Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-03-2021, 10:59 AM   #681
PeteMoss
Franchise Player
 
PeteMoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: SW Ontario
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Calgary4LIfe View Post
Only the lousy ones. I think I know exactly who you are talking about, but only the lousy ones that were insignificant AHL'ers at best never got a 'fair shot'. Few earned it. Calgary was JUST starting to turn around their drafting and development program. Back then, we all were happy with guys like Armstrong making a push one year.



I would say Calgary probably gave more chances back then to guys who never got another sniff again anywhere else. The one guy that I faintly recall complaining never got a sniff, but he wasn't even good in the AHL, and never went on to play pro at any other level either.
I'm not sure the Flames drafting and development is any better now than it ever has been now unless you go with the typical rose coloured glasses that all of the current prospects will make it.
PeteMoss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2021, 11:19 AM   #682
Textcritic
Acerbic Cyberbully
 
Textcritic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: back in Chilliwack
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PeteMoss View Post
I'm not sure the Flames drafting and development is any better now than it ever has been now unless you go with the typical rose coloured glasses that all of the current prospects will make it.
"Typical rose coloured glasses"? Where do you see anything on CP about "all of the current prospects mak[ing] it?"
__________________
Dealing with Everything from Dead Sea Scrolls to Red C Trolls

Quote:
Originally Posted by woob
"...harem warfare? like all your wives dressup and go paintballing?"
"The Lying Pen of Scribes" Ancient Manuscript Forgeries Project
Textcritic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2021, 12:07 PM   #683
BrennyBaller
Backup Goalie
 
BrennyBaller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Calgary4LIfe View Post
Only the lousy ones. I think I know exactly who you are talking about, but only the lousy ones that were insignificant AHL'ers at best never got a 'fair shot'. Few earned it. Calgary was JUST starting to turn around their drafting and development program. Back then, we all were happy with guys like Armstrong making a push one year.



I would say Calgary probably gave more chances back then to guys who never got another sniff again anywhere else. The one guy that I faintly recall complaining never got a sniff, but he wasn't even good in the AHL, and never went on to play pro at any other level either.
Why so secretive? Who is the player you recall complaining?!
BrennyBaller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2021, 01:36 PM   #684
PeteMoss
Franchise Player
 
PeteMoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: SW Ontario
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Textcritic View Post
"Typical rose coloured glasses"? Where do you see anything on CP about "all of the current prospects mak[ing] it?"
Very common that people think their team's draft has turned around before guys flame out in the pros.

Very likely the last 4 drafts will produce 5-8 full time (200+ games) NHLers. I'd bet most people would think a higher number than that.
PeteMoss is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to PeteMoss For This Useful Post:
Old 11-03-2021, 01:39 PM   #685
Jiri Hrdina
Franchise Player
 
Jiri Hrdina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PeteMoss View Post
Very common that people think their team's draft has turned around before guys flame out in the pros.

Very likely the last 4 drafts will produce 5-8 full time (200+ games) NHLers. I'd bet most people would think a higher number than that.
This is true but you can also look for leading indicators - including things like if the player is progressing post draft, and if they would theoretically go higher in a re-draft.

For me it's also an evolution of the philosophy. They are clearly taking swings at players with high upside, which is entirely what I believe the approach should be including in later rounds.

Proof will be in the puddin'.
Jiri Hrdina is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Jiri Hrdina For This Useful Post:
Old 11-03-2021, 01:43 PM   #686
Knut
 
Knut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Exp:
Default

Andersson, Kylington, Mangiapane, Dube, Gaudreau all currently top 9 F and Top 4 D on this team. Those are guys nabbed out of the first round.

There is definitely better drafting right now. Prior to Johnny and Brodie how many hits outside of round 1 were there with the team since Theo Fleury.

They are loading a tonne of prospect bullets into the chamber right now with these later round higher risk picks. Guys with upside but obvious flaws (too small, too fat, cant play defense etc).

I think you have more of an issue with Development, not drafting. I think there is improvement there as well. There are a lot of later round picks that seem to be improving year over year at a higher rate than their peers.
Knut is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Knut For This Useful Post:
Old 11-03-2021, 01:44 PM   #687
Textcritic
Acerbic Cyberbully
 
Textcritic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: back in Chilliwack
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PeteMoss View Post
Very common that people think their team's draft has turned around before guys flame out in the pros.

Very likely the last 4 drafts will produce 5-8 full time (200+ games) NHLers. I'd bet most people would think a higher number than that.
Why are you limiting your scope to only the last four drafts?

The post you quoted specifically identified players who were in the system more than a decade ago as the reference point from which the Flames drafting has improved. And he is not wrong: Between 2005–2010 the Flames drafted four players who played +200 NHL games. In the next five years they drafted eight, with another two who will pass this mark in the next year or two.

The Flames drafting and development has been objectively better over the past decade than it was in the previous one.
__________________
Dealing with Everything from Dead Sea Scrolls to Red C Trolls

Quote:
Originally Posted by woob
"...harem warfare? like all your wives dressup and go paintballing?"
"The Lying Pen of Scribes" Ancient Manuscript Forgeries Project

Last edited by Textcritic; 11-03-2021 at 01:59 PM.
Textcritic is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Textcritic For This Useful Post:
Old 11-03-2021, 01:46 PM   #688
Jiri Hrdina
Franchise Player
 
Jiri Hrdina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Knut View Post
Andersson, Kylington, Mangiapane, Dube, Gaudreau all currently top 9 F and Top 4 D on this team. Those are guys nabbed out of the first round.
From a drafting POV you have to give them credit for Fox too. Though not from a development POV.
Jiri Hrdina is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to Jiri Hrdina For This Useful Post:
Old 11-03-2021, 01:52 PM   #689
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Knut View Post
Andersson, Kylington, Mangiapane, Dube, Gaudreau all currently top 9 F and Top 4 D on this team. Those are guys nabbed out of the first round.

There is definitely better drafting right now. Prior to Johnny and Brodie how many hits outside of round 1 were there with the team since Theo Fleury.

They are loading a tonne of prospect bullets into the chamber right now with these later round higher risk picks. Guys with upside but obvious flaws (too small, too fat, cant play defense etc).

I think you have more of an issue with Development, not drafting. I think there is improvement there as well. There are a lot of later round picks that seem to be improving year over year at a higher rate than their peers.
They also identified and drafted Fox, Kulak, Ferland and Broissoit FWIW. All over 200 GP except Broissoit and he’s on a different curve.
GioforPM is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to GioforPM For This Useful Post:
Old 11-03-2021, 02:05 PM   #690
Torture
Loves Teh Chat!
 
Torture's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jiri Hrdina View Post
From a drafting POV you have to give them credit for Fox too. Though not from a development POV.
True, and they also got some value from Fox including him in a trade when it was clear he wasn't going to sign. So while we all hate it, from an asset perspective it's better than nothing and the scouts successfully identified the talent.

Last edited by Torture; 11-03-2021 at 02:20 PM.
Torture is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2021, 02:19 PM   #691
PeteMoss
Franchise Player
 
PeteMoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: SW Ontario
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Knut View Post
Andersson, Kylington, Mangiapane, Dube, Gaudreau all currently top 9 F and Top 4 D on this team. Those are guys nabbed out of the first round.

There is definitely better drafting right now. Prior to Johnny and Brodie how many hits outside of round 1 were there with the team since Theo Fleury.

They are loading a tonne of prospect bullets into the chamber right now with these later round higher risk picks. Guys with upside but obvious flaws (too small, too fat, cant play defense etc).

I think you have more of an issue with Development, not drafting. I think there is improvement there as well. There are a lot of later round picks that seem to be improving year over year at a higher rate than their peers.
If you go from Gaudreau draft - you've got Granlund, Ferland, Bourma, Brodie (as you mentioned), Aulie just missed, Prust, Dustin Boyd, Adam Pardy. OBviously more as you go back further - David Moss, Lombardi, McElhinney
PeteMoss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2021, 02:23 PM   #692
Torture
Loves Teh Chat!
 
Torture's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PeteMoss View Post
If you go from Gaudreau draft - you've got Granlund, Ferland, Bourma, Brodie (as you mentioned), Aulie just missed, Prust, Dustin Boyd, Adam Pardy. OBviously more as you go back further - David Moss, Lombardi, McElhinney
That's a pretty yikes list. Flames weren't generating a lot of talent back then. Drafting has definitely improved.
Torture is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Torture For This Useful Post:
Old 11-03-2021, 02:25 PM   #693
PeteMoss
Franchise Player
 
PeteMoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: SW Ontario
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Textcritic View Post
Why are you limiting your scope to only the last four drafts?

The post you quoted specifically identified players who were in the system more than a decade ago as the reference point from which the Flames drafting has improved. And he is not wrong: Between 2005–2010 the Flames drafted four players who played +200 NHL games. In the next five years they drafted eight, with another two who will pass this mark in the next year or two.

The Flames drafting and development has been objectively better over the past decade than it was in the previous one.
Those were the drafts with no NHL games so far.
PeteMoss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2021, 02:27 PM   #694
PeteMoss
Franchise Player
 
PeteMoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: SW Ontario
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Torture View Post
That's a pretty yikes list. Flames weren't generating a lot of talent back then. Drafting has definitely improved.
All those guys had NHL careers. David Moss got 500 games as a 7th rounder
PeteMoss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2021, 02:31 PM   #695
PeteMoss
Franchise Player
 
PeteMoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: SW Ontario
Exp:
Default

I will add - they may be better overall, but it isn't a significant change. The years they were terrible drafting also coincided with when the team was good and picked in the mid-twenties each year.
PeteMoss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2021, 02:49 PM   #696
Textcritic
Acerbic Cyberbully
 
Textcritic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: back in Chilliwack
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PeteMoss View Post
Those were the drafts with no NHL games so far.
So? That was not part of comparison the poster you quoted was making. You are constructing a straw man response by ignoring the point of his argument.
__________________
Dealing with Everything from Dead Sea Scrolls to Red C Trolls

Quote:
Originally Posted by woob
"...harem warfare? like all your wives dressup and go paintballing?"
"The Lying Pen of Scribes" Ancient Manuscript Forgeries Project
Textcritic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2021, 03:00 PM   #697
Robbob
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jiri Hrdina View Post
From a drafting POV you have to give them credit for Fox too. Though not from a development POV.
Fox came to a couple developments camp did he not? I am sure some of the insights and direction from the club helped in some way.
Robbob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2021, 03:25 PM   #698
Lanny_McDonald
Franchise Player
 
Lanny_McDonald's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PeteMoss View Post
I will add - they may be better overall, but it isn't a significant change. The years they were terrible drafting also coincided with when the team was good and picked in the mid-twenties each year.
I actually have to disagree with you here. I think the Flames have evolved in their drafting and are taking a lot more calculated risks in selecting players, no longer focusing on just guys they think might make a good 4th liner, but instead picking guys with big upside but some challenges to work through. It gives the system a way different look than years gone by. The upside is much higher, but so is the failure rate.

For example, Ryan Francis and Rory Kerins from 2020 are both smallish but highly skilled players. Both have shown some incredible growth that caught the eye of people observing camp. That is what you hope for out of late picks, and these guys are now seriously in the conversation of being legitimate NHL prospects, and not just possible minor league players. The guy that is most interesting to me from this draft is Jeremie Poirier because he is a such a strong offensive talent from the blueline. He's a game changer back there and just has to learn how to play some defense, which he has obviously taken seriously and committed to. In the past, he is a player the Flames would have passed on because of the major hole in his game. But they took a swing and it might payoff. This draft could be a very good one for the Flames in the long run. Same things apply to 2021. Whynot and Beck were surprise picks to me, and they have potential to payoff well. Sure, we won't know exactly what we have until they are a year into their AHL careers, but the fact they made people sit up in their seats and take note at this point speaks well for them and the Flames' drafting. Yes, lots of warts to these guys, but a lot to like as far as skill goes.
Lanny_McDonald is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to Lanny_McDonald For This Useful Post:
Old 11-03-2021, 05:58 PM   #699
Jiri Hrdina
Franchise Player
 
Jiri Hrdina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PeteMoss View Post
Those were the drafts with no NHL games so far.
EDIT: Never mind I misunderstood your point.
Jiri Hrdina is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Jiri Hrdina For This Useful Post:
Old 11-04-2021, 06:39 AM   #700
Moneyhands23
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: victoria
Exp:
Default

Glad this guy isn't a Saber today so that's a positive thing
Moneyhands23 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Moneyhands23 For This Useful Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:47 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy