Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Back Burner: The Calgary Wranglers and Flames Prospects Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-03-2011, 04:47 PM   #61
Phanuthier
Franchise Player
 
Phanuthier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Silicon Valley
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CaramonLS View Post
Sorry Vulcan, I like you as a poster, but this is a stupid statement. You draft for the NHL - not the farm.

I could probably create you a roster in Abbotsford that would challenge for the Calder Cup each year (just look at the Moose's roster or Chicago Wolves right now) really easily, but if you do that, you're just shooting yourself in the foot when trying to develop quality guys.

You can buy AHL fillers quite easily.
Weighing on this topic, I agree here. You draft for your NHL team. If your AHL depth is thin, you can always sign UFAs, both out of junior and journeyman. You can trade for them. You can pick them up with late round picks. But things like trading down (Zajac for Chucko + Pardy/Prust/Boyd) really hurt the organization.

I still hold out hope for Backlund, Pelech could just be hitting a rut, and Phaneuf was drafted a talented player but his ego took over. The drafting isn't fantastic, but I don't think its a nightmare either. But then again, I still hold out hope Backlund will be a 1st line center too.
__________________
"With a coach and a player, sometimes there's just so much respect there that it's boils over"
-Taylor Hall
Phanuthier is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2011, 05:36 PM   #62
Vulcan
Franchise Player
 
Vulcan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Sunshine Coast
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Phanuthier View Post
Weighing on this topic, I agree here. You draft for your NHL team. If your AHL depth is thin, you can always sign UFAs, both out of junior and journeyman. You can trade for them. You can pick them up with late round picks. But things like trading down (Zajac for Chucko + Pardy/Prust/Boyd) really hurt the organization.

I still hold out hope for Backlund, Pelech could just be hitting a rut, and Phaneuf was drafted a talented player but his ego took over. The drafting isn't fantastic, but I don't think its a nightmare either. But then again, I still hold out hope Backlund will be a 1st line center too.
I probably shouldn't have said to stock the farm, but the facts are we didn't have much in our system so Sutter seemed to make the safe picks and trade down for quantity over quality. He did this because the main team needed a boost and so he traded draft picks that needed to be replaced.
Most weren't complete busts, they were good enough to be signed to pro contracts but not many were wins either. A good farm system with plenty of youngsters puts pressure on the big team to produce. Signing a bunch of AHL vets doesn't do this and I think now we are starting to have more than one player that will put this pressure on the Calgary team. Now that we've got a solid basis, we can gamble more.
Vulcan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2011, 08:39 PM   #63
sa226
#1 Goaltender
 
sa226's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Back in Calgary!!
Exp:
Default

As far as asset management goes, it sucks to have a first round pick wasted.

But as far as young Defense prospects go, the organization is just fine. Better than fine actually.

Brodie, Erixon, Negrin(Hopefully)

Even guys like Breen and Carson.

You can add Giordano and Bouwmeester to the list as well.

Long term the Back-end is in good shape.
sa226 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2011, 04:45 PM   #64
SebC
tromboner
 
SebC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: where the lattes are
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vulcan View Post
I probably shouldn't have said to stock the farm, but the facts are we didn't have much in our system so Sutter seemed to make the safe picks and trade down for quantity over quality. He did this because the main team needed a boost and so he traded draft picks that needed to be replaced.
I consider "safe picks" to be an inaccurate description of the likes of Nystrom, Chucko, and Pelech. If they were safe, shouldn't they be panning out?
SebC is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to SebC For This Useful Post:
Old 03-04-2011, 04:54 PM   #65
dissentowner
Franchise Player
 
dissentowner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SW Ontario
Exp:
Default

Pelech and Chucko are both 100% certified busts. Neither of these guys will ever play in the NHL.
dissentowner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2011, 05:50 PM   #66
TnT~55
Backup Goalie
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dissentowner View Post
Pelech and Chucko are both 100% certified busts. Neither of these guys will ever play in the NHL.
Matt Pelech
2008-09 - 5 games 3 points

Kris Chucko
2008-09 - 2 games 0 points


Might want to rephrase that statement.
TnT~55 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to TnT~55 For This Useful Post:
Old 03-04-2011, 06:18 PM   #67
Knalus
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Knalus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Pelech as a bust is better than Pelech dead. Cause that blood clot in the leg was really scary. I know someone that died in her twenties from a blood clot in the leg that dislodged and traveled to the heart. Add together all his other injury problems, and you could almost say we're lucky to have him in the AHL at all. Mickey isn't there.

Daniel Tkachuk, Richie Regher, Pelech, all sidelined by injury. Too bad, really.
Knalus is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Knalus For This Useful Post:
Old 03-04-2011, 07:29 PM   #68
Vulcan
Franchise Player
 
Vulcan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Sunshine Coast
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SebC View Post
I consider "safe picks" to be an inaccurate description of the likes of Nystrom, Chucko, and Pelech. If they were safe, shouldn't they be panning out?
In a draft nothing is safe but there are percentages. Both Chucko and Pelech have had serious injuries and Nystrom wasn't drafted by Daryl.

Last edited by Vulcan; 03-04-2011 at 07:34 PM.
Vulcan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2011, 11:26 AM   #69
Cactus Jack
First Line Centre
 
Cactus Jack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Exp:
Default

For comparisons sake, Darryl drafted NHLers Dion, Backlund, Pardy, Boyd, Prust.
Button drafted Lombardi, Stoll, Foster, Moen, McElhinney, Nystrom and Kobaseew
__________________
Resident beer snob
Cactus Jack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2011, 12:24 PM   #70
kirant
Franchise Player
 
kirant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SebC View Post
I consider "safe picks" to be an inaccurate description of the likes of Nystrom, Chucko, and Pelech. If they were safe, shouldn't they be panning out?
I think "Safe" means there is less of a risk of turning nothing out. Nystrom was drafted on the belief that, while he could make it up to the top 6, he would probably make the NHL in any variety because his play is still viable in a bottom 6 position. In comparison, a high risk/high reward player like (I'm not 100% if this is an accurate representation of his gameplay, just what I remember) a Jens Karlsson might not pan out into...well...anything and be a complete waste of a pick instead of a disappointment (To be fair, I don't think Karlsson ever signed an NHL contract, so that might have been an issue).

Same goes with Chucko and Pelech. The difference with these two is that major injuries have hurt their development, something that is extremely hard to predict (if not impossible) when their injury record pre-draft isn't that big. I think had their development gone as planned without major gaps for recovery, Chucko would be a 4th line or 13th forward and Pelech would be a bottom pair D.
__________________
kirant is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2011, 01:32 PM   #71
Flames Draft Watcher
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

I don't really see Chucko and Pelech as having been safe picks at any point. Instead I view Chucko as an attempt to get a powerforward who had some skill. His skating was an issue for the new NHL, something that couldn't have been predicted at that time. He also didn't develop into as dominant a physical player as they hoped. Injuries have set him back.

Pelech was risky because of his injury in his draft year (much like backlund). Injuries set his development back and his mobility isn't perfect for the new NHL either.

I think to call most of Sutter's picks "safe" is to overgeneralize inaccurately. In fact arguably Craig Button's picks of Nystrom and Kobasew were "safer" picks than Sutter's picks of Chucko or Pelech
Flames Draft Watcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2011, 02:42 AM   #72
BigBrodieFan
Franchise Player
 
BigBrodieFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: H-Town, Texas
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dissentowner View Post
Pelech and Chucko are both 100% certified busts. Neither of these guys will ever play in the NHL.
I don't know about that.. I saw Pelech play tonight and I was pretty impressed. He looks tough and he plays hard, definitely a stand-out. I guess it will just depend on injuries in the future and progression, I hope the best for the kid.
BigBrodieFan is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to BigBrodieFan For This Useful Post:
Old 03-06-2011, 03:35 PM   #73
bax
#1 Goaltender
 
bax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Exp:
Default

A bit off topic but who do you guys wanna see drafted with our first this year?


I was thinking Ty Rattie might be a good fit depending on where we end up.
bax is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2011, 04:39 PM   #74
jeremywilhelm
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Americas hat
Exp:
Default

Joel Armia.
jeremywilhelm is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to jeremywilhelm For This Useful Post:
Old 03-06-2011, 05:27 PM   #75
kirant
Franchise Player
 
kirant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Exp:
Default

I'd go after Sven Bartschi if he's available.
__________________
kirant is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2011, 05:33 PM   #76
nik-
Franchise Player
 
nik-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jeremywilhelm View Post
Joel Armia.
He won't be there when we pick.
nik- is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2011, 07:50 PM   #77
Flames Draft Watcher
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nik- View Post
He won't be there when we pick.
No one could know that.

It's not like Armia is expected to go top 5.

There aren't a lot of certainties in the draft, not a lot of consensus. Players that some people think will go top 10 will go later. Someone unexpected will go high.

Expect surprises with the draft. Trying to predict much outside of the top 5 is usually a foolish exercise.
Flames Draft Watcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2011, 12:49 PM   #78
Calgary4LIfe
Franchise Player
 
Calgary4LIfe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Exp:
Default

Scouts have said that Armia needs another season or two to mature before entering the NHL. I think he is going to be a great player.

However, I would love to get a center as well. We don't have that much depth at any forward position in our farm really, so we have the 'luxury' of drafting the best available forward when it is our go. I love Armia, but I also think this organization should try and concentrate on centers a bit more, as it really is the toughest position to acquire.
Calgary4LIfe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2011, 02:23 PM   #79
Flame4Ever
RIP Mickey
 
Flame4Ever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Exp:
Default

From an OHL perspective, I'll assume that D. Hamilton, Landeskog, Strome and Murphy are all off the board in the top 10 likely and most definitely by the top 15.
A guy like Brandon Saad who is very raw and has been surpassed by a few guys since the start of the season is someone who I would have a long look at. He will need at least 2 years of seasoning but has all the tools and instincts to be a solid top 6 player and possibly quite a bit more.
Alexander Khoklachev is another guys I would target if he is still available. Solid player with great offensive tools, speed and isn't afraid to go to high traffic areas with the puck to score. He'll likely take a bit o a hit because he is a smaller guy and the russian factor.
Flame4Ever is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2011, 02:35 PM   #80
Weiser Wonder
Franchise Player
 
Weiser Wonder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Moscow, ID
Exp:
Default

I think the Flames should go out of their way to get a smart and quick center. If there's a wide gap between the players available and the next center like that, trade down. I'm not a big fan of drafting wingers early unless they are very skilled, especially with discrepancy between center depth and winger depth among the prospects.
__________________
As you can see, I'm completely ridiculous.
Weiser Wonder is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:57 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy