Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-01-2023, 11:01 AM   #641
calgarygringo
Crash and Bang Winger
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Exp:
Default

No inside info but listening to a few current player interviews and a few old players but still close to the room I think he may have been a bit of a challenge in the room. I think Conny made the move quickly to take the poison out and with not having to retain salary it gives the Flames some room to make moves.
calgarygringo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2023, 11:09 AM   #642
Bonded
Franchise Player
 
Bonded's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Exp:
Default

Space was for Kylington? I didn't really buy the Coronato/Solo thing lol
Bonded is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2023, 11:10 AM   #643
Niemo
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Niemo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Niemo View Post
I understand the trade.
I understand the cap space.
I understand not retaining on your 4th most valuable trade asset when you have only 3 spots for retention.
I understand the slight rush as we need to stagger the dmen trading a bit so we're not lowering the bids when the big dawgs are ready to be auctioned off.

However, when the whole league's reaction is that the return is very underwhelming (and surprisingly low), then I can't help to feel the very same. I have no doubt that Conroy took the best deal on the table. It's disappointing that the best deal was not a good one. This would've felt a lot better if it was TWO 3rd round picks - but it wasn't on the table without retention.

I understand. I was surprised at the return. I am still disappointed. I will reserve being pissed off until I see the return for Tanev, Hanifin, Lindholm after full retention.
to add, I also understand the how critical getting out of LTIR and having the cap room accumulate + being able to call up kids. Does not change my disappointment with this trade and the Toffoli trade.

My fingers are crossed that there will be no more excuses for sub par returns when Tanev, Hanifin, and Lindholm are dealt.
Niemo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2023, 11:15 AM   #644
Scroopy Noopers
Pent-up
 
Scroopy Noopers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Plutanamo Bay.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Niemo View Post
to add, I also understand the how critical getting out of LTIR and having the cap room accumulate + being able to call up kids. Does not change my disappointment with this trade and the Toffoli trade.

My fingers are crossed that there will be no more excuses for sub par returns when Tanev, Hanifin, and Lindholm are dealt.
When you have unrealistic expectations, and ignore the current market for trades, it’s easy to be disappointed about everything.
Scroopy Noopers is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Scroopy Noopers For This Useful Post:
Old 12-01-2023, 11:30 AM   #645
Aarongavey
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Niemo View Post
to add, I also understand the how critical getting out of LTIR and having the cap room accumulate + being able to call up kids. Does not change my disappointment with this trade and the Toffoli trade.

My fingers are crossed that there will be no more excuses for sub par returns when Tanev, Hanifin, and Lindholm are dealt.
What do the returns have to be as a floor to avoid your disappointment?
Aarongavey is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Aarongavey For This Useful Post:
Old 12-01-2023, 11:59 AM   #646
stemit14
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Exp:
Default

Interesting development if Kylington does return. May add another bit of context in the Zadorov trade in terms of why gaining the cap space was prioritized.

As long as the cap space is going to be used for some benefit… whether it is for Kylington or to make it so they can take back salary in potential Lindholm, Hanifin or Tanev trades to maximize the return in those trades. What would be frustrating is if it comes out that ownership did not want to retain salary on a player that is not on the team… just to save money.

Last edited by stemit14; 12-01-2023 at 12:17 PM.
stemit14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2023, 12:02 PM   #647
Hockey_Ninja
 
Hockey_Ninja's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Cleveland, OH (Grew up in Calgary)
Exp:
Default

Flames/Canucks trade history leading up to this trade:

https://flamesnation.ca/news/amp/loo...couver-canucks
__________________
Just trying to do my best
Hockey_Ninja is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2023, 12:19 PM   #648
Bingo
Owner
 
Bingo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Phew ... that took a long time to read.

The biggest issue in this, of course, is why they didn't want to retain salary.

If it's to keep the slots open then this is likely a very good move.
If it's an owner not wanting to retain for bottom line reasons, then not so much.

I get the fear that it's #2 given their history, but there's a pretty big distinction this time around ... the GM is out in the media after the transaction talking about cap space, brokering and saving his 3 retention spots.

That isn't done unless you have a sign off to use them in my mind.

So they decided to take less for Zadorov, to have more flexibility and accrue more cap space by the deadline for other deals. If his plan comes to fruition, then this was likely a very good trade. If it goes for not it cost them the difference between 2024 and 2026 in value.

Didn't blow my socks off, but the deal is fine as it stands, and could play a really important role in a future transaction.
Bingo is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Bingo For This Useful Post:
Old 12-01-2023, 12:32 PM   #649
Blaster86
UnModerator
 
Blaster86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: North Vancouver, British Columbia.
Exp:
Default

If the team is planning on a fire sale, you keep cap space open to weaponize the cap space


If the team is planning to try for the play-offs still, you keep cap space open so you can add if the opportunity arises.


The return may not be what people wanted, but it's a UFA player who has said "I want out." Everyone knows the player is getting dealt. You get what you get.
__________________

THANK MR DEMKO
CPHL Ottawa Vancouver
Blaster86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2023, 12:40 PM   #650
Flamesfan05
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: Dallas
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bingo View Post
Phew ... that took a long time to read.

The biggest issue in this, of course, is why they didn't want to retain salary.

If it's to keep the slots open then this is likely a very good move.
If it's an owner not wanting to retain for bottom line reasons, then not so much.

I get the fear that it's #2 given their history, but there's a pretty big distinction this time around ... the GM is out in the media after the transaction talking about cap space, brokering and saving his 3 retention spots.

That isn't done unless you have a sign off to use them in my mind.

So they decided to take less for Zadorov, to have more flexibility and accrue more cap space by the deadline for other deals. If his plan comes to fruition, then this was likely a very good trade. If it goes for not it cost them the difference between 2024 and 2026 in value.

Didn't blow my socks off, but the deal is fine as it stands, and could play a really important role in a future transaction.
Yes, would be nice if Conroy back up what he said and make good use of the cap saving.

If it’s just to call up people then he is just bull ####ting. You don’t need all the cap to call up minimum salary prospects
Flamesfan05 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2023, 12:41 PM   #651
Flamesfan05
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: Dallas
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Blaster86 View Post
If the team is planning on a fire sale, you keep cap space open to weaponize the cap space


If the team is planning to try for the play-offs still, you keep cap space open so you can add if the opportunity arises.


The return may not be what people wanted, but it's a UFA player who has said "I want out." Everyone knows the player is getting dealt. You get what you get.
They said up to 10 teams were poking and 3 serious

So it’s not like nobody was interested
Flamesfan05 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2023, 12:46 PM   #652
devo22
Franchise Player
 
devo22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Austria, NOT Australia
Exp:
Default

yeah Conroy talking about the value of having all three retention spots gives me hope. Based on the Flames' history, it's easy to be cynical about this, but I'm willing to give Conroy and the team the benefit of the doubt here. If they are willing to retain salary for all of Lindholm, Hanifin and Tanev, it makes the return more stomachable.

Really hoped for a 2nd, but a 3rd and a 5th isn't that bad in a nutshell in a deal without salary retention. What irks me is the fact that the 3rd is so far down the road, but I guess they'll have opportunities to add more 2024 and 2025 picks between now and the deadline.
devo22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2023, 12:49 PM   #653
dino7c
Franchise Player
 
dino7c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

The media suddenly loved Zadorov since the Leafs needed a damn...anyone who actually watched him play this season knows he has been a disaster. He hasn't been worth his current contract this season let alone a raise.
__________________
GFG
dino7c is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2023, 01:01 PM   #654
Bingo
Owner
 
Bingo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flamesfan05 View Post
Yes, would be nice if Conroy back up what he said and make good use of the cap saving.

If it’s just to call up people then he is just bull ####ting. You don’t need all the cap to call up minimum salary prospects
1. Don't think Conroy has a long history of bull ####ting, as a player or team executive. If anything he's too honest and reveals too much.

2. Talking about brokering deals for assets and holding all three retention slots has nothing to do with calling up an AHL player.
Bingo is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Bingo For This Useful Post:
Old 12-01-2023, 01:03 PM   #655
Bingo
Owner
 
Bingo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dino7c View Post
The media suddenly loved Zadorov since the Leafs needed a damn...anyone who actually watched him play this season knows he has been a disaster. He hasn't been worth his current contract this season let alone a raise.
That's over the top.

Zadorov was a good 5th defenseman, paid a little more because he can impact the game in ways that other 5th defensemen won't.

I've always felt that he suffers if they give him too much rope, he can't be or won't be a 3-4 defenseman on any team. But he's a solid 5 in my mind, with that slot (5) never being a perfect player.
Bingo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2023, 01:04 PM   #656
Buff
Franchise Player
 
Buff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: I don't belong here
Exp:
Default

I really liked Zadorov. He's fun to watch and a good interview too. I was sad that he asked for a trade and disappointed in how he and his agent handled it. Glad to have this situation dealt with.

The return feels low for sure but reasoning seems sound to me. I'm very interested to see what plays out with the rest of the UFAs and have a bit of concern as to how good the returns will be.
Buff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2023, 01:11 PM   #657
kevman
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Exp:
Default

I'm just disappointed that the 3rd is 3 years out since it's hard to get excited about the 5th round pick. I don't remember the odds of a 3rd round pick hitting, but a 10% chance at a player having an impact in 2030 (picking 3 years out plus 3-4 year of development) isn't that exciting either.
kevman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2023, 01:16 PM   #658
dino7c
Franchise Player
 
dino7c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bingo View Post
That's over the top.

Zadorov was a good 5th defenseman, paid a little more because he can impact the game in ways that other 5th defensemen won't.

I've always felt that he suffers if they give him too much rope, he can't be or won't be a 3-4 defenseman on any team. But he's a solid 5 in my mind, with that slot (5) never being a perfect player.
He has been the Flames worst dman since the TO game and the back end looked great last night against maybe the best team in the league.

Bottom line he was being over rated in the media big time. Big hits are fun and flashy I will give you. Turnovers and poor coverage though not so much.

Vancouver isn't expecting a bottom pair guy
__________________
GFG
dino7c is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2023, 01:23 PM   #659
dash_pinched
Franchise Player
 
dash_pinched's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Maple Bay, B.C.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dino7c View Post
Vancouver isn't expecting a bottom pair guy
I'm out here on Vancouver Island and listening to the Vancouver talking heads the hope is that Zadorov can take some of the minutes away from Tyler Myers (i.e. push Myers down to the 3rd pairing).
dash_pinched is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2023, 01:28 PM   #660
Blaster86
UnModerator
 
Blaster86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: North Vancouver, British Columbia.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dash_pinched View Post
I'm out here on Vancouver Island and listening to the Vancouver talking heads the hope is that Zadorov can take some of the minutes away from Tyler Myers (i.e. push Myers down to the 3rd pairing).

The hope is that Zadorov steps in and fills the void left by the injured Soucy. which pushes Myers back to the bottom pairing on the short term.
When Soucy is back, I think the team is hoping for:


Hronek - Hughes
Soucy - Cole
Zadorov - Myers
Friedman
Juulsen


Quote:
Originally Posted by Flamesfan05 View Post
They said up to 10 teams were poking and 3 serious

So it’s not like nobody was intereste

I think a lot of teams were probably interested. I don't think many teams were offering to pay much.
__________________

THANK MR DEMKO
CPHL Ottawa Vancouver

Last edited by Blaster86; 12-01-2023 at 01:30 PM.
Blaster86 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Blaster86 For This Useful Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:28 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy