Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-17-2008, 02:20 PM   #41
mrdeeds
Scoring Winger
 
mrdeeds's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Exp:
Default

The union will have no choice but make concessions. Unions did not believe plant closures were possible in the cases of Maple Leaf and Molson in Edmonton right down to the things were being dismantled. It's ludicrous. A crippling strike at Superstore was avoided here at the 11th hr. How Superstore can survive against Wal-Mart Supercentres must be pure magic. Unions are a monopoly of labour and we all know how monopolies distort the market. Not that I am a laissez-faire, I don't care advocate myself. Maybe we could apply an incomes policy to unionized labour?
__________________
Behind Enemy Lines in Edmonton
mrdeeds is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2008, 02:23 PM   #42
Resolute 14
In the Sin Bin
 
Resolute 14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TimSJ View Post
Gov't can't afford to let these huys fail. 1 in 7 jobs in the US and 1 in 5 jobs in Canada are a result of the Auto industry. It would cost them a lot more if they all closed up shop.
Sure they can. If any of the big three fails, the sales they would have had would slide over to another manufacturer, who would then be required to increase production to meet new demand. i.e.: open new plants, hire more workers.

Certainly it would hurt pretty bad in the short term, but as Transplant's link above shows, letting one or all of the Big 3 fail wouldn't be a bad thing in the long run.
Resolute 14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2008, 02:28 PM   #43
Phanuthier
Franchise Player
 
Phanuthier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Silicon Valley
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by corporatejay View Post
Okay UAW don't make concessions, and then you'll all be out of jobs because the company will go bankrupt.
For some reason, that didn't seem to cross their minds.
__________________
"With a coach and a player, sometimes there's just so much respect there that it's boils over"
-Taylor Hall
Phanuthier is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2008, 02:36 PM   #44
Cowboy89
Franchise Player
 
Cowboy89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by corporatejay View Post
They have a sharty product that no one wants and ridiculous labour costs. Their competitors even charge more for their products and still outsell them (specifically the civic). I'm all for "saving them" but something needs to be done about their business model, this money needs to come with strings.
Ah yes, but what strings do you anticipate a pro-labor Obama administration to give for bailout money? My guess would be that the money would be attached to forcing them to continue to overpay for labor and to avoid layoffs in exchange for way more restrictions and tariffs on imported cars (Lookup autopact agreements of the 1970s and 80s). Net result is the taxpayer picks up the tab for the short-term operating cash shortfall of the big three, and then the consumer pays the long-term tab in perpetuity regardless of which car brand they buy (Import or export due to tariffs).

And for what? The priviledge of having inefficient domestically owned businesses paying a select collection of high school graduates as if they worked in higher skilled, more educationally inclined professions. A side-effect of this would be lower quality and even more out of touch vehicle offerings from the big three as their operating environment within North America would be far less competative. We've been here before, anyone who owned/owns a typical car built by the big three in the 1980s knows exactly what I'm talking about.
Cowboy89 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2008, 03:06 PM   #45
Table 5
Franchise Player
 
Table 5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: NYYC
Exp:
Default

If this was 3-4 years ago, I would be right there with you guys. Let GM and it's bloated unions rot. But I'm not convinced at a time like this, the economy can handle another brutal shockwave of this sort of news. Half of this crisis is about confidence, and this would be like finding out your wife is cheating on you....with your dad.
Table 5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2008, 05:01 AM   #46
Phanuthier
Franchise Player
 
Phanuthier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Silicon Valley
Exp:
Default

Looks like Ford is selling some liquid assets to raise money to pay the bills

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?p...de0&refer=asia

zoom zoom
__________________
"With a coach and a player, sometimes there's just so much respect there that it's boils over"
-Taylor Hall
Phanuthier is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2008, 07:00 AM   #47
TimSJ
First Line Centre
 
TimSJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Saint John, NB
Exp:
Default

GM announced yesterday that they are going to delay paying dealers incentive dollars to conserv cash.. This is the $1,500 signing bonus, meeting volume bonuses etc.. not good for the dealers who depend on this money
TimSJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2008, 07:01 AM   #48
Table 5
Franchise Player
 
Table 5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: NYYC
Exp:
Default

The Canadian Auto Workers Union won't accept job cuts.

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?p...w&refer=canada

we'll see about that.
Table 5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2008, 08:39 AM   #49
Resolute 14
In the Sin Bin
 
Resolute 14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Exp:
Default

The CAW/UAW is easily the biggest reason why the big 3 need to fail.

Unions suck.
Resolute 14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2008, 08:55 AM   #50
mykalberta
Franchise Player
 
mykalberta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

If I was the US, I would offer a package but have it based on that in 6 years, 50% of all vehicles produced have to be Electric. You should be able to sell that as the following for the fat cats in Congress and the Senate:

Job saver for the rust belt states
Environmental incentive for the greenaholic states
Anti Terrorism legislation for the "cold dead hand" states
Wealth generation for those few states that dont fit into the above.
__________________
MYK - Supports Arizona to democtratically pass laws for the state of Arizona
Rudy was the only hope in 08
2011 Election: Cons 40% - Nanos 38% Ekos 34%
mykalberta is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2008, 09:30 AM   #51
Table 5
Franchise Player
 
Table 5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: NYYC
Exp:
Default

So what's the impact to Calgary if the Big 3 dies or there is a major bailout condition to switch to non-oil guzzling cars?
Table 5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2008, 09:50 AM   #52
CaptainCrunch
Norm!
 
CaptainCrunch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Exp:
Default

I think there needs to be some seperation here.

Yes everyone has the right to work, there's no question about that. However its the ability to work thats going to be threatened.

Nobody neccessarily has the right to work for 70 dollars an hour in a industry that is being killed by the current global threat of recession. The U.S. automotive industry is bloated, and inefficient, and its arrogant as well. They are learning the same lessons now that they had to learn during the oil crisis in the 70's when they were building big gass guzzlers while the Asian car companies were building tiny gas efficient cars.

Right now the only place that the automotive industry can logically cut is in its manufacturing and logistics arms. If people aren't going to buy cars then those 40, 50, 60, dollar per hour workers have to go, and those outlying manufacturing plants have to go. For the most part the Canadian Manufacturers are probably going to have to go because Ford, GM etc are American Companies first and if they have to poop on the Canadian employment rate to save their own then they will without hesitation.

Someone mentioned above that the destruction of the auto industry in the U.S. is a death knell for the U.S. economy because of confidence, and he's correct, and the government will step in to save them, if the Auto industry takes significant steps to save itself.

The Unions, and especially CAW seem to have a real muddled view of modern day reccession economics. By refusing to even talk about pay or benefits cuts, they're effectively backing the auto industry into a corner where they just might say screw Canada, they're union is impossible to deal with.

And if Canadian manufacturing gets hit its going to ripple right across all sectors of Canadian Business, and we will be pulled kicking and screaming into the same hole that all of the other nations in the world are facing no matter what our banking industry is doing.
__________________
My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings;

Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!
CaptainCrunch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2008, 09:54 AM   #53
mykalberta
Franchise Player
 
mykalberta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Table 5 View Post
So what's the impact to Calgary if the Big 3 dies or there is a major bailout condition to switch to non-oil guzzling cars?
We sell our oil else where. Whose exports are going to be hurt more, a neighbour connected by land who transports oil via pipelines, or countries who transport oil via tankers and live in a very hostile region towards the US.

Also, there will be plenty of gas vechicles in the US to sell our oil to.
__________________
MYK - Supports Arizona to democtratically pass laws for the state of Arizona
Rudy was the only hope in 08
2011 Election: Cons 40% - Nanos 38% Ekos 34%
mykalberta is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2008, 10:21 AM   #54
ok, ok,....I get it
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: , location, location....
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vulcan View Post
Well the UAW has been making concessions so I don't see how we can throw all the blame on the workers.
http://www.financialpost.com/story.html?id=964043


Maybe if they built a better product or got better reviews because for the last number of years it's been cool to lambaste N. American cars and from my experience it isn't called for. If we continue to buy only foreign goods, we deserve it when our economy goes in the tank.

Sometimes in life we have to hold our noses and ante up and this bail out is one of those times.
I believe that all "imports" currently sold in NA are made here, Toyota, Nissan and Honda all have plants in NA.
ok, ok,....I get it is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2008, 10:49 AM   #55
Ironhorse
Franchise Player
 
Ironhorse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ok, ok,....I get it View Post
I believe that all "imports" currently sold in NA are made here, Toyota, Nissan and Honda all have plants in NA.
Some, but definitely not all.
Ironhorse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2008, 11:53 AM   #56
Bill Bumface
My face is a bum!
 
Bill Bumface's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ok, ok,....I get it View Post
I believe that all "imports" currently sold in NA are made here, Toyota, Nissan and Honda all have plants in NA.
Depends on the model. Lots of manufacturers still make some/most models in their 'home' country. Companies like VW use Mexico as their NA manufacturing base.
Bill Bumface is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2008, 12:07 PM   #57
Bobblehead
Franchise Player
 
Bobblehead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: in your blind spot.
Exp:
Default

Honda and Toyota are worried about their NA operations if the Big 3 go down.

Quote:
McGuinty says both Japanese automakers are worried that the collapse of one of the Big Three will produce "supplier shock."

He says they fear companies who supply parts to the Big Three would not be able to sustain themselves if one failed.
http://www.thestar.com/business/article/538940

BTW, the Civic is made in Alliston Ont.

Quote:
Honda Canada manufactures
the Honda Ridgeline and Civic sedan and coupe, and the Acura CSX and MDX at
its two plants in Alliston, Ontario, and has produces fuel-efficient
4-cylinder engines at its new engine plant in Alliston.
http://www.newswire.ca/en/releases/a.../03/c4166.html
__________________
"The problem with any ideology is that it gives the answer before you look at the evidence."
—Bill Clinton
"The greatest obstacle to discovery is not ignorance--it is the illusion of knowledge."
—Daniel J. Boorstin, historian, former Librarian of Congress
"But the Senator, while insisting he was not intoxicated, could not explain his nudity"
—WKRP in Cincinatti
Bobblehead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2008, 12:29 PM   #58
browna
Franchise Player
 
browna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

The CBS news was on last night, the big 3 employ 249K employees....133K GM.

As touched on above, the hundreds of parts suppliers to the big 3 employ about 2.3 million people. Of course, those part suppliers, although doing the majority of the work for the Big 3, also make various parts and supply to each of the car manufactuers in the US. And if those suppliers go under or severely cutback, each and every manufacturer will be affected.
browna is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2008, 01:45 AM   #59
HOZ
Lifetime Suspension
 
HOZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by browna View Post
The CBS news was on last night, the big 3 employ 249K employees....133K GM.

As touched on above, the hundreds of parts suppliers to the big 3 employ about 2.3 million people. Of course, those part suppliers, although doing the majority of the work for the Big 3, also make various parts and supply to each of the car manufactuers in the US. And if those suppliers go under or severely cutback, each and every manufacturer will be affected.
You are looking at almost 500,000 people(Canada+USA) that will be affected if the big three disappear completely. The thing is...a bailout will only prolong the agony. The best scenario is the file for bankruptcy and then go through (can't think of the word now)...fixing.... With likely one of the big three (Chrysler?) ending up on the garbage heap of history. 4-5 years of pain with likely a new vibrant auto industry across the great lakes.

Just put it this way....as if there WON'T be an auto industry in the USA....sorry NOT. Too big a market and the big three will leave a huge vacuum. Easily filled....hopefully with something much, much better than we have seen over the past 20-30 years.
HOZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2008, 01:51 AM   #60
Phanuthier
Franchise Player
 
Phanuthier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Silicon Valley
Exp:
Default

You know, all this talk about the jobs being lost and whatnot - maybe I'm missing something here, but if there's no bailout, can't/won't companies like Toyota and Ford just acquire portions of GM, Chrystler and Ford super cheap (ala JPM buying WaMu; BoA buying ML, super cheap) as well as their facilities? Rather then have their fixed assets sitting around doing nothing, they'll probably get sold to another car company to use, and with that, skilled labour will be acquired as well. (It might require a government loan - I wonder what happened to that $700B anyways?) Sure the $30 per hour floor sweepers will be out of a job, but skill workers will probably should be able to find jobs in the new environment, no? Plus, under new management (Toyota, Honda, et al) those UAW contracts get replaced by new ones that are, lets say... a little more capatalist.

Or if the feds don't want all of them in the tank, maybe save one, consolidate what you can of the big 3 into 1, and sell the rest of the assets to the overseas car manufacturers. Ford seems to have assets that they are selling to raise capital, maybe they'll survive. Buh-bye, GM - good riddance.
__________________
"With a coach and a player, sometimes there's just so much respect there that it's boils over"
-Taylor Hall
Phanuthier is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:20 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy