Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-15-2013, 10:42 AM   #61
Enoch Root
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wastedyouth View Post
I'm a fan of Kent's work. And while the article ended up not representing what happened in the long run, it is a viewpoint many people had at the time. Even many posters on CP.
Not everyone shared that viewpoint.

I thought Erixon wanted NY for personal reasons - Wilson used it as a chance to take a couple shots at the organization. Calling the return magic beans was unprofessional. He had an agenda with that article (as most writers do with most articles) and now it has come back to make him look foolish.

It happens.

But it goes way past the fact that things can turn out unexpectedly in time.

I like when people get called out for overly aggressive or one-sided viewpoints. If you want to make them, you should expect them to be called out.
Enoch Root is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Enoch Root For This Useful Post:
Old 10-15-2013, 11:43 AM   #62
cannon7
Needs More Cowbell
 
cannon7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Not Canada, Eh?
Exp:
Default

If not for Erixon blowing his career up, maybe Brodie doesn't get the chance he did and emerge as a 24 minute a night guy. Funny how things turn out.
cannon7 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to cannon7 For This Useful Post:
Old 10-15-2013, 11:58 AM   #63
the2bears
Franchise Player
 
the2bears's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: The Bay Area
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wastedyouth View Post
I'm a fan of Kent's work. And while the article ended up not representing what happened in the long run, it is a viewpoint many people had at the time. Even many posters on CP.
Fair enough regarding his work. I just thought your reaction a little over the top. Especially comparing his historical work to that of a poster on a forum. I figure we should hold them to different standards sometimes.
the2bears is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2013, 12:01 PM   #64
Wastedyouth
Truculent!
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Exp:
Question

Quote:
Originally Posted by the2bears View Post
Fair enough regarding his work. I just thought your reaction a little over the top. Especially comparing his historical work to that of a poster on a forum. I figure we should hold them to different standards sometimes.
Haha. You shoulda saw what I had on that post before I edited it. It was far grumpier.
Wastedyouth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2013, 12:11 PM   #65
Robbob
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Exp:
Default

Calling second rounders magic beans is a bit of a disservice. A lot of good players are drafted in the second round. Some contending teams are where they are because of players drafted in the second round.
Robbob is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2013, 08:27 PM   #66
Vulcan
Franchise Player
 
Vulcan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Sunshine Coast
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flames Draft Watcher View Post
Oh man does that Kent Wilson article look absurd now.

We'll keep those "magic beans" Kent, they're blossoming quite nicely actually.

And the crying about Calgary getting a "stigma"? Haven't had trouble signing prospects since then. In fact we're attracting guys (see Knight).

Terrible editorial.
We're attracting prospects because we're perceived as being terrible, so there are opportunities. We didn't change our philosophy because we had an epiphany of how to build a winner. We're in this position because Feaster has built a bad hockey team.

As for the stigma, yeah it had been an ongoing criticism of the Flames but still this was just a red herring that Tom used as he wanted to be with the Rangers. Anyways all in all it looks good on Tom. I hope he becomes a tweener for years to come.
Vulcan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2013, 01:20 AM   #67
FAN
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Exp:
Default

I don't understand the criticism of Kent's article, considering that it was written at a time when most of us here thought Feaster was crazy and stupid for thinking that the team was playoff bound. Do people not understand that news articles are suppose to reflect the times? It's not like Kent was making predictions.

There was little wrong with the article at the time. Erixon was widely considered the team's top prospect and it is thought that Erixon's stock had rose since he was drafted. Was Erixon NHL ready? Not quite, but he was seemingly close. Did he have top 4 potential? Yes he did. Were 2nd round picks guaranteed to produce top 4 defensemen or top 6 forwards? Nope. Is trading a former first rounder with top 4 potential for an average prospect and two 2nd round picks generally a good idea? Nope. Were the Flames seemingly reluctant to integrate youth into the lineup? It's a reasonable argument. Did the Flames have a bad reputation for giving youth a chance at the time? I suppose.

Seriously... are some of us really denying the fact that the team was considered somewhat a joke because of the team's refusal to rebuild? After the Erixon trade, it took Feaster almost two years to admit defeat and finally try to rebuild this team. Things are finally looking up now, let's not forget that it wasn't too long ago when most of us thought that things were pretty bleak with the team refusing to realize that the team wasn't a playoff team.
FAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2013, 08:02 AM   #68
FlameZilla
First Line Centre
 
FlameZilla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Exp:
Default

Just a random thought, but would anyone be open to re-acquiring Tom? There's no room in Columbus for him & despite all our hatred & joy at his struggles he's probably due to break out as a legit NHL blue liner very soon...
FlameZilla is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to FlameZilla For This Useful Post:
Old 10-16-2013, 08:05 AM   #69
sa226
#1 Goaltender
 
sa226's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Back in Calgary!!
Exp:
Default

Though this trade is looking better and better for us. It sure would be nice to have another young top 2 Dman with star potential in the line-up
sa226 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to sa226 For This Useful Post:
Old 10-16-2013, 08:25 AM   #70
Poe969
Franchise Player
 
Poe969's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Thunder Bay Ontario
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FlameZilla View Post
Just a random thought, but would anyone be open to re-acquiring Tom? There's no room in Columbus for him & despite all our hatred & joy at his struggles he's probably due to break out as a legit NHL blue liner very soon...
If he agreed to get his head out of his butt and would accept a trade to the Flames, I'd rather have him on the team then Butler. Even if he didn't make the team, it would be great to have him in the system
__________________
Fan of the Flames, where being OK has become OK.
Poe969 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2013, 08:29 AM   #71
JiriHrdina
I believe in the Pony Power
 
JiriHrdina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FAN View Post
I don't understand the criticism of Kent's article, considering that it was written at a time when most of us here thought Feaster was crazy and stupid for thinking that the team was playoff bound. Do people not understand that news articles are suppose to reflect the times? It's not like Kent was making predictions.
.
It is the magic beans comment I think that people are reacting too. Certainly I think that applies to Horak as at the time he looked like a toss-in. But two 2nd round picks was something that an organization, lacking picks, actually needed. If they were 4th and 5th round picks sure - but 2nds have value clearly.
JiriHrdina is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to JiriHrdina For This Useful Post:
Old 10-16-2013, 08:53 AM   #72
Resolute 14
In the Sin Bin
 
Resolute 14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FlameZilla View Post
Just a random thought, but would anyone be open to re-acquiring Tom? There's no room in Columbus for him & despite all our hatred & joy at his struggles he's probably due to break out as a legit NHL blue liner very soon...
I think Erixon's mentality is the complete opposite of what the organization is looking for. His me-first and me-only attitude is more suited for the Oilers.
Resolute 14 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Resolute 14 For This Useful Post:
Old 10-16-2013, 09:00 AM   #73
FlameZilla
First Line Centre
 
FlameZilla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Exp:
Default

Is my memory correct? Magic Beans = Horak, Granlund & Wotherspoon? 3 solid prospects for the price of 1 is a good deal, which Feaster managed to haggle in a very short time-frame. I'm sure Kent Wilson would recognise this in retrospect.
FlameZilla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2013, 09:02 AM   #74
DionTheDman
First Line Centre
 
DionTheDman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Robbob View Post
Calling second rounders magic beans is a bit of a disservice. A lot of good players are drafted in the second round. Some contending teams are where they are because of players drafted in the second round.
I think it's maybe because we are so unfamiliar with second round prospects from the Sutter era.
DionTheDman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2013, 09:06 AM   #75
saillias
Franchise Player
 
saillias's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Exp:
Default

In retrospect it was a better return than what we got for Regehr... or Phaneuf
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by JobHopper View Post
The thing is, my posts, thoughts and insights may be my opinions but they're also quite factual.
saillias is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to saillias For This Useful Post:
Old 10-16-2013, 09:09 AM   #76
DionTheDman
First Line Centre
 
DionTheDman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by saillias View Post
In retrospect it was a better return than what we got for Regehr... or Phaneuf
or Gilmour
or Savard
or Giguere...
DionTheDman is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to DionTheDman For This Useful Post:
Old 10-16-2013, 11:24 AM   #77
automaton 3
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Lethbridge
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DionTheDman View Post
I think it's maybe because we are so unfamiliar with second round prospects from the Sutter era.
This, and drafting for this organization in general has improved in recent years.

"Magic beans" was a little over the top though.
automaton 3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2013, 11:29 AM   #78
Wastedyouth
Truculent!
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Exp:
Default

A. We had no idea who the two second rounders would be, and as of yet neither are NHLers or even very close to being.

B. I'm sure he wasn't the only one who said Roman who-rak? When the trade went down.

So in effect, yes, it was magic beans. But we ended up getting a nice bean stock out of them.

What an odd thing to get upset about.
Wastedyouth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2013, 11:53 AM   #79
undercoverbrother
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Sylvan Lake
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DionTheDman View Post
or Gilmour
or Savard
or Giguere...
#### you for bringin up that trade, just when I think I have banished from my memory......
undercoverbrother is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2013, 01:55 PM   #80
Bertuzzied
Lifetime Suspension
 
Bertuzzied's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Market Mall Food Court
Exp:
Default

It still bottles my mind why people who hate Erixon still like Gilmour or Niewendyk. Both of those greedy dbagslost all my respect when they requested to leave.
Bertuzzied is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:35 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy