Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-28-2013, 11:30 AM   #61
moon
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lethbridge
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dino7c View Post
remember that when you are bitching about every player on the team in the game thread 82 games this season
What does that have to do with season tickets prices?

Now if I don't like the team they have assembled I have to bitch about season ticket prices?
moon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2013, 11:31 AM   #62
dino7c
Franchise Player
 
dino7c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr.Coffee View Post
I think some of you guys are missing the point for fans. I think it has less to do with seeing winning and losing and more to do with seeing an exciting brand and a little effort.

Have you ever left the game after a loss but it was a great game to watch? Yes, probably many times. Probably because the players put in a little effort which directly relates to more chances, more close calls / nice saves, more nice goals, more big hits.... With Iginla as captain over the last couple years, again that wasn't happening. You had consistent floating nights.

THAT's the problem with the raising ticket prices. I forget exactly but I think over the last 7-10 years I'm pretty sure the Flames have raised ticket prices every single year. And the problem is then you have these idiots sit out half a year while they squabble over the billions. F that noise.

I think it has less to do with "being cool" relating to winning / losing / rebuilding and more to do with the QUALITY OF THE PRODUCT.

If the rookies come in, are crap, but play an exciting brand then yes- raise prices, you'll probably have people excited about the near-term future of the team. If they dick around and float all over the place, you shouldn't raise prices because the product really does suck.

It's like they're rewarding themselves for inept management and laziness on the ice.
This, I am and will always be a fan of this team...I am happy they are going in a new direction.

I don't like that they raise tickets every season...rewarding everyone for failure. Especially after the lockout debacle last season that solved nothing. Makes me feel like a sucker to keep coming back and paying whatever they charge.

I am just venting some frustration with constant ticket price increases...I will never not be a Flames fan
dino7c is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2013, 11:32 AM   #63
dino7c
Franchise Player
 
dino7c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by moon View Post
What does that have to do with season tickets prices?

Now if I don't like the team they have assembled I have to bitch about season ticket prices?
just was funny coming from you the guy who complains about everything

pot-kettle

just bustin' balls
dino7c is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2013, 11:34 AM   #64
moon
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lethbridge
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr.Coffee View Post
I think some of you guys are missing the point for fans. I think it has less to do with seeing winning and losing and more to do with seeing an exciting brand and a little effort.

Have you ever left the game after a loss but it was a great game to watch? Yes, probably many times. Probably because the players put in a little effort which directly relates to more chances, more close calls / nice saves, more nice goals, more big hits.... With Iginla as captain over the last couple years, again that wasn't happening. You had consistent floating nights.

THAT's the problem with the raising ticket prices. I forget exactly but I think over the last 7-10 years I'm pretty sure the Flames have raised ticket prices every single year. And the problem is then you have these idiots sit out half a year while they squabble over the billions. F that noise.

I think it has less to do with "being cool" relating to winning / losing / rebuilding and more to do with the QUALITY OF THE PRODUCT.

If the rookies come in, are crap, but play an exciting brand then yes- raise prices, you'll probably have people excited about the near-term future of the team. If they dick around and float all over the place, you shouldn't raise prices because the product really does suck.

It's like they're rewarding themselves for inept management and laziness on the ice.
Well I think the lack of excitement the last few years BS is just that BS.

I didn't find the games all that much more exciting when the young guys came in at the end of the year and supposedly played with more passion. The games were horribly played and tough to watch at times.

They are rewarding themselves because the marketplace has shown a willingness to pay the prices they set and they can charge these prices and make more than they would charging less.

If the team was going 82-0 winning every game 10-0 while playing a beautiful style of hockey but nobody wanted to go to the games there is no chance they are raising prices every year.
moon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2013, 11:40 AM   #65
Mr.Coffee
damn onions
 
Mr.Coffee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Well agree to disagree on that point. This fan knew that if they held onto that core of players, they would never achieve anything significant. And I knew that about at least 1 year prior, and I'm more or less an idiot. If I saw that, I guarantee anybody with half a brain saw that. In December 2011, were you looking at this group and saying yep- these guys could win a cup????

Lack of excitement is bs? That's laughable, this has been a very boring team for quite awhile. Ever watched Pittsburgh or Philly? I know you have and their games were significantly more interesting. Obviously just my opinion. Same with playoffs, almost to a game all of them were more interesting than Flames games because their players were laying it out on the line every night.

They can absolutely reward themselves based on the willingness of the market, but that market is a two way street. Fans should reward themselves for the stupidness and stubbornness of the team. And while this small opening for ticket holders may not be a big deal, and I'd agree with that, it clearly is a sign that fans' willingness to pay increasing prices for crap product does have its' limits.
Mr.Coffee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2013, 11:44 AM   #66
getbak
Franchise Player
 
getbak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by burnitdown View Post
I find it shocking there are season seats available. Sure it'll be a bad team and the costs are high...but it's still hockey in a Canadian market. Is there any other Canadian team that has open availability for season tickets?? I'd be shocked if this was happening anywhere else...except for maybe Vancouver! But their fans are the definition of bandwagon fans!!
Assuming the numbers Ace posted before are accurate, there's 48 total seats available with this offer. That's less than one quarter of one percent of the capacity of the Saddledome.

This isn't anything new. Every year, people on the Hot House list get offered tickets just before the start of the season. It's most likely because people who previously renewed had their accounts closed for some reason (non-payment, cancellation, etc).

They're still selling Hot House memberships, so demand is still higher than supply.
__________________
Turn up the good, turn down the suck!
getbak is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2013, 12:06 PM   #67
pylon
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FFR View Post
Sooo - people complain that the lower bowl is full of corporate suits and no real fans - now tickets in the lower bowl are available but no one wants to put up the money? Shocking.
I know. According to all the hyperbole on this site, the second tickets became available, everyone would be grateful to dump $13-16,000 on a set of lower bowl seats, just to get the chance to see ANY type of NHL hockey, no matter what. Where are all of those fans willing to take a second mortgage on their house to watch young GunZ 2.0?

Yeah, didn't think so.
pylon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2013, 02:35 PM   #68
Howie_16
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Howie_16's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Exp:
Default

Let's get back to basic economics here for a second. Generally speaking, prices are set by supply and demand, not by whether or not the Flames spend to the cap. While missing the playoffs may decrease demand, as long as greasy Bronco guy and his co-horts are making a profit on game nights, I would argue that the Flames are setting their price points too low.

I'd much prefer this money end up with the Flames ownership than with Bronco guy, even if I end up paying a little more for my season tickets.
Howie_16 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2013, 12:51 PM   #69
Sec218
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Sec218's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Section 218
Exp:
Default

So what happen? Did you guys decide to get the season tickets? It has been a fun time at the Dome so far this season.
Sec218 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:04 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy