Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-20-2009, 04:36 PM   #41
PsYcNeT
Franchise Player
 
PsYcNeT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Marseilles Of The Prairies
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JoseCuervo View Post
What i'm trying to say is just because he supports a side that the west deems as "terrorists", doesnt mean he should not be allowed to talk to an audiencein Canada. Were not a dictatorship, were all about free speech or so I thought. He should have the same rights as Bush, to tell people what he thinks.
Supporting someone politically as a member of the house (or whatever the hell Bush did before he was prez) and financially donating to their 'cause' have a pretty big gap between them.
__________________

Quote:
Originally Posted by MrMastodonFarm View Post
Settle down there, Temple Grandin.
PsYcNeT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2009, 04:42 PM   #42
Bagor
Franchise Player
 
Bagor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Spartanville
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Azure View Post
I think the difference between Arafat and this guy is that Arafat was willing to compromise for peace.

Any government that wanted a peace accord between Israel/Palestine, was forced to work with Arafat.

Big difference.
No difference. Both Galloway and Arafat financially supported organisations that are on PSC's list.

Are you implying that if Arafat was alive today he should be allowed to enter Canada and his sponsorship of terrorist organisations shouldn't count?
Bagor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2009, 04:44 PM   #43
Resolute 14
In the Sin Bin
 
Resolute 14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bagor View Post
Wrong call IMO.

Not that I totally disagree with it and don't understand the reasoning behind it, just that it benefits Galloway and hurts Canada more than if they had allowed him to enter. He's going to get more airtime and media out of this than if he had sneaked in, done his debates or whatever they are and left.
Actually, this doesn't hurt Canada at all. Nobody here knows who he is, or cares, and in a couple days, he will be forgotten completely. Ignatief won't touch this with a ten foot pole, and everyone knows where Taliban Jack lies in terms of feelings towards terrorists and their supporters, so there aren't any political points to be gained either.

He'll get some press in his home constituency, but that isn't any of our concern. If Britons wish to elect a terrorist sympathizer as their representative, well, that certainly says a lot about the people of that riding.
Resolute 14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2009, 04:47 PM   #44
T@T
Lifetime Suspension
 
T@T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JoseCuervo View Post
Bush Supports Terrorist groups and he was in Calgary the other day. No one is saying he should not have been let into the country. He supported the Taliban when they were fighting the Russians. He supported Al Qaeda until they turned against him. But there he was having a nice lunch in Calgary.
Every country supports certain fighting groups in a war torn country, Al Qaeda was supported with arms before they started their terrorist acts to fight the Russians from invading Afghanistan just as the Russians supplied arms to Irac to fight the Americans.

Funny how everyone feels the need to blame Bush when it was neither him or his dad who was president at the time
T@T is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2009, 06:10 PM   #45
Azure
Had an idea!
 
Azure's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bagor View Post
No difference. Both Galloway and Arafat financially supported organisations that are on PSC's list.

Are you implying that if Arafat was alive today he should be allowed to enter Canada and his sponsorship of terrorist organisations shouldn't count?
My point is that Arafat was willing to sit down and try and work out a peace accord so that Palestine could get their own state.

He was/is a terrorist, but governments were forced to work with him. Considering the violence going on over there at that time....what would you do if a very strong voice suddenly rose up and said that he wanted peace?

You have to work with the guy, despite prior doings.
Azure is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2009, 06:11 PM   #46
Azure
Had an idea!
 
Azure's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Exp:
Default

I think its good that Canada did this, for one simple reason.

It tells the people in this guys riding to wake up and realize who they are electing to office.

Sort of a slap in the face.
Azure is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2009, 11:16 AM   #47
Azure
Had an idea!
 
Azure's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Exp:
Default

Found this thread when I was searching for the thread about the MP being banned from Canada.

http://forum.calgarypuck.com/showthr...light=Galloway

A gem. 11 pages. Although strange how people seem to have no problem with Galloway's views.

Either way....

Quote:
OTTAWA — Conservative politicians did not instigate the move to bar outspoken British MP George Galloway from entering Canada, Immigration Minister Jason Kenney said yesterday.

The Canada Border Services Agency has told Mr. Galloway that an aid convoy he led into Gaza earlier this month amounted to engaging in terrorism and being a member of a terrorist organization because he said he would donate the aid to Hamas Prime Minister Ismail Haniyeh.


Mr. Galloway, who has four speaking engagements scheduled in Canada next week, is a five-term British MP who was kicked out of Tony Blair's Labour Party in 2003 for statements opposing the Iraq war.


Mr. Kenney said Mr. Galloway is being barred for providing financial and material support to Hamas, not for his views, and the decision won't be overruled.
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servl.../politics/home

I almost missed this.

Quote:
The NDP and various aid organizations have accused the Tories of political interference in the border agency's decision.
Azure is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2009, 12:54 PM   #48
CaptainCrunch
Norm!
 
CaptainCrunch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Exp:
Default

Banned by the Ontario courts

http://www.canada.com/Technology/story.html?id=1444419
__________________
My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings;

Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!
CaptainCrunch is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:07 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy