Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-20-2015, 05:20 PM   #61
getbak
Franchise Player
 
getbak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Locke View Post
Dont you need some Heritage to have a Heritage 'Classic?'
You should have an outdoor venue if you're going to host an outdoor game, but that didn't stop Vancouver.


It makes sense to postpone the Heritage Classic rather than hosting it only a couple of months after Winnipeg hosts the Grey Cup. There's no sense in hosting two big "once a decade" type events that close together.

I wonder if this also means they're looking at having the Heritage Classic in November rather than February. There's a slightly better chance for nicer weather at an outdoor game in November than February in Winnipeg.
__________________
Turn up the good, turn down the suck!
getbak is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2015, 05:23 PM   #62
saskflames69
#1 Goaltender
 
saskflames69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kunkstyle View Post
Just because you're stuck in Sasatchewan doesn't mean our team should be subjected to traveling there.
No, but several times a year they have to travel to Edmonton, which is just Saskatoon on a bigger scale.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Street Pharmacist View Post
If ever there was an oilering
Connor Zary will win the Hart Trophy in 2027.
saskflames69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2015, 05:59 PM   #63
PegCityFlamesFan
First Line Centre
 
PegCityFlamesFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bouw N Arrow View Post
AHAHAHAHAHA, it's too cold in Winnipeg
Did you read the article?
__________________
PegCityFlamesFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2015, 06:45 PM   #64
RM14
First Line Centre
 
RM14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pylon View Post
If they did a 'Mystery Alaska' style game with small attendance on a lake and made it PPV, that would be freaking awesome. Even if they didn't have it as a PPV, the publicity would be crazy.
The Mystery Alaska rink was built on the quary in Canmore. Could easily be done again! A real life Mystery Alaska would be awesome. Flames should host the Rangers. Oh man.
RM14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2015, 07:29 PM   #65
browna
Franchise Player
 
browna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

So the real reason is why exactly? Can't secure dates? In an outdoor stadium in Canada between January and March?

Just a guess but I can't imagine there's a scheduling conflict between AC/DC, Metallica, and a Papal visit for weekend in Feb 2016.

A check of the stadium website for this next stretch of time shows "One Direction" as the only event listed on the calendar of events, and it's in July.

I think they know they can't sell the game out is the likely scenario. With the Grey Cup in late November which are attended mainly by locals, asking locals to again shell out another wad of money in that small market a few months later to try and fill the stadium again, is a lot to ask.

Last edited by browna; 01-20-2015 at 07:31 PM.
browna is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2015, 08:27 PM   #66
jayswin
Celebrated Square Root Day
 
jayswin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by browna View Post
So the real reason is why exactly? Can't secure dates? In an outdoor stadium in Canada between January and March?

Just a guess but I can't imagine there's a scheduling conflict between AC/DC, Metallica, and a Papal visit for weekend in Feb 2016.

A check of the stadium website for this next stretch of time shows "One Direction" as the only event listed on the calendar of events, and it's in July.

I think they know they can't sell the game out is the likely scenario. With the Grey Cup in late November which are attended mainly by locals, asking locals to again shell out another wad of money in that small market a few months later to try and fill the stadium again, is a lot to ask.

Bahahahahahaha.........oh wait, you're serious?
jayswin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2015, 08:53 PM   #67
browna
Franchise Player
 
browna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Snark aside, yes, as serious as Getbak was above. I don't doubt that they probably realized after announcing it a year ago, that they got feedback from Bombers ticket holders and the general public that they weren't going to get people paying an average of $200 per ticket X 40000+ tickets for two winter events in 3 months. People would choose one or the other, but not both.

Wrangling the local sponsors required for a large portion of both events would be an issue, to outlay that sort of $ in a 3 month time frame as well.

Whatever it is, you really think it was the lack of an available/suitable date holding this back from going forward? The place is as inhabitable as McMahon or the stadium in Regina is in the winter no matter how much nicer it is.

Last edited by browna; 01-20-2015 at 08:55 PM.
browna is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2015, 08:17 AM   #68
PegCityFlamesFan
First Line Centre
 
PegCityFlamesFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by browna View Post
Snark aside, yes, as serious as Getbak was above. I don't doubt that they probably realized after announcing it a year ago, that they got feedback from Bombers ticket holders and the general public that they weren't going to get people paying an average of $200 per ticket X 40000+ tickets for two winter events in 3 months. People would choose one or the other, but not both.

Wrangling the local sponsors required for a large portion of both events would be an issue, to outlay that sort of $ in a 3 month time frame as well.

Whatever it is, you really think it was the lack of an available/suitable date holding this back from going forward? The place is as inhabitable as McMahon or the stadium in Regina is in the winter no matter how much nicer it is.
The NHL wants it to be hosted in December, The Bombers and the CFL said February. The Bombers were okay with February, as long as the NHL paid for heating during the winter (not going to happen). Now it will be December 2016. Do I think it is stupid, of course, but that's the reality. It has nothing to do with being able to afford it. Standard garbage argument from a clueless outsider.
__________________
PegCityFlamesFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2015, 08:24 AM   #69
DownhillGoat
Franchise Player
 
DownhillGoat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by saskflames69 View Post
No, but several times a year they have to travel to Edmonton, which is just Saskatoon on a bigger scale.

Exactly. So why punish them further?

Quote:
Originally Posted by PegCityFlamesFan View Post
The NHL wants it to be hosted in December,

December seems like a poor time to hold it, IMO.
DownhillGoat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2015, 08:40 AM   #70
troutman
Unfrozen Caveman Lawyer
 
troutman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Crowsnest Pass
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by saskflames69 View Post
http://www.tsn.ca/no-heritage-classi...atoon-1.187741

Looks like the Heritage Classic will not be played in Winnipeg in 2016. They are hoping to have it in 2017 instead.

OT but, they're giving us the Oilers and Wild? What the ####. I guess the Flames are too good to play preseason games here.
Mr. Friedman said it was because 2016 is the 100th Anniversary of the NHL, and Toronto will get the game.
troutman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2015, 10:21 AM   #71
Stay Golden
Franchise Player
 
Stay Golden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: STH since 2002
Exp:
Default

Winterpeg is a perfect setting for an outdoor game. Makes perfect sense and it was only a matter of time before they got an outdoor game.
__________________
Stay Golden is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2015, 10:28 AM   #72
locsofblu
First Line Centre
 
locsofblu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Vancouver, B.C.
Exp:
Default

The masquito classic.
locsofblu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2015, 10:28 AM   #73
Resolute 14
In the Sin Bin
 
Resolute 14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by troutman View Post
Mr. Friedman said it was because 2016 is the 100th Anniversary of the NHL, and Toronto will get the game.
Which is rather dumb since the 100th anniversary of the NHL (and the Leafs) is 2017. The 2016-17 season would be the 100th season, counting the cancelled one though.
Resolute 14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2015, 10:38 AM   #74
troutman
Unfrozen Caveman Lawyer
 
troutman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Crowsnest Pass
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Resolute 14 View Post
Which is rather dumb since the 100th anniversary of the NHL (and the Leafs) is 2017. The 2016-17 season would be the 100th season, counting the cancelled one though.
The Habs 100th anniversary lasted about 5 years.
troutman is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to troutman For This Useful Post:
Old 01-21-2015, 10:40 AM   #75
Resolute 14
In the Sin Bin
 
Resolute 14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Exp:
Default

Ok, and? Pointing out that Montreal did dumb things doesn't make the dumb things Toronto does any less dumb.
Resolute 14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2015, 10:43 AM   #76
troutman
Unfrozen Caveman Lawyer
 
troutman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Crowsnest Pass
Exp:
Default

Just found this - more clearly makes the point:

http://www.sportsnet.ca/hockey/nhl/3...016-world-cup/

16. Winnipeg’s decision to back away from the Heritage Classic next season brings added intrigue to the NHL’s plans for 2016-17. That is the league’s 100th anniversary; both Ottawa and Toronto want the event then. Could Winnipeg be added to that mix, or will the Jets (and Manitoba) have to wait?
troutman is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:30 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy