Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-24-2024, 12:25 PM   #741
Tbull8
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Exp:
Default

I guess if Utah wouldn’t part with Tij for Rasmus, then we don’t trade him there. Connie will set his price and if you meet it you get Ras
Tbull8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2024, 12:37 PM   #742
Jiri Hrdina
Franchise Player
 
Jiri Hrdina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tbull8 View Post
I guess if Utah wouldn’t part with Tij for Rasmus, then we don’t trade him there. Connie will set his price and if you meet it you get Ras
Those prices have to be based in reality though.
The Coyotes have a rich asset pool - locking in on a single player doesn't make sense.
Jiri Hrdina is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2024, 12:37 PM   #743
FlamesAddiction
Franchise Player
 
FlamesAddiction's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

I would be kind of funny though.

It's pretty rare to see a prospect drafted in the 1st round traded within the same calendar year from when they were drafted, but a notable time it happened is when the Flames acquired Jarome just 3 months after Dallas drafted him. At that time of course, he was a fine prospect, but the name wasn't famous yet.
__________________
"A pessimist thinks things can't get any worse. An optimist knows they can."
FlamesAddiction is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to FlamesAddiction For This Useful Post:
Old 10-24-2024, 12:37 PM   #744
SuperMatt18
Franchise Player
 
SuperMatt18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Cozens to me feels like one of those guys that can be a good number 2 center but isn't ever going to be a play driving number 1 center

So as long as you're not paying the price of getting him as a play driving number 1 center then it's fine.

But I don't think Buffalo would be ready to sell low yet.
SuperMatt18 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2024, 12:39 PM   #745
Tkachukwagon
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Tkachukwagon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Exp:
Default

Ras is a superstar now, those don’t come cheap

https://twitter.com/user/status/1849117994875797931
Tkachukwagon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2024, 12:46 PM   #746
TheIronMaiden
Franchise Player
 
TheIronMaiden's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: ATCO Field, Section 201
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperMatt18 View Post
Cozens to me feels like one of those guys that can be a good number 2 center but isn't ever going to be a play driving number 1 center

So as long as you're not paying the price of getting him as a play driving number 1 center then it's fine.

But I don't think Buffalo would be ready to sell low yet.
The Flames are likely never going to get an "elite" star player through a trade unless some young player surprises. That said, it shouldn't stop us from trading for a top 6 centre under 23.
TheIronMaiden is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2024, 01:31 PM   #747
FlamesAddiction
Franchise Player
 
FlamesAddiction's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tkachukwagon View Post
Ras is a superstar now, those don’t come cheap
Some of the comments in that thread are funny. Like the one; "I think this just proves a flawed model lol he’s a top 4 dman at best".

A top 4 "at best", suggesting that he could even be a bottom 6 defenseman. Must be an Oilers fan as I am sure they have as many Anderssons in their system as they do Giordanos.
__________________
"A pessimist thinks things can't get any worse. An optimist knows they can."
FlamesAddiction is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to FlamesAddiction For This Useful Post:
Old 10-24-2024, 01:38 PM   #748
The Cobra
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tbull8 View Post
I guess if Utah wouldn’t part with Tij for Rasmus, then we don’t trade him there. Connie will set his price and if you meet it you get Ras
So he won't trade him then I guess. Because only Utah can trade Iggy Jr.

I reality, Conroy is too good to say Iggy or bust. Because that will likely end up with a bust, and there are other deals with Utah that would be exceptional.

And the Jarome deal was at a time when there was no salary cap.

So, Neiwy had exceptional value because Dallas knew they could sign him without worrying about the cap implications. Andersson needs a large contract in 1.5 years at an age which is not attractive for for any team trading for him.
The Cobra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2024, 01:39 PM   #749
Ba'alzamon
Scoring Winger
 
Join Date: Mar 2024
Exp:
Default

Kind of gratifying considering I've been saying Andersson should have gone in the first round since that draft. I couldn't believe it when Jacob Larsson and Gabriel Carlsson both went before Andersson and Kylington.

Speaking of Kylington, I said the same thing about him, so... 50% right, I guess. He still should have gone before Larsson, though.
Ba'alzamon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2024, 01:56 PM   #750
The Cobra
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ba'alzamon View Post
Kind of gratifying considering I've been saying Andersson should have gone in the first round since that draft. I couldn't believe it when Jacob Larsson and Gabriel Carlsson both went before Andersson and Kylington.

Speaking of Kylington, I said the same thing about him, so... 50% right, I guess. He still should have gone before Larsson, though.
If it wasn't for his issues, Kylington should be a 1st round pick.
The Cobra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2024, 02:11 PM   #751
JTech780
Powerplay Quarterback
 
JTech780's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Exp:
Default

The Rangers are going to be a team to watch going forward, they have a lot of guys needing new deals, Shesterkin, Lafreniere, Miller, Kakko, Cuylle, Rempe, Lindgren. They aren’t going to have the cap to bring back all of those players, they will have to move out salary at some point.
JTech780 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to JTech780 For This Useful Post:
Old 10-24-2024, 03:03 PM   #752
Sofa GM
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JTech780 View Post
The Rangers are going to be a team to watch going forward, they have a lot of guys needing new deals, Shesterkin, Lafreniere, Miller, Kakko, Cuylle, Rempe, Lindgren. They aren’t going to have the cap to bring back all of those players, they will have to move out salary at some point.
To NYR
Andersson
3rd

To CGY
Miller
Kakko
Sofa GM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2024, 03:36 PM   #753
FlamesAddiction
Franchise Player
 
FlamesAddiction's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ba'alzamon View Post
Kind of gratifying considering I've been saying Andersson should have gone in the first round since that draft. I couldn't believe it when Jacob Larsson and Gabriel Carlsson both went before Andersson and Kylington.

Speaking of Kylington, I said the same thing about him, so... 50% right, I guess. He still should have gone before Larsson, though.
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Cobra View Post
If it wasn't for his issues, Kylington should be a 1st round pick.
The year leading up to the draft, many people had Kylington ranked to go in the top 5. He slid hard that year and seemed to fall out of favour with his team.

I don't know what happened, but Loob recommended that they get him to North America right away to take control of his development.
__________________
"A pessimist thinks things can't get any worse. An optimist knows they can."
FlamesAddiction is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to FlamesAddiction For This Useful Post:
Old 10-24-2024, 03:54 PM   #754
dustygoon
Franchise Player
 
dustygoon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Bay Area
Exp:
Default

The 1st rounder this year:

If it's 11th or lower, Montreal gets it over the florida one.

If we trade our 1st this year for a young center, does anyone know how that works? The wording in the trade could read "montreal gets our pick if it's 11th or lower UNLESS IT'S TRADED". I doubt that's the wording but just curious.

Still, we could pass this risk onto the team we trade with. Acquiring team might get a top 10 pick or a bottom pick.
__________________
.
"Fun must be always!" - Tomas Hertl
dustygoon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2024, 04:00 PM   #755
Jiri Hrdina
Franchise Player
 
Jiri Hrdina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Exp:
Default

The Flames wouldn't be able to trade the pick.
The pick they can trade is the NJ one.
Jiri Hrdina is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2024, 04:01 PM   #756
Jay Random
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Exp:
Default

That's what got us into this mess. The Florida pick was traded to Calgary conditionally, and we don't know if the conditions will be met. So when Calgary traded the Florida pick, the trade included a condition that could substitute Calgary's 1st instead. If Conroy wants to trade his own 1st, he'll have to get the other party to agree to a condition that substitutes another pick in case the pick is not available – which could be an unprotected 1st next year. I say no dice.

The conditions on first-round picks this year remind me of that stock movie visual, the conspiracy theorist's wall map with all the photos connected by pieces of string. There's a whole ball of yarn up on that wall now. Better to trade picks that are not part of the mess.
__________________
WARNING: The preceding message may not have been processed in a sarcasm-free facility.
Jay Random is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2024, 04:39 PM   #757
dino7c
Franchise Player
 
dino7c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jiri Hrdina View Post
The Flames wouldn't be able to trade the pick.
The pick they can trade is the NJ one.
I mean they still could trade it with conditions
__________________
GFG
dino7c is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to dino7c For This Useful Post:
Old 10-24-2024, 04:39 PM   #758
Vinny01
Franchise Player
 
Vinny01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss View Post
LeBrun on insider trading:

https://www.tsn.ca/video/early-tradi...market~3017052

Utah's plan for 2 of their top 4 D men out for months is internal for now but will probably turn to trade if losses mount up
one d-man Armstrong has checked on is Provorov - Blue Jackets not ready to move him yet
Utah prefers finding a rental like Provorov because the injured players are expected to come back at some point this season

Montreal is doing due diligence looking to shake up team
Difficult to do trades this early in the season
Habs won't mortgage the future
Habs are at cap so must be equal $ in and $ out
I would be very interested in dealing with Montreal if the flames can get their 1st back.
Vinny01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2024, 05:06 PM   #759
stemit14
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vinny01 View Post
I would be very interested in dealing with Montreal if the flames can get their 1st back.
It’s too bad the flames are loaded with wingers and Montreal’s two bad contracts are wingers (Anderson and Gallagher). Montreal could trade one of those two to Calgary and attach the first round pick Calgary sent them. Would work out for both sides in some ways except that the flames have so many good young wingers that it’s probably not a good idea to bring in veteran wingers on bad contracts taking roster spots from guys like Honzek, Coronato, Pelletier or Klapka. What would be interesting is if the flames took on the full salary of Anderson (while getting their first round pick back) and then trade him to someone else at 50% retained. Would probably only get a 3rd round pick for him but that’s something and I think there would be a few teams interested in him at half of his current cap hit.

About ends up like this:

To Montreal:
Future considerations

To Calgary:
Calgary/Florida’s 1st round pick
3rd round pick from third team
$2.75 million in cap used up

Third team:
Josh Anderson (50% retained)

Calgary ends up getting a 1st round pick + 3rd pick for $2.75 million in unused cap space this season and next season. Montreal gets cap space to make another trade without it having to be money in=money out. Also sends a message to their line up trying to spark the team. Third team gets a middle-six power forward with a middle six cap hit who could rebound into being an impact player on another team.

Last edited by stemit14; 10-24-2024 at 05:28 PM.
stemit14 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to stemit14 For This Useful Post:
Old 10-24-2024, 05:25 PM   #760
Sandman
Franchise Player
 
Sandman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

I of course ran out of thanks many posts back, but I just want to thank everyone for sticking up for me, giving “thanks” to those posts, and for all the amazing comments!!!

Can’t say enough how much I appreciate you guys!
Sandman is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:09 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy