Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-15-2013, 12:56 PM   #61
Ashasx
Franchise Player
 
Ashasx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Swayze11 View Post
All 29 other teams have a Gaudreau in their system. If you look at the % of players that make it to the NHL depending on what round they were drafted, its a significant drop off from round 1 to round 2.
Absolutely ridiculous. Every team might have a small, skilled player, but how many of them are putting up 50+ points in college as a sophomore? How many are winning individual awards left and right?

Gaudreau alone would be the top prospect on the Sharks, Canucks, Devils, and Flyers.
Ashasx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2013, 12:58 PM   #62
#-3
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Exp:
Default

All this talk of Gaudreau's trade value is stupid, either way you look at it

His Value to Calgary > NHL trade value.
Meaning he will not be traded.


A good example of Trade value not equalling a players value to the team is Ramo, Montreal basically traded him to us for a 2nd. His trade value was higher that his value to the team, because he is older than their starter who is already at the top of the league, and he was not coming to North America in the next couple years.

Calgary would not think of trading him for a 2nd, because there is about a 50% chance he will be our starter sometime in the next 2 years. Neither the 31st or 60th pick will ever get you a goaltender who is NHL ready.
#-3 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to #-3 For This Useful Post:
Old 04-15-2013, 12:59 PM   #63
squiggs96
Franchise Player
 
squiggs96's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Section 203
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wronskian View Post
I'm indifferent to Jankowski, I still can't believe we passed on TT at 14 though. Lets everyone be perfectly honest, if the Oilers or Canucks made the Jankowski pick at 23 (or whatever it was), we'd be laughing at them.
Evidently other teams saw what Calgary saw, and passed on him at 14, 15, 16 and 17 as well. Tom Wilson, a RW, was even chosen at 16 over TT.
__________________
My thanks equals mod team endorsement of your post.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bingo View Post
Jesus this site these days
Quote:
Originally Posted by Barnet Flame View Post
He just seemed like a very nice person. I loved Squiggy.
Quote:
Originally Posted by dissentowner View Post
I should probably stop posting at this point
squiggs96 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2013, 01:00 PM   #64
kyuss275
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashasx View Post
Absolutely ridiculous. Every team might have a small, skilled player, but how many of them are putting up 50+ points in college as a sophomore? How many are winning individual awards left and right?

Gaudreau alone would be the top prospect on the Sharks, Canucks, Devils, and Flyers.

Just because he would end up being top prospect on some teams does not make him a blue chip prospect with high value. Gaudreau could not garner a 1st + at this moment.

Look at the 2 guys that the flames got in the Iggy trade. They seem to be ranked high on the flames prospect list but i doubt that makes them worth 2nd rounders.
kyuss275 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to kyuss275 For This Useful Post:
Old 04-15-2013, 01:03 PM   #65
Ashasx
Franchise Player
 
Ashasx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kyuss275 View Post
Just because he would end up being top prospect on some teams does not make him a blue chip prospect with high value. Gaudreau could not garner a 1st + at this moment.

Look at the 2 guys that the flames got in the Iggy trade. They seem to be ranked high on the flames prospect list but i doubt that makes them worth 2nd rounders.
When did I say Gaudreau was a blue chip prospect?

And since when do only blue chip prospects return first round picks?
Ashasx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2013, 01:03 PM   #66
Erick Estrada
Franchise Player
 
Erick Estrada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by neo45 View Post
Well they took Gaunce and Mitch Moroz right after Janko so I was already laughing at them

For the record I think the Jankowski pick is a great one
Like I said it was a terrible draft. Gaunce and Moroz are both longshots to make the NHL.
Erick Estrada is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2013, 01:04 PM   #67
Erick Estrada
Franchise Player
 
Erick Estrada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashasx View Post
Gaudreau alone would be the top prospect on the Sharks, Canucks, Devils, and Flyers.
Not sure about that. I feel some fans are overvaluing Gaudreau here.
Erick Estrada is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2013, 01:06 PM   #68
Freeway
Franchise Player
 
Freeway's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CliffFletcher View Post
Gaudreau is probably worth a late 1st rounder. But he's not a blue-chipper by any stretch of the imagination. The dude needs to gain 40 pounds before he reaches Fleury's or St. Louis' playing weight. 40 pounds. He's still a long-shot to make it as an NHLer.
Fleury was MAYBE 180 pounds with his gear on.
Gaudreau is at roughly 165 with his gear on.
__________________
PHWA Member // Managing Editor @ FlamesNation // Author of "On The Clock: Behind The Scenes with the Calgary Flames at the NHL Draft" // Twitter

"Does a great job covering the Flames" - Elliotte Friedman
Freeway is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2013, 01:10 PM   #69
Swayze11
something else haha
 
Swayze11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashasx View Post
Absolutely ridiculous. Every team might have a small, skilled player, but how many of them are putting up 50+ points in college as a sophomore? How many are winning individual awards left and right?

Gaudreau alone would be the top prospect on the Sharks, Canucks, Devils, and Flyers.
Yup, putting up points in COLLEGE. How many college free agents have panned out? I think there is a thread on it someone where on the forum.

Lets take a look at the last few Hobey Baker winners:
Drew LeBlanc - wasn't drafted. Signed as a free agent, way too early to make judgement.
Jack Connolly - Got a few sniffs as a free agent in the NHL. Signed in sweeden.
Andy Miele - The prized free agent everyone wanted. Got a few NHL games, seems to be putting up decent numbers in the AHL. Like the above, maybe a little to early to judge. Similar size to Johnny.
Blake Geoffrion - 2nd rounder on the Preds. Unfortunately had to retire due to a serious head injury. Can't make a comparison.
Matt Gilroy - The next prized college free agent. Outstanding COLLEGE stats. Looks like a depth d-man at the NHL level.
Kevin Porter - Regular NHLer. Unreal college stats. Career 4th line depth player.
Ryan Duncan - who?
Matt Carle - A solid d-man. The only really noteworthy player in the last 10 years to win the Hobey.

Again, I am not at all saying hes a bust and we should get whatever we can for him and we probably shouldn't trade him, it doesn't make sense. My point is if someone offers you a 1st round pick for him, you take it and run.

I think at the very least you are undervaluing late 1st round picks, especially in this years draft.
__________________

Swayze11 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Swayze11 For This Useful Post:
Old 04-15-2013, 01:11 PM   #70
Calgary4LIfe
Franchise Player
 
Calgary4LIfe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Exp:
Default

This is just further proof as to why Pierre isn't a GM.

At anyways, I will always compared TT with Jankowski. So far, I like that comparison, seeing as TT is still a ways away, and is looking more like a winger. Both of them are projects - but the Flames picked the guy who is 4"(or more) taller and translates into a more likely center.

Pierre... lol
Calgary4LIfe is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Calgary4LIfe For This Useful Post:
Old 04-15-2013, 01:14 PM   #71
valo403
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MrMastodonFarm View Post
No, I'm really not. He called it an amazing pick, then stated it would take a while to pay off. Something that I agree with.

Now it's a bad pick?

Sure.
He called an amazing pick based on completely different reasoning. It was amazing, he was completely off the board and out of high school. That doesn't happen often. That it did is amazing. The word can be used in different ways, by not providing context you're skewing his remarks.
valo403 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2013, 01:17 PM   #72
Ashasx
Franchise Player
 
Ashasx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Swayze11 View Post
Yup, putting up points in COLLEGE. How many college free agents have panned out? I think there is a thread on it someone where on the forum.

Lets take a look at the last few Hobey Baker winners:
Drew LeBlanc - wasn't drafted. Signed as a free agent, way too early to make judgement.
Jack Connolly - Got a few sniffs as a free agent in the NHL. Signed in sweeden.
Andy Miele - The prized free agent everyone wanted. Got a few NHL games, seems to be putting up decent numbers in the AHL. Like the above, maybe a little to early to judge. Similar size to Johnny.
Blake Geoffrion - 2nd rounder on the Preds. Unfortunately had to retire due to a serious head injury. Can't make a comparison.
Matt Gilroy - The next prized college free agent. Outstanding COLLEGE stats. Looks like a depth d-man at the NHL level.
Kevin Porter - Regular NHLer. Unreal college stats. Career 4th line depth player.
Ryan Duncan - who?
Matt Carle - A solid d-man. The only really noteworthy player in the last 10 years to win the Hobey.

Again, I am not at all saying hes a bust and we should get whatever we can for him and we probably shouldn't trade him, it doesn't make sense. My point is if someone offers you a 1st round pick for him, you take it and run.

I think at the very least you are undervaluing late 1st round picks, especially in this years draft.
Completely ignore that fact that Gaudreau was more than 4 years younger than almost every single one of those players at the time.
Ashasx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2013, 01:17 PM   #73
Mass_nerder
Franchise Player
 
Mass_nerder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Barthelona
Exp:
Default

I like Pierre. He's interesting to listen to, even if he is a little over the top sometimes.
He reminds me a bit of a cartoon character.
I can imagine he wouldn't get much respect from the rest of the GMs if he ever got back into an NHL management position.
Mass_nerder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2013, 01:17 PM   #74
_Q_
#1 Goaltender
 
_Q_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

I think the strategy with the Jankowski pick was to take a guy with huge potential that hopefully pans out. I think Terravainen, might one day top out as a 2nd line guy, but is more of a sure thing to play in the NHL where as Jankowski can possibly top out as a franchise centre or be a career minor leaguer.

I like the pick because of that.
_Q_ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2013, 01:19 PM   #75
Lanny_McDonald
Franchise Player
 
Lanny_McDonald's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CliffFletcher View Post
Gaudreau is probably worth a late 1st rounder. But he's not a blue-chipper by any stretch of the imagination. The dude needs to gain 40 pounds before he reaches Fleury's or St. Louis' playing weight. 40 pounds. He's still a long-shot to make it as an NHLer.
Gaudreau is listed at 5'8, 153 right now. Steve Sullivan is listed at 5'8', 161. Sullivan played at this weight or less his entire career, all 1,006 games of it. Size is not much of a factor for some players. Gaudreau appears to be one of those guys.
Lanny_McDonald is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2013, 01:19 PM   #76
Stampede2TheCup
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Stampede2TheCup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: lower mainland
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CliffFletcher View Post
Gaudreau is probably worth a late 1st rounder. But he's not a blue-chipper by any stretch of the imagination. The dude needs to gain 40 pounds before he reaches Fleury's or St. Louis' playing weight. 40 pounds. He's still a long-shot to make it as an NHLer.
25 pounds - Gaudreau is 155 versus Fleury and St. Louis at 180. He undoubtedly needs to keep putting on weight but there's no need to exaggerate it by comparing his draft weight from a couple years ago.

http://www.hockeysfuture.com/prospects/john_gaudreau/

http://www.bostonglobe.com/sports/20...szO/story.html
Stampede2TheCup is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2013, 01:20 PM   #77
MrMastodonFarm
Lifetime Suspension
 
MrMastodonFarm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by valo403 View Post
He called an amazing pick based on completely different reasoning. It was amazing, he was completely off the board and out of high school. That doesn't happen often. That it did is amazing. The word can be used in different ways, by not providing context you're skewing his remarks.
You should watch the video I posted again then. The first quote you can chalk it up to what you're suggesting but certainly not the "Amazing pick" quote at 1:40. At that point he is talking strictly about the player.
MrMastodonFarm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2013, 01:20 PM   #78
Flames Draft Watcher
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Swayze11 View Post
Yup, putting up points in COLLEGE. How many college free agents have panned out? I think there is a thread on it someone where on the forum.

Lets take a look at the last few Hobey Baker winners:
Drew LeBlanc - wasn't drafted. Signed as a free agent, way too early to make judgement.
Jack Connolly - Got a few sniffs as a free agent in the NHL. Signed in sweeden.
Andy Miele - The prized free agent everyone wanted. Got a few NHL games, seems to be putting up decent numbers in the AHL. Like the above, maybe a little to early to judge. Similar size to Johnny.
Blake Geoffrion - 2nd rounder on the Preds. Unfortunately had to retire due to a serious head injury. Can't make a comparison.
Matt Gilroy - The next prized college free agent. Outstanding COLLEGE stats. Looks like a depth d-man at the NHL level.
Kevin Porter - Regular NHLer. Unreal college stats. Career 4th line depth player.
Ryan Duncan - who?
Matt Carle - A solid d-man. The only really noteworthy player in the last 10 years to win the Hobey.

Again, I am not at all saying hes a bust and we should get whatever we can for him and we probably shouldn't trade him, it doesn't make sense. My point is if someone offers you a 1st round pick for him, you take it and run.

I think at the very least you are undervaluing late 1st round picks, especially in this years draft.
LOL. Are you seriously trying to convince us that College doesn't produce good NHLers? You think listing the players who've won the Hobey Baker in any way proves that College doesn't produce elite NHLers?

Toews
Vanek
Suter
Parise
Kesler
Zajac
Schneider
J. Johnson
Oshie
Kessel
Van Riemsdyk
Turris
McDonagh
Shattenkirk
Wilson
Gardiner
E. Johnson

That's a short list of some of the players developed in College in the last decade.

Trying to downplay Gaudreau because he is excelling in College is one of the stupidest arguments I've heard.
Flames Draft Watcher is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to Flames Draft Watcher For This Useful Post:
Old 04-15-2013, 01:23 PM   #79
valo403
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Swayze11 View Post
Yup, putting up points in COLLEGE. How many college free agents have panned out? I think there is a thread on it someone where on the forum.

Lets take a look at the last few Hobey Baker winners:
Drew LeBlanc - wasn't drafted. Signed as a free agent, way too early to make judgement.
Jack Connolly - Got a few sniffs as a free agent in the NHL. Signed in sweeden.
Andy Miele - The prized free agent everyone wanted. Got a few NHL games, seems to be putting up decent numbers in the AHL. Like the above, maybe a little to early to judge. Similar size to Johnny.
Blake Geoffrion - 2nd rounder on the Preds. Unfortunately had to retire due to a serious head injury. Can't make a comparison.
Matt Gilroy - The next prized college free agent. Outstanding COLLEGE stats. Looks like a depth d-man at the NHL level.
Kevin Porter - Regular NHLer. Unreal college stats. Career 4th line depth player.
Ryan Duncan - who?
Matt Carle - A solid d-man. The only really noteworthy player in the last 10 years to win the Hobey.

Again, I am not at all saying hes a bust and we should get whatever we can for him and we probably shouldn't trade him, it doesn't make sense. My point is if someone offers you a 1st round pick for him, you take it and run.

I think at the very least you are undervaluing late 1st round picks, especially in this years draft.
You've conveniently ignored that of all of those guys only Ryan Duncan was a Sophomore, every other player was a Senior with the exception of Carle, who was a Junior. It is an award dominated by Seniors, the fact Gaudreau was a finalist as a Sophomore is huge. Trading him for a late 1st would be simply stupid.
valo403 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to valo403 For This Useful Post:
Old 04-15-2013, 01:24 PM   #80
Swayze11
something else haha
 
Swayze11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flames Draft Watcher View Post
LOL. Are you seriously trying to convince us that College doesn't produce good NHLers? You think listing the players who've won the Hobey Baker in any way proves that College doesn't produce elite NHLers?

That's a short list of some of the players developed in College in the last decade.

Trying to downplay Gaudreau because he is excelling in College is one of the stupidest arguments I've heard.
Not one bit am I saying that at all. You may need to re-read it or read what we have been discussing.

edit: to add to that, I actually value the NCAA very highly in regards to developing players.
__________________

Swayze11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:01 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy