds so completely awful if you had to line up on the other side of it. The two best two-way centres in the NHL (except Datsyuk) along with Benn, whose entire style of play seems to be predicated on going right through everyone. I can't imagine a more horrendous situation for elite opposition to find themselves in that trying to score against these guys. They not only want it much more than you do, they have high scoring potential, too. This line exists to make people utterly miserable, and they're uniquely equipped for the task.
Thornton - Hall
Thornton is there because you don't leave a veteran centre who's scoring at a top 10 rate and can slot in on basically any of your lines at home. Ideally, any ice time he sees is either on Crosby's or Getzlaf's line as he fits quite nicely in either situation. Hall, meanwhile, is there as a gamebreaker who can fill in on that full-speed second line if changes need to be made, i.e. Duchene isn't working or something. Everyone hates the Oilers and he's pretty one dimensional, I know, but given his one dimension is "probably the best skating winger in the league" and it's a big ice surface I can't not bring him. He doesn't have to do it all, he just has to do his one thing.
Either way, he's an extra, so if you want to bring Marleau instead I'm not much fussed (Marleau could also substitute for E Staal on line 3 if Staal's not 100%).
Last edited by 19Yzerman19; 01-05-2014 at 06:18 PM.
|
|
|
01-05-2014, 06:16 PM
|
#80
|
First Line Centre
|
Canada should just send the 23 best Corsi players.
__________________
Tyger! Tyger! burning bright
In the forests of the night,
What immortal hand or eye
Could frame thy fearful symmetry?
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Red John For This Useful Post:
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:35 PM.
|
|