Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-25-2016, 08:51 AM   #581
Moneyhands23
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: victoria
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Insufficient Funds View Post
Aside from losing a old D man (no big loss) it's really just nashville that should be really really worried.

24 mil in the last year! That's crazy talk
Moneyhands23 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2016, 08:53 AM   #582
Insufficient Funds
Scoring Winger
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: A glass case of emotion
Exp:
Default

Yeah I'm sure the league will bail them out just like they did with the Devils. They should at least lose a first round pick though and maybe some hefty fines.
Insufficient Funds is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2016, 08:54 AM   #583
East Coast Flame
Powerplay Quarterback
 
East Coast Flame's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Exp:
Default

Seriously, there is zero chance they will be paying that
East Coast Flame is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2016, 08:56 AM   #584
Ashasx
Franchise Player
 
Ashasx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Exp:
Default

It is really unfortunate that fans have such little trust in the integrity of the league to uphold these recapture penalties.

Problem is, they are right. Weber probably retires in 2023 and there is no way the league is going to force an $8 million cap penalty to hold them back for 3 years.

The same thing will happen for Hossa, despite the Hawks having won 3 Cup with an unbelievably unfair contract.

Last edited by Ashasx; 10-25-2016 at 08:59 AM.
Ashasx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2016, 09:02 AM   #585
Flamenspiel
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by East Coast Flame View Post
Seriously, there is zero chance they will be paying that
They will be paying it, that is guaranteed. Pronger is still being paid.

They may allow some sort of cap relief but there is no way Nashville will not pay the player.

All in all though, at this early stage it looks like Montreal moves this year have worked out, Radulov and Shaw have been good pick ups as well.
Flamenspiel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2016, 09:02 AM   #586
Lubicon
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by savemedrzaius View Post
I think for a team like Nashville who are always trying to get more people out to the games Subban is just a better fit. He's a more exciting player and he's more personable/charismatic. He has that ability to attract new fans.
.
Absolutely agree with this. He has the capability to generate a lot of excitement in Nashville and his personality is perfect. He can also be a great role model for the African American community and the potential is there for the team to build a fan base here. Sounds like he loves the city too so off the ice this appears to be a win-win so far for both the organization and the player.

He's already cross promoting with the Titans it would seem.

http://www.thescore.com/news/1135544
Lubicon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2016, 09:03 AM   #587
Weitz
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flamenspiel View Post
They will be paying it, that is guaranteed. Pronger is still being paid.

They may allow some sort of cap relief but there is no way Nashville will not pay the player.
You are confused.
Weitz is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Weitz For This Useful Post:
Old 10-25-2016, 09:04 AM   #588
SuperMatt18
Franchise Player
 
SuperMatt18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

To be fair to those teams there was no rule against those contracts when they were signed.
SuperMatt18 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2016, 09:04 AM   #589
Ashasx
Franchise Player
 
Ashasx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Exp:
Default

Pronger is on LTIR and not a recapture penalty.

The team (Nashville) doesn't actually owe any cash under any circumstances to Weber any more. All we're talking about is a cap penalty.
Ashasx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2016, 09:06 AM   #590
Ashasx
Franchise Player
 
Ashasx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperMatt18 View Post
To be fair to those teams there was no rule against those contracts when they were signed.
Chicago doesn't win 3 Cups without that Hossa contract though.

Either they should have restructured the calculation of their cap hits when the new rule was introduced, or they should be given a recapture penalty. We know the former didn't happen, so they should be penalized for having a significant advantage over the other teams.
Ashasx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2016, 09:06 AM   #591
Senator Clay Davis
Franchise Player
 
Senator Clay Davis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Maryland State House, Annapolis
Exp:
Default

Someone will take that $24 million hit to get to the cap floor, especially when it doesn't actually cost any real dollars.
__________________
"Think I'm gonna be the scapegoat for the whole damn machine? Sheeee......."
Senator Clay Davis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2016, 09:08 AM   #592
Ashasx
Franchise Player
 
Ashasx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Senator Clay Davis View Post
Someone will take that $24 million hit to get to the cap floor, especially when it doesn't actually cost any real dollars.
I don't think that can be traded. I mean, they already traded Weber and they are still stuck with the penalty. All that matters now is when Weber retires.

of course nothing matters because the league will rescind it anyway
Ashasx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2016, 09:16 AM   #593
DJones
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Exp:
Default

I still think it was a good trade for both teams. Nashville got the more skilled, flashier player. Montreal got the player that fits their team better and the better contract.

When you have Price, you want a safe dependable #1. Not someone that leaves your goalie hanging. That ruins your goalie advantage.

Nashville has already spent the majority of the cash. In two years Weber will only cost 6 million per year and all of the risk is Nashvilles.
DJones is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2016, 05:22 PM   #594
GreenLantern2814
Franchise Player
 
GreenLantern2814's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Insufficient Funds View Post
Yeah I'm sure the league will bail them out just like they did with the Devils. They should at least lose a first round pick though and maybe some hefty fines.
I keep hearing this, but I really don't agree. Nashville would have never structured Weber's contract this way of their own volition - Philadelphia went Philadelphia and tried to steal Shea Weber. I believe this was the same offseason where they lost Suter, and to lose both in one summer would have been devastating.

In the same way Feaster structured the O'Reilly offersheet in such a way that Colorado would need to qualify him at $6.5+ in the hope it would be enough to get them to walk away, the Flyers gave Weber something like $60 million in cash in the first four years of the deal to discourage the notoriously cash poor Predators from matching.

Nashville told the Flyers to go **** themselves. The $24M cap recapture is garbage, and the league will be justified in finding a way to absolve the Predators of it. Maybe a 2nd rounder or something. They don't deserve the cap penalty, and they don't deserve to lose a 1st round pick because they didn't roll over and let Philadelphia steal their captain and face of the franchise.
GreenLantern2814 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to GreenLantern2814 For This Useful Post:
Old 10-25-2016, 05:24 PM   #595
Ashasx
Franchise Player
 
Ashasx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Exp:
Default

Nobody forced the Predators to sign that contract.

They absolutely deserve a cap penalty.
Ashasx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2016, 05:27 PM   #596
Knut
 
Knut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashasx View Post
Nobody forced the Predators to sign that contract.

They absolutely deserve a cap penalty.
Flyers kind of did
Knut is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2016, 05:28 PM   #597
GreenLantern2814
Franchise Player
 
GreenLantern2814's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashasx View Post
Nobody forced the Predators to sign that contract.

They absolutely deserve a cap penalty.
Yes; they were absolutely forced to sign the contract. Offersheets come with a time crunch.

Nashville may well have given Weber a Suter-type teenage years $100M deal. But they wouldn't have given him $60M over the first four, which is why that recapture is so absurd.

If anyone deserves that cap hit, it's the Flyers.
GreenLantern2814 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2016, 05:29 PM   #598
Oil Stain
Franchise Player
 
Oil Stain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Exp:
Default

I think if Weber is done at that point the Predators will just trade to get him back and pay him his million a year to sit in the press box.
Oil Stain is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Oil Stain For This Useful Post:
Old 10-25-2016, 05:35 PM   #599
Ashasx
Franchise Player
 
Ashasx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GreenLantern2814 View Post
Yes; they were absolutely forced to sign the contract. Offersheets come with a time crunch.

Nashville may well have given Weber a Suter-type teenage years $100M deal. But they wouldn't have given him $60M over the first four, which is why that recapture is so absurd.

If anyone deserves that cap hit, it's the Flyers.
No, they absolutely were not forced to sign him.

Nashville could have chosen not to match the offer sheet, and Weber would have been a Flyer. They would have been compensated with four 1st round picks. Nobody forced Nashville to do anything.

They signed on the dotted line, they should face the consequences.
Ashasx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2016, 05:38 PM   #600
GreenLantern2814
Franchise Player
 
GreenLantern2814's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashasx View Post
No, they absolutely were not forced to sign him.

Nashville could have chosen not to match the offer sheet, and Weber would have been a Flyer. They would have been compensated with four 1st round picks. Nobody forced Nashville to do anything.

They signed on the dotted line, they should face the consequences.
For matching an offersheet that wasn't even illegal at the time it was signed?

No way.
GreenLantern2814 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:57 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy