11-11-2013, 08:27 PM
|
#581
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Austria, NOT Australia
|
I wouldn't want Yak on the Flames at all, whatever the acquisition cost ... can you imagine a guy like him, who seems self-centered and who doesn't want to play defense, wanting to play under Bob Hartley? He'd board a plane to Russia after two or three practice sessions.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to devo22 For This Useful Post:
|
|
11-11-2013, 08:38 PM
|
#582
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: The Bay Area
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by trackercowe
I'd probably trade our first rounder this year for him, but I am sure many posters on here will disagree with me. This years draft isn't that stellar to begin with, and we'll likely be picking in the 3rd-6th spot. I think that sort of pick could be sacrificed for someone like Yakupov. Doubt he'd work that much better here than in Edmonton, but our expectations currently aren't as grandiose as theirs is.
|
If you don't think he'd work that much better here, I don't understand why you'd trade a fairly high lottery pick for him. I wouldn't.
|
|
|
11-11-2013, 08:52 PM
|
#583
|
Some kinda newsbreaker!
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by devo22
I wouldn't want Yak on the Flames at all, whatever the acquisition cost ... can you imagine a guy like him, who seems self-centered and who doesn't want to play defense, wanting to play under Bob Hartley? He'd board a plane to Russia after two or three practice sessions.
|
Hartley did manage Kovalchuk well, granted Kovalchuk was doing much better offensively than Yakupov.
|
|
|
11-11-2013, 09:16 PM
|
#584
|
Franchise Player
|
Doesn't matter what we would give, NYR, Toronto or one of the other big market playoff teams would probably give a 1st plus a top prospect. Our first would be the starting point in negotiations so no thanks.
|
|
|
11-11-2013, 09:29 PM
|
#585
|
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Cleveland, OH (Grew up in Calgary)
|
I hope where ever he is traded (excluding Vancouver) that he lights it up.
__________________
Just trying to do my best
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Hockey_Ninja For This Useful Post:
|
|
11-11-2013, 09:33 PM
|
#586
|
Celebrated Square Root Day
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hockey_Ninja
I hope where ever he is traded (excluding Vancouver) that he lights it up.
|
I don't. Him and the Oilers were a match made in heaven and both deserve what's happening right now. This is a case where I hope he either bolts for Russia or is traded to another NHL team for a crappy return and then sucks on that team, too.
|
|
|
11-11-2013, 09:33 PM
|
#587
|
Scoring Winger
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Calgary
|
flames getting any of the big 4 would never happen. Im sure the clowns up north wouldn't even do that.
|
|
|
11-11-2013, 09:46 PM
|
#588
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by flameswin
I hope he either bolts for Russia or is traded to another NHL team for a crappy return and then sucks on that team, too.
|
Yes please.
Mind you, that might actually force changes in management, I'm torn on this one.
|
|
|
11-11-2013, 09:48 PM
|
#589
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Thunder Bay Ontario
|
My guess is he goes to the wings and plays amazingly
__________________
Fan of the Flames, where being OK has become OK.
|
|
|
11-11-2013, 10:00 PM
|
#590
|
In the Sin Bin
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by trackercowe
I'd probably trade our first rounder this year for him, but I am sure many posters on here will disagree with me. This years draft isn't that stellar to begin with, and we'll likely be picking in the 3rd-6th spot. I think that sort of pick could be sacrificed for someone like Yakupov. Doubt he'd work that much better here than in Edmonton, but our expectations currently aren't as grandiose as theirs is.
|
Complete and utter waste of a high first round pick. Yakupov is the antithesis of everything the Flames are trying to build. You can't separate the skill from the attitude, and you can't force desire into him. Yakupov is the kind of player we need to stay the hell away from.
|
|
|
The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to Resolute 14 For This Useful Post:
|
Clever_Iggy,
devo22,
Erick Estrada,
Francis's Hairpiece,
Lanny_McDonald,
mikephoen,
MrMastodonFarm,
Redliner,
Shawnski,
You Need a Thneed,
Zevo
|
11-11-2013, 11:03 PM
|
#591
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Resolute 14
Complete and utter waste of a high first round pick. Yakupov is the antithesis of everything the Flames are trying to build. You can't separate the skill from the attitude, and you can't force desire into him. Yakupov is the kind of player we need to stay the hell away from.
|
I wonder if Capitals fans were saying the same thing in 2004 when they drafted Ovechkin. They were seemingly is a similar stage as the Flames are now when he was drafted. Yakupov may have had a bad couple weeks to start off the season, but his ceiling is still far greater than pretty much anyone in this upcoming draft. That and this draft is supposedly inferior to last years and next years drafts. Unless we finish are picking in the top 3 (Reinhart, Ekblad, Nylander), then we're likely going to end up with someone whose potential will likely be far less than what is expected from Yakupov..
Yakupov was very good last year, and only just turned 20 last month, so it's way too early to write him off. The Oilers are using him very poorly, so some of the blame should land at their feet as well. I for one don't think he's a flight risk, but sure he does have perceived attitude issues. Although that's not a whole lot different than many 20 somethings in the league. Take Evander Kane or PK Subban; talented Canadian players, who are older than Yakupov and have their own attitude issues. Ovechkin had his share as well, so did Lindros, Lemieux and many other players over the years. But that doesn't mean Yakupov won't become a great player just like all those other players became in their careers.
Now there is zero chance the Oilers would trade him to Calgary, so the merit of it is not even worth debating. But I don't think his value is as low as some on here are expecting.
Last edited by trackercowe; 11-11-2013 at 11:06 PM.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to trackercowe For This Useful Post:
|
|
11-11-2013, 11:17 PM
|
#592
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yoho
Just a tad bit of an "apples to oranges" comparison
|
You're right, Comeau was decent in the defensive zone and hit every once in a while too.
|
|
|
11-12-2013, 12:18 AM
|
#593
|
Franchise Player
|
Who on the Oilers is there that can take Yak under his wing to provide leadership and guidance? Ference.. and who?
Anyone remember Yakupov's scouting reports? One thing I really loved about his game was the mention of him being a very aggressive fore checker (and good back checker) who went and got the puck himself when he didn't have it. I believe at the Ivan Hlinka tournament he turned a lot of heads with his aggressive play.
Now look at the Oilers. Here is a kid surrounded by kids who obviously don't play a 200ft game, but have been HIGHLY rewarded by the organization for their offensive contributions mostly. 6 million dollar long-term deals. Players that STILL don't play a 200ft game with any real sense of the word. Sure, he can go and back check, but why? Is it going to get him one of those contracts by trading a bit of his offensive ability in making sure his defensive game helps the team win, when nobody else seems to be willing to do it?
Sure, criticize this young kid for not 'wanting' or 'caring' to do it, but when he is sitting on the bench watching the highly-paid and heralded Hall, Eberle and RNH not exactly making the effort to do it themselves, why should he? I bet you put him on any team with a better culture, he WILL be a pretty decent 200ft player with a high-offensive ability.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Calgary4LIfe For This Useful Post:
|
|
11-12-2013, 12:55 AM
|
#594
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Calgary4LIfe
Who on the Oilers is there that can take Yak under his wing to provide leadership and guidance? Ference.. and who?
Anyone remember Yakupov's scouting reports? One thing I really loved about his game was the mention of him being a very aggressive fore checker (and good back checker) who went and got the puck himself when he didn't have it. I believe at the Ivan Hlinka tournament he turned a lot of heads with his aggressive play.
Now look at the Oilers. Here is a kid surrounded by kids who obviously don't play a 200ft game, but have been HIGHLY rewarded by the organization for their offensive contributions mostly. 6 million dollar long-term deals. Players that STILL don't play a 200ft game with any real sense of the word. Sure, he can go and back check, but why? Is it going to get him one of those contracts by trading a bit of his offensive ability in making sure his defensive game helps the team win, when nobody else seems to be willing to do it?
Sure, criticize this young kid for not 'wanting' or 'caring' to do it, but when he is sitting on the bench watching the highly-paid and heralded Hall, Eberle and RNH not exactly making the effort to do it themselves, why should he? I bet you put him on any team with a better culture, he WILL be a pretty decent 200ft player with a high-offensive ability.
|
This is my thoughts as well. The prima donna culture needs to be removed for that team to ever succeed. Its like they think they have made it in the league just because they are high draft picks. They need to stop believing their own hype and buy in or be parted out to teams that will hold them accountable........ or not I guess, why would we want the Oil to get better.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Psytic For This Useful Post:
|
|
11-12-2013, 01:08 AM
|
#595
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: The toilet of Alberta : Edmonton
|
Honestly, I'd take Yakupov on the Flames at a decent cost. I don't see his main problem that he's a selfish prima donna at all. I see a player who has become a scapegoat for a pitiful coach and a pitiful team. Hall is yelling at him, Eberle constantly ignores him when looking to make a pass, and Eakins benches him even though the main problem with the team is defense (nice swarm Eakins) and goaltending. This kids confidence is rock bottom, and his play is a result of that. I think if he got a clean slate with a new team, you'd see the Yakupov of last year. He's never going to be Toews when it comes to the defensive side of things, but neither are a lot of dynamic goal scorers. As long as he's not a complete and total defensive liability, he'd be a great asset on a young team. I'd take him in a bargain deal. Something like Backlund + late round pick for Yakupov.
__________________
"Illusions Michael, tricks are something a wh*re does for money ....... or cocaine"
|
|
|
11-12-2013, 01:18 AM
|
#596
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Calgary
|
If he was free, I wouldn't want him at this point. You can always add a guy like Yakupov (attitude wise) if the rest of your team is decent. We aren't at that point and he'd take away from what we are trying to do (hard working tough team)
__________________
Fireside Chat - The #1 Flames Fan Podcast - FiresideChat.ca
|
|
|
11-12-2013, 01:23 AM
|
#597
|
Franchise Player
|
I'd take Yakupov if the cost was really low. It won't be, so no thanks.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterJoji
Johnny eats garbage and isn’t 100% committed.
|
|
|
|
11-12-2013, 06:56 AM
|
#598
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Calgary4LIfe
Who on the Oilers is there that can take Yak under his wing to provide leadership and guidance? Ference.. and who?
Anyone remember Yakupov's scouting reports? One thing I really loved about his game was the mention of him being a very aggressive fore checker (and good back checker) who went and got the puck himself when he didn't have it. I believe at the Ivan Hlinka tournament he turned a lot of heads with his aggressive play.
Now look at the Oilers. Here is a kid surrounded by kids who obviously don't play a 200ft game, but have been HIGHLY rewarded by the organization for their offensive contributions mostly. 6 million dollar long-term deals. Players that STILL don't play a 200ft game with any real sense of the word. Sure, he can go and back check, but why? Is it going to get him one of those contracts by trading a bit of his offensive ability in making sure his defensive game helps the team win, when nobody else seems to be willing to do it?
Sure, criticize this young kid for not 'wanting' or 'caring' to do it, but when he is sitting on the bench watching the highly-paid and heralded Hall, Eberle and RNH not exactly making the effort to do it themselves, why should he? I bet you put him on any team with a better culture, he WILL be a pretty decent 200ft player with a high-offensive ability.
|
I still can't believe they gave out those contracts
|
|
|
11-12-2013, 07:03 AM
|
#599
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Calgary4LIfe
Who on the Oilers is there that can take Yak under his wing to provide leadership and guidance? Ference.. and who?
Anyone remember Yakupov's scouting reports? One thing I really loved about his game was the mention of him being a very aggressive fore checker (and good back checker) who went and got the puck himself when he didn't have it. I believe at the Ivan Hlinka tournament he turned a lot of heads with his aggressive play.
Now look at the Oilers. Here is a kid surrounded by kids who obviously don't play a 200ft game, but have been HIGHLY rewarded by the organization for their offensive contributions mostly. 6 million dollar long-term deals. Players that STILL don't play a 200ft game with any real sense of the word. Sure, he can go and back check, but why? Is it going to get him one of those contracts by trading a bit of his offensive ability in making sure his defensive game helps the team win, when nobody else seems to be willing to do it?
Sure, criticize this young kid for not 'wanting' or 'caring' to do it, but when he is sitting on the bench watching the highly-paid and heralded Hall, Eberle and RNH not exactly making the effort to do it themselves, why should he? I bet you put him on any team with a better culture, he WILL be a pretty decent 200ft player with a high-offensive ability.
|
I agree. In junior, Yakupov played a more complete game. He was very aggressive without the puck. A lot of young players try to go strictly offense when they break into the league because it's less physically demanding and they know that it is what will get them a big contract in a couple of years.
I don't think it's too late to turn Yakupov around, but it won't happen in that environment.
__________________
"A pessimist thinks things can't get any worse. An optimist knows they can."
|
|
|
11-12-2013, 07:16 AM
|
#600
|
In the Sin Bin
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by trackercowe
I wonder if Capitals fans were saying the same thing in 2004 when they drafted Ovechkin. They were seemingly is a similar stage as the Flames are now when he was drafted. Yakupov may have had a bad couple weeks to start off the season, but his ceiling is still far greater than pretty much anyone in this upcoming draft. That and this draft is supposedly inferior to last years and next years drafts. Unless we finish are picking in the top 3 (Reinhart, Ekblad, Nylander), then we're likely going to end up with someone whose potential will likely be far less than what is expected from Yakupov..
Yakupov was very good last year, and only just turned 20 last month, so it's way too early to write him off. The Oilers are using him very poorly, so some of the blame should land at their feet as well. I for one don't think he's a flight risk, but sure he does have perceived attitude issues. Although that's not a whole lot different than many 20 somethings in the league. Take Evander Kane or PK Subban; talented Canadian players, who are older than Yakupov and have their own attitude issues. Ovechkin had his share as well, so did Lindros, Lemieux and many other players over the years. But that doesn't mean Yakupov won't become a great player just like all those other players became in their careers.
Now there is zero chance the Oilers would trade him to Calgary, so the merit of it is not even worth debating. But I don't think his value is as low as some on here are expecting.
|
His value to us is as low as some here, myself included, are saying. Hartley and the Flames are trying to build a team that is all going the same direction, all willing to work hard every shift, and willing to sacrifice for each other. Not one of those characteristics describes Yakupov. He is simply the wrong player for our team.
Never mind the fact that his agent implicitly demanded a trade on his behalf yesterday because the Oilers aren't letting him play the game he wants to play.
He is also going to be expecting another one of those $6 million contracts the Oilers hand out after next year, and is the kind of player you simply can't push too hard because of the flight risk. If we do end up in the 4-6 range at the draft and we do want to trade that pick, we can grab a player who is a better fit for us. Lower talent ceiling perhaps, but greater chance of reward. I'd rather dangle that pick for a young defenceman than for a small, soft forward.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Resolute 14 For This Useful Post:
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:50 PM.
|
|